Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using Ideation, Disruption and Aha (IDA) Pedagogy in Introduction to Flight Sidaard Gunasekaran1 University of Dayton Abstract A fundamental essence of Aerospace Engineering is creativity. However, most aerospacecourses offered in academia does not teach creativity which as history suggests, is integral totechnological breakthrough. At the University of Dayton, the Ideation, Disruption and Aha (IDA)pedagogy developed by the Institute of Applied Creativity and Transformation (IACT) wassuccessfully implemented in the sophomore level Introduction to Flight
received all of his degrees from Purdue University, including his PhD in Engineering Education, Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. Justin is the Program Chair-Elect of the American Society for Engineering Education’s Liberal Education/Engineering & Soci- ety Division and the vice chair of the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committee on Sustainability subcommittee on Formal Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 What Do Students Learn About Innovation?IntroductionInnovation is a complex construct. It spans a variety of processes and tasks [1,2], project andproduct outcomes [3,4], personal
Introduction to Engineering, Introduction to Materials and Manufacturing, and Structural and Chemical Characterization of Materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ Perceptions of Team SupportsAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we report on a variety of interventions we provide in anattempt to support first-year student teams in a project-based learning course. At the end of thesemester, we surveyed students to ask their perception of the usefulness of each of theintervention strategies. While a majority of students rated each of the strategies as useful, the twostrategies rated highest were peer mentoring and progress meetings with the
, special education and engineering education.Ms. Yuxin Xu, University of Washington Yuxin (Ziva) Xu is a second-year undergraduate student at University of Washington, Seattle. Her research areas of interest include reflection in engineering education, equity in engineering, and human-computer interaction. Address: 746 1035 NE Campus Pkwy, Seattle, WA 98105 Phone: 206-209-6202 Email: yxxuziva@uw.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ engagements with reflection: Insights from undergraduatesIntroductionIn this research paper, we situate our work in an understanding of reflection as a form of thinkingthat involves stepping out, thinking about, and connecting forward [1
Technology Education in a So- cietal and Student Oriented Context, www.cetuss.se) and the IEEE Education Society Nordic Chapter. He as a reviewer for a number of major journals and conferences, including the Computer Science Education Journal (Taylor and Francis), the ACM SIGCSE and ITiCSE and Koli Calling International Computer Science Education conferences.Dr. Niall Seery, Athlone Institute of Technology Dr. Niall Seery is also the Director of the Technology Education Research Group (TERG) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Theorising the Role of Engineering Education for Society: Technological Activity in Context?AbstractThis paper establishes a
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Introducing EngOTG: A Framework for an Audio Study Material App for Engineering StudentsABSTRACTAuditory learning tools, such as recorded study materials, are very commonly used in manydisciplines and have proven to be effective for second-language learners, learning-disabledstudents, and struggling readers. However, such tools have been seldom used in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, mostly because of the technicalnature of the subjects. The objective of this study is to investigate the features of audio studymaterials that could improve student learning and
on which to draw to help mentor the engineering leaders of the future. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Making Connections Across a Four-Year Project-Based Curriculum: ePortfolios as a Space for Reflection and Integrative LearningAbstractThe systematic use of reflection and integrative learning across experiences in thecurriculum and co-curriculum has often been neglected in engineering education,yet these processes are essential for deep and transferable learning. This paperreports on the use of ePortfolios to provide a mechanism for reflection andintegrative learning in a four-year, project-based curriculum. Student use ofePortfolios was introduced in the
professional member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Jinan Ziade, Westcliff University Jinan Ziade, PhD, holds a doctorate of management in Organizational Leadership and information sys- tems technologies from the University of Phoenix (UOPX), also a graduate Executive Transformation Certificate in Strategic Diversity and Inclusion Management from Georgetown University. Dr. Ziade is an Assistant Professor and a member of the Diversity and Inclusion committee at Westcliff University, teach- ing managing global diversity, corporate social responsibility and organizational behavior. Additionally, Dr. Ziade is a postdoc research fellow and a member of the Center of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
arid soils, piled foundations, pavement design & materials, and concrete durability. His interests also include: contemporary issues of engineering education in general, and those of the Middle East and the Arab Gulf States in particular. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 On the Contribution of Adjunct Engineering Faculty to Learning Programs: Enhancing the Practice and Providing Guidance to Solving Real ProblemsAbstract: The paper (an Evidence-based Practice paper) examines the status quo of adjunctfaculty in engineering institutions and argues for the positive contributions adjuncts, withpractical experience, could make by bringing their experience into the classroom. Also, in
Aerospace Engineering.Dr. Bora Cetin, Michigan State University Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDr. Andrea E Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Andrea Surovek is a research scientist and faculty development coordinator at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She is the recipient of the ASEE CE Division Seeley Fellowship and the Mechanics Division Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Qualitative Analysis of How a Student, Faculty, and Practicing Engineer Approach an Ill-Structured Engineering ProblemAbstract Solving open-ended
organizations supporting education institutions. 14References1. East Carolina University, College of Engineering and Technology, Department of Technology Systems,Information and Computer Technology, https://cet.ecu.edu/techsystems/undergraduate-programs/information-computer-technology/2. East Carolina University, College of Engineering and Technology, Computer Science Department,https://cet.ecu.edu/csci/3. P. Lunsford, J. Pickard, J. James, J. Linn, "Strengthening the Pipeline from Highschool to CommunityCollege to University in Rural Underserved Communities Through a Collaborative VideconferencingInfrastructure", Submitted to 2020 ASEE Annual
26, 2018].[5] A. C. King and C. H. Hidrovo, “Development and evaluation of a mass conservation laboratory module in a microfluidics environment,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 4, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://advances.asee.org/2015/09/ [Accessed Jan. 26, 2018].[6] M. G. Mauk, R. Chiou, and M. E. Carr, “Point-of-care medical tests devices and their value as educational projects for engineering students,” in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[7] M. J. Rust, A. W. Browne, “Engaging undergraduate biomedical engineering students in lab on a chip research through a course-based project,” in Proceedings of the 120th ASEE
and Outcomes for Connectivity Series Evaluation Plan Objective Short-Term Intermediate Long-Term Evaluation Outcomes Outcomes Outcomes Data Source (s) / Each AY AY 2017 AY 2019 Cycle Strengthen Continual Assess Inform NSF Connectivity faculty core review of Connectivity ADVANCE Series competenci Series Series impact on national Evaluations es and build satisfaction participating community with (individual faculty
EEDP Program, where he mentored interns, co-ops and Edison associates from the Middle East and Africa regions by developing and teaching a technical training cur- riculum, providing guidance for graduate school applications, and providing career consultation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Capturing the Experiences of ESL Graduate Students in Engineering Education AbstractDoctoral education can be a challenging and overwhelming journey for many graduate students.Engineering Education as an interdisciplinary and emerging field welcomes diverse students interms of race and ethnicity, gender, nationality, sexual orientations, abilities, and
Case Study on Course-Based Outcomes Assessment toEnhance Student Learning and Course Delivery in the Engineering Sciences Core Curriculum”,Paper No. IMECE 2009-12946, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition, November 13 – 19, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 2009.[2] A. Ghosh and E.C. Hensel, “An interpretive assessment of engineering science core courses”,Paper No. IMECE-12939, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition, November 13 – 19, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 2009.[3] ABET Self Study Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute ofTechnology, June 2010.[4] A. Ghosh, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019 (in preparation)[5] W. T. Thomson, and M. D Dahleh
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Cornerstone Design for Sociotechnical “Grand Challenges”IntroductionThis Evidence-based Practice paper describes the development and evolution of aninterdisciplinary First Year Seminar providing a cornerstone design experience addressingthe Grand Challenges. The sociotechnical nature of the Challenges is emphasized, makingclear the need to develop sociotechnical skills and practice, and a sense of sociotechnicaljustice. The authors are an engineer (with expertise in biomedical engineering and design)and a political scientist (with expertise in the politics and gender of development in theGlobal South) who sought to collaborate in the development and teaching of the course.Building
Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. Dr Jensen has authored over 120 refereed papers and has been awarded over $4.5 million of research grants. He is a Fellow at the Singapore Univ. of Technology and Design’s International Design Center. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creativity exercises to enhance innovation in undergraduate
Linguistics in 2005. April worked at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in residence life for two years and as an Instructor for two years. She also worked at Texas A&M University in College Station, TX for 7 years as a student affairs professional in residence life. Currently, April is a program coordinator for the THRIVE Technical Assistance Program with College & Community Fellowship. Her position includes research and training for agencies looking to strengthen their service delivery to citizens with criminal justice involvement as well as increasing agencies knowl- edge regarding an underutilized labor force. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Systematized Review: Gender and Race in Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms AbstractTeamwork is an essential skill for undergraduate engineering students, and
University.Dr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and her PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural history of engineering, and the aerodynamics of sports projectiles. She writes the essay series ”An engineer reads a novel” for Public Books. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Integrative Education in Engineering and
Evaluation.Dr. Amanda Portis Malefyt, Trine University Amanda Malefyt is currently Chair and Associate professor in the McKetta Department of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering at Trine University. She received her bachelor’s degree from Trine (formerly Tri- State) University and Ph.D. from Michigan State University. Her research interests include engineering education and nucleic acid therapeutics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing the reliability of a chemical engineering problem- solving rubric when using multiple ratersAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper discusses the preliminary validation of a project modifiedversion of the Promoting
, particularly in higher education; learning in the workplace; curricular and pedagogical development; and the preparation of professionals for social justice goals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Practitioner Learning Community: Design of instructional content, pedagogy and assessment metrics for productive, inclusive and socially just teaming practice AbstractThis paper describes the development of and outcomes from a Practitioner Learning Community(PLC) model used to design instructional content, pedagogy, and assessment metrics forinclusive, socially just teaming practices. Comprised of postdoctoral
University, Los Angeles. She earned her BS in Electrical Engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China, and her MS in Electrical Engineering, MS in Aerospace Engineering, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University of Central Florida. She previously served as a lecturer at University of Central Florida. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Iterative Improvement in Flipped Classroom Teaching of Lower Division Engineering CoursesAbstract: Lower division engineering courses are important yet hard to teach as many studentsfind these highly abstracted material hard to comprehend. Recent studies have suggested thatflipped classroom teaching
University. She teaches the Cornerstone of Engineering courses to first- year students as well as courses within the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. She is a recent recipient of the Outstanding Teacher of First-Year Students Award and is interested in research that compliments and informs her teaching. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preparing First Year Engineering Students for a Career where Communication Skills MatterAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper describes the techniques used in the project basedfirst-year Cornerstone of Engineering courses at Northeastern University to address the need forbuilding communication
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Course in Differential Equations, Modeling and Simulation for Engineering StudentsIntroductionA course in differential equations generally is taken at a critical point in engineeringcurricula – where a turn is made away from basic math and science courses towardscourses in which basic skills and knowledge are synthesized and applied. This raises thequestion of whether the course should be a mathematics course, an engineering course, ora hybrid. It has been argued [1], with supporting results, that the teaching of differentialequations through the modeling of physical and chemical phenomena is effective becauseit allows students to overcome the cognitive
University. He has published over 50 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investi- gator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State University, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D. Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan Uni- versity of Technology in 1991, and B.Sc. in Metallurgical Engineering from Tehran University in 1988. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, and ATMAE.Dr. M. Affan Badar, Indiana State University M
between Academia and Industry in Approaches for Solving Ill-Structured Problems: Problem Formulation and Protocol Development. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[26] Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21.[27] American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering; advancing the state of the art of engineering ethics instruction; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Justin received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is the 2020 program chair for the ASEE LEES division.Dr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is an assistant research professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Fostering Entrepreneurship in Project-Based Software Engineering CoursesIntroduction.The 2013 ASEE report on Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education identifiedentrepreneurship and intrapreneurship as in-demand skills that require additional attention inengineering curricula for “expanding on business and economics acumen and enabling studentsto learn more than economic capitalization, but also the process of starting a business from anidea” [1]. Meanwhile, the technology sector is growing, led largely by software companies likeApple, Microsoft, Alphabet (parent of Google), and Facebook. Accordingly, many of the leadingsoftware companies emerged from a “tech startup” culture and
homework quizzes asan alternative to grading homework. Even if the student-learning results are not as dramatic as inthis study, in-class homework quizzes do greatly reduce the issue of knowing whose work isactually being assessed and used as part of a course grade as it is much more difficult forstudents to submit the work of others as their own on such a quiz.References[1] “Flipped Classroom?” https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/flipped-classroom Last queried:December 2019.[2] M.H. Holdhusen, (2015), A “Flipped” Statics Classroom Paper presented at 2015 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23356[3] R.T. LaConte (1981). Homework as a learning experience: What research says to theteacher. National Education