Paper ID #14609Transforming Liberal Arts Graduates to Advanced Manufacturing Careers:The First CohortDr. Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University Ibrahim Zaid is a professor of mechanical, industrial, and manufacturing engineering at Northeastern Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Akron. Zeid has an international background. He received his B.S. (with highest honor) and M.S. from Cairo University in Egypt. He has received var- ious honors and awards both in Egypt and the United States. He is the recipient of both the Northeastern Excellence in Teaching Award and the SAE Ralph R. Teetor
the class make contact with thesepartners at least 2 times a semester, with an end-of-semester showcase to display the finishedproduct. The community partners not only partake in creating a ‘consumer’ that satisfies thedesign process, but the children are also involved with a hands-on STEM-related project thatthey have had a large impact on its development. The hope is to create a growing interest inSTEM in the minds of children and upcoming teens in the area, as well as creating lastingrelationships and growing positive impacts on organizations in and around the city vicinity.ResearchResearch is being conducted on how to improve the course.Unfortunately, there is no way to calculate the retention rate of Engineering undergrads impactedby
Paper ID #26456SISTEM: Increasing High School Students’ Engineering Career Awareness(Evaluation, Diversity)Dr. Schetema Nealy, University of Nevada, Las VegasDr. Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Erica Marti completed her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). She holds a Master of Science in Engineering and Master of Education from UNLV and a Bachelor of Science in chemistry from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to graduate studies, Erica joined Teach for America and taught high school chemistry in Las Vegas. While her primary research
notyet been completed; we are in the midst of collecting data for the semester. Our initial resultsshow that conative understanding increases satisfaction and confidence, which we hypothesizewill lead to improved retention. This paper summarizes the conative interventions in engineering,the research methods, and preliminary results.IntroductionIn engineering advanced cognitive skills are highly valued and consistently rewarded. However,the mind consists of three separate domains: cognitive, affective and conative (Hilgard 1980 andTallon 1997). By focusing only on one of the three, students who don’t fit the typical mold mayfeel marginalized and discouraged from completing an engineering degree. We suspect that byexploring this idea we may
maximize learning inall aspects of their work. The Innovation Mindset and Skillset’s intended learning outcome can bedivided into three categories: (1) developing students’ skillsets, (2) cultivating students’ mindsets,and (3) combining students’ skillsets and mindsets. More information on the framework can befound here [10].3.0. Study Methodology An undergraduate and graduate level course named "Innovation Mind and Skill Sets for Designand Research" was developed based on these learning objectives. Although offered within themechanical engineering department, this course was open to students across all STEM majors. Thecourse’s central focus is on a semester-long collaborative group project to devise an innovativeproduct or enhance an existing
- Belong- Thriving Mindful Motiv-populations (Likert Scale from 1-5, Comfort standing ingness -ness ation with 5 is most positive response) Independent Variable ‘n’ + Variable Categories [name of Engineering, 95 3.54 * 3.51 * 3.98 * 3.90 * 3.28 * 4.15 engineering Computer Science, (1.20) (1.13) (1.14) (1.08) (1.15) (1.10)Undergraduate college and redacted] TechnologyProgram (For
science fiction novel; two award-winning books in the genre of body-mind-spirit, and numerous papers and articles.Dr. William J Davis, University of Virginia William J Davis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engineering and Society and the University of Virginia. William has degrees in literature and Science and Technology Studies, and has taught courses in English, philosophy, and sociology in universities in the USA and Mexico. His current research investigates the ethical and social implications of technology, including those related to artificial intelligence, automation, bioethics, machine ethics, and post and trans- humanism.Mr. Kent A. Wayland, University
Paper ID #19811Effective Approaches for Teaching STEM-literacy for All Majors: The Ex-ample of ResonanceDr. Maria E. Garlock, Princeton University Maria Garlock is an Associate Professor at Princeton University in the Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering where she is the Director of the Architecture and Engineering Program. Her scholarship is in resilient building design and in studies of the best examples of structural designs of the present and past. She has co-authored the book Felix Candela: Engineer, Builder, Structural Artist and has recently launched a MOOC titled ”The Art of Structural Engineering
were two middle school units enacted in this study. One focused on the challengeof conserving, filtering, and reusing water in extreme environments, and the other challengedstudents to learn about and design multiple remote sensing technologies, and then to use thosetechnologies to explore a model “mystery moon.” Each unit consists of eight one-hour,sequenced activities. Throughout each unit, youth are introduced to engineering practices andhabits of mind through an Engineering Design Process (EDP), which they use as a guide whileworking in small groups to design a solution to an engineering challenge. The EDP begins withidentifying a problem that needs to be solved and investigating what has already been done.Next, engineers imagine different
of criticalthinking (Chinn et al. 2014). Both the broad term of critical thinking and the more niche term ofsystems thinking share similar meanings of thoughtful analysis or analytical reasoning, and callto mind King & Kitchener’s Reflective Judgement Model (King & Kitchener, 1994, 2001, 2004),a stepping stone between the cognitive development research started in the 1970s and morerecent epistemological research. This researcher argues that discovering the epistemic beliefs offaculty and the ideas being disseminated to students in their chemical engineering classroomswill prove useful in the field of chemical engineering education as well as related academicfields concerned with systems and critical thinking.TheoryResearch preceding
Paper ID #25409An Educational Framework to Promote Self-Authorship in Engineering Un-dergraduatesDr. Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological University Laura Kasson Fiss is a Research Assistant Professor in the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Techno- logical University. She holds a PhD from Indiana University in English (2013). Her work has appeared in Victorian Periodicals Review, The Lion and the Unicorn, and The Cambridge Companion to Gilbert and Sullivan. In addition to her research on Victorian humor, she conducts higher education research and scholarship on issues of inclusion, reflection, and innovation.Dr
.[16] K. Beddoes and M. Borrego, “Feminist theory in three engineering educational journals:1995-2008,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 281-303, 2011.[17] M. F. Belenky, B. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. N. Tarule, Women’s Ways of Knowing:The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Sterling, VA: Basic Books, 1997.[18] B. E. Rincón, and C. E. George-Jackson, “Examining department climate for women inengineering: The role of STEM interventions,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 57,no. 6, pp. 742-747, 2016.[19] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing AmongFive Traditions, 4th ed. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
a product by the end of the lesson. Students will need to be able to determine a community need in addition to designing and creating a smaller-scale example of their solution. They will need to keep in mind who t hey are designing for; it is not for themselves! Once complete, students will present their projects in an engineering exhibit, and evaluate each other’s solutions. Looking for more inspiration? You can prompt your students to design something more specific. For example: Have your students design a shelter for victims of natural disasters or political conflict. Have your students design a library for small villages without access to this resource. The possibilities are endless! Project Checklist: What are you trying
of understanding how youths’ interests and attitudes toward engineering develop in out-of-school-time environments.Our research questions are as follows: What engineering practices or habits of mind (HoM) emerge as OST youth engage in engineering activities? How do these HoMs impact youth’s interests and attitudes toward engineering?MethodsSite SelectionWith a goal of understanding the development of youth attitudes toward engineering in the OSTsetting, we began recruiting OST programs into the study. A limited budget required that we caprecruitment at four sites; however, we wanted these sites to represent both school-affiliated andnon-school-affiliated programs from urban, suburban, and rural locations. We chose two sites
Empirical StudyIntroductionIndian engineering education system is one of the colossal educational systems. As per the AllIndia Council of Technical Education (AICTE) report of 2012-13, it has 3,384 colleges admitting1.63 Million students1. The system has almost no attrition and is graduating more or less theentire intake. The study of Blom and Saeki2 shows that 64% of employers are only somewhatsatisfied or worse with the current engineering graduate skills. Earlier, NASSCOM andMcKinsey report (2005)3 had found that 75% of engineering graduates are not employable bymultinational companies. A recent report by Aspiring Mind found that there is a drop inemployability in all roles and at all locations. It has noted that the decrease in employability
balanced influx has created issues of high attrition within engineering schoolsacross the country. Possibly, administrators keep this imbalance in mind as universities enroll farmore students in their freshman engineering courses than will graduate from these programs.Despite this, nearly all future projections call for an increase in the number of students trained inthe STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields, particularly engineering.Even with this growing spotlight, however, studies have still shown how the number of studentsentering college as STEM majors has actually declined in recent years.2 This issue of lowmatriculation combined with growing national attention thus results in a need to place higherpriority on the
– Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, ar 69, pp. 1-23, 2021. DOI:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0132[29] T.S. Samuel, S. Buttet, and Jared Warner, “‘I Can Math, Too!’: Reducing math anxiety in STEM-related courses using a combined mindfulness and growth mindset approach (MAGMA) in the classroom,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 613-626, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2022.2050843[30] I. Villanueva, L. Gelles, M. Di Stefano, B. Smith, R. Tull, S. Lord, L. Benson, A. Hunt, D. Riley, and G. Ryan, “What does hidden curriculum look like and how can it be explored?” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, paper 21884, 16 pp, 2018. DOI 10.18260/1
troubles with their homeworkand they’ve come to me for suggestions. So, I don’t consider myself as that far below them ifthey’re coming to me for questions. – Latina, Senior (P1)Another student expressed a similar sentiment of having to prove to her peers that she is just ascapable, if not more so, by earning some of the top grades in her engineering classes.Interestingly, while she described how her male, White peers are mostly close-minded, shealigned herself as being closer with them than other women in the program.Being in a major with church going rednecks who think one way, you have to remember, this isan engineering program, so most of the people in the program are kind of close-minded…It’s notreally an issue as far as me being Black. When
kinds of cultural backgrounds. As an engineer it is my responsibility to work in the bestinterest of the public, and that simply wouldn’t be possible if 1) I wasn’t able to effectivelyunderstand and work with coworkers of different backgrounds, and 2) If I couldn’t understandcultural values and their differences among the people I am supposed to work for. This ties a lotinto what I need to continue developing, as intercultural competence is not something you justlearn and never forget. The world and all the people in it are continuously changing, so to makesure that I continue to do my best work while keeping everybody’s wants and needs in mind issomething that is going to require me to continue learning, evolving, and seeking out discomfortin
Paper ID #23764Preliminary Insights from Exploring Engineering Learning Ecosystems ofBlack YouthNina McDaniel, University of Michigan, Dearborn Nina McDaniel is a senior at University of Michigan-Dearborn majoring in Industrial Systems Engineer- ing with a minor in Anthropology. She is also pursuing a certificate in STEM education. Nina uses anthropological skills (e.g. ethnographic and participant observation) and engineering principles to ob- serve patterns in selected environments that allows insight and discussion.DeLean Tolbert, University of Michigan, Dearborn DeLean Tolbert is an Assistant Professor in the Department
Coordinator for Minds in Motion in 2014, which later developed into also coordinating Design Camp, Physics Camp, Geography Camp and Business Camp! She is passionate about inspiring youth to explore, enrich their knowledge and be active!Dr. Philip Egberts, University of Calgary Philip Egberts obtained his Ph.D. from the McGill University in Montreal, Canada specializing in Exper- imental Condensed Matter Physics, while completing most of his research at the INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials in Saarbr¨ucken, Germany. Following his PhD studies, he joined the Carpick Research Group in the Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics department at the University of Pennsyl- vania as a Natural Sciences and Engineering
with measuring how cultural programs andexperiences contribute to positive changes in students’ abilities to work and thrive in diverseenvironments. Global competency can be defined broadly as “having an open mind whileactively seeking to understand cultural norms and expectations of others, leveraging this gainedknowledge to interact, communicate and work effectively outside one’s environment”1.Measuring global competency levels before and after participation in cultural programs maytherefore be a potentially effective method for measuring changes in students’ ability to work ina global environment. Currently, studies on engineering students’ baseline global competencylevels are few at the undergraduate level. This research fills this gap
our overall goal for the session was to initialize a globalcollaboration to advance diversity and inclusion in engineering education, it was crucial that ouraudience be empowered to continue these conversations following the session. This trainingconsisted of two parts: 1) a definition of biases, explicit and implicit, including examples ofconsequences of implicit biases within a variety of contexts and 2) an interactive activity throughan anonymous PollEveryWhere.com survey in which audience members shared their experienceswith implicit bias within engineering spaces.In part one of the training, we defined bias as habits of mind--preferences, inclinations, orpatterns of thought. Biases play a pivotal role in shaping how we navigate judgments
-structured problems, keeping the individual learner in mind, andencouraging mistakes. They also highlighted the benefits of having teachers who are dedicated totheir growth and success. Responses from the participants for each of these suggestion areas arequoted to give participating engineering practitioners a direct voice [6], [14].1. The importance of direct, hands-on experience: “I use more of the knowledge I learned being on site and doing things in person…than I ever learned from a class.” (Martin, early-career) “It's not enough just to see a couple powerpoint slides on something. You actually have to live through it.” (Andrew, mid-to-late career) “For me, it would be courses that were not
: Biotechnology and Science Fiction and Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engi- neers about Ethics, Meaning and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology; a science fiction novel; two award-winning books in the genre of body-mind-spirit (including When the Horses Whisper), and numerous papers and articles. Her newest book, ”Animals, Ethics and Engineering” (working title) is under contract to be published in summer, 2024. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Non-human Animals and a New Ethics for EngineeringIntroductionThe sixth mass extinction is underway. Earth's animal populations have declined by an averageof 69% since 1970 [1], partly due to unsustainable use of land, water and
“sufferingand shared hardship” [1]. This negative culture of hazing has been described as particularlyunwelcoming to marginalized groups in engineering [3, 4]. The high stress from this culture ofsuffering and socially acceptable hazing in engineering may negatively impact student mentalhealth.Mental health of undergraduate students is a growing concern. Roughly 40% of college students(N = 62171) surveyed in the 2018-2019 Healthy Minds study report having been diagnosed witha mental health disorder in their lifetime [5]. Some studies have suggested that engineeringstudents face higher levels of anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms than non-engineeringstudents [6, 7]. Concerningly, students who are underrepresented often face additional
affirmingtheir advisor took an active role in ensuring their success in students' expectations of academic advising and itsengineering at 86 percent. Comparing co-advising to faculty- importance in their lives” [5]. Crookston asserted thatonly advising model, each group had a higher percentage of advising is a form of teaching [6]. With these twoaffirmation. These metrics, along with other data analysis, holistic definitions in mind, it might be evident howsuggest adopting elements of a co-advising model may improve pairing students with an instructor in the first-yearthe advising experience for URM engineering students. Keywords—academic advising
internationalexperience participants appeared to offer the potential to 1) create momentum for global learningand leadership in returnees 2) allow a space to creating meaning from one’s experiences 3)establish a dedicated student corps to promote an increase in global experience participation.With these ideas as guiding principles, the Global Engineering Fellows Program was launched.History and Program ComponentsSince 2016, when the Global Engineering Fellows Program was founded, it has evolved to awell-known organization at Penn State with the following mission statement “Empowersglobally minded engineering students through targeted professional development that integratesinternational perspectives, cultural intelligence, and the ability to deliver a compelling
, Determination, and striving for Excellence, in thisendeavor. This represents the art of building character in the minds of the young students.Non-pedagogical as it may be, that is exactly what we did in 2010 in a pilot project and found itvery rewarding. That is what we continued to do since then making this program a success. Thispaper describes the steps in this systematic approach to implement RE.What is reverse engineering?Experience is the teacher of all things. [2] RE is an invaluable learning experience and ateaching tool. It is “a scientific method of taking something apart in order to figure out how itworks.” [3] The technique does involve “an act that would otherwise be considered a copyrightviolation.” [3] Whereas, “copyright law has allowed
broaden the appeal of engineering educationto a wider range of gender and ethnic categories. 8 These activities seek to engage students incritical thinking processes while simultaneously achieving a greater sense of civic and socialresponsibility. However, depending on the approach there are inherent technical, cultural andpolitical limitations which can privilege students and teachers at the expense of the communitiesbeing served. 9 With that in mind, we note that analysis of practices such as service learning showpositive effects on students’ attitudes, social behavior, and academic performance. 10 As such,finding the most effective means by which these topics and pedagogical approaches can beintegrated into the engineering curriculum has the