is vital to educate students now to better prepare them to face many challenges in professional practice in the 21st Century. However, there is no existing civil and environmental engineering curriculum that addresses both PBE and sustainable design. It is impossible to design sustainable civil infrastructure while keeping the essential merits of PBE design without an integrating effective training for the students. How to address that is a challenge, but also an opportunity for educators in CEE. It is difficult to add a separate course on sustainability engineering, given the already heavy CEE curriculum in most universities. The integrated curriculum needs sustainability concepts to be introduced in a broad
university curricula. See his YouTube channel at: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheBomPE American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Adding Industry-Based Certification and a Recruiting Partnership to Increase High School Participation in a Workforce Pathways ProjectAbstractThe objective of this paper is to share how an industry-based certification (IBC) and a strategicrecruiting partnership were integrated with a federally-funded, Arduino-based high school dualenrollment course in basic electricity and instrumentation in order to increase high school teacherparticipation in the project (see Figure 1). Project COMPLETE is
curriculum in Dutch higher education: an exploratory study from the teaching staff perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education 38(1), 1-10. 7. Tonso, K. L. (1999) Engineering Gender− Gendering Engineering: a cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 5(4). 8. Shane, J., Puerto, C. L., Strong, K., Mauro, K., & Wiley-Jones, R. (2012) Retaining women students in a construction engineering undergraduate program by balancing integration and identity in student communities. International Journal of Construction Education and Research 8(3),171-185.
Paper ID #32585Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences Teaching Engineering to ElementaryStudents During the Time of COVID (Work in Progress)Dr. Nick Lux, Montana State University - Bozeman Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education
implementation of PBL activities hasbeen studied widely. Integration of design content into the freshman year is not a new concept; in1990, many Freshman Design courses were taught at universities nationwide. National ScienceFoundation’s Gateway Engineering Education Coalition [11] emphasized introducing design earlyin the engineering curriculum to help student retention. In the early years, the engineering designcourse was mainly intended to introduce the students to the engineering profession and designcomponents instead of engaging them in hands-on fabrication and testing [12].Many universities use Rube Goldberg-based design projects for first-year engineering students asa general engineering design course [14], [15]. Rube Goldberg projects were also
Experience in a First-year Engineering Design Class to a Remote Learning Environment 1. Introduction and BackgroundThis evidence-based practice paper describes the transformation of the hands-on learningexperience for MAE 3 Introduction to Engineering Graphics and Design at University ofCalifornia San Diego (UCSD) for remote instruction. As a first year engineering design course,it plays an important role in establishing the foundation for students’ principal area of study,teaching basic design methods, and helping the students gain a better understanding of theirchosen major, which is essential for their intellectual development and engineering identityformation. As the first design course in the curriculum, the course aims to
, school-enterprise cooperation [15].Resonating the national ambition in building an innovation-driven economy, the 3E policy alsocalls attention to strengthening the cultivation of engineers’ innovative and entrepreneurialabilities. The policy envisions a "creative-innovation-entrepreneurship" education system forengineers, which aims to increase the employment of college graduates via innovation andentrepreneurship, particularly through supporting incubators for student entrepreneurs, makerspace, and other platforms for innovation and entrepreneurship [15]. The policy stresses theimportance of integrating innovation and entrepreneurship education into professional trainingwith real-world, cross-border issues, ill-structured problems, and future
District in Wilmington, DE. In her role, Amy works collaboratively with secondary science teachers to develop and implement standards-based curricula and assessments. She also provides mentoring, coaching, and co- teaching support to secondary science teachers across the entire trajectory of the profession. Her research focuses on teacher education, classroom assessment, and P-16 environmental and engineering education.Prof. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to
identified as essential were implemented in-person provided they obtained an approved safety plan. Students were not compelled to attendface-to-face courses and were given the option to pursue virtual alternatives. This combination offactors presented us with a unique opportunity to study the impact of face-to-face and virtualsynchronous instruction modes.A critical part of the biomedical engineering curriculum at [the institution], [this course] coverscore engineering analytical and computational techniques, with a laboratory portion consisting ofa sequence of MATLAB-based programming activities for undergraduates in biomedicalengineering [1]. Typically offered in a face-to-face (F2F) modality, the most recent Fall 2020 termpresented these
” with CSR in Geological Engineering. All professors agreed that CSR is an important topic to teach in undergraduate curriculum, thoughsuggested methods for teaching these topics vary. Four overarching terms were identified in our initialinterviews: integrated, separate, implicit, and explicit, which from here will be referred to in its entirety asthe ISIE classification (Figure 2). By classifying pedagogy in these terms, it helps us to understandoverarching themes in teaching styles and how easily identifiable CSR topics are for students, as well ashow in-depth into CSR topics the techniques go. “Implicit” in this case indicates more subtle methods ofmentioning CSR, not using the term directly, and not making it the centrally focused
. Chandanabhumma et al., "Space within the scientific discourse for the voice of the other? Expressions of community voice in the scientific discourse of community-based participatory research," Health communication, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 616-627, 2020.[2] M. Estrada et al., "Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM," CBE-Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. es5, 2016.[3] D. J. Gilbert, M. L. Held, J. L. Ellzey, W. T. Bailey, and L. B. Young, "Teaching ‘community engagement’ in engineering education for international development: Integration of an interdisciplinary social work curriculum," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 256-266, 2015.[4] J. Bowen and G
. George Chitiyo, Tennessee Technological University George Chitiyo is a Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation at Tennessee Tech University. He teaches courses in research methods, statistics, and program evaluation. He is involved in designing and implementing evaluation initiatives of different types of educational programs and interventions in PreK-12 and higher education settings. His evaluation work includes projects in Advanced Technological Education (ATE), STEM education programs, and health related research.Dr. Perihan Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Perihan Fidan is a faculty member at the Curriculum and Instruction department at Tennessee Tech University. Her current research
Dora Renaud currently serves as the Senior Director of Academic Programs and Professional Develop- ment of the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE). Dora oversees the development and management of grants, scholarships, professional development, and National Programs that address the needs of SHPE members. For over a decade Dora has been an adjunct faculty with the American College of Education, impacting educators across the world by developing curriculum and teaching masters and doctoral level courses in education administration, curriculum and instruction, and bilingual education. Prior to working for SHPE, she was a public school administrator serving campuses with over 1,500 students. Dora also
of the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE). Dora oversees the development and management of grants, scholarships, professional development, and National Programs that address the needs of SHPE members. For over a decade Dora has been an adjunct faculty with the American College of Education, impacting educators across the world by developing curriculum and teaching masters and doctoral level courses in education administration, curriculum and instruction, and bilingual education. Prior to working for SHPE, she was a public school administrator serving campuses with over 1,500 stu- dents. Dora also served as the instructional specialist and curriculum manager for 245 elementary, middle and high school
in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for
standardization is well-established, and the need has persisted since the inception ofpre-college engineering education (Chandler et al., 2011). The field currently lacks an adequatenumber of programs to learn from. Engineering often gets lost either as an integrated disciplineunder science standards or as a topic under technology education. The question is whetherengineering belongs embedded within science or technology education. The recent release of theFramework for P-12 Engineering Learning is a strong foundational step toward futurestandardization efforts of engineering-specific education (AEEE & ASEE, 2020). The frameworkshould lead toward generating and implementing a cohesive engineering curriculum in alignmentwith state requirements rather
frame and address problems. It isbecoming increasingly apparent that more substantive frameworks that challenge engineeringeducators to holistically integrate these concerns into curricula are necessary. Suchframeworks can help engineering educators move beyond simply modifying one or twocourses to think more systematically about how various aspects of such content can beinfused throughout the undergraduate curriculum and beyond.This paper examines how students enrolled in a second-year, project-based, use-inspired designcourse recognized, used, and understood concepts and outcomes related to a new frameworkfocused on environmentally and socially responsible engineering called Engineering for OnePlanet (EOP) [2]. The intent is to leverage these
students focus primarily on the technical aspects of the problem, asapparent in the type of data they seek to collect, many include considerations on the peopleimpacted, government interventions, and cultural values. This study sheds light on the ways thatstudents answer a real-world problem before learning technical problem-solving techniques. Theinsights from this study will be used to supplement the introductory engineering curriculum, sostudents are better positioned to integrate social, economic, and political insights with theirtechnical competencies in solving real-world problems.Introduction "An engineer and a sociologist were tasked with finding the height of a church steeple. The engineer measured the angle to the top of the
Paper ID #33774Industry Driven Design and Manufacturing Course for Aerospace Engineer-ingDr. Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University Dr. Zhenhua Wu, is currently an Associate Professor in Manufacturing Engineering at Virginia State University. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University. His cur- rent research interests focus on cybermanufacturing, friction stir welding, sustainable manufacturing, and adaptive machining.Mr. Lorin Scott Sodell, Virginia State University College of Engineering and Technology Mr. Lorin Sodell is the Director for External and Industry Engagement at Virginia State
Board (TRB) and other engineering journals and conferences across the United States.Ayodeji B. Wemida Ayodeji Wemida is a Master’s student at Morgan State University. He received his Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering with a focus on cybersecurity in 2018. As part of his commitment to learning and excellence, he has served as a tutor both on and off Morgan State’s campus and has also led class sessions as a Teaching Assistant in the school of engineering. He is currently working towards completing his Masters of Engineering degree while developing his analog and digital design skills.Dr. Steve Efe, Morgan State University Dr. Steve Efe is an Assistant Professor and the Assistant Director of the Center for
Paper ID #35365Enhancing student engagement and connecting theory to practice inmaterials engineering: bridging experiential learning opportunitiesthrough a virtual ”classroom” for first-year learnersDr. Bosco Yu, McMaster University Dr Bosco Yu is an Assistant Professor (CLA) in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at McMaster University. Dr Yu’s teaching responsibility focuses on the development of a new first-year engineering curriculum as part of McMaster Engineering’s ’The Pivot’ transformation, teaching the new first-year course (1P13), and conducting pedagogy research. Dr Yu is a strong advocate for
Personal learning devices and remote labs: Applying what we learned in the pandemic to post pandemic education Jay A. Weitzen and Dohn Bowden University of Massachusetts Lowell Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lowell Ma, 01824 Abstract — Prior to Covid, we were experimenting with a hybrid curriculum in which students learned to use both standardlaboratory format for our ECE labs combining classic benchtop bench equipment and the personal learning device to one totallylabs and personal learning devices utilizing the same experiments. based on the personal learning device and Zoom
structured class. Findings from thestudy illustrated how students were able to develop core competencies such as in CAD-CAMwhile characterizing the kinds of mistakes that students make in developing said competencies.We conclude on the illustration of a future iteration of an M3 curriculum, one where thechallenges students typically face in CAD-CAM are purposefully woven into the assignmentsthemselves, serving as a way to provoke awareness and improvement in skill development.Introduction‘Making through Micro-Manufacturing’ (M3 ) [1, 2] provides a model of how to couple theflexibility of ‘Making’ with the concerns of production engineering. Such an approach inproduction emphasizes customizability and personalization in product design. Because of
technology graduates-- graduates endowed with public policyskills, yet fully adroit in the latest and emerging technology, defining a contemporary needed role for thegood of the society. However, with a paucity of such talent (and jobs) available today, it’s crucial to growthese new career pathways which are destined to be in high demand 5-10 years from now. [2]Among its various charters, the PIT-UN is managing new curriculum introductions and courses acrossuniversities by first building awareness through various outreach programs. It’s time to reshape theengineers traditional role into an expert where constant private sector innovations will face competenttechnical staff with public policy skills.Figure 1 shows the PIT-UN first phase, high-level
Director for the NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST).Mr. James Edward Lamberth III, Enloe High School James Lamberth received a BA in science education and a BS in chemistry from North Carolina State University in 2005. He currently teaches science at Enloe Magnet High School in Raleigh, North Carolina. He is an ASSIST RET (Research Experience for Teachers) fellow, and a Kenan Fellow Class of 2014. He works as an education outreach liaison to the NCSU ASSIST Center.Mrs. Evelyn L. Baldwin, Wake STEM Early College High School Evelyn Baldwin has a Master of Education degree and a Bachelor of Science In Science Education degree from
Faculty Affiliate, Vector Institute of Artificial IntelligenceShelir Ebrahimi, McMaster UniversityDr. Colin McDonald P.Eng., McMaster University Dr. Colin McDonald is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at McMaster University and the Associate Director (Undergraduate) of the Integrated Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences (iBiomed) Program. His teaching interests are in engineering design, graphics design, computing, and biomedical engineering. Dr. McDonald has a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering and a B.E.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering, both from Western University.Dr. Melec Zeadin, McMaster University Melec Zeadin earned her PhD in Metabolism and Nutrition from McMaster University. She
mindsets to tackle today’s complexengineering challenges. Some engineering programs have reacted by introducing thefundamentals of systems thinking and systems engineering throughout design courses. However,a stronger approach might be to thread systems thinking / systems engineering skills verticallythroughout the curriculum to build students’ knowledge gradually. This paper considers infusingsuch an introduction into a freshman level introduction to mechanical engineering course.The intervention studied in this paper consisted of two parts: an online learning moduledeveloped using the Online Learning Initiative (OLI) platform that introduces both theengineering design process and the fundamentals of systems thinking, and an in-class
whileparticipation in a focused STEM program in college further increases this persistence (Ikuma etal., 2019).Self-efficacy and confidence are recognized as important factors in the effective teaching andlearning of math and science, especially for women and minorities (Alhaddab and Alnatheer,2015). As noted by Bandura (Bandura 1977), self-efficacy, “the strength of people's convictionsin their own effectiveness”, is likely to have a significant impact in STEM education (Tärning etal., 2019, Hanifa et al., 2020). Over the years, several methods and technologies have beenutilized to increase the effectiveness of mathematics curriculum including, integrated subject-based methods (Chai et al., 2019), mobile technologies (Menon et al., 2017), computer
withlocal businesses, industry, higher education and regional development, this committee hassponsored activities such as: Curriculum development in the High School, Mentoring withyoung practicing engineers (representing multiple organizations from diverse backgrounds), job-shadowing with engineers to discover the nuts and bolts of a day in the life of an engineer, abusiness / engineering Pro-E computer lab at the High School, and a Junior Engineers Clubamong other things. The committee is comprised of instructors from Hibbing High School,Hibbing Community College and the University of Minnesota-Duluth; industry leaders fromCliffs Natural Resources, Jasper Engineering, BARR Engineering and NORAMCO; and leadersfrom regional support agencies such as
developing their skills and interest in the STEM fields to ensuretheir success at the post-secondary level and beyond. The fundamental principles of E-CADEMY are based on a combination of best practices from research including: a project-basedlearning (PBL) curriculum, high dosage model, cohort of like-minded peers, engagement withSTEM professionals, and family engagement [4]-[8]. This paper provides an overview of theprogram’s component, student feedback and program model future considerations.II. Program Overview Project SYNCERE has provided equitable hands-on engineering experiences for morethan 20,000 underrepresented students in grades three through twelve since 2011. The goal of theorganization’s work is to create pathways for