a public middle school ina Midwestern city. The students in this class are enrolled in 7th and 8th grade. It requires anunderstanding of the students’ preference and responses on various learning topics to bridge thegap between the college and K-12 classroom. A graduate student with an interdisciplinarytraineeship on global sustainability served as the primary instructor for the course, with the supportof the host teacher. The schedule for the visiting instructor is: (1) in week 1-2, the instructorobserves the class and accepts training on K-12 education; (2) during week 3-6, the instructorassists the host teacher during the course and develop a lesson plan; (3) in week 7-9, the instructorteaches the designed module and collects reflections
evaluation findings, unexpected challenges,and planned modifications to continue to improve the program. I will share a bitabout our model and impact to date, including how that model has evolvedover time to best serve our community. Throughout this discussion, we’llengage in a few of the community-building activities we utilize within LATTICE. 3This program developed through two earlier iterations:WEBS: women in biological sciences, with an emphasis on ecology and evolutionarybiology. Five cohorts, 2007-2013BRAINS: for individuals belonging to racial/ethnic groups underrepresented withinNeuroscience and/or individuals with disabilities. Running biennially
computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and
Paper ID #24879The Effectiveness of Engineering Camps as Pre-College Recruitment ToolsMalle Schilling, University of Dayton Malle Schilling is planning to pursue a PhD in Engineering Education. As an undergraduate mechanical engineering student at the University of Dayton, she explored the effects of engineering camps on par- ticipants’ self-efficacy in engineering and other issues of diversity and inclusion in engineering. She is interested in engineering education, diversity in engineering, outreach and policy.Dr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff
Poshtan, Cal Poly Dr. Majid Poshtan obtained his PhD in EECE from Tulane University, New Orleans, USA in 2000. Dr. Poshtan has over 20 years of wide-ranging experience in EE academic and industry. He is an expert in electric power systems, transmission planning, short circuits studies and protection, condition monitoring of generators, induction motors, transformers and power cables, substation design, power system com- puter simulators, and Real Time simulator. Dr. Poshtan is currently an associate professor at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, CA, USA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of Versatile Buck Converter Module for
five female undergraduate students who have hadengineering internship experiences and are currently enrolled at a Large Public Southwestern R1Institution. The research project described in this work-in-progress paper details the plans toaccomplish the following research objective: to document and describe the industry experiencesof female engineering undergraduate students in relation to their learning experiences back in theclassroom. The narrative stories, which have not yet been constructed until the IRB is approvedfor data collection, are guided thematically by examining the female students’ perspectivesbefore, during, and after their internship experience. This paper serves to explore how thediffering experiences of classwork and
teams that exist inworkplaces within the United States and abroad. As such, the purpose of this paper is to describethe process of creating and subsequent plans for implementation of an interdisciplinary capstonecourse at a large research-intensive institution in the Southeast US. The challenges associatedwith developing a course that meets the need of each disciplinary capstone experience and spansthe boundary of different approaches to pedagogy, knowledge structure and learning will beexplored as well.Background and ObjectivesOne of the most common complaints among recruiters of engineering graduates is a failure ofuniversities to properly prepare their students to collaborate within a diverse workplaceenvironment [1], [2]. Students typically
sought to identify what features if any were consistent throughout all thedocuments. The features identified in the summaries from the semesters of the interventionwere used to review the summaries from the previous year(s). Once the structural features ofthe summaries were identified, one of the second authors read the summaries looking for thesame structural elements to confirm the structural patterns. Then the board comments/scores were also collected for the semesters used to identifyany patterns of improvement. This strategy did not work out as planned due to a few anomaliesinvolved in the semesters included in the study. There was no clear evidence of improvementbetween the semesters studied. As a result, word counts of the
implemented the twodifferent forms of labs and who are helping us in modifying the lab experiments as part of theirinternship experience. Having the student feedback during the lab handout design is helpful.As a generalizable insight into the paper, the goal was to integrate new tools to an introductorycourse that teaches basic concepts. Giving students hands-on experience on structuring thesame design using basic building blocks and applying more advanced tools that they will see inindustry was the main objective. Having the two options run in parallel in lab experimentsshould help them visualize the analogy in the two methods for a more profound understandingand easier prospect implementation.Our future plan is to design an online version for the
islands and jungle-clad limestone pillars. WeVietnam. A plan was drawn in advance to delve into spent a couple of hours exploring an ancient lime- 3Fig. 3. Ho Chi Minh Mausoleum. Fig. 6. Halong Bay. Fig. 4. Temple of Literature. Fig. 7. Limestone Cave. stone cave (Fig. 7) and a floating bamboo village. Hòa Bình hydropower A 2-hour bus ride west of Hanoi brought us to the mountains on the Black River. The massive
force students to thinkcarefully about their words and effectively improve their learning within the course. This ismotivated by the idea that if students have less to write, they will have more time to think abouttheir writing, as well as to reflect and revise, which is a critical component of improvingcomposition as well as developing self-criticism skills7. Since most engineering students plan towork in industry, real-world context is useful for giving them an idea of the types of writing theymay encounter in their future career.ImplementationTo satisfy the proposed objectives, five unique assignments were designed for the course whichinvolves the completion of five multi-week laboratory projects. By considering differentassignments for each
this will alter theaerodynamics for the projectile. The last object to improve the wing actuation system is the slidermechanism. The original plan was to use the EOS laser sintering 3-D printer to manufacture the 54steel bar. However, due to the limitations of the machinery we decided to 3-D print the bar usingplastic. The testing of the projectile was one part of the project that we didn’t get to because ofthe limitations on the project. A wind tunnel test for the projectile would be needed in the futureto ensure the calculations and simulations are correct. Another part of the testing would have beenon the actual launching of the projectile. This also was not possible for our group
Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25044 Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assis- tant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design-Based Research methodologies to investigate design learning and social engineering, in which he studies urban planners who design real-world interventions for commu- nities and students who use design to learn. A member of the Grand Portage Band of
peer mentors are rising sophomores, juniors, andseniors, most of whom have previously participated in a similar summer bridge program and whoshare common academic interests and life experiences with PTG participants.Peer mentoring activities include the completion of weekly one-on-one and small group meetingsof mentors and their assigned participants. Mentors follow weekly discussion guidelines toencourage participants’ learning and reflection; topics include syllabus review, study planning,goal setting, time management, and networking on campus, among other topics.In addition to formal peer mentoring activities, the bridge program environment provides frequentopportunities for participants to create informal connections with one another and
talks, and completing a mentor profile assignment. While the SciComm program expanded graduate students’ understanding of variousSTEM careers, only three graduate students (21.4%) indicated their career intentions shifted as aresult of the SciComm program. Most graduate students still maintained their intended careerintentions (n=8, 57.1%). Two graduate students’ (14.3%) career plans changed over the 2017-2018 academic year, but indicated the SciComm program did not impact this change.SciComm Program Perceptions Based on inductive coding of the qualitative data, it appeared that participants had bothpositive perceptions of the program and suggestions for improvement. Further, participants citedadditional benefits from the program
.[16] M. Krishnamurthy, D.A. Pezza, K.J. Fridley, D.B. Hains, “The Practitioners’ Point of View of the ASCE Body of Knowledge.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Salt Lake City UT, June 23-26, 2018. https://peer.asee.org/31120.[17] S.J. Ressler and D.R. Lynch. “The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge and Accreditation Criteria: A Plan for Long-term Management of Change.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Vancouver BC, June 26-29, 2011. https://peer.asee.org/18392.[18] ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. 2019. ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD: 2019
FAA,and major aerospace companies (eg, Lockheed-Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing and itssubsidiaries). Likewise, this history and UAF’s support of student-led design programs has alsodrawn interest from the aerospace industry for future collaboration. Companies see these activitiesas being particularly relevant on resumes.Future Efforts.With the great success in the courses and design team activities to date, UAF is next planning onextending these opportunities to other venues.UAS Operations. UAF intends to extend its existing UAS investigation and UAS design coursesto include a course where these assets are utilized to accomplish a realistic arctic research or publicservice mission. Students will examine the operational and data requirements
purpose, follow certain rules, andinteract with each other and with their surrounding environment.” A more general “handbook”defining the discipline and practice of “systems engineering”, available from the InternationalCouncil on Systems Engineering8, has been used to train engineers in a variety of topics,including: 1) technical processes (i.e., business mission, stakeholder needs, system requirements,design definition operation, maintenance, and disposal); 2) technical management processes (i.e.,project planning, risk management, and quality assurance); 3) agreement processes (i.e.,acquisition and supply); and 4) organizational project-enabling processes (i.e., life cyclemanagement, human resource management, and knowledge management). These
several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Martin A. Watkins, University of New Mexico Martin A. Watkins is a PhD student in Educational Linguistics at the University of New Mexico. He earned his BA degrees in Deaf Studies (ASL/English Interpretation) and Linguistics from California State University, Northridge, and his MA degree in Linguistics from Gallaudet University. His research em- ploys critical ethnography and discourse analysis to investigate language ideologies and language plan
incorporateelements of this learning into our own courses so they hear about the value of this from civil andenvironmental engineers. We have several plans for improving our learning in these areas andare confident our efforts will be fruitful. We think the valuing of the humanities and socialsciences is broader than just a civil engineering or even an engineering focus. We are educatingfuture leaders and feel their effectiveness in society extends beyond framing things within anengineering or civil engineering context. In fact, we are concerned this may be to their detrimentand are still discussing our priorities in these areas.Alabama. We struggle with addressing the relationship of humanities to the practice ofengineering. We do this fairly effectively in
and areas for improvement. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop SeminarsI Learning to Teach: Justifies importance of formally learning to teach and introduces a model instructional strategy that will be a road map for the ETW.II Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning: Introduces Lowman’s3 two-dimensional model of teaching and provides a compendium of learning principles.III Introduction to Learning Styles: Examines Felder’s Learning Style Dimensions4 and discusses how to accommodate all styles of learners.IV Learning Objectives: Introduces Bloom’s taxonomy5 of educational objectives and shows how to write appropriate and useful learning objectives.V Planning a Class
part of the resilience process. The responsestate also requires well-orchestrated logistic management. Once the event is over, a strategic andwell documented damage assessment is required. This damage assessment will help identify sourcesof new or different nature of vulnerabilities. The magnitude of the damages will help identify if thelevel of damages requires a disaster declaration by the government. Alternative recovery effortsshould be planned ahead of time and be implemented as soon as possible to minimize amplificationof damages. Recovery alternatives must focus on the objectives of reducing the level of risk andimproving the level of target vulnerability with higher resilience. The state of engineering practice,codes and regulations
Chair or Chairperson To man (verb) to staff, to run, to operate Man-hours Work hours, hours worked, staff hours, person hours, hours Mankind Humanity, human race, human beings, people Manmade Artificial, synthetic, manufactured, crafted, machine made Manpower Work force, labor force, personnel, workers Guys Everyone, people, folks● Plan ahead. Include statements about inclusion and diverse learning needs in your syllabus.● Embrace diversity in content and practices ○ Assume students are diverse in ways you can’t see. Race, national origin, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, physical and
the courses includes: test plan creation, test case generation, program inspections,black-box testing, white-box testing, GUI testing, and the use of testing tools. The prerequisite forCEN4072 is the data structures course. The grading policy for the course is based on 2 midtermexams (25 % each), a group project (25%), attendance and class participation (5%) and a finalexam (20%). The course is structured as a lecture section with no lab component, and students areexpected to work on the project outside of class on their own time, with some in class question ses-sions. The textbook currently used in the course is “Foundations of Software Testing”’ by Mathur[21]. Other reading material includes class notes and tutorials on testing tools.The
needs to“plan and carry out fair tests,” which involves identifying failure points and difficulties, thenidentifying and gathering relevant data [9]. Designers are intentional and can explain the designrationale with each suggested iteration. Experienced designers run quick, valid tests, conductfocused diagnostic troubleshooting, and actively look for potential faults. These help them moveefficiently through progressively better ideas and prototypes. This stands in contrast to naivedesigners who tend to run random and confounded experiments, brush aside unanticipatedresults, and often remain intent on original ideas [8], [10]. Though novice engineers may beengaging in iteration, they may not be able to explain their choices and their practices
inductive loads is also used to highlight theissues of having an unbalanced power system. The student experience is based uponmeasurement and data acquisition to develop visual frameworks coupled with traditionalwhiteboard discussions.This paper contains a description of the course, its learning outcomes, lecture plans, assignments,laboratory experiments, and exam content. Student assessments, evaluations, and opinions arealso included to show the benefits of how the class improved student understanding of powerquality. A rubric was designed and employed which provides prognostics and analytics about theperceived value of the course. Lastly, a conclusion of the course from the instructor’s point ofview, including lessons learned and future
, scaling-up from a pilot processto a full-sized product plant is not a linear scaling as many processes, transformations, flow,chemical reactions and heat transfer are not together linearly scalable. That is: scale-up is(usually) possible but requires careful planning and “watching the dials and turning the knobs”on the first series of runs. Our first class sequence is a bench design, our second class sequenceis a small pilot and third year will be a full pilot plant with subsequent years scaling to fullproduction. Even then, we will have start-up issues and fine tuning to deal with as we continueto iteratively improve – watching the dials and turning the knobs as necessary.By using the “pilot approach,” and managing the specific changes made to
].Other research efforts show that students also have a lack of confidence, interest and sense ofbelonging [4, 9, 10] in engineering programs. There is evidence that they still struggle withcareer decisions into their fourth year [5]. To have a positive impact on student motivation andproblem-solving skills, these concerns must also be addressed. The sense of belonging, thefeeling of being technically competent and socially comfortable, the ability of students to asktheir own questions, plan their research, analyze their own findings and communicate their ownknowledge enable a more effective and lasting learning [5, 11].This is why active learning methods can increase student retention rates and engagement inengineering programs [12-14]. In these
in courses; this paper will report on progress to dateand lay out plans for future work.IntroductionTechnological and engineering literacy (TEL) has been recognized as a critical need [1-3], andmuch work has gone into efforts to define and teach these subjects [4-9]. While much of thiseffort at colleges and universities has been focused on non-majors, people graduating fromengineering and engineering technology degree programs cannot just be assumed to have thisliteracy. TEL needs to be incorporated in the engineering curriculum as well [10-14].Classes for majors focus on specific subjects in engineering and technology. The material mustbe covered, and students are to be evaluated based on their ability to demonstrate the use of thespecified
draft is my finished product 0.766 (NR_2) I do not normally expect to make significant changes to my text by revising it 0.674 (NR_5) Revision is usually a one-time process at the end 0.653 Factor 4: Intuitive (I_1) I can hear myself while writing 0.517 (I_3) I visualize what I am writing about 0.549 (I_10) I put a lot of myself in my academic writing 0.560 Factor 5: Scientist (SC_1) When faced with an academic paper, I develop a plan and stick to