, materials selection,safety, and cost considerations. Take-home project problems enhance and demonstrate the typeof study and research required for design. Topics to be studied include strength and fatigueconsiderations, shaft design, threaded fasteners, lubrication and bearings, springs, andfundamentals of gear analysis, including terminology, forces, and stresses. One additionalrequirement for this course is working on a team-based design project. For the Fall 2002 class, acommon feature of such design project was to present a case study on any one of the ethicalissues that are available in the literature along with some engineering calculations to appreciatehow engineering ethics play a very important role in the design of a system or a
possess communication skills to interact effectively in thecommunity and within the professional and political arenas. Today’s ethical issues will assumeglobal proportions and our graduates must have the strong ethical foundation they will need todeal with issues involving equitable distribution of resources, byproducts of design, proprietaryinformation, sustainable development, environmental conservation, genetic engineering, andhuman cloning. They need to be familiar with legal and business aspects of engineeringsolutions and their social impact and have a foundation in best business practices andfundamentals of entrepreneurship.To position our graduates to compete and lead in a dynamic future, we must first ask ourselves:• What understandings
-answer exam questions. Due to the inclusion of case studies in student reading,assignments, and exams, as well as in classroom discussions, we have also been able to evaluatelearning outcomes such as oral and written communication skills and students’ understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility. This has been a boon both for our students and for ourdepartment in communications with ABET.Over six semesters assessed in this way, students in the continuum mechanics course haveachieved an average score of 4.3 on a 5-point scale. Unfortunately, the department initiated theuse of rubric-based assessment after the continuum mechanics course was developed, so data arenot available to compare these results with those for the former course
, ISBN:0072227427Course Description:Computer Systems and network security: implementation, configuration, testing of securitysoftware and hardware, network monitoring. Computer attacks and countermeasures. Emphasison laboratory experiments.Course Learning Objectives:Upon completing this course a student will: • Understand the ethics of using hacking tools • Be able to describe the TCP/IP network protocols and the effect of an open network protocol on security • Be able to snoop traffic from a network and decode the data • Be able to describe methods to counter traffic attacks like snooping, spoofing, redirection, and flooding. • Understand the importance of passwords and methods to select good passwords • Be
problems. (a)* 2. Ability to formulate and solve open-ended problems. (e) 3. Ability to design mechanical components, systems, and processes. (c) 4. Ability to set up and conduct experiments, and to present the results in a professional manner. (b) 5. Ability to use modern computer tools in mechanical engineering. (k) 6. Ability to communicate in written, oral and graphical forms. (g) 7. Ability to work in teams and apply interpersonal skills in engineering contexts. (d) 8. Ability and desire to lay a foundation for continued learning beyond the baccalaureate degree. (i) 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, including ethical responsibility, safety, the creative enterprise, and
Session 0897 Lessons from Starting an Entrepreneurship Program John C. Wierman, Marybeth Camerer The Johns Hopkins University1. IntroductionThe W. P. Carey Program in Entrepreneurship & Management is housed in the MathematicalSciences Department of the Whiting School of Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. Itconcentrates on preparing undergraduates to become founders and leaders of major enterpriseslater in their careers. The academic program provides basic business education courses inaccounting, finance, ethics, and marketing, plus advanced courses in
-wide impact such as the integration of engineering ethics and the use of technology in teaching and learning. • Assessment of the impact of innovative projects on students’ intellectual development and development of expertise. • Faculty development related to teaching and learning. • Integration of students in the process of change. Center Projects include, but are not limited to, an Engineering Entrepreneurship Minor, an Engineering Leadership Development Minor (ELDM), Engineering Ethics, and the Leonhard Center Technical Writing Initiative (LCTWI). The Leonhard Center works closely with the Engineering Instructional Services (EIS) program. The Director of the Center is a tenured faculty member from one of
requirements with their project advisor. The primary student references are Dennis1 andBrooks.2 In CS408A, students implement, test, and complete their project.Completed project solutions must address technological, social, political, and economicconsiderations in the design and fielding of their completed product. Ethical engineeringdecision-making consistent with the safety, health, and welfare of the public is also an importantconsideration.Multidisciplinary senior design project teams range in size from four to twenty students. Theorganization of individual teams varies from teams with students from four or more engineeringdisciplines to teams with students from two engineering disciplines. Each team configurationprovides its own set of
Technology.Among these programs most are designed for general study in Computer and InformationTechnology fields in order to build students a solid foundation in Computer InformationTechnology. They typically include a collection of fundamental concepts in areas, suchas, Computing History and Environment, Computer Hardware, Computer Software,Computer Programming, Networking and Data Communication, Database, SoftwareEngineering, Security, Ethics and so on.Many traditional colleges offer the Computer Information Systems programs at bothAssociate and Bachelor degree levels. Most of these programs are designed to cover thebasic theory or every aspect of computer information technology. Their goals are to helpstudents to build a broad of knowledge in a variety
problems can be rated as,14. As a result of this course, my ability to communicate effectively can be rated as,15. As a result of this course, my recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning can be rated as,16. As a result of this course, my ability to understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities can be rated as,17. As a result of this course, my respect for diversity and knowledge of contemporary professional, societal, and global issues can be rated as,18. As a result of this course, my commitment to quality, timeliness and continuous improvement can be rated as,Specific Course Management Questions:19. My instructor passed out a syllabus or made one available in the Internet early in the
withminimum effort, time, and money. NEE will eventually see that human nature, not nobleidealism, dominates student attitudes and behaviors, as in all lives and relationships, andthat not every Johnny or Jane fits his/her idealization and personal history of a knowledge-hungry, hard working, and ethical college student.Historically, standards and rules in colleges and universities were stringent andunforgiving. Higher education was not the entitlement of all young people, as is now thenorm, and competition for admission and survival in college was fierce. Professors hadalmost absolute power regarding attendance, structure, content, assessment, and grades andanything less than near-perfection in student performance or behavior often led to
Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering Education We believe that PBL can be effectively implemented in engineering curricula. TheAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) considers the following to beamong the 11 required outcomes attained by engineering graduates [2]: ability to engage in life-long learning; ability to work in multidisciplinary teams; ability to identify, formulate and solveengineering problems; and ability to consider the ethical and social dimensions of engineeringsolutions. These outcomes are those that prove most difficult for engineering faculty to achieve inthe standard curriculum. Our approach is to combine improvement in these ABET-related processskills with the learning of critical
, anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility, and “the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societalcontext.” [ABET, Criterion 3, p. 29] Page 8.272.4 The new criteria place increased emphasis on engineering design, a creativeprocess distinct from the study of the underlying science that dominates most curricula.They require that graduates have an ability to design a system, component, or process tomeet desired needs. “Students must be prepared for engineering practice through thecurriculum and culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge andskills acquired in earlier
the last eight years, the course has evolved through a series of refinementsand improvements based on systematic evaluation and reflection. The basic concept andstructure of the course remains the same; however, activities and assignments for thestudents have seen fundamental changes. For example, when the course was established, inaddition to the weekly lab, there were two 1-hour lectures per week that involved all ~200students. The educational objective of the lectures was to provide an introduction for thestudents to many different aspects of engineering and design ranging from discussions ofengineering ethics and engineering and society to introduction to strength of materials andelementary electronics. As a result of observation of
projects to realize Page 8.1060.12savings, (3) presenting implement-able plan to the plant with proper economic and sustainabilityjustification, (4) seeking alternative energy options as second nature.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationConclusionEnergy sustainability must be achieved and can best be done through engineering education wherepotential makers of energy technologies and designers of energy consuming systems are beingmolded. Not only is it ethically responsible for engineers as a profession to do 6, it is inelegant
for Engineering Education Figure 6. Design evaluation of a Philips product via international video conferencing3. Integrated Design ArtsThe Integrated Design Arts Program is an offshoot of the iP3 Program and a natural evolution ofthe Department of Art and Architecture to become the campus center for design arts education.In spring 2000 the department received faculty approval for an ID minor consisting of thefollowing courses: sketching and rendering, color theory, 2D & 3D visualization techniques,ergonomics, design aesthetics and ethics, 29th Century ID and the capstone e-team projectscourse. Figure 7 shows an example of a series of studies that lead the student to understand thepsychology of color used in advertising, marketing
/shelearns that simple, elegant, and even almost trivial solutions, if they meet specifications andconstraints, often are superior to complex, sophisticated, and/or theoretical solutions; that is, anounce of common sense is worth a pound of theory.With all of the above, this sense of real world engineering and specific examples of such can’thelp but positively impact the relevance and wisdom of a new professor’s classroom instruction,particularly in light of recent, for example, ABET’s, increased emphasis on engineering design,ethics, and teamwork.A rapidly expanding contact network is another benefit of consulting. Just as with compoundinterest, contacts and business tend to increase exponentially with time as the availability andquality of one’s
science of improvement through quality driven processes.6 Practice professionally and ethically in the field of Mechanical Engineering.7 Are prepared for positions of leadership in business and industry.Table 4. Mechanical Engineering Program Educational Outcomes.III. Assessment obstacles and preliminary results A few obstacles were encountered while developing and implementing the assessment plan.The obstacles involved both human factors and the need to effectively and efficiently collect dataand use the data to improve the student learning process. Assessment planning and implementation is time-consuming and requires cooperation on thepart of the faculty members involved. It is important to remember that the purpose of
Army (and others) at UMR10 18 Robust design Chap. 1911 Apr. 1 Manufacturing processes Handout12 8 Alternative design approach: TRIZ Handout13 15 Ethics in engineering14 22 Trust in the workplace15 29 Prototyping16 May 6 Final design presentation/demonstration of Beta prototypes Presentation/demonstration to Army (and others) at UMR or Ft. Wood17 13 Finals Week Figure 4. A sample syllabus for the design project course.Used in the education
include: · teamwork · faculty involvement · students contribution · organizational support · periodic assessment 1. Sufficient knowledge of fundamentals 2. Ability to use mathematics to solve engineering problems 3. Ability to solve problems across disciplinary boundaries 4. Proficiency with computer software 5. Proficiency in oral and written communications 6. Ability to learn independently 7. Ability to work with peers 8. Ability to design in declared areas of competence 9. Appreciation of safety, ethics, community concerns, and environmental issuesTable 3. Desired Qualities of Engineering GraduatesTeamwork: A key element is appropriate communications between students and faculty to instill:mutual trust
on getting the students to appreciate the complexity arisingfrom the interaction of factors from inside and outside engineering—that is, we aimed to havestudents explain the importance of taking a broad view of a problem and considering feedbackand dynamic behavior. By the end of the sophomore seminar, the students were expected toachieve the following learning objectives: For complex, ill-defined, dynamic problems involving engineering, social, ethical, cultural, environmental, business, and political issues, students will Identify connections between subsystems with rich pictures Page
globalization, project management, leadership, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medi- cal Technology Company (1995-2006). In this capacity he worked as a product development engineer, quality engineer, technical lead, business leader and program/project manager managing many differ- ent global projects. Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufac- turing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young University. Gregg also is a Professional Associate Instructor for IPS Learning and Stanford University where he teaches the IPS
course was developed by STEMfaculty at The University of Texas-Pan American (UTPA) and at South Texas College(STC). This course was implemented for the second time during the summer in 2010 asone of the first ever college courses that qualified junior and senior high school dual-enrollment students take at STC. This new course covers most of the material required inthe Introduction to Engineering course at STC; besides that, challenges with hands-onactivities have been added in order to engage, motivate, and encourage students to pursueSTEM career. Some of the topics studied in this course are engineering professions, datapresentation and graphing, ethics, engineering economics, units and conversions, andrenewable energy. To limit the class time
projects, even if not a central theme of the project 10,20,35,43 and ethical responsibility [ABET1] Attitudes toward community Higher CS scores for EWB participants and high for students in service (CS) Engineering for Developing World course 9 Self-efficacy, self-confidence, Confidence in own abilities is enhanced, particularly as students self-esteem achieve success and see the true benefits to a community 26 Critical thinking / scientific Critical thinking gains demonstrated for LTS outside engineering 5,44 reasoning Engineering identity Redefine engineering as a helping profession particularly effective in
assignements in groups Y 5ability to function on multidisciplinary and diverse multidisciplinary and/orteams (ABET D). diverse teams. Discuss ethical land professional Outcome 1: Students will take responsibilities in classGoal 3 - Objective 2: The Civil Engineering Program at pride in the
“authenticity” and/or “authentic” in the title and body of the text were searched and saved. Inaddition, articles with “integrity”, “realistic”, “genuine”, and “legitimate” in the title and body ofthe text were searched in the following journals: Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation and Practice, IEEE Transactions on Education, IEEE Transactions on LearningTechnologies, Science and Engineering Ethics, International Journal of Electrical EngineeringEducation, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Engineering Education (openaccess), Engineering Science and Education Journal, European Journal of EngineeringEducation, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, which were saved in aseparate archive.The results are
teacher training to provideteachers with experience with the curriculum. The curriculum was developed for use in varyingsocioeconomic and cultural contexts in high-school curricula across the country with the goal ofgiving students a sense of empowerment and involvement in their own communities, as well as asense of engagement with a global community. It is designed to be flexible, written in sectionsthat can be taught as stand-alone lessons, with our without homework assignments, or combinedinto a series. It is organized around five modules: Human-Centered Design, Service-Learning,Cultural Context and Ethics, Teamwork, and Communication. Each module includes 45thematically organized nine-week lesson plans with content handouts and materials to
work.” This includes accelerating the implementation ofprograms that help engineering graduates develop teamwork, communication and leadershipskills while enhancing students’ appreciation of culture and diversity, global perspective, and thesocietal, economic, and environmental impacts of engineering decisions. While strong analyticalskills will continue to be as important, according to The Engineer of 2020 future engineers willneed to exhibit: • practical ingenuity • creativity • good communication • project management • leadership • high ethical standards • and strong sense of professionalism.Future engineers must also be dynamic, agile, resilient, and flexible to deal with the uncertainand changing character of the
. This discrepancy is present multiple timesin the data shown, but is distinctly found in Figure 11 (Competency 10.7.3). For thiscompetency—which concerns understanding the influence of environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability constraints on engineeringsolutions—the student rating is approximately 3 while the instructor rating is almost 4.5 in theWinter 2003 semester. While the degree of separation diminishes in subsequent semesters, thestudent ratings continue to be lower than the instructor ratings up to the present time. Such Page 25.78.11discrepancies are also observed in Figure 7
AC 2012-4539: THE COMPLEXITIES OF ENGINEERING DESIGN ANDSYSTEM MODELINGDr. Gayle E. Ermer, Calvin College Gayle Ermer is a professor of engineering at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Mich. She teaches in the mechanical concentration in the areas of machine dynamics and manufacturing processes. Her master’s degree was obtained from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in manufacturing systems engineering (1987), and her Ph.D. from Michigan State University (1994). Her research interests include philosophy of technology, engineering ethics, and women in engineering. Page 25.1279.1 c