. Also, though insightwas gained into engineering leadership styles, it is unknown to what extent these styles compareto those employed in other disciplines. In order to improve upon this study, a larger sample ofengineers as well as individuals in additional disciplines could be considered. Using aquantitative approach, established leadership assessment tools could be used to determinedifferences in leadership behaviors across disciplines. This comparative approach may serve tofurther enhance the understanding of leadership within an engineering context.References[1] Hartmann, B. & Jahren, C. (2015). Leadership: industry needs for entry-level engineering positions. Journal of STEM Education, 16(3),. Laboratory for Innovative
degreesoffered, profiles of recent alumni, and hands-on activities related to that major. Next, students wererequired to attend a student panel, an alumni panel, and laboratory tours. In each case, students wererequired to attend these events for only one department (sessions for each department were offered inparallel so that each department met in a separate room), but they could attend additional departmentofferings based on their interests. Finally, students were required to attend 3 events outside of class timethat would contribute to their major discernment. These included but were not limited to events put on byengineering student groups, departments, and the Career Center as well as individual meetings withfaculty, alumni, or upper-class
children’seducations, before the child enters grade school [12]. This practice benefits upper-class andupper-middle class families, as they have the income to save, leading to a continuing cycle ofcollege attendance and social mobility [12].Pre-College EducationThe education and opportunities provided to students while in high school play a significant rolein their confidence and success in college as well as their selection of major [13, 14]. Hands-onwork such as laboratory experience, FIRST Robotics, Project Lead the Way (PLTW) and otherprograms encourage development of STEM skills before students enter college. The courseworkin the PLTW program features hands-on projects for high school and middle school students thataim to teach critical thinking and
the last two years, the project has been carried out asindependent undergraduate research projects for the senior students working in the authors’research laboratory. Under the detailed guidance, the undergraduate students were able toestablish a solid understanding of the 3D printing process, and effect of nanoparticles on theoverall materials’ mechanical properties. In addition, the experience in mechanical testingfollowing ASTM standards emphasized the solid mechanics knowledge the students learned intheir junir year. Three students have participated in the reported undergraduate 3D printing andmaterials testing research. Positive feedbacks were given by the students in the final classevaluation and survey.In order to benefit a broader
refereed jour- nals on these topics, and has presented nearly 65 papers at a broad spectrum of international scientific and professional meetings, including several invited papers. To date, Dr. Schonberg has received over 35 contract and grants from a variety of federal, state, local, and private funding agencies, including the U.S. DoT, NASA, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Army Research Office, Sandia National Laboratories, the U.S. Army Missile Command and the Engineering Foundation. In 1995 Dr. Schonberg received the AIAA’s Lawrence Sperry Award for his work on the design of spacecraft protection systems. In 1998, Dr. Schonberg was promoted to the membership rank of Associate Fellow in the AIAA and
Professor for the Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research
, upperclassmen wouldtutor and mentor freshman and sophomore students. Additionally, we witnessed a “giving back” philosophy in which freshmanstudents who were recipients of these services became mentors or tutors when they became juniors and seniors. Mentors and tutorswere employed by the project and paid an hourly wage.What also made this program fit into a student-type “learning community” was it was housed within its own facility located on themain campus. This was a large modular unit which became central to all program activities. This unit contained a student computerlaboratory, faculty digital media laboratory, tutoring center, conference room, and student meeting space. It was open to all STEMstudents and faculty. It essentially served as a
service, student government, andintramurals, for example. There are more than 140 student organizations and clubs that includethe following categories: sports (3), departmental (42), diversity/cultural (12), honorary (15),religious (9), social Greek (3), and special interest (24). It is believed that participation in suchactivities allows students to feel part of the campus community [14]. Nevertheless, at ourinstitution, most students cannot avail themselves of opportunities to participate inextracurricular activities.A different approach to getting students involvedGroup work in lecture courses can be used as a means of getting students to interact with eachother. Group work is common in laboratory courses, where, generally, data collection is
Paper ID #25241Exploring Parents’ Knowledge and Awareness of Engineering through Mid-dle School Students’ Summer CampsEmel Cevik, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the
committees aligning the Standards of Learning (SOLs) to the Newport News Public Schools pacing guide for biology as well as creating the curricu- lum for Forensic science which is taught in all five high schools within Newport News. She has taught Environmental science, Biology, Advanced Placement biology, Human Anatomy, and Forensic science. Within her three years at Virginia Space Grant Consortium, she has used Qualtrics to examine pre-test and post-test surveys in the middle/high school program that she coordinates to examine its effectiveness in leading students to explore STEM related careers. She received her B.S. in Biology from Virginia Com- monwealth University and her M.S. in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
Paper ID #25669Extending Systems Thinking Skills to an Introductory Mechanical Engineer-ing CourseDr. Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Karim Muci-K¨uchler is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Experimental and Computational Mechanics Laboratory at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T). Before joining SDSM&T, he was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University in 1992. His main interest areas include Computational
eat at the cafeteria and then return to their studies or bring their food with them. Most studentssimply ate at the cafeteria and then returned to their studies. If students had class, or needed toattend their professor’s office hours or meet with student groups, or utilize laboratory or studiofacilities in their respective colleges, they were able to step out for these engagements and thenreturn. The general idea was to have a central study location that students would study in forthree days straight during the day. They also had vouchers which could be used for lunch. After5:20 pm they could continue their regular evening schedules, which might include studying orcompleting final assignments. This was a mandatory event. On Day 1
easier collaborative modeling, and demonstrates the value of reuse. The hypermodelprofile was created to address this need and will undergo continued development as the author’smodeling approach and skills mature.Bibliography[1] D. Cohen, "SE Transformation - “Shaping our Future…”," in NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory MBSE Symposium, Torrance, 2019.[2] Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering, "Department of Defense Digital Engineering Strategy," Department of Defense, Washington, 2018.[3] L. R. D. McMurray, AFLCMC/CC, Keynote address, Dayton: 2017 Wright Dialogue With Industry Conference, 2017.[4] M. J. Vinarcik, "The NeMO Orbiter: A Demonstration Hypermodel," in Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering
2011 Annual Conference & Exposition,Vancouver, BC, June, 2011, https://peer.asee.org/17982.[3] T. J. Garrison, Exploratory Physics: An Active Approach to Learning Physics. currently self-published, 2014.[4] T. J. Garrison, (2015, June), “Active Learning Laboratories in a Restructured EngineeringPhysics–Mechanics” in American Society of Engineering Education, ASEE 2015 AnnualConference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June, 2015, 10.18260/p.23489.[5] I. Ruzybayev, “Reinforcing Critical Thinking Skills Using a Homework Layout inEngineering Physics Course” in American Society of Engineering Education, ASEE 2017 AnnualConference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June, 2017, https://peer.asee.org/28789.
Paper ID #24780Implementation of Visual Supplements to Strengthen Pedagogical Practicesand Enhance the Physical Understanding of Fundamental Concepts in Engi-neering MechanicsDr. Eleazar Marquez, Rice University Eleazar Marquez is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Rice University.Dr. Samuel Garcia Jr., Texas State University Dr. Samuel Garc´ıa Jr. currently serves as Educator Professional Development Specialist at the Jet Propul- sion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA and is an Assistant Professor of Practice for the LBJ Institute for Edu- cation and Research at Texas State
calibrated out usingdead weight loading.The engine mount features a rectangular vent which allows the ejection charge to escape. Thethrust measurement range is between 0 and 25 lbs. at a sampling rate of up to 1 kHz. Commonhobby-grade solid rocket motors (up to 24 mm in diameter) will fit in the cylindrical engine mountusing various adapter sleeves. The entire test assembly is suspended on a mobile cart allowing theunit to be moved between laboratory sites. The finished cart with a rocket engine at thrusting andejection stages are shown in Figures 6 and 7. The details of the test stand design can be found inZongolowicz [18]. Figure 5. Model Rocket Engine Thrust Stand Figure 6. Rocket Test Stand at D12-5
-Atlantic United States. The Department of Biomedical Engineering, started in 2010, offers botha doctoral program and an undergraduate program. The historical biomedical engineeringundergraduate cohort size has been ~55 students. The undergraduate program is ABETaccredited.Due to a biomedical engineering undergraduate curriculum change that was implemented overmultiple years, four cohorts of students with varying degrees of exposure to engineeringstandards emerged (Table 1). Engineering standards are implemented in three courses: SeniorDesign (required capstone, senior year), Junior Design (required course, junior year), and Cell &Tissue Laboratory (required course, sophomore year).Table 1. Cohorts. Due to a curriculum change, 4 cohorts of
competencieswith data from science center and classroom testing. At the outset of this project, there were few resources that specifically consideredteaching CT with 5-8-year-old children and fewer clear examples of what it looked like forchildren to engage in CT. However, there were many, sometimes competing, definitions andapproaches to CT more generally. After further review of the literature and some laboratory andclassroom testing with children, the team refined definitions for the following CT competencies:abstraction; algorithms and procedures; automation; data collection; data analysis; datarepresentation; debugging/troubleshooting; problem decomposition; parallelization; simulation;and pattern recognition. Analysis of hundreds of students
have also offered a summer section of this course to newly admittedengineering students who wanted to make a head start in their studies.Summary of Project Results:Mathematics Enrichment SessionsThe performance of students who opted to register for the ES sections are compared to those whochose the non-ES sections. Non-ES sections have either the traditional recitation sessions orcomputer laboratories that use the software Mathematica. Graduate teaching assistants conductboth of these options. The results from the initial implementation of ES are presented in [5].To gauge the effectiveness of the ES approach, the ES group and the non-ES group werecompared relative to two measures: proportion of students who passed Calculus I, that isproportion
] theorized that development evolves out of processes (e.g.,interactions) occurring in context. The overall RED project that this study is a part of is aninvestigation of the interactions between students and instructors, as well as between studentsand “objects and symbols” (e.g., course curriculum), within students’ microsystems (e.g.,classroom, laboratory, pro), as they matriculate through the program [29]. These processes havethe potential to powerfully influence student development [30]. The curricular changes thatincorporate needs finding and design across all four years of the curriculum are a direct effort tointervene in these processes and interactions between students, faculty, and the objects andsymbols within their immediate learning
smart sensors formulti-scale monitoring and control of civil infrastructure. Journal of Civil Structural HealthMonitoring, 6(1), 17-41.[35] Yoon, H., and Spencer Jr, B. F. (2016). Enabling smart city resilience: Post-disaster responseand structural health monitoring. Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory. University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign.
post-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on developing a modern computational framework for the nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. This work seeks to expand the under- standing of soil structure interaction for these structures and the means of modeling this behavior both theoretically and experimentally. In addition to her research experience, Dr. Wong also has worked for the public and private engineering sectors in the areas of water infrastructure, transportation, data systems, and project management. She joined San Francisco State University in 2014 as lecturer and is currently an assistant professor of Civil Engineering in the School of
opportunities education majors have to practicediscourse development prior to their student teaching practicum. Discourse simulation activitiesat universities prior to student teaching and internships are often insufficient to prepare teachersfor engaging in discourse with students throughout an entire school day.Traditional Methods of Discourse DevelopmentTraditionally, discourse development begins with pre-service teachers’ own understanding ofmath and science based upon how they were taught when they were first learning the material.Most education programs require pre-service teachers to take at least one laboratory-basedscience course and to complete mathematics courses. Once the students have a foundation inmath and science, they then take courses
X X X various aspects of a construction project 3. utilize computer methods, including X X X Excel, to carry out estimation. 4. prepare a complete bid submission for a X X X X typical construction project ABET program outcomes (a) utilize techniques that are appropriate to administer and evaluate construction contracts, documents, and codes; (b) estimate costs, estimate quantities, and evaluate materials for construction projects; (c) utilize measuring methods, hardware, and software that are appropriate for field, laboratory, and office processes related to construction; (d) apply
. Ramachandran received the B. Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M. Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From October 1990 to December 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From January 1993 to August 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to August 1997. Since September 1997, he is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University where he has been a Professor since September 2006. He has served as a consultant to T-Netix, Avenir Inc., Motorola and Focalcool. From
. Showing potential workplaces and career role models intheir study field will help scholars to stay motivated, connect academic work to real worldprofessions, and concretize their career vision. Scholars will visit local industry, national labs,infrastructures, public utilities, other research universities, professional workshops,conferences, and engineering construction projects. In Spring 2019, the program provided thefirst field trip to NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) to the scholar cohort group.3.3 Program Impact on Scholars and MentorsAfter the Fall 2018 semester, the program conducted two focus group meetings (Mentee FocusGroup and Mentor Focus Group) to discover impact on scholars and Mentor+ advisors. 1) Mentee Focus GroupEight
Paper ID #26832Board 59: Coevolutionary-Aided Teaching: Leveraging the Links BetweenCoevolutionary and Educational DynamicsDr. Alessio Gaspar, University of South Florida Dr. Alessio Gaspar is an Associate Professor with the University of South Florida’s Department of Com- puter Science & Engineering and director of the USF Computing Education Research & Evolutionary Algorithm Laboratory. He received his Ph.D. in computer science in 2000 from the University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis (France). Before joining USF, he worked as visiting professor at the ESSI polytechnic and EIVL engineering schools (France) then as
broader context mean to you? 6. In this course we have included examples that have social relevance such as how can engineering benefit different populations. Do you see this as being relevant to engineering?The focus group data provided a more detailed understanding about the impact of the project onfirst year students. Students commented that they enjoyed working on a “real world” project.They also enjoyed the opportunity to conduct hand on laboratory experiments that required themto collect and analyze data. They indicated that the experiments allowed them to learn aboutlaboratory experiment failure and perseverance. Students noted the value of active participationand expressed confidence in their ability to learn in the course
Electrical Engineering and MS Biomed- ical Engineering degrees from Drexel University, and her PhD Bioengineering degree from the University of Washington. Between her graduate degrees, she worked as a loop transmission systems engineer at AT&T Bell Laboratories. She then spent 13 years in the medical device industry conducting medical de- vice research and managing research and product development at several companies. In her last industry position, Dr. Baura was Vice President, Research and Chief Scientist at CardioDynamics. She is a Fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE).Vincent Chen, Loyola University Chicago Dr. Vincent Chen is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical
. StereotypeGender and racial bias which affects how we perceive and treat one another is shaped bycultural stereotypes. Despite a decline in explicit or self-reported bias, implicit or unconsciousbias remains widespread [2]. Babcock and Laschever [3] showed that even women themselveshold stereotypes about women and that women undervalue the work that they perform. A studyfound pervasive gender discrimination among science faculty where faculty were more likely tochoose a male candidate over a female candidate for a student science-laboratory position [4].In this case, both male and female scientists offered a higher salary to a male candidate thanthey did to an identical female candidate. Although this particular study was on faculty biasagainst student