Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Banglong Liang; Haojing Chang

cultivating top-notch innovative talents.However, the extracurricular learning system needs further pilot verification to better balancethe improvement of scientific research literacy and the pressure on students’ curriculum.References[1] H. Heo, K.Y. Lim, and Y. Kim, “Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning.” Computers & Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1383-1392, 2010.[2] D.Drinka, and M. Y. M. Yen, “A Project-Centric Curriculum Design.” College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 25-34, 2006.[3] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Konstantinos Apostolou, McMaster University; Amin Rajabzadeh, McMaster University

: https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer. [Accessed 2022].[2] D. Wiley, "Defining the "Open" in Open Content and Open Educational Resources," [Online]. Available: http://opencontent.org/definition/.. [Accessed 2022].[3] Creative Commons, "About the Licenses," [Online]. Available: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/. [Accessed 2022].[4] T. J. Bliss and M. Smith, "A Brief History of Open Educational Resources," in Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science, R. S. Jhangiani and R. Biswas-Diener, Eds., London, Ubiquity Press, 2017, pp. 9-27.[5] O. M. Belikov and R. Bodily, "Incentives and barriers to OER adoption:," Open Praxis,, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 235-246, 2016.[6] M. T

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Robert Nickel; Stu Thompson, Bucknell University

supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-2022271. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] National Science Foundation, “IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED),” vol. 2017, no. May 15d. 2017.[2] D. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, and G. Pawlas, “First-Year and Capstone Design Projects: Is the Bookend Curriculum Approach Effective for Skill Gain,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Louisville, KY, 2010.[3] B. Akbar, J. L. Brummet, S

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Julie Martin, The Ohio State University; Chiebuka Egwuonwu, The Ohio State University; Isabel Miller, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

speakers Sheri Sheppard,Sara Atwood, Elif Miskioğlu, Adam Carberry, Kaela Martin, Kelly Cross, Nicole Pitterson,Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, Rachel Kajfez, Marie Paretti, Sarah Zappe, Holly Matusovich, BrianHelmke, Maura Borrego, and Paul Gannon for sharing their expertise with the VCoP. Finally, weappreciate the VCoP members who participated and provided valuable feedback.References[1] A. L. Pawley, A. R. Carberry, M. E. Cardella, M.-I. Carnasciali, S. R. Daly, J. L. Gorlewicz, G. L. Herman, M. M. Hynes, S. S. Jordan and N. N. Kellam, "The PEER Collaborative: Supporting engineering education research faculty with near-peer mentoring unconference workshops,” presented at the 121st American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra

advisory board members Jennifer Cromley, AllisonGodwin, and Nicola Sochacka for feedback on the research design and analysis. The authors alsothank the students for participating in the survey.References[1] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, "Effects of COVID-19 on Engineering Students’ Baseline Stress," in Proceedings of the AAEE2020 Conference, 2020.[2] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, "Major differences: Variations in undergraduate and graduate student mental health and treatment utilization across academic disciplines," Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, pp. 23- 41, 2016.[3] K. Jensen, S. R. Vohra, J. F. Mirabelli, A. J. Kunze, I. Miller, and T. E. Romanchek

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

M. M. Darwish; M. H. Akram; B. Green

technology can impact andenhance student learning. Further, this paper will provide information about how to getstudents more involved and be responsible for their education thru the case studyapproach. IntroductionIn the 1980’s, a series of experiments was done on the effectiveness of several teachingmethods in higher education as well as in engineering education. Research shows thattraditional instructor-centered teaching is less effective than student–centered learning inpreparing engineering students. (Buchanan,1991; Khurfiss, 1988; McKeachie et al.,1986;National Research Counsel, 1996; Raju & Sankar 1999; Sankar and Raju, 2003;Tribus, 1992;). Research has also shown that active student based learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Alexa G. Moreno; Thomas W. Smith; Edgar C. Clausen

experimental results are shown as smallcircles on the figure. In this experiment, the initial temperature of the pre-heated plate was 357K (84°C) and the final temperature after 2,000 s (33.3 min) was 318 K (45°C). Thus, the wholeexperiment could be carried out in 1 ½ hr, excluding the time to preheat the oven. Figure 3. Typical Results from the Cooling of the Flat Plate by Free Convection © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceData ReductionThe development of equations for the modeling of the experiment was previously presented byClausen and Penney [5] and is only shown here for the convenience of the reader.A heat balance on the center

Collection

2022 ASEE - North Central Section Conference

Authors

Seth Vuletich, Colorado School of Mines; Emily Bongiovanni, Carnegie Mellon University ; Brianna B Buljung, Colorado School of Mines; Alexander Luis Odicino, Claremont Colleges Library

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Educational Resource Development for STEM Disciplines. in (2020).4. Sukhai, M. A. & Mohler, C. E. Creating a Culture of Accessibility in the Sciences. (Elsevier Science & Technology, 2016).5. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration- of-human-rights.6. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer (2019).7. Tajmel, T., Starl, K. & Spintig, S. The Human Rights-Based Approach to STEM Education. (Waxmann, 2021). doi:10.18452/23769.8. Disability and health. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability- and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaping Li, University of Michigan; Maartje E. D. Van Den Bogaard, Iowa State University; Lea Marlor, University of Michigan; Laura Carroll, University of Michigan; Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan

, M. DeMonbrun, C. Crockett, S. Tharayil, P.Shekhar, C. Waters, and R. Rosenberg, "Instructor strategies to aid implementation of activelearning: a systematic literature review," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1pp. 1-18, 2021.[6] B. Chen, K. Bastedo, and W. Howard, "Exploring Design Elements for Online STEMCourses: Active Learning, Engagement & Assessment Design," Online Learning, vol. 22, no. 2,pp. 59-75, 2018.[7] A. Khan, O. Egbue, B. Palkie, and J. Madden, "Active learning: Engaging students tomaximize learning in an online course," Electronic Journal of E-Learning, vol. 15, no. 2, pp.107-115, 2017.[8] G. E. Hall, and S. M. Hord, Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes.Pearson Education, Inc., 2014

Conference Session

LEES 4: Understanding and Disrupting Engineering Cultures

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland College Park; Chandra Turpen, University of Maryland College Park; Fatima Abdurrahman, University of Maryland College Park; Danjing Chen, University of Maryland College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland College Park; Amol Agrawal; Sona Chudamani

set of data with the question,“How is our imagination being constrained by current social structures in society and when doesit break free from these narrow constructions of engineering practice?” From the set of twelveinterviews, we selected two FG interviews for closer analysis, which had evidence of both“narrow” and “expansive” reasoning. These focus groups were: Malik, Serena, Molly, & Joanna(M+S+M+J) and Dustin & Harveen (D+H) (all pseudonyms). Within these FG interviews, ourco-authoring team collaboratively identified candidate focal segments that: (a) exhibited highly“narrow” design thinking where implicit assumptions about the status quo were dominating theimagination, and (b) exhibited more “expansive” or liberatory design

Collection

2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Utomwen David Irabor, Prairie View A&M University; Nabila Shamim, Prairie View A&M University

400 0 350 0 300 0 250 0 200 0 150 0 100 0 400 0 350 0 300 0 250 0 200 0 150 0 100 0 W av enu mber s ( c m- 1) W av enu mber s ( c m- 1

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Cioc, University of Toledo; Noela A Haughton, University of Toledo; Sorin Cioc

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division

Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Combining Problem-Based Learning with the KEEN ‘s Framework for Entrepreneurially Minded Learning in a Fluid Mechanics Course: Pilot ImplementationAbstractThis paper describes the implementation and the results of problem-based learning (PBL)pedagogy infused with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network’s 3C’s in a senior levelAdvanced Fluid Mechanics course within the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET)program. The work, a close collaboration between engineering and education faculty, aligns withthe New Research Areas (National Engineering Education Research Colloquies 2006), ABETCriteria for

Conference Session

Technical Session 11 - Paper 2: Completing the engineering and computer science transfer pathway: Transfer students’ post-matriculation experiences through a four-year institution

Collection

2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)

Authors

David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Amy Richardson P.E., Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Dustin Michael Grote, Virginia Tech; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Janice Leshay Hall, Florida International University ; Hannah Glisson

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

Mississippi State University. As a 2015 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program, Hall obtained her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Hannah Glisson American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022In this session we will think about the latter stages of a transfer student’s journey. Much research has focused on pre‐transfer and the first semester post‐transfer, but in this session we will think about students’ experiences beyond that initial semester. We will be drawing on a set of interviews with transfer students who participated in an NSF‐funded S‐STEM program.The project is a collaboration between Virginia Tech

Collection

2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

sunil Dehipawala, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Harsha Rajapakse, Medgar Evers College, CUNY ; Breeya Evans; Tak Cheung

Organization (WHO) Arsenic is a well-known carcinogen2 . The levelof toxicity depends on the type of compound. For example, Arsenic in organic compounds is lesstoxic but Arsenic in inorganic compounds is more toxic. Arsine (ASH3), Arsenite, and Arsenatein particular are highly toxic compounds. Humans unknowingly consume Arsenic throughdrinking water and plants. In addition to naturally occurring Arsenic, the Arsenic concentration ofsoil increases due to human activity. Arsenic compounds are used in the industry sector in themanufacturing of semi-conductors, glass production, papers, metal adhesives, ceramics, woodpreservatives, and explosives3 . Inorganic Arsenic compounds were used as pesticides in theUnited States of America (USA) before the 1950’s

Collection

2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference

Authors

Suresh Immanuel P.E., University of Evansville

questions in the concept inventory test; however, the index propertiesand soil classifications required seven classes and had only one question in the assessment test.Table 3. Course Coverage and Assessment Questions Class Hours Topic Coverage, Test Question Curricular Topic Devoted % Number(s) Geology 2 5 - Index Properties and 7 18 Classifications 1 Phase Relations 4 10 2 Compaction

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Najmus Saqib, University of Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

questions are generally related to the heat transfer processes/geometriesdescribed in said figure. Students are asked to carefully scrutinize the figure toidentify the probable mode(s) of heat transfer. During the review period, groups ofstudents work together to come up with potential exam problems related to thecovered content and then identify strategies, methodologies, and/or relevantequations to obtain solutions. The primary role of the instructor during theseactivities is to ensure that the discussions are relevant to the upcoming exam’scontent or focus. Review sessions are typically held the day before the exam, andthe preview figures are provided in advance. The review activity is based onvarious studies supporting collaborative learning as

Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University; Harry T Ingle Jr., Tennessee Technological University; Kumar Yelamarthi, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Topics

Works In Progress

-13/ALL_MAJORS/X/X/home/ (accessed May 27, 2022).[9] S. B. Robbins, I-S Oh, H. Le, and C. Button, Christopher, “Intervention effects on collegeperformance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors:Integrated meta-analytic path analyses,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp.1163-1184, 2009, DOI: 10.1037/a0015738.[10] C. Cairncross, T. VanDeGrift, S. Jones, Sharon, and L. Chelton, “Best practices for advisingat-risk first-year engineering students, 7th First Year Engineering Experience Conference,August 3-4, Roanoke, VA, 2015,https://pilotscholars.up.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=egr_facpubs[11] W. R. Habley, “Key concepts in academic advising. In Summer Institute on

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gianluca Guadagni, University of Virginia; Deepyaman Maiti, University of Virginia; Farzad Shafiei Dizaji, University of Virginia

February 2022).[6] U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR)’s June 2021 report “Education in aPandemic: The Disparate Impacts of COVID-19 on America’s Students”. Available at:https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/20210608-impacts-of-covid19.pdf (Accessed: 10February 2022).[7] Faulkner, B., Earl, K. and Herman, G. (2019) ‘Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students’,International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), pp. 97–128.doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8.[8] Zavala, G., & Dominguez, A. (2016, June), ‘Engineering Students' Perception of Relevance ofPhysics and Mathematics’ Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, NewOrleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26664. doi

Conference Session

Innovation In Teaching - I

Collection

2022 ASEE Zone IV Conference

Authors

Heather Marriott, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott

Tagged Topics

Conference Submission

2014.[2] “Why Colleges Suck at Making Programmers”, codeup.com Commentary, https://codeup.com/why-colleges- suck-at-making-programmers/, August 14, 2018.[3] Nigaglioni I., “Pokémon Go: An Unexpected Inspiration for Next Generation Learning Environments”, Childhood Education, 93:4, 333-336, DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2017.1343588 https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2017.1343588[4] Hu X, Goh Y., Lin Z, “Educational impact of an Augmented Reality (AR) application for teaching structural systems to non-engineering students”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 50, 2021[5] Iqbal M, “Pokémon Go Revenue and Usage Statistics (2021)”, https://www.businessofapps.com/data/pokemon-go-statistics/, May 6 2021[6] Ho S

Conference Session

Joint Session: Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning in the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timo Bunk, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen Chen, Stanford University

something successful at the end.”(I18M, Pos. 19).4.2.4 Fellow Students Proposition 2.4: ME218 attracts highly motivated and talented students and creates an environment where friendship and partnership flourish.Ten interviewees emphasize the connections and the quality of their ME218 classmates. “EdCarryer will tell you on day one: ‘This is hard, and we will take up your whole life for thisyear.’” (I12M, Pos. 29). Thereby he creates that feeling that the students “[…] are all in theMarines together […]” (I15M, Pos. 22). The preselection process at Stanford University andME218’s image leads to the situation that “[…] the people around you are phenomenal.” (I01M,Pos. 34).During ME218, students collaborate closely and spend much time together. Their

Conference Session

Inclusivity at Two Year Colleges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder; Gabe Hanzel-Sello; Gary Barnak, Saddleback College; Michael Venn, Community College of Baltimore County

material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos.(HRD 1834628 and HRD 1834608). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] NASEM, "Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads," National Academy of Engineering, Washington, 2018.[2] X. Y. and R. Larson, "STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes, and yes. Monthly Labor Review," 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis- or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm.[3] T. Dinh and Y. L. Zhang, "Engagement in

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 1: Innovative Approaches to Teaching Energy-Related Concepts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Mativo, University of Georgia; Jacob Lancaster, University of Georgia

. The solution occurs where theminimum area for heat transfer needed to provide adequate heat transfer out of the system12.6kW is achieved. Figure 1 indicates that this point occurs at approximately 0.0465m2 (72in2).Using this area, students determined the minimum volumetric flow required to provide adequatecooling is 0.69 m3/s, as shown in figure 2. Figure 1: Solution for most efficient radiator output Figure 2: Required Volumetric flow rate for given Radiator area Taking these solutions into account the team decided to add a factor of safety andincrease the total radiator area 20%. Resulting in the selection of a radiator with a 0.058 m2 (90in2) cross section for the final design and a fan that has

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Garcia; Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Diane Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Irma Torres-Catanach; Nora Cuvelier, University of Texas at El Paso; Crystal Cholewa; Karla Ayala Mendoza

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Rahman, Wichita State University

://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/what-is-project-management[2] Accessed Feb. 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/who-are-project-managers[3] Accessed Feb. 5, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/project-management.html[4] Accessed Feb. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/project-manager-qualities[5] S. M. Shariff et al., "Assessment of Project Management Skills and Learning Outcomes inStudents’ Projects," in 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching(InCULT 2012), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) pp. 745 – 754.[6] P. N. Mustaro and R. Rossi, “Project Management Principles Applied in Academic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Huff, Harding University; Amy Brooks, Oregon State University

in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewersfor their constructive feedback that helped us to improve this paper. Lastly, we thank the studyparticipants themselves for allowing us to learn important insights from their lived experiencesof shame in the context of engineering.References[1] J. P. Tangney and R. L. Dearing, Shame and guilt. Guilford Press, 2003.[2] J. L. Huff, B. Okai, K. Shanachilubwa, N. W. Sochacka, and J. Walther, “Unpacking professional shame: Patterns of White male engineering students living in and out of threats to their identities,” Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana; Shelly Blunt, University of Southern Indiana; Zane Mitchell, University of Southern Indiana

Undergraduate Education (EHR/DUE) and Division of Engineering Education and Centers (ENG/EEC), where she worked in multiple STEM education and research programs, including the IUSE, TUES, STEP, WIDER, S-STEM, Noyce, REU, and ERC. She also served as Associate Chair and was on the faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering.Shelly B. Blunt (Associate Provost for Academic Affairs) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Capacity-Building to Transform STEM Education Through Faculty Communities in Learning Analytics and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines; Deb Jordan, Colorado School of Mines; Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines

as they are also at a point of transition to a new Director. Formore information about the evaluation, please feel free to contact the author team.References:Jordan, D., Spiegel, S., Sanders, M., Cutler, S., & Zappe, S. (2022). Lessons Learned: Findingsfrom an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons Learned Paper#2 of 2). American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,Minneapolis, MN.POD Network (2018). Defining what matters: Guidelines for comprehensive center for teachingand learning (CTL) evaluation.https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/POD_CTL_Evaluation_Guidelines__2018_.pdf 5Appendix 1. 6

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Jarvie-Eggart, Michigan Technological University; Alfred Owusu-Ansah, Michigan Technological University; Shari Stockero

,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.[2]​​V. Vankatesh, and F. Davis, (2000). ”A Theoretical Extension of the Technology AcceptanceModel: Four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, 46(2), 186.[3] J. Case, and G. Light, (2014). Framing Qualitative Methods in Engineering EducationResearch. In A. Johri and B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering EducationResearch (pp. 535-550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034.[4] Vedel, J. Ramaprasad, and L. Lapointe, “Social Media Strategies for Health Promotion byNonprofit Organizations: Multiple Case Study Design,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 4, p.e15586, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.2196/15586.[5] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Owusu-Ansah, and S. L. Stockero, “Factors

Conference Session

Imagining the Research Agenda for ASEE LEAD

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Brian Novoselich, United States Military Academy; Matthew Dabkowski

and experiences to develop student's leadership and other professional Experiences skills [41] 3 Undergraduate Coaching Developing the engineering leadership of undergraduate students through coaching [42] 7 Diverse Student Workshops Workshop-based co-curricular EL development for diverse student populations [43] Out-of-class 2 SHPE Social-cognitive Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE)'s Social-cognitive leadership theory [44] experiences Leadership Theory 2 International Experience International project-work/experiences for undergraduate students [45

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Vimal Viswanathan, San Jose State University; Vinayak Krishnamurthy; Hillary Merzdorf, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Morgan Weaver, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wayne Li, Georgia Institute of Technology

ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award, the 2020 TEES Faculty Fellows Award, and the 2011 Charles H. Barclay, Jr. '45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. She has also been recently appointed as the Speaker-Elect of the Faculty Senate. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Julie S Linsey (Professor) Georgia Tech © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Sketchtivity, an Intelligent Sketch Tutoring Software: Broadening