] [Author], “[name deleted to maintain the integrity of the review process],” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Learning and Instruction, University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 2023.[8] Harper, K. & Rhoads, K. “Work in Progress: Knowing Our First-year Students, Meeting Them Where They Are, and Supporting Them for Success.” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[9] Husman, J., Cheng, K., Puruhito, K., & Fishman, E., “Understanding Engineering Students' Stress and Emotions during an Introductory Engineering course,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[10] Mirabelli, J., Kunze, A., Ge, J., Cross, K., & Jensen, K., “Work in progress: Identifying factors that
Education, 2024“Someone has invested in me to do this”: Supporting Low-Income Students to Persist in STEM through an NSF S-STEM grantThere have been numerous, widespread national efforts to address the challenge of a growingneed for STEM professionals. In a 2012 report, the President’s Council of Advisors on Scienceand Technology suggested that the United States needed to produce one million additionalcollege graduates in STEM fields by 2022 in order to keep up with the expected growth inSTEM positions [1]. Between 1970 and 2018, STEM occupations grew 79% [2] and areexpected to continue to grow 10.8% between 2021 and 2031 [3]. Evidence suggests that thenumber of STEM degrees is increasing, as is the diversity of those obtaining STEM
and lower the barriers to QISTentry? As outlined in the literature [11]–[16], various factors, such as learning environment, design andorganization of the curriculum, assessment, feedback, and learning new tools outside thestudent's comfort zone can impede learning. This research focused explicitly on identifyingfactors that could serve as barriers within the newly designed modules for the Introduction toQuantum Computing course (EEE 4423).Course Structure of Introduction to Quantum Computing (EEE 4423)The course syllabus was designed to cover the 9 key concepts for Quantum Information Science(QIS) learners [17]. This course aims to provide engineering students with an in-depthunderstanding of quantum computing software as well as some
principles of Universal Design for Learning and Culturally Responsive/Sustaining Pedagogies.Tanvir Hossain, The University of KansasDr. Swarup BhuniaDr. Pavlo Antonenko Pavlo ”Pasha” Antonenko is an Associate Professor of Educational Technology at the University of Florida. His interests focus on the design of technology-enhanced learning environments and rigorous mixed-method research on the effective conditions for tec ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Supporting Hardware Engineering Career Choice in First-Year Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe semiconductor and digital electronics field is undergoing rapid changes with continuousprogress in integrating
program curriculum and data science competencies used in this study wereidentified in an earlier study [4], which examined 136 colleges and their undergraduate DataScience degree program curriculum. The competencies detailed in Table 1 are drawn from theData Science Task Force of the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) report[4], whichidentified 11 core data science competencies shown in Table 1. Table 1: Data Science Competencies and Sub-topics by 2021 ACM Data Science Task Force ACM Data Science Task Force Report Competencies1. Analysis and Presentation 7. DataPrivacy, Security, Integrity, and Analysis for ● Foundational considerations
Engineering Education, 2024This NSF ITEST project is centered around AI topics, including computer vision, machine learn-ing, and computational cameras, to facilitate the professional development of middle school teach-ers in these AI topics and develop lesson modules that can be developed and implemented in theircurriculum for middle school students.A summer workshop was conducted in the summer of 2023 at Barrow County Innovation campusin Winder, GA, by the project team to empower middle school teachers to integrate AI topics inthe curriculum through an NSF-funded ITEST program titled Image STEAM. Teachers were in-troduced to AI topics for the summer workshop, including computer vision, machine learning, andcomputational cameras. The lesson modules
single class was not seen positivelyby the students as the emphasis on the course material can be different from one major to anotherdespite the same learning outcomes. Therefore, ChE’s take a Fluid Mechanics course separatelyfrom the ME’s with an increased focus on compressible flows. The aim of this study is toinvestigate how the integration of a collaboration on certain dates and specific assignments couldenhance the perception of multidisciplinary collaboration in upper-level chemical andmechanical engineering undergraduates.BackgroundInterdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity have been used broadly withoutrecognizing their main distinctions. Multidisciplinarity involves the collaboration of multipleexperts from at
panelists. What is an Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM)? Defined as "a set of attitudes,dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a unique approach to problem-solving, innovation,and value creation" [1] by the Engineering Unleashed (KEEN) website, EM holds the key toamplifying engineers' technical skills. Join us to explore how EM empowers engineers toidentify opportunities, target their impact, and consistently create value, all while embracing the3C's: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value.Our panelists, integral members of the KEEN Project known as EMIFY, will share theirexpertise and extensive experience in not only teaching first-year students but also in seamlesslyintegrating Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) into the curriculum. The
Education Innovation at Colorado School of Mines in the Engineering, Design, and Society Department. He teaches the first-year engineering Cornerstone design course. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based courses, the first-year engineering experience, and student professional skills. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and serves on the First-Year Programs Division Executive Board and was the past Webmanager for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engineering Experience Conference. He is on the Executive Steering Committee for the Vertically Integrated Projects Consortium. Prior to
exercises to inspiresystems thinking. The PILLARS arecompleted first, integrating citizenshipfundamentals and design thinking and theengineering design process into bothPILLARS. Though they both integrate bothskill families, the content is inverselyproportional, as shown in Figure 2. Eachpillar presents students with a case toaddress civically with an appropriatesolution. The solutions may be tangibleproducts, processes, or models. Afterstudents complete both PILLARS, they willpractice both civics knowledge and designthinking skills repeatedly through engaging Figure 2 Graphic showint the composition of PILLAR 1 and PILLAR 2 having both Citizenship and Design Thinking andin the PATHWAYS
, according to what theinterviewees mentioned.1. Cross-disciplinary integration of AI in the curriculum. Implies integrating artificial intelligence not as an isolated module but as an interconnected element across all learning areas in the Construction Engineering program. It is important to integrate artificial intelligence transversally into the curriculum of the Construction Engineering career, ensuring that students master both the theoretical foundations and their practical applications in the industry (P1). For this, the following is suggested: ● Introductory courses with AI fundamentals: Introduce basic AI concepts in introductory courses to familiarize students with this technology's terms, applications, and potential
confidence to change.FindingsTeachers’ confidence shifted when: 1) they completed the hands-on projects; 2) theirperspectives got positive feedback 3) they collaborated on curriculum design, and 4) they saw achance to integrate ML/AI into their classroom.1. Hands-on projects provide opportunities for participants to engage in emerging technologies, and understand and use emerging ML tools. We had several hands-on projects for participants during the co-design workshop, such as exploring and playing the AI games on Google Labs, using Smart Motors to build an interactive garden project, and using Smart Motors to build a project based on the given context (Figure 1). We observed that participants got familiar with the emerging technology tools
illustratedin the following sections, this perspective also makes it possible to critique administrativeapproaches in higher education that privilege classroom activities over other forms ofeducational work that are necessary for developing transdisciplinary curriculums, such as thework of external evaluators. By focusing on external evaluation as an integral component of aneducational system, this paper seeks to highlight the value of this seemingly “peripheral work”(Lederman, 2019). This in turn raises critical questions about how power dynamics and otherasymmetric relationships can be exposed early in the development of an academic plan. Suchexposure is important if the principles of transdisciplinary curriculums are to be fully realized inways that
digital proficiency. accessibility issues are amplified.Conclusion and Future WorkThis mapping review shows how complex digital accessibility is in computing education. Thereview synthesized the current literature, revealing efforts to enhance the accessibility ofcomputing curricula to teach accessibility design principles with no practical implementation ofaccessible course content. The detailed analysis of the two papers by Lewthwaite et al. suggestreasons for why there is limited practical implementation, such as the absence of an accessibility-centric pedagogical culture and a standardized curriculum that integrates digital accessibilityeffectively. These gaps highlight the need for established pedagogical practices and a
Paper ID #43473Board 154: Broadening Participation and the Mission of Engineering forUS All: A Case Study of Engineering in a Classroom Serving Students withDisabilities (Work in Progress)Dr. Jennifer Lee Kouo, The Johns Hopkins University Dr. Jennifer Kouo is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Technology in Education (CTE) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education. Jennifer’s areas of expertise include Universal Design for Learning, technology integration, assistive technologies, and serving students with a range of disabilities, particularly autism spectrum disorder. She is currently engaged in
academic year by 32teachers. These units are embedded in courses that cover mathematics, science, engineering,English, and social studies content. The results from the content pre- and post-assessments willanswer the research question: How do students conceptualize microelectronics and its meaningfor engineering and society after completing an integrated STEM unit embedded withmicroelectronics contexts?A measurement of change in student understanding is collected through identical pre- and post-assessments given at the start and conclusion of each curriculum unit. These content assessmentscontain the four prompts: 1) What does the term “microelectronics” mean?, 2) How aremicroelectronics used in field?, with “field” being the subject of the class
100 150 200 300 27 Projections2829 Conclusions and Future Work30 Two new engineering technology programs in computer engineering technology and lean31 systems engineering are designed based on the unique pedagogical method of Reimagining32 Engineering Technology Education (RETE). The curriculum of these programs focuses on a33 strategic and industry-integrated multi-disciplinary training program to propel the innovative34 pathways that link these institutions. RETE is built through strategic collaboration and inquiry-35 driven learning to create an engaged and diverse community of practice among all stakeholders © American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #41525Board 167: Pre-College Engineering: Perspectives of Engineering Faculty(Work in Progress)Natasha Lagoudas Wilkerson, Texas A&M University Natasha Wilkerson is a Ph.D. candidate in Curriculum & Instruction with an emphasis in engineering education at Texas A&M University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering and her M.S. in Curriculum & Instruction from Texas A&M University. She is the President of the Cosmic Leap Foundation and Co-Founder of Vivify, LLC.Joanne K Olson, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Pre-College
: The Role of Student Changemakers in Advancing Sustainability within Engineering EducationAbstractOver the last decade, we have seen an increase in the number of engineering programs thatintegrate sustainability. However, employer demand for green skills continues to outpace thesupply. Furthermore, most engineering students are unable to access the educational experiencesthat will prepare them for sustainability-focused careers. Engineering for One Planet (EOP) isone of the initiatives working to address this gap by using a multi-pronged approach to supportand accelerate the integration of social and environmental sustainability into engineeringeducation. Supported by The Lemelson Foundation, EOP provides a framework of
. Moreover, 50% view its inclusion as a positive aspect, describing it as aNICE addition to the course material. In other words, having LiDAR technology as asupplemental course delivery tool is more appealing to the students. Another 25% consider itsuitable as an optional component within the curriculum. Figure 6 illustrates the survey results. Figure 6. Students' perspective regarding the integration of LiDAR in Construction Education, ESTIMATING course.To gain a more comprehensive understanding of students' performance with LiDAR data andtheir proficiency in using the application's features, students were instructed to install theapplication, import provided data, explore the project environment, and experiment
) opportunities for people facilitating educational experiences (i.e., faculty or school counselors). Dr. Ross’ work has been published in national and international journals, including Research in Higher Education, AERA Open, Teachers College Record, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, and the Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice.Dr. Deeksha Seth, Villanova University Deeksha Seth is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Villanova University. Her primary research interests include integrative and interdisciplinary engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Beyond Exhibits: Exploring Bio-Inspired Education
experiences at home and within the community, support African psychology andlearning, and appeal to the African personality. Strategies include the use of African terms of authority,endearment and affirmation, call and response, African griot teaching style, communal and cooperativelearning. A curriculum is considered African-Centered when the historical, philosophical, and culturalcontext of the lessons are centered around the experiences of African people. For instance, in African-Centered curricula, academic disciplines are introduced within the context of when these disciplines arefirst encountered or developed by African people (Akoto, 2018; George, 2024; Shockley, 2011). Forexample, the origin of advanced geometry in an African-Centered
-based learning, STEM integration, engineering education, curriculum development, and self-efficacy.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC), Dr. Alemdar made significant contributions to the fields of STEM education. Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering
uncertain future that lies ahead. Evidence suggests thatproficiency in innovation, critical thinking, complex problem-solving, and effectivecommunication positions students for success in sustainable engineering careers [2-4]. However,a prevalent culture of risk aversion among students stifles exploration into unchartedtechnological territories, thereby limiting their comprehensive academic growth [5].In response to these challenges, this paper presents an evaluative study of an inventive, multi-disciplinary, project-based course known as "Innovation Through Making." This course isdesigned to blend the foundational Engineering Sciences (ES) curriculum with anEntrepreneurial Mindset, thereby endowing students with critical knowledge and
plan involving faculty and staff from all regionalcampuses and establish a strong assessment culture. The curriculum was developed rigorouslybased on the needs of the industry to build the manufacturing workforce. An effective ABETassessment process will help build a curriculum that meets the standards necessary to preparegraduates to enter industrial manufacturing fields in the global workforce. A curriculumdevelopment and assessment committee (CDAC) was formed in the first year the program waslaunched. The assessment plan includes direct and indirect assessment measures for studentoutcome attainments. It targets not only program-level outcome attainment but also course-leveloutcomes. Continuous improvement involves evaluation of the
interactive review sessions on reducing exam stress and enhancing learningoutcomes. The integration of interactive review sessions serves as a valuable tool in fosteringstudent engagement and understanding. By incorporating activities such as Bingo, Trivia, andword search, educators can create an interactive and dynamic learning environment thatencourages active participation. These sessions aim to shift the focus from a solely passivelearning experience to one that promotes collaboration, critical thinking, and a deeperunderstanding of the subject matter.This study focuses on the application of interactive review sessions in the context of the courseAlgorithms and Complexity. The course delves into intricate topics related to algorithm designand
methodologies, including inquiry-based learning [1–4], project-based learning [5–11],collaborative learning [12–15], and flipped learning [16–20]. Each method brings a uniquedimension to the educational experience, enriching the learning landscape for students.Inquiry learning emphasizes student curiosity and investigation, encouraging learners to activelyseek knowledge through questioning and exploration. In [1], Xenofontos et al. explored studentengagement with graphing tasks in a computer-supported environment, highlighting theimportance of retrospective action. However, its small sample size limits its generalizability.Notaroˇs et al. [3] integrated MATLAB-based instruction into an electromagnetic course. Theassessment was limited to qualitative
technologies into the engineering classroom, and excellence in instruction. His additional research interests include water, and wastewater treatment, stormwater management and pollution control, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engineering.Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamentals of Engineering Design course that includes a wide spectra of activities to teach general engineering
fully context-driven model presentedalongside a case study for empathy education in a BME design curriculum. This framework is particularlyuseful when developing and evaluating a program curriculum. The pillars of this model encouragepedagogy that not only equips students with empathic design skills, but also facilitates valuesdevelopment. The pillars can be traced throughout a curriculum to ensure empathy education iscontinuously integrated. Therefore, each model can be used to the advantage of engineering educators in avariety of ways and course context should be considered for the selection of a given model.Pedagogical StrategiesIn this section, instructional activities for empathy education that have been implemented in BME coursesare
Paper ID #40724Student Recruitment and Retention Improvements through Success in FirstYear Mathematics: A Multi-faceted ApproachDeirdre Donovan Dr., Wentworth Institute of Technology Deirdre Donovan is the Director of First Year Mathematics at Wentworth Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Wentworth, she was program chair for mathematics, data analytics, and cybersecurity. Chairing three unique data-rich disciplines under one umbrella enabled an interdisciplinary approach to meeting student needs and curricular development. Scholarship has focused on mathematical problem solving, first year programs, student success