classesAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we report on peer oral exams, a cross between oral examsand peer assessment, as implemented in a high-enrollment undergraduate computerprogramming course for engineers. The idea was to leverage the educational andimplementational advantages of both evidence-based approaches simultaneously. Oral exams,for instance, have been argued to promote conceptual understanding, self-reflection,communication competency, and professional identity formation in students – but theirdeployment in large classes is resource-demanding and nontrivial, stifling their broader adoption.Peer assessment, on the other hand, is highly scalable and affords students many potentialeducational benefits of its own, including the
. Schneider graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in chemical engineering in 1999, attended Columbia University Film M.F.A. Program in 2001, and earned his master’s and Ph.D. from Cornell University in mechanical engineering with a concentration in controls & dynamics in 2007. David has taught at both Columbia University, where he was the highest student-rated instructor in the College of Engineering, and at Cornell University where he is now the Director of M.Eng. Studies for Systems Engineering, the largest M.Eng. program at Cornell. As a faculty member in systems engineering, David has focused largely on industry collaborations, ad- vising over 1200 professional M.Eng. students, and over 1000 students
makepersistence difficult (if not impossible). This paper introduces a novel, virtual, cohort-based,professional development (PD) program that helps computing administrators, faculty, staff,postdoctoral researchers, and graduate students to identify and address systemic barriersimpacting students and faculty with marginalized identities in computing classrooms anddepartments. The programmatic objectives are: (1) to increase participant knowledge of identity-related topics, (2) to increase participant self-efficacy to lead initiatives based on anunderstanding of these topics, and (3) to increase the number of departments implementing moreidentity-inclusive courses, modules, and other activities.The program was piloted in the 2020–2021 academic year with
Paper ID #30769Transforming an Engineering Design Course into an Engaging LearningExperience using ePortfoliosMiss Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Taylor Tucker graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a Bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics and is now pursuing a master’s in Curriculum and Instruction through the Digital Environments for Learning, Teaching, and Agency (DELTA) program. She is interested in engineering design and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring how to improve ill-structured tasks for
characterize STEM careers as unworthy of literate andcreative individuals [2]. Does she have a good point? During the last two decades substantial efforthas been expended towards reconciling developing students with what can be broadly defined asSTEM identities. Considerable recent research broadly on STEM identities [e.g. 3-21], includingseparate considerations of science, engineering and math identities, has focused on the identitiesof groups and intersectionalities underrepresented in STEM disciplines and careers. But, someresearch also suggests that merely inserting a STEM label, e.g. science or scientist, into adiscussion unleashes implicit biases of gender, race and ethnicity in middle school children [14].Surveys to assess self-efficacy and
and engineering projects. She also co-directs the Welcome Project (welcomeproject.valpo.edu), a first-person story collection about identity and inclusion.Dr. Jeffrey Dale Will, Valparaiso University Will completed his B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and has been a full-time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering De- partment at Valparaiso University since August of 2001. He teaches courses in senior design, computer architecture, digital signal processing, freshman topics, and circuits laboratories and is heavily involved in working with students in undergraduate research. Will is also a 2013 recipient of the Illinois-Indiana ASEE
Paper ID #32306Cracks in the Foundation: Issues with Diversity and the Hiring Processin Computing FieldsStephanie J. Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie Lunn is presently a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida International University (FIU). Her research interests span the fields of Computing and Engineer- ing Education, Human Computer Interaction, Data Science, and Machine Learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from FIU.Dr. Monique S
theprogram level, i.e., outcomes expected at graduation time, and others at the course level, i.e.,outcomes expected at the time of clearing a course. Unfortunately, still, the terminology can beconflicting here with some acronyms having more than one usage and different terms being usedfor the same idea. We introduce the main terms next. • Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)—Program learning outcomes are statements that de- scribe what the knowledge, skills and attitudes students should have at the time of graduation from an engineering program. PLOs are discipline agnostic. These are also referred to as Graduate Attributes (GA) (see Table VI for the Washington Accord’s recommended GAs). The term PLO also has synonyms
, University of Maryland, College Park Stephen is an Education PhD student at UMD, researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught introduction to engineering design in the Keystone Department at the UMD A. James Clark Engineering School. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of engineering education.Prof. Shuvra Bhattacharyya, University of Maryland, College Park, and Tampere University of Technology Shuvra S. Bhattacharyya is a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. He holds a
; Maturity – Helping 9th-grade students develop the socio-cognitive skills to bridge the transition into high school. Page 23.1337.4 Subject Matter Tutoring – Providing a consistent, reliable source of encouragement and advice, including scheduled or as-needed online tutoring for academic subjects and help with homework.Pilot Study Model: During a 2008-2010 field testing, the EMERGE professional-levelsupervisor trained 18 women engineering and science students at Rose-Hulman in the skills ofmentoring. (Participation was by competitive application / interview for these paid positions.)Together, the supervisor and mentors set up
StudentsIntroductionThe College of Engineering at Rowan University, a four-year, mid-sized, suburban, publicuniversity in the North East, is in the fourth year of a six year NSF S-STEM grant (Scholarshipsfor Science, Technology, Engineering and Math). In addition to providing two cohorts ofstudents with four year $3,000 dollar annual scholarships, students are provided targetedmentoring, participate in an Engineering Learning Community (ELC) in the first year, and areprovided with tutoring-on-demand for core engineering courses throughout the four-year degreeprogram.Only students with financial need were accepted into the S-STEM scholarship program and ELC.Students from under-represented groups in Engineering were aggressively recruited, i.e., women,African
undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22967Dr. Jeremiah SullinsDr. Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia Shari E. Miller is an Associate Professor and the Associate Dean of the School of Social Work at the Uni- versity
for Teaching and Learning in Engineering at the University of Louisville. Her research includes studying changes in science and engineering teacher practice, best practices in teacher professional learning experiences, teacher and student learning in mathematical and computational think- ing, and the use of undergraduate learning assistants in introductory STEM coursework. Address: Depart- ment of Middle and Secondary Education, Porter Building, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292 Phone: 502.852.3948 Email: sbphil02@louisville.eduDr. Jason Immekus, University of Louisville c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 What can we learn from a
Paper ID #33704Research-practitioner Partnerships Supported by the Computer Science forAll Program: A Systematic EvaluationRahman AdekunleMr. John Kofi Eshirow Jr., University of Virginia John Eshirow is a first-generation fourth-year student at the University of Virginia majoring in Systems Engineering with a concentration in Economic Systems and a minor in Engineering Business. Originally from the Bronx, he grew to have a passion for understanding and developing the intersection of business, engineering, and technology. In the future, John hopes to be an investor and strategic advisor to companies whose mission is
, theresa@creus.com jjhu@bridgeport.edu, abhilash@bridgeport.edu, aelsayed@bridgeport.edu Abstract—The University of Bridgeport (UB) received Achieve) is an NSF IUSE: HSI project funded under thefunding from the National Science Foundation's Division of Planning or Pilot Projects (PPP) track for the purposes ofUndergraduate Education through its IUSE: HSI Initiative in thesummer of 2022 to increase retention, persistence, preparedness, planning a process for building capacity and enhancingand graduation rates of students majoring in Computer, undergraduate STEM education at less-resourced institutionsElectrical, Mechanical Engineering, and Computer Science (CS) as a means of increasing
is or is not preparing them to address macroethical issues?We also pose a question to assess our curriculum: RQ3) How does the macroethical curriculum impact students’ perceptions and awareness of macroethical issues and their desire to engage with the macroethical implications of their future work?In the first year of our project, we are developing a survey to conduct quantitative and qualitativeanalyses of students’ awareness and perception of macroethical issues in aerospace engineering,as well as their educational experiences on the topic. A pilot study of a proposed two-factorstructure based on RQ1 and RQ2 did not offer evidence of validity via confirmatory factoranalysis (see the poor fit shown in Figure 3
Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. Her research centers the intersection identity formation, engineering culture, and dis- ability studies. Her work has received several awards including best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education and the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. She holds a Ph.D. in En- gineering Education from Virginia Tech as well as M.S. and B.S. degrees in civil engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology.Gabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University Gabriel Van Dyke is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. His current research interests are engineering culture and applying
circuit concepts but also using the appropriate metrics andcommunication style tailored for the audience for us to further identify potential misconceptionsthat students, teachers, or both of them share.MethodologyThis pilot study was a result of our ongoing interest in pinpointing misconceptions amongelectrical engineering students; thus, the development of our own instrument. There is not muchresearch in the use of concept inventory for instructors because concept inventories, as anassessment tool, is supposed to be designed by the instructors for the students. However, wesought to validate and use this instrument adaptively for both students and teachers who areinvolved in the learning and teaching of these engineering concepts. For this pilot
in place to alternate the flow sourcesand receivers depending on the results desired. Flow control is achieved by manipulating valveV6. This ½-turn valve has graduations from 0 to 180o in 15o markings that allow students to setthe valve at repeated positions.Two variations of sight glasses exist on the experiment. One sight glass, SG1, is empty andrepresents flow through a smooth tube. Its length is 36 inches and its internal diameter is 0.75inches. The other sight glass, SG2, is identical to SG1 except that it contains 8 elements of aStata-tube static mixer. The static mixer achieves mixing by repeatedly dividing thestreamlines via elements. Figure 6 is a photograph of the static mixer used in this work.Differential pressure measurements
"correct."MethodsThe research team invited conversations with professors and graduate students from Women,Gender, and Sexuality Studies (WGSS) who are scholars in the area of oppression and privilege.Through these brainstorming sessions, possible subjects for the vignette were generated, most ofwhich had to do with the treatment of individuals with identities outside of the dominantparadigm (e.g., women’s experiences in engineering, racial or cultural insensitivity in a socialsetting, and gender as a social construct). A vignette format was chosen because it could beeasily constructed to elicit responses around several different underlying concepts believed to beimportant indicators of an understanding of oppression and privilege. The input from
complicates social relations, and evidence that harassing or uncivilbehavior gets punished all have the potential to change individual risk-benefitcalculations. Bystander training can help to increase participant awareness andconfidence, and thus to consolidate norms that endorse interventions. We expect toreport results of our pilot study of bystander intervention in engineering at the 2023ASEE meeting. ReferencesCares, A. C., V. L. Banyard, M. M. Moynihan, L. M. Williams, S. J. Potter, and J. G. Stapleton (2015). Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: Translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus. Violence Against Women 21(2), 165–187.Dobbin, F. and A. Kalev
topics and specific ideas for surveyitems.13 For example, Crede and Borrego3 utilized ethnographic observations and interviews todevelop a survey about retention amongst graduate-level engineering students. Themes identifiedfrom this ethnographic study and previous research literature were used to develop surveyconstructs. The researchers then used participant excerpts to design specific survey itemsrepresentative of the survey constructs, often using the direct language of the target population.The survey was revised through two rounds of pilot testing. The first of these rounds includedreview by members of the original ethnography sample and a panel of experts. The second ofthese rounds included pilot testing of the revised survey with a
Paper ID #36855Assessing authentic problem-solving in heat transferJiamin Zhang Jiamin Zhang, PhD, is a postdoctoral scholar and lecturer in physics at Auburn University. Her research focuses on studying authentic problem-solving in undergraduate engineering programs and what factors impact student persistence in STEM. She earned her PhD in chemical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara.Soheil Fatehiboroujeni (Assistant Professor ) Soheil Fatehiboroujeni received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Merced in 2018 focused on the nonlinear dynamics of
; Neville, 2015). Other scales have been written to capture theexperiences of only one intersectional group such as Keum et al. (2018) who designed theGendered Racial Microaggression Scale for Asian American Women (GRMSAAW). Oneexception to this approach of examining only one or two intersectional identities was Torres-Harding et al. (2012) who included several racial and ethnic identities in the design in the RacialMicroaggression Scale (RMS). None of these previous scales have been designed to capturemicroaggression experiences among engineering undergraduate students across severalintersectional identities. This study proposes the creation of a novel Engineering GenderedRacial Microaggression Scale (EGRMS) to capture the unique experiences and
students’ scores in a mathcompetition (Hangen et al, 2019b). I also am currently working on projects examining the role ofstereotypes for the motivation and math performance of female students and students of Asian heritage.Dr. Drazan (Biomedical Engineering): In addition to my technical training, engineering outreach andeducation has been a major theme in my scholarly development. As an undergraduate, I was a varsitybasketball player and one of my teammates, John Scott, created a non-profit called 4th Family Inc in 2011after he lost one of youth basketball players to gun violence. I became involved with the non-profit in2012 during my first year of graduate school. John Scott was coaching high school basketball and heasked if I was interested in
well, we fully engage with local high school teachers, students,parents, engineering faculty and student counselors, and the professional organizations andbusiness leaders who need our products for their workforce.Program ApproachIn this WIP effort, we are initiating a survey that will track student persistence and time tograduation for the E&ET programs, and with particular attention on female and minority students.Some pilot studies [2] show a large degree of variability in retention and graduation by race,ethnicity, and gender. The study shows the six-year graduation rate of Asian Americans was66.5%, Caucasians – 59.7%, Hispanics – 44.4%, Native Americans – 38.6%, African Americans– 38.3%, females 61%. A survey is being created that
system as a whole—is going to be necessary for making sustainableand significant impacts on human health going forward [1,4,10-11].The application of multi-scale systems bioengineering approaches to biomedical researchrequires knowledge of human physiology/pathology, in addition to quantitative skills in mathand engineering [4,12-14]. More importantly, however, it requires the ability to integrate thesesubjects in a meaningful way [15]. Within both the biotechnology sector and in academia, thedemand for graduates who possess expertise in the generation of high-throughput data—as wellas the modeling skills needed to analyze/predict pathological states and identify viabletherapies—has increased dramatically [2,4,16].In terms of STEM pipeline
AC 2012-5229: FACULTY SURVEY ON LEARNING THROUGH SERVICE:DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL FINDINGSDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory
Paper ID #10088Work-in-Progress: The Platform-Independent Remote Monitoring System(PIRMS) for Situating Users in the Field VirtuallyMr. Daniel S. Brogan, Virginia Tech Daniel S. Brogan is a PhD student in Engineering Education with BS and MS degrees in Electrical En- gineering. He has completed several graduate courses in engineering education pertinent to this research. He is the key developer of the PIRMS and leads the LEWAS lab development and implementation work. He has mentored two NSF/REU Site students in the LEWAS lab. He assisted in the development and implementation of curricula for introducing the LEWAS at VWCC
intervention aimed at exposing underrepresented fourth and fifth grade boys to hands-on, inquiry based STEM experiments and activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23043 Henderson is a part of the first year engineering experience team and he was recently appointed by the Dean of the College as the Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES), a program aimed at increasing engineering student achievement, engagement, and graduation rates. His research interests are in engineering identity formation and persistence among underrepresented students