are required to develop an electronic portfolio that includessamples of their most important learning experiences, which may be projects, term papers,extracurricular experiences, and internship reports. The electronic portfolio is reviewed andassessed by faculty members on a regular basis to monitor student progress. During their finalsemester, students finalize their electronic portfolio and present their achievements to a facultypanel. The electronic portfolios allow students to document and reflect on their learningexperiences. Integrating learning outcomes into the curriculum provides a mean for faculty toassess the effectiveness of the academic programs.1. IntroductionUniversities in the USA and worldwide are taking a critical look at
beginning learner is at the periphery of the knowledge base, and theresearcher/expert is at the center, delving ever deeper into the veins of knowledge. In mostengineering curricula, synthesis is left to the "senior capstone design course". Various "freshmenexperiences" try to provide perspective and enable synthesis, but cross-disciplinary thinkingoften stalls there. A primary obstacle is that undergraduates are the only people who are expectedto integrate knowledge and have perspective; professors and graduate students are "specialists".ADL inverts this model, as seen in Figure 2. A design-centered introduction (DCI)7, is the centralgateway, set at the freshman level. Immersed in the design process unique to the school, thelearner visits each of
. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/story-driven-learning-in-biomedical-engineering-quantifying-empathy-in-the- context-of-prompts-and-perceptions[14] K. L. Morgan, C. L. Bell-Huff, J. Shaffer, and J. M. LeDoux, “Story-Driven Learning: A Pedagogical Approach for Promoting Students’ Self-Awareness and Empathy for Others,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Oct. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/story-driven-learning-a-pedagogical-approach-for- promoting-students-self-awareness-and-empathy-for-others[15] G. Guanes, L. Wang, D. A. Delaine, and E. Dringenberg, “Empathic approaches in engineering capstone design projects: student
Page 20.12.3including biomedical electronics, biomechanics and biomaterials, BME capstone projects, design,and BME elective courses as well as courses in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,Mechanical Engineering, Math and Physical and Life Sciences. These are often complimented byan array of courses in Humanities and Social Sciences.Students may be offered a choice of tracks, depending on the emphasis to be placed in the BMEprogram. These tracks include biomechanics, bioelectronics, biomaterials, etc. The selectedspecialization will determine which courses are appropriate for students to gain relevant expertise.In order to ensure a well-rounded training, related programs have generally begun to increase thelaboratory, design, and
industry can provide substantial direct experience in the types of work that mightbe assigned. A prominent example would be serving on selection committees, where theindustry experienced faculty member has likely screened, interviewed, and hired morecandidates than most departments might work with in a decade or longer. Additionally, it isimportant that industry experience candidates look for ways to leverage service into the otheraspects of their appointment. For example serving on an internal research grant or NSF selectionreview panel can provide insight into how decisions are made to fund proposals, while servingon a group to solicit industry capstone projects can potentially lead to research activities andfuture publications.26 Finally
Paper ID #6759Negotiating Masculine Spaces: Attitudes and Strategies of First-Year Womenin EngineeringDr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion and teamwork in engineering, design education, and engineering identity. She was awarded a CA- REER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI on NSF . Her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
Engineering Education Midwest Section Conference to more advanced courses, i.e., machine design, structural design, etc., projects become lengthier, open-ended and difficult, leading to the capstone design experience. The implementation of this approach carries with it the following significant challenges:1. Symbolic Equations. The difficulty in requiring a symbolic approach with sophomore and junior engineering students is motivating them to write a complete set of governing equations in symbolic form before substituting numerical values. They just are not familiar with formulating problems this way. Their training in high school and college has primarily involved sequential solutions of the applicable formulas. The good news is that
AC 2007-1342: BUILDING AS A POWER PLANT: MODELING AND SELECTIONOF A COMBINED HEAT AND POWER SYSTEM FOR AN ADVANCEDCOMMERCIAL BUILDINGBrendan Egan, Milwaukee School of EngineeringStephen Dechant, Milwaukee School of EngineeringChristopher Damm, Milwaukee School of Engineering Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Page 12.330.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Building as a Power Plant: Modeling and Selection of a Combined Heat and Power System for an Advanced Commercial BuildingAbstractIn this Mechanical Engineering senior project, combined heat and power (CHP) systems wereevaluated based on their effectiveness in supplying the
research includes in-depth case studies of three programs that seek to educateengineers as liberal learners: the engineering program at Harvey Mudd College (“HMC” Page 24.1374.2hereafter), a liberal arts college for engineers, scientists, and mathematicians; the PickerEngineering Program (“Picker” hereafter) at Smith College, the only ABET accreditedengineering program in a women’s liberal arts college; and the program of Design, Innovation,and Society (“DIS” hereafter) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, a program that blendsengineering, arts, and critical social studies in design learning.Data for the dissertation research project was collected
regards to the Tampa Bay Interstate Express project andelements of equitable transportation. Her narrative provided concrete examples of elements fromthe ASCE Code of Ethics Canon 1 and Canon 8. Students’ written comments provided evidenceof effectiveness and impact. In a senior professional issues course, shorter clips from multiplemembers of the ASEE community panel were shown during class as part of both the ethicsmodule and sustainability module. However, it was unclear that the seniors gained any insightsor abilities from these activities. In an elective/graduate level course focused on site remediation,clips from Sydney Brown discussing Tonawanda Coke and from a community meetingdiscussing a proposed remedy at a Superfund site were
second year of the program, students enroll in STS ‘practicum’ courses that are designedto provide students with service-learning and field experiences focused on communityengagement. The STS program experience concludes with a capstone course where studentssynthesize their STS learning to pursue sustainability projects with global partners. See [1] formore information about key foothold ideas that students are introduced to in this program and theorganizing principles behind this program. The STS program, through its directors, instructors,and other support partners, embodies certain values, goals, practices, and knowledge bases thatlaid the foundation for our study and for the collaborative work we sought to accomplish in ourresearch
is required to tackle the engineering grand challenges that ourworld faces. They must complete a Capstone experience and utilize one or more of the followingopportunities provided by our institution: 1. Engage in undergraduate research experience in an approved team or individual research or design project with a university faculty member, focusing on one of the fourteen NAE grand challenges. 2. Complete an Entrepreneurial Initiative project approved by the instructor and the scholar’s grand challenges mentor, focusing on one of the grand challenges. 3. Complete an approved independent study project focusing on one of the four grand challenges’ themes (sustainability, security, health, and joy of living).As
Page 26.422.3introduce techniques for learning innovation piecemeal over multiple courses. Consequently,teaching the processes of creative problem solving and innovation becomes disjointed amongmultiple courses. Alternately, the content could be integrated into an existing course (e.g.,capstone/senior project). Unfortunately with this approach, the students will all be from thesame institution and potentially all from the same major. A multi-institution, multi-disciplinaryexperience is highly conducive to learning creativity and innovation. More details are availablein reference 9, but in particular, one camp student noted, “Having all of us work as groups fromdifferent schools made it so that we were able to solve the problems given to us
comprehend. This paper provides suggestions regarding the use of graphical design inspiredmethods for communicating these and similar ideas.As suggested in [4] a central theme can be used to "glue together" disparate topics as part of alarger puzzle in an advanced networking course. In a similar vein, as part of the Solution-BasedLearning (SBL) framework proposed by [5], students are encouraged to develop expandingfunctionality diagrams for their advanced capstone projects. Students provide a "back-of-the-napkin" sketch as part of the initial project proposal, depicting the proposed specifications whichconstitute the core and extension phases of their project. The development of theserepresentations require opportunity for practice across multiple
experience in the four sub-disciplines of Structures, Geotechnical, Hydrologyand Hydraulics, and Construction Management. A depth component in Structures is providedthrough required courses in Structural Analysis, Steel Design, and Reinforced Concrete Design.Additionally, there is a mandatory Capstone design course as well as a widely subscribedprogram of Independent Study projects. The three elective offerings are mostly in the area ofstructural or environmental engineering. Thermodynamics and Electrical Engineering provideengineering breadth outside the civil discipline.A key difference from other institutions in that all students have a full scholarship and are fullyexpected to graduate in four years. The summers are filled with military training
Francis (which could arguably be in anothercategory) all courses are taught by other departments. Such major requirements in anotherdepartment allow the EnvE department to increase enrollment in the program without needing tohire additional faculty, an efficiency for smaller PUIs. All programs require some sort of seniordesign capstone course per ABET requirements. Saint Francis does this through a two-coursesequence (ENVE 497 and 498) while Cal Poly Humboldt and UW-Platteville each have a onecourse capstone. Cal Poly Humboldt, however, offers an additional elective design projectcourse for seniors. At another institution this could be called an independent design project basedon the course description in the catalog.Regarding water management
AC 2011-350: GLOBAL COMPETENCE: ITS IMPORTANCE FOR ENGI-NEERS WORKING IN A GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTGregg M. Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the External Relations and Intern Coordinator for the Mechanical Engineering de- partment in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at BYU. He works directly with industry each year to recruit more than 30 funded Capstone projects and provides project management, team development, and coaching support to each of these project teams and faculty coaches. In ad- dition, he continues to focus on increasing international project opportunities for students and faculty. His research and teaching interests include globalization, project management
are grounded in John Dewey’s theory ofLearning by Doing and are defined by learning a concept through experiencing it or working directly withsaid concept [25]. Several projects evaluate the extent to which each experience prepares students. AtOhio State University [21], students who participated in an internship, a real-world project, or capstoneclasses were surveyed on their perceived improvement in various technical and non-technical categoriessuch as integrating multiple technologies, analyzing cost/benefit tradeoffs, leadership skills, teamwork,communication, and personal growth. This survey indicated that compared to capstone classes and real-world projects, internships resulted in the greatest improvement in all categories except for
how others haveapproached empathy in curricula, projects, and practice. We applied Zaki’s model of empathy —which triangulates “sharing,” “thinking about” and “caring about,” as the theoretical frameworkguiding the inquiry — and performed a systematic literature review. We sought answers to thefollowing research questions: 1) How have educators integrated empathy development intolearning activities in STEM?; 2) What pedagogical approaches have been shown to promoteempathy of students in STEM?; and 3) How have scholars approached the development ofdifferent kinds of empathy in classrooms? After querying Google Scholar, analyzing more than10,000 publications, and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, we identified 63 articles thatcentered
autoethnographic, ethnographic, and qualitative interview projects on a wide- range of topics, has taught research methods at the introductory, advanced, and graduate levels, and has trained research assistants in diverse forms of data collection and analysis.Robert L. Nagel © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student competency, autonomy, and relatedness in a practice-oriented engineering program: An application of self-determination theoryAbstractFor engineering students, how might three basic needs—competency, autonomy, andrelatedness—promote intrinsic motivation among students? In this
engineering design projects26. The rubric iscurrently used as the end-of-course assessment for the capstone Engineering Design andDevelopment (EDD) course from Project Lead the Way27. Additional details about the history ofthe original EDPPSR instrument are provided by Goldberg28.The EDPPSR was revised in order to obtain an instrument that is aligned with the AMP-IT-UPhigh school curriculum and is appropriate for describing student achievement at the high schoollevel. Whereas the original EDPPSR included 14 individual scoring elements, the rubric for theEDP log includes eight elements that correspond to the stages of the design process used in thecourse: A) Identify the Problem; B) Understand; C) Ideate; D) Evaluate; E) Prototype and Test; F
the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10
Conferenceengineering school. Others incorporate STS material into traditional engineering courses, e.g., bymaking ethical or societal impact assessments part of a capstone project.”2 While theinterdisciplinary nature of STS makes it difficult to define, the foundational concepts draw onrelated fields such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, history, cultural studies, and feministstudies. Bringing this interdisciplinary approach to educating engineering students allows themto approach their profession in ways that enhance their problem-solving skills and professionalcommunication skills. Given these benefits, the problem engineering programs face is how tointegrate these skills within the curriculum as opposed to outsourcing these course offerings toother
, and L. Benson, “Work in progress: How differences in student motivation characterize differences between engineering disciplines,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2012.[33] D. Shah, E. Kames, C. C. McKenzie, and B. Morkos, “Examining the differences in student motivation for industry projects and non-industry projects in senior capstone design,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[34] L. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, and K. Jarr, “Mentoring Engineering Educators with an Entrepreneurial Mindset – Focused SOTL Professional Development Experience.” ASEE Conferences, Minneapolis, MN.
Engineering, all first-year students follow a commoncurriculum, as part of a “Cornerstone to Capstone” curriculum design adopted in 2015. TheCornerstone course is taken in the students’ first year, and uses projects to emphasize the ways inwhich engineering can develop practical problem-solving applications. The course was carefullydesigned to help first-year students achieve success in the program regardless of the specificengineering major they select in their second year. The program has been continually reevaluatedand redesigned over the past several years, and the addition of the information literacy workshophas been one step in Cornerstone’s evolution. Prior to the workshops, instructors noted limiteduse of citations and academic references in
were, she said that she wanted to be a part of acompany that contributes to society, either as a developer or as a manager. When asked by the developers technical questions, she demonstrated that she could design andwrite simple code (design of a tic-tac-toe game, and how to determine whether some has won in a gameof tic-tac-toe). When asked to write Quicksort, she had trouble at first, but she eventually got it right.Had trouble remembering when it might be more appropriate to use a hash table than a binary searchtree. When asked what courses she took for electives, she said she took the database course, thenetworks course, the digital media course, the entrepreneurial course, and a capstone project where sheimplemented a
with graduate and undergraduate students) and directed large scale projects in engineering education research. He is the founding editor for the Journal of Pre- College Engineering Education, co-editor of the book ”Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices” and ”Technology Education Today: International Perspectives” and co- lead author of Hands-on Standards STEM in Action, an award winning internationally available set of learning modules for grades preK - 5th grade published by ETA hand2mind and LearningResourcesUK.Prof. Suzanne – Burgoyne, University of Missouri Suzanne Burgoyne, Ph.D., is a Curators’ Distinguished Teaching Professor of Theatre, and Director of MU’s Center
program.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and
undergraduate capstone projects) and the project or thesis research required for a graduate SE degree.6) Graduate study in SE should focus on preparing candidates for service as engineering interdisciplinarians, who think always about “the end before the beginning”.7)) The overarching goal should be to promulgate systems thinking focused on the human - made world; that is, the world emerging from system design by humans.10Entirely too much engineering time and talent is being expended addressing operationaldeficiencies plaguing the human-made world. Operational problem mitigation will always beneeded, but the dramatic payoff for humankind lies in operational problem avoidance throughsystem thinking, as recommended for addressing pervasive
textstandards documents. Faculty may also need standards to respond to grant applications, completeresearch projects, or design course materials. The accreditation body for U.S. engineeringcolleges’ undergraduate degrees requires a capstone design course that incorporates use ofconstraints, such as standards, in the design process [3]. While the engineering college is themost likely to need standards documents due to the nature of their design and research projects,standards exist for a wide variety of topics, including documentation (e.g. ISO 21127), education(e.g. CAS standards), and engineering (e.g. ASME B18.2.8). Additional institutional users ofstandards include those who design, build, maintain, and operate the physical plant (facilities