training for teachers. Project Lead the Way, for example, allows schools to offer engineeringexperiences through design courses in a variety of disciplines [26]. University-based K-12outreach programs have also shown promise in promoting engineering knowledge, self-efficacy,and interest [27]-[30]. It must be understood that, by necessity, knowledge of these standards andprograms must be communicated to school counselors to increase student awareness andaccessibility. Schools advocating for these programs have indicated their commitment to studentpreparation for STEM careers and school personnel should understand the mechanisms by whichthese programs do so.Research questions. This pilot, ongoing research explores the following overarching
these fields.Lack of Confidence: Many female students are faced with the constant battle of self-doubt. Are they reallycapable of being in STEM? Do they belong with the other students? Universities have alreadystarted to look at these problems. A study was performed focusing on achievement goals andhow they affect women in engineering as well as their perspectives on courses and experiencecompared to male students. The achievement goal theory is that those with low competenceperceptions usually take on the avoidance achievement goals that avoid failure rather than focuson success. The two types of competence perceptions investigated were self-efficacy andperceived ability. The study was conducted to see if women in a freshmen engineering
academic excellence. Through the formation of posses and similar cohort programs,universities have been able to successfully aid underrepresented students with their adjustmentinto the academic and social culture of the university.2 The NSF S-STEM program at RobertMorris University is one such academic center where the implementation of a cohort modelsuccessfully helped student self-efficacy and academic progress.3 While the PEEPS at Cal Polydoes not employ alternative admissions models to admit or identify cohort members, our termand acronym, “PEEPS,” captures the idea of a “posse,” “family” or “my peoples” as a group thatsupports and cares for one another.Our primary goal is to recruit, retain, and graduate academically talented, financially
influencing their self-efficacy, the development of their career interest goalsand their academic course outcomes as related to studying science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM). This study is unique in that it was also designed to identify experiencesthat appear to contribute to women’s identity development and self-confidence and includes asubstantial representation of Latina women’s voices. Data was collected and analyzed to identifyif similar patterns exist between subjects and if so, which are the greater influencers in theirdecision to select a STEM major and to persist beyond the critical first two years ofundergraduate studies.The literature of socialization and identity development as related to women as STEM learners indiverse
)changes over time. There have also been several reviews of the literature on mentoring specificto higher education42-45. Reviews by Jacobi43, Roberts45, and Crisp and Cruz44 have yieldedsimilar characterizations to those offered by D’Abate et al. and Eby et al., though all agree that itis difficult to reach a unified definition or a quantitatively validated framework, even within asingle domain such as higher education. Mentoring is, however, consistently linked to academicsuccess (e.g. increased GPA), as well as increases in self-efficacy, integration into thecommunity, retention, career goals, intention to persist and much more. While such broaddefinitions and outcomes provide important starting points for understanding mentoring inengineering
approach taken by other studies, which have focused on suchinstitutional factors as faculty-student ratio, school size, school type, and undergraduatepopulation diversity [13]. Instead, the team sought to investigate the ways in which learners’experiences are shaped by key facets of the entire learning environment, such as faculty attitudes,advising support, approaches to DEI, and student sense of belonging and self-efficacy. Whenstudents face multifaceted barriers, educators and administrators are obliged to exploremultifaceted solutions [14]. For this reason, the team sought to understand barriers from multipleperspectives using quantitative and qualitative data.MethodsThe current study describes the development and implementation of an
: they believe in innate talents. Thegrowth mindset is considered an important component in promoting positive learning behaviorsand dispositions, because it promotes success through effort.Dweck also found that students with the growth mindset adopt a mastery goal orientation, inwhich they strive to master an academic subject whereas students with the fixed mindset adopt aperformance goal orientation in which they aim only to earn a grade or to perform better thanpeers8. Mastery goal orientation has been associated with positive outcomes such as self-efficacy,persistence, preference for challenge, and self-regulated learning, whereas performance goalorientations has been associated with maladaptive patterns of cognition, affect, and behavior 9
in the subject domain.MethodsWhile the data analysis is ongoing, the survey questions had a 4-Likert scale to measurestudents’ perceptions. Most survey questions utilized a 4-item Likert scale from StronglyDisagree, Disagree, Agree, to Strongly Agree. Multiple items asked students about theclassrooms’ environment, activities and interactions as well as self-efficacy. 42 of the 46undergraduate chemical engineering students consented to participate in the study. A closed-ended survey was administered to participants with a 52% response rate.Preliminary Results74% of the responding students indicated the homework and in-class worksheets were mostconducive to their learning while reading the textbook was perceived by 60% of the respondentsas the
-economic backgrounds incomputing fields.Research surrounding women’s engagement in computing has been on the rise in recent years. Itbegan with the realization that computer science is the only STEM field that is experiencing asteady decline of female enrollment since the 1980’s, 37% to 18% [5]. Since this revelation,rigorous research has highlighted the barriers to computing which include environment andclimate, stereotypes, and self-efficacy, to name a few [6-8, 23]. Exploration has also includedinitiatives by various organizations and universities that have proven to be successful atattracting and retaining women in computer science [9-10].Another demographic with paltry representation within the fields of computing garneringattention in the
face of adversity and significantstress [8]. It is often described in terms of “bouncing back” from difficult experiences [e.g., 9,10, 11]. Resilience is a multidimensional construct [12] that is defined differently depending onthe context in which it is investigated. For example, in a study of how children developresilience, Maclean [13] discussed a wide range of factors including self-esteem, self-efficacy,locus of control, initiative, faith and morality, trust, affection, safe environment, autonomy,identity, and more. In an educational context, resilience has been defined as the “the heightenedlikelihood of success in school and in other life accomplishments, despite environmentaladversities” [14]. Similarly, Novotný and Kreménková [12
recruitment procedures, we asked faculty members to fill out a pre-survey regardingtheir attitudes towards student development, their self-efficacy for supporting student success, theirpedagogical choices, and their perceptions of barriers to implementing the intervention alongsideits efficacy. Six engineering faculty completed the survey, all of whom were willing to implementthe intervention in their course. Unfortunately, the lack of response from uninterested facultyprevents us from characterizing the differences between this population and those willing toimplement the intervention. These differences remain a subject of future research. Due to the smallsample size (n = 6) tests of statistical significance were considered inappropriate and no
differences in GPA alone. Analysis of students’survey responses shows that real-time feedback and unlimited submission attempts helpedstudents assess their learning progress and motivated them to continuously improve theirsolutions. Instant feedback and unlimited submission attempts were regarded by students aslikely having positively impacted academic integrity in the course. The effect of automatedfeedback and optional assignments on students’ need to visit office hours is explored.Implications for future pedagogical practice and research are discussed.IntroductionTimely and effective feedback provided to students on their submitted work has the potential tosignificantly enhance learning, improve student self-efficacy, reduce drop-out rates, and
diversity. We developed an instrument for measuringstudents’ latent diversity from a review of the existing literature as well as interviews withundergraduate students. A detailed description of this process can be found in [7]. This surveymeasured students’ epistemic beliefs, innovation self-efficacy beliefs, STEM role identityconstructs, motivation, personality, and background factors such as race/ethnicity, genderidentity, sexual orientation, ZIP code, and parent(s) level of education. Students responded toitems measuring their attitudes and beliefs on a 7-point anchored numeric scale. We administered3,855 paper and pencil surveys to 32 ABET accredited institutions to understand students’ latentdiversity. These schools were recruited from a list
StudyLooking at the leaky pipe has not made significant progress towards understanding all thedimensions of the problem. Women are not and have not entered or persisted in engineering.There is not one single factor that can be pointed to in order to explain why women are notreceiving undergraduate engineering degrees. Previous explanations offered by the field havefocused on student characteristics or looked at a single dimension. The interaction of curriculum,the field, subjective grading scales, unrealistic demands, and declining self-efficacy cannot beseparated from each other. A more complete picture needs to be formulated. The purpose of thisstudy is to understand the social, structural and curricular constraints on the field of engineeringand
techniques and assessment tools will be utilized toassess and improve engineering education at both the undergraduate and K-12 levels throughvaried techniques: i) undergraduate module lesson plans that are scalable to K-12 levels, ii) shortinformational video lessons created by undergraduates for K-12 students with accompanying in-person mentorship activities at local high schools and MakerSpaces, iii) pre- and post-testassessments of undergraduates’ and K-12 participating students’ AM knowledge, skills, andperceptions of self-efficacy, and iv) focus groups to learn about student concerns/learningchallenges. We will also track students institutionally and into their early careers to learn abouttheir use of AM technology
practice between early elementary teachers, K-12 STEMCenter staff and Ph.D. student volunteers could boost in-service, inner city teacher ability andself-confidence to teach coding and introduce robots as authentic, real-world digital learningopportunities. Based on the teacher responses to surveys administered pre- and post-PD sessionsby an independent external evaluator, the results show this to be true.Overall, the first- and second-grade teachers who participated in the BOTS program held apositive perception of these activities, as measured in the surveys from the four PD sessions.These surveys show that teachers felt more confident in implementing the material in theclassroom and demonstrated improved self-efficacy navigating through Code.org
persist in engineering and STEM, did so through personal agency[9] motivation [9], self-efficacy [10], [11], familial support [9], [12], [13], and institutionalsupport [9], [13], [14]. It was found that often these support relationships were related; parentalsupport predicted student engagement, and strong familial relationships resulted in willingness toseek mentors and support in college [12]. Sense of belonging was also a crucial factor forpersistence. Smith and Lucena [15] found that first generation and low-income studentsexperience a lack of sense of belonging in engineering, and that these students were aware ofperceived differences between their continuing generation peers. Nevertheless, these studentsbrought assets to the program through
joining MechE and EE majors [6]. Girls,however, are not participating in pre-college robotics at the same rate as boys [7]. An analysis of pre-college extracurricular activities and their mapping to engineering majors showed that traditionaldisciplines, such as MechE and EE, had more students tinkering with electrical or mechanicalcomponents outside of school prior to entering college[8]. When girls are not part of extracurricularrobotics programs, they miss vital opportunities to develop tinkering self-efficacy. If we can attract moregirls to participate in pre-college robotics, we may open a pathway for these students to developattitudes and self-beliefs that lead them to join majors with lower representation of women [6].Critical Engineering
professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Gender Harassment at Work and in School Seeing it, Solving It (Panel Discussion)AbstractThe landscape of sexual harassment has evolved since #MeToo went viral in 2017. Thankfully,more violent and more egregious forms of sexual harassment, including sexual coercion andunwanted sexual attention, have declined. Unfortunately, gender harassment and discriminationappear to have increased in
institutionalizationdecisions, providing a practical model for other institutions, and supporting future programmodification to provide the best possible experience for students. Since cohort 1 studentsreceived ACCESS scholarships for the first time in fall 2020, however, data is not yet available.Analysis of measures of student success and persistence, self-efficacy, and motivation within thecybersecurity field will be topics of future papers.6.0 ChallengesWhile the restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges related torecruitment and programming activities, the ACCESS project team quickly adapted to the newreality and organized online meetings, an award ceremony, panels and seminars, and created anonline private group to support effective
that indicate college success and are on the job, interpersonal communication strategies,within the power of the individual to adjust. The activities and networking, interview strategies, working on a team, projecttopics covered in the Connections course focus on these six management and working in a global context. Furtherfactors and provide resources to help students improve. The opportunities to become connected are provided through theareas are as follows: academic self-efficacy, organization and Clay N. Hixson College of Engineering Student Success Fairattention to study, stress and time management, involvement where each organization and department shares informationwith college activities
interaction of MEPs and cultural engineering student organizations such asNSBE and the combined impact of their programs, activities, and services warrants furtherinvestigation [16], [18], [19]. Future studies will be conducted to explore how and why the associations present in thisstudy occur at this particular chapter. However, elements that have been identified in theliterature such as participation in social, academic, and professional activities of the chapter, aswell as regional and national conferences, may contribute to outcomes that support persistencesuch as fostering a strong sense of community or “family”, increased self-efficacy, increasedconfidence in technical and non-technical skills and abilities, and a strong social and
details, gave us only a limited understanding ofhow our general GSI and IA population define and learn to practice inclusive teaching. To gainfurther insights into the instructor experience, our larger study includes analyzing survey datathat will provide us with information regarding new instructors’ expectations about theorientation, their initial definitions of inclusive teaching, and their confidence associated withparticular teaching skills as identified by the Teaching Self-Efficacy Inventory [17]. To gain abetter understanding of the instructors’ development of inclusive teaching practices, we willanalyze surveys administered at the start of the term, one week after orientation, and at thebeginning of the following semester. This analysis
photos from opening or closing day that include parents? Emphasize human and Offer single sex social context and Include parents programming teaming Build self-efficacy in Provide role models and Facilitate multiple engineering peer support
, students’ SB within a university includes their social andacademic belonging. Social belonging relates to positive social interactions with peers, faculty,and campus community, whereas academic belonging relates to academic performance,academic self-efficacy, curriculum motivation, and perceptions of belonging within aprofessional discipline [4, 5]. SB is, therefore, one of the main contributors to students’ academicsuccess, persistence, and overall well-being. The literature reports that the lack of SB isperceived differently by different student groups and is critical for underrepresented students(e.g., first-generation and low socioeconomic status) to persist in college after the first year ofstudy [6]. In engineering, women and
Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Community College Student Experiences with Interdisciplinary Computing Modules in Introductory Biology and Statistics CoursesAbstractInterdisciplinary professionals with both domain and computing skills are in high demand in ourincreasingly digital workplace. Universities have begun offering interdisciplinary computingdegrees to meet this demand, but many community college students are not provided learningexperiences that foster their self-efficacy in pursuing them. The Applied ProgrammingExperiences (APEX) program aims to address this issue by embedding computing modules intointroductory biology and statistics courses at community colleges. Here, we describe an
, UPRM is onlybeginning to incorporate JEDI into Strategic Planning. This project will accelerate those efforts.We intend to work with administrators to develop a climate survey and to improve the counting ofnon-binary students.3. MindsetsBefore discussing the program design, we deliberate a set of mindsets essential to develop instudents. This is a precursor to developing a competency-based profile that is under development.Student Self-efficacyAside from the theme of Sustainability, students in the new programs must be prepared to be self-motivated and willing to take a high level of responsibility for their learning. We plan to use thePittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitudes Survey (PFEAS) to assess student self-efficacy uponentry and use
have completed thefirst two cohorts. Cohort 3 is actively participating in yeartwo, and Cohort 4 is in year one. Each subsequent cohortbuilds on the lessons learned from the prior, refining the 15program's impact. 15This map demonstrates the distribution of the participantsI’ve just mentioned 16 Evaluation • Iterative improvements between sessions based on participant feedback • Duke Social Science Research Institute • Increased knowledge and awareness of the impact of systemic inequities on computing environments • Increased self-efficacy to identify factors
significant improvements in students’ interest,self-efficacy, stereotypes, and utility perceptions of engineering after participating in anengineering workshop [10]. Similarly, design experiences in secondary school education havebeen shown to develop students’ practical and professional skills. The activities influenced theirself-efficacy beliefs and shaped their future career interests [6].One of the key outcomes of pre-college engineering education is the positive impact onpromoting equity. For example, a one-day workshop for high school girls improved attitudestoward STEM fields, boosted their confidence in engineering, and enhanced their knowledge ofcareer opportunities [11]. Likewise, a one-year Engineering Projects in Community Serviceprogram
. Authoritarian parents prioritize adherence to"rigid rules" and high expectations over open dialog. Permissive parents indulge child autonomyover behavioral regulation, while uninvolved parents provide general neglect and disengagement.Several research studies have examined the relationship between parenting styles and career-decision making and career self-efficacy (Guay et al., 2003; Sovet & Metz, 2014). In another line of research, Kincaid et al. (2012) mentioned that “Bronfenbrenner (1961,1979) was among the first to suggest that parenting behaviors, including parental affection andtenable authority, may have differential effects on boys and girls'' (p. 5). Given the importance ofparents’ role and parenting styles on career decision making