effectiveness ofengineering education, recent engineering graduates were interviewed, and the results showedthat the majority of them felt that their education failed to impart the practical skills required fortheir jobs [8]. Additionally, other researchers ([9], [10], [11], [12], [13]) have also highlighted theinadequacy of engineering education in preparing students for engineering practice. Some studieshave even documented the distressing impact of this gap on recent graduates, leading them toseek alternative career paths ([14], [15]). In response to this issue, several researchers in the fieldof engineering education have emphasized the importance of experiential learning ([16], [17],[18], [19], [20]). In fact, ([19], [20]) has suggested that
university and its communities, accomplishing her responsibilities as the captain of the SUNY Canton Cheerleading team and treasurer of the SME chapter.Dr. PS Dhanasekaran, State University of New York, Canton Dr PS (Puttagounder Dhanasekaran Swaminathan) has PhD degree in mechanical engineering from Wi- chita State University, Wichita, KS. He is currently working as an Associate professor, at SUNY Canton, NY. He has taught, CAD/CAM, FEA, Machine design, Statics, Strength of Materials, and various courses on materials and materials selection, for both undergraduate and graduate programs. He also authored and co-authored a text book chapter and research papers on machining of composites. He has a di- verse industrial
engineering design education: Ontology for a generic product design process,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 70, pp. 338–343, 2018.[43] M. Bussemaker, N. Trokanas, and F. Cecelja, “An ontological approach to chemical engineering curriculum development,” Comput Chem Eng, vol. 106, pp. 927–941, 2017.[44] V. Khabarov and I. Volegzhanina, “An impact of ontology-based service-oriented ecosystems on digital transformation of railway transport and engineering education,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 1899–1908, 2022.[45] Purdue University, “https://www.purdue.edu/.”[46] M. Uschold and M. Gruninger, “Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications,” Knowl Eng Rev, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 93–136, 1996.[47] N. F. Noy
. Most of them have onefoot in college and one foot in industry or graduate programs. They expect the course to providea bridge between the “two worlds”, or between “the past and the future”.The capstone course at our institution has been described elsewhere [3]. Essentially, it is a five-credit-hour course, offered twice a year in the spring term (two sections) and in the summersession (one section). Spring sections normally enroll 30-50 students, and less than 20 in thesummer sessions. One faculty teaches each section. Spring sessions may have one or twoteaching assistants (graduate students). It focuses on a team project for the design of acommercial chemical plant, with supporting lectures on process synthesis and design, equipmentsizing
systems. The year the class is taken was represented from a scale of 1-4, with 1representing the first year, and 4 representing senior year. So, if a particular class is taken as asophomore in half of the departments and a junior in the other half, it would be represented as a2.5.Data for master programs were taken from institution websites and public graduate studenthandbooks. If a school had multiple programs, such as thesis and coursework, only the thesisprogram was considered.Faculty information was taken from department web pages. For classifying professor positions,faculty ranks were classified as associate, assistant, or full, and either tenure-track or lecturer(e.g. professors of practice, and teaching professors).Teaching data was taken
instruction in one of theclasses reviewed will be presented.IntroductionAdvances in technology in manufacturing present challenges to engineering programs that mustkeep their curriculums current so that their graduates meet the needs of the industries that hirethem. This is most important in the area CAD/CAM and CNC where new trends in software,information technology and hardware capabilities impact industry practices in machining. Onesuch manufacturing engineering program, the context for this paper, has traditionally maintaineda focus on CAD/CAM and CNC in its curriculum that extends back to its roots as an engineeringtechnology program. The faculty in consultation with the program’s Industrial AdvisoryCommittee have maintained a mission of
development of assets-based SVSMawareness training for university faculty, staff, and administrators. This work requires them todive into the literature to understand best practices in SVSM awareness training and allyship(e.g., Dillard & Yu, 2016, 2018). Additionally, the undergraduate researchers are continuing thework of expanding the narrative literature review on SVSM in public engineering programspublished/presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference [20] into a systematic literaturereview suitable for a journal publication. Both undergraduate researchers are also active inquantitative and qualitative in data collection and/or analysis for two collaborative projects, withveteran studies scholars from other institutions (i.e., school names
. Topics include best safety practices with respect to; riskmanagement, lockout/energy isolation, fluid power and electrical symbols, basic circuit designand machine design, and sequence of operation involved with automation controls andmechanical motion.Collaborations with industry partners have helped influence courses in the newly establishedgraduate certificate in Manufacturing Engineering and the Master of Science in ManufacturingEngineering at Michigan Technological University. This assessment reviews how courseassignments and student evaluations will be used to assess the level of meeting course learningobjectives.Industry 4.0 Concepts CourseWith Industry 4.0 being a popular advanced manufacturing topic, Industry 4.0 STEM educationresearch
reliability, risk assessment, systems modeling, and probabilistic methods with social science approaches. She is a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and a 2023-2024 Mavis Future Faculty Fellow. She is a member of the NIST Center of Excellence for Community Resilience and collaborates with engineers, economists, social scientists, and planners on the development of tools to support community resilience decision-making. She has been recognized for her research at multiple international conferences with a Student Best Paper Award at ICOSSAR 2021/2022 and CERRA Student Recognition Award at ICASP 2023.Prof. Eun Jeong Cha, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Eun Jeong Cha is an associate professor in the
Paper ID #42989Assessing Sophomore Cornerstone Courses in Electrical and Computer EngineeringProf. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Professor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. He has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. He was awarded the best paper award by the ECE division of ASEE in 2017 for his work on freshman engineering course
Cardenas [1]:Learning Goals: ModSim serves several purposes within Olin’s curriculum: It is an introductionto important tools (computing with MATLAB), course-specific content (mathematical modelingpractices), and college-level goals (self-directed learning). It is not a design class, but usesmany of the ideas from architecture and design pedagogy.Physical Space: The studio space for ModSim follows best-practices for design studios,featuring an abundance of open space and good lighting [1]. Figure 1 shows some of thephysical features of the space, including large tables for groups of students with laptops andsidewall whiteboards for ad hoc instruction.Figure 1. (Left) Typical table group in ModSim. (Right) Sidewall whiteboard.Studio Exercises: The
department faculty was formed and beganworking with a professional from the University Teaching Center, to help ensure they werefollowing best practices in instructional design. The committee employed the Backward DesignProcess [7] to ensure that the focus was on student learning outcomes and proficiencies, ratherthan specific course content.At present, the committee has developed a document summarizing the program goals, studentlearning objectives, and student proficiencies, which will be a basis for the revised curriculum.These have been mapped to the ABET required student learning outcomes [8]. This informationwas shared with the larger faculty of the department in November 2023 and feedback wascollected and integrated into the document.Much work
-294, 2020[4] E. Latif and S. Miles, “The Impact of Assignments of Academic Performance”, Journal ofEconomics and Economic Education Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1-12, 2011.[5] A. Grodner and N. G. Rupp, “The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes:Evidence from a Field Experiment”, The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 44, No 2, pp. 93-109, 2013.[6] O. Eren and D. J. Henderson, “The Impact of Homework on Student Achievement”,Economics Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 326-348, 2008.[7] H. J. Trussel and E. J. Dietz, “A Study of the Effect of Graded Homework in a PreparatoryMath Course for Electrical Engineers” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 92, No. 2, pp.141-146, 2003.[8] A. Fernandez, C. Saviz and J. Burmeister, “Homework as an
based on its sustainability commitment broadly and/or theavailability of courses related to sustainability. A possible alternative explanation is thatinstitutions with a greater commitment to sustainability have different admissions or financial aidpolicies that result in admitting more diverse students into engineering and/or systems to supportthese students to successful graduation. Research could be conducted to ask female students ifthe sustainability of the institution overall and/or the courses available impacted their collegeselection decision. The demographics of students enrolled in ME elective courses with stronglyvisible sustainability, such as Renewable Energy, Sustainable Energy, and Global Developmentcourses, could provide
University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, and Education Sciences. Dr. Lord is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and received the 2018 IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. She is a coauthor of The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. She is a co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI).Scarleth Vanessa Vasconcelos, Villanova University
for TGNC students [7]. A primary objective ofthe site visits was to learn more about students’ experiences through collaboration.BackgroundAs described in earlier work [8], the design of research with the TGNC community should centermethodological approaches that do not reinforce harm. To address this need, our study included aresearch justice design and based analysis on feminist, trans, and queer methodologies tointerrogate ideologies that shape engineering norms and practices. This important context isdetailed more fully below.Research justiceThe design of our study was influenced by feminist, trans, and queer research methodologies thatare centered on deconstructing power imbalances between the researcher and participant as aform of
” by adding manyinnovations, we are first collecting data to understand the current impact of our work,contextualizing our future goals and possible techniques with published research, and thendeveloping tools and processes for improvement.One intersection which we believe to be promising is aligning best practices in hands-onteaching with our newly embraced collegewide pedagogy. CEAS adopted UDL, a frameworkthat offers multiple entry points for learners to engage with new knowledge and demonstratetheir gained skills. UDL relies on three pillars: • the Affective Network engages the “why?” of learning, • the Recognition Network engages “what?” and • the Strategic Network engages “how?”These pillars invite students to interact in
engineeringeducation culture while also presenting a valuable and unique opportunity for engineeringeducation researchers and faculty developers to make significant practical impact. However,seizing this opportunity has been difficult, and the development of an inclusive culture hascontinued to elude traditional educational research approaches. While quantitative methods canbroadly identify the presence and prominence of marginalized inclusion, they often lack thedepth needed to foster a comprehensive understanding of inclusion. In contrast, qualitative andnarrative-based approaches offer rich accounts of marginalized experiences and perspectives butstruggle to reach a broad faculty audience. Dissemination approaches for engineering educationresearch
and enter the workplace. E-Compete has beensuccessfully piloted in a capstone engineering technology course where students are designing,building, and testing a Baja vehicle in preparation for the competition.IntroductionThe EvaluateUR method provides statistically reliable assessments of student learning growth ina wide variety of outcome categories identified as essential to success in the workplace. Themethod differs from more traditional approaches to assessing student outcomes because it isintegrated directly into the research/engineering design experience. A unique feature of theEvaluateUR method is its emphasis on metacognition by helping students learn and practice thediscipline of realistic self-assessment. Thus, the method also
to the challenges and building upon the existing body of research, we havedeveloped a Chemical Engineering Escape Room that leverages virtual elements programmed inMATLAB. This approach aims to create a more practical and cost-effective solution whilemaintaining the engaging aspects of traditional escape rooms. Our design integrates educationalbrochures to provide participants with game flow guidance and concise explanations of theunderlying engineering principles, addressing the need for clear educational objectives [17].The escape room will be implemented at the upcoming 2024 ASEE Midwest section conference,where we plan to gather data gauging its effectiveness through a post-activity questionnaire.However, the analysis of learning
prevent misdiagnosis [6]. However, this method is novel inundergraduate engineering education research. Although engineers do not diagnose patients, theydo require a similar skillet that is necessary for complex problem solving in groups, such asadequate observational, listening, and interpersonal skills required to discuss open-endedproblems and scenarios. How this technique helps shape engineering students’ interpersonalskills has not been previously studied. This study uses VTS as a guided practice activity toobserve its effects on engineering students' preference towards teamwork, which is measuredthrough the validated instrumentation of Collective Orientation [7]. This research aims tounderstand how VTS impacts undergraduate engineering
from this research and for this population of students, that humaninteraction with a live instructor has greater receptiveness than electing to use an interactiveresource (i.e., ChatGPT). However, as additional tools of the kind are launched, like Khanmigo,an AI tutor by Khan Academy, this paradigm may change [23]. We acknowledge that additionalresearch is needed to determine the impact of student use of Gen-AI tools for achieving studentlearning outcomes (SLOs) and best student engagement practices that support student learning,and how teachers must tailor instructional practices to accommodate student Gen-AI use. Aprimary result of this research investigation leads to the conclusion that students must have abaseline knowledge of solving
Paper ID #42733Faculty Perspectives on Undergraduate Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence(GAI) Assistance: A Work-in-ProgressMichaela Harper, Utah State University Michaela Harper is a graduate student at Utah State University specializing in engineering education with a background in Environmental Studies, focusing on STEM and non-traditional education. Her interest predominantly lies in understanding the underlying nature of things, bringing an exploratory and explanatory approach to her research, including the impacts of disruptive technology on engineering, a field popularly deemed as ”tech-savvy.”Dr. Cassandra
medicalnanotechnology device for disease detection and complete a microfluidics lab on a chipexperiment. Students read journal articles and used newfound knowledge from these articles toinform their designs throughout the project. Much like the robot design/build project, thestakeholder needs and tasks for the alternative were well-defined. The research-based project forthe 2022-2023 academic year was redesigned to be more open ended and to expand the themesof the course. Specifically, it asked students to identify an opportunity and problem within thethemes of either medical nanotechnology or sustainability. The course still focused on researchand reading journal articles but also expanded assignments to consider value creation, needs, andthe impact of their
funded projects led by five differentprofessors. I had learned how to do qualitative research by practicing it and by being exposed tomany different professors who did this work. While the tools for experimental research tend tobe external to the individual researcher, qualitative research depends on the researcher as analystto make decisions based on decades of reading and experience. I was unsure how to condenseseveral years of situated learning into a digestible nugget. This problem was compounded by mydiscomfort performing “sage on the stage” knowledge-transfer type teaching.I tried my best and ended up leading a seminar on paradigms, focusing on positivism, socialconstructivism, and critical theory [25]. I created a chart to help my
casesand problems by integrating heterogeneous knowledge bases and knowledge making practices”[2]. These heterogeneous knowledge bases and practices may include both different engineeringand science disciplines as well as non-technical disciplines that illuminate the economic, social,and cultural dimensions of a given problem. Such a well-rounded perspective has long been highon the list of desirable attributes sought in future engineering graduates [3]. For example,ABET’s accreditation requirement that students be able to solve complex engineering problemsincludes solving problems with “many components or sub-problems, involving multipledisciplines, or having significant consequences in a range of contexts” [4].In this work-in-progress paper, we
education institutions, and the potentialimpacts of considering OR theories for engineering education.Introduction Resilience is a complex concept analyzed by the literature and can be defined as the“ability to recover from or adjust easily to misfortune or change”2. Since the COVID-19pandemic shocked the world, various research has been developed to understand and reflect onthis phenomenon. One scope of this research analyzes the educational context, and how highereducation institutions responded in their practices while learning about external shocks. Whilesome universities suffered from this unexpected disastrous scenario, some were sufficientlyprepared to smoothly pivot to the obligated online modality to learn and teach. This
Paper ID #41920Board 432: Work in Progress: Immersive, Hands-On, and Interactive QuantumInformation Science and Technology: Empowering Undergraduate Studentsin Quantum ComputingMr. Syed Hassan Tanvir, University of Florida Syed Hassan Tanvir is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science and a Master’s in Software Engineering. His research is focused on investigating the factors that influence engineering undergraduate enrollment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his Ph.D., he plans to incorporate stealth assessment techniques to foster
, problem-solving,design, project execution and management skills to real-life civil and environmental engineeringproblems. The capstone experience has morphed over the past 20 years from a single projectcompleted by the entire graduating class in small teams to multiple projects with separatestakeholders for each capstone team. The current structure is a two-course sequence thatincorporates several pedagogical approaches to help students apply and hone their professionalskills. Standardized or common grading rubrics, guidance, and assessment tools have beendeveloped and used uniformly by all capstone groups under the direction of faculty advisors and acourse coordinator. These guidelines include mandatory weekly progress meetings with
,and employing predictive analytics. Major goals of the project included developing expertise inusing a student dashboard and integrating student data, with the potential broad impact ofinforming the STEM community of best practices for timely interventions, improving retentionand graduation rates, and facilitating career development. The Navigate platform is used for predictive analytics and to track and document ECS Scholarprogress toward achieving benchmark goals in the areas of retention, graduation rates,internships, undergraduate research experiences, and job placement. The use of predictiveanalytics has significant potential for helping students arrive at successful outcomes. However, itis an assumption of this project that the