-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (s) -5 x 10 Fig. 6. MATLAB simulation of a square pulse (Amplitude=2V, Pulse width= 0.1 µs). 2.5 2 Voltage (V) 1.5 1 0.5 0 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (s) -5
that are generalizable to a largerpopulation 9. Qualitative researchers collect textual data through interviews, observations,documents, or other methods in an effort to understand the lived experiences of individuals orgroups 9. A mixed methods approach combines qualitative and quantitative approaches in aspecific way which best answers the desired research question(s) 9,11. My research follows thequalitative research tradition to explore the development of students as cross-disciplinary teammembers.Qualitative educational research often seeks to gain insight into the lived experiences of anindividual or group of people through direct interaction between the participant and theresearcher. This connection between the qualitative researcher and
aerospaceGraphic organizers are described in [56] by Felder and Brent who provide an example on page viof [56]. Graphic organizers “preview material to be covered in class and/or summarize what wascovered and put it in a broader context.”56In the case of this two-course sequence, the VLSI Graphic Organizer gave students the bigpicture of the circuit design process in the context of authentic industrial and aerospaceproblems. The use of a graphic organizer is expected to be helpful because approximately 80%of engineering students are visual learners [27, Table 1].2) Learning objectivesFor each homework assignment, laboratory exercise, and exam, students are provided with atable mapping each problem to the appropriate course learning objective(s). This
directly linked to student persistence. The factors outlined in thisframework will be central to understanding student success at HBCUs and enable the connectionof the present study’s findings to existing literature.MethodsThe researchers implemented an iterative, descriptive research model by including the followingaction items: (a) engaging research participants; (b) developing data collection strategies; (c)defining variables and constructs; and (d) gathering information and investigating researchquestion(s). This paper focuses on the data collected currently from one institution. The presentresearch study findings are informed by quantitative data. Data from additional HBCUs will becollected and analyzed subsequently.ParticipantsParticipants
-based traditional classroom saw approach over several semesters would provide additionalaround 40% of at least one non-attempted CT. It is seen that results to support the effectiveness of this approach.First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 - 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-6 Session W1A REFERENCES [17] Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, Chen, N-S., “Is FLIP enough? Or
engineering education, 3(2), 2-16. 2. Hadim, H. A., & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. Frontiers in Education, IEEE. 3. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Advances in strategic management, 8(3), 345- 382. 4. Larochelle, P. (2005). Unifying assessment of freshman design teams with team project management. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. 5. Bannerot, R. (2005). Characteristics of good team players. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
summers. This paper clearly demonstrates that the program can more thandouble the engineering graduation rate for the student population with 17-25 ACT Math scoresand the majority graduate in four years. To date, 100% of the 232 students in the bridge programare African Americans (not required).BackgroundA detailed analysis of the cause(s) for low (15%) Engineering graduation rates clearly revealedthe problem was challenges with mathematics. The majority of first time freshman engineeringmajors were struggling with mathematics and changing majors, largely due to poor preparation.Most did not meet the College Readiness Benchmark for Mathematics. A summer bridgeprogram was developed for the ACT Math score of 17-25 because the preponderance (70
the instructor and learner. Thisinformation will be used by both the instructor and learner(s) to guide decision making andengagement in bio-inspired design. Rubrics or grading guidelines will be created for eachformative assessment to ensure they align with the project goals and learning objectives.Summative assessment will occur at the end of the bio-inspired design instruction and will bealigned to the project goals and learning objectives. Summative assessment may be individual orcollaborative with peer feedback or an individual or collaborative deconstruction and analysis ofa model bio-inspired design. A rubric for the summative assessment assignment will be created,integrating the key knowledge and skills embedded in the project goals
Society for Engineering Education, 2017Using Super Heroes to Relay Biomechanics Principles in Education Anahid Ebrahimi, Jill S Higginson University of Delaware, Newark, DE anahide@udel.edu BACKGROUND RESULTS Recent literature has supported student-centered learning to promote positive learning outcomes and A list of biomechanics
. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Chandrupatla, T. R., Dusseau, R. A., Schmalzel, J. L., Slater, C. S., (1996). “Development of multifunctional laboratories in a new engineering school.” Proc., ASEE, Washington, DC.2. Marchese, A. J., Hesketh, R. P., Jahan, K., (1997). “Design in the Rowan University Freshman Engineering Clinic.” Proc., ASEE, Milwaukee, WI.3. Newell, J. A., Marchese, A. J., Ramachandran, R. P., Sukumaran, B., Harvey, R., (1999) “Multidisciplinary design and communication: a pedagogical vision.” Int. J., Engineering Education, 15, 376–382.4. Dahm, K. D
forth. ● Application (a): Using learned material in new and concrete situations. For example, using information, methods, concept s, and theories to solve problems requiring the skills or knowledge presented.A topic’s relevance to the core is designated in a similar manner: ● Essential (E): The topic is part of the core. ● Desirable (D): The topic is not part of the core, but it should be included in the core of a particular program if possible; otherwise, it should be considered part of elective materials. Figure 1: IEEE SE2014 Software Verification and Validation Coverage [7]One of the challenges of teaching software verification has been the lack of quality teachingmaterials at
programs at CSULBthereby improving the diversity of the profession.Bibliography[1] T. Camp, S. Zweben, D. Buell, and J. Stout. “Booming Enrollments: Survey Data,” ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16), pp. 398-399, March 2016.[2] W. M. DuBow, B. A. Quinn, G. C. Townsend, R. Robinson, and V. Barr. “Efforts to Make Computer Science More Inclusive of Women.” ACM Inroads 7, 4 (November 2016), pp. 74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998500[3] NCWIT. (2016, April 28). Recruit Strategically: A “High Yield in the Short Term” Workbook for Attracting Women to Undergraduate Computing and Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/recruitstrategicallyworkbook_print.pdf[4
: The Exercise of Control. New York, N.Y. W.H. Freeman andCompany. 1997.[6] Jenkins, Maura, and Robert G. Keim, “Gender Trends in Engineering Retention,” inProceeedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, Georgia,October, 2004.[7] Ting, S.R. “Predicting Academic Success of First-Year Engineering Students fromStandardized Test Scores and Psychosocil Variables.” International Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol 17, No.1, 2001, pp. 75 – 80.[8] Jin, Q., Imbrie, P. K., Lin, J.J. J., and Chen, X. C., “A Multi-Outcome Hybrid Model forPredicting Student Success in Engineering.”, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, June, 2011.[9] Brainard, S. G., and Carlin, L., “A
Study Student's Exhibition, didcomplete visual identities and package designs for the project and added valuable feedbackduring Team meetings: Evan Ardanaz, Angel Juarez, Jamie Liu, Jackson Magnaye, MatthewPerrotti, Francesca Robinson, and Alessandra Sardella.References 1. James L.Huff, Carla B. Zoltowski, and William C.Oakes, “Preparing Engineers for the Workplace through Service Learning: Perceptions of EPICS Alumni,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 2016): 43 – 69. 2. John S. Lamancusa, Jose L, Zayas, Allen L. Soyster, Lueny Morell, and Jens Jorgensen , “The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 2008): 5 - 11. 3. Alan J. Dutson, Robert H. Todd
Integration Of Self-assembling Systems For Engineering Innovation (ODISSEI); Photosynthesis Biorefineries (PSBR)FY’14,15 2-Dimensional Atomic-Layer Research and Engineering (2-DARE)FY 16, 17 Advancing Communication Quantum Information Research in Engineering (ACQUIRE) New Light and Acoustic Wave Propagation: Breaking Reciprocity and Time-Reversal Symmetry (NewLAW) NAE GRAND CHALLENGESRESTOR A SEED R E S RESIN CBE BioFlex
completing a course in engineering economy. Regardless of the pedagogical techniques, students experience significant improvement in conceptual understanding of economy concepts during the course.This research provides a necessary first step towards identifying capabilities and limitations inour capacity in teaching engineering economy and can provide important feedback with regardsto what works and what does not work for improving student’s conceptual understanding offundamental concepts.References: 1. Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R,J, Arter, J., Chappuis, S. Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right - Using It Well. Pearson, 2012, ISBN: 0132685884, 9780132685887. 2. Methods of Assessment. The
major. However despite a lack of connection between their identity andengineering, some students may persist in engineering based upon factors such as the desire toearn an engineer’s salary. Students with lower academic performance have been shown to persistin engineering if they identify with the engineering major or feel as if they were getting futureusefulness or enjoyment from engineering.6,10Engineering programs across the country have varying formats and matriculation processesranging from: common course(s) for First-Year Engineering (FYE), direct admittance to anengineering discipline, or programs in which all students are initially undesignated11. Studentsenrolled in common FYE were more likely to persist to the third semester than
formation in a multicultural and interdisciplinarysetting coupled with hands-on doing based on repetitive do-test-learn cycles that areconstantly assessed and communicated by the teaching team.Design, whether as design science or design thinking has been with us for quite some time.Already in the 1950´s B. Fuller, a renowned scientists and inventor described design scienceas: “…the effective application of the principles of science to the conscious design of ourtotal environment in order to help make the Earth’s finite resources meet the needs of allhumanity without disrupting the ecological processes of the planet” Buckminister Fuller [17].There is relevant criticism to be considered as well. The three perspectives, based on Kimbell2011, are that
. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Biomedical Engineers, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/biomedical-engineers.htm.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Occupational Information Included in the OOH, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/about/occupational-information-included-in-the-ooh.htm.[3] C. G. Prober and S. Khan, “Medical Education Reimagined: A Call to Action.,” Acad Med, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1407–1410, Oct. 2013.[4] T. Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education.,” Science, Vol. 340, Issue 6130
allow students to better develop into adult learners upongraduation. References1. P. Mortimore and C. Watkins, Understanding Pedagogy and its Impact on Learning, SAGE, 1999.2. M. S. Knowles, The Modern Practice of Adult Education, Andragogy versus Pedagogy, New York: Associated Press, 1970.3. M. Knowles, The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company, 1973.4. S. B. Merriam, "Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory," New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, pp. 3-14, 2001.5. Educational Technology and Mobile Learning, Accessed March 2017. http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/05/awesome-chart-on-pedagogy-vs- andragogy.html.6. S. Bell, "Project-Based
there is less than a 95% probability that the two groups are actually different.The significance of differences in overall student score for the questions of the pre- and post-testwere determined using a one-tailed t-test (Equation 4). x 0 t (Equation 4) s/ nWhere: ̅ = Mean score on concept inventory, end-of-semester = Mean score on concept inventory, beginning-of-semester s = Standard deviation, end-of-semester n = Number of students, end-of-semesterThe internal consistency of the concept inventory was evaluated with the Kuder-RichardsonFormula 20 approach (Equation 5). k j 1 p j q j k
with a variety of long-termcareer objectives including premedical students pursuing a baccalaureate inenvironmental engineering.Table 1. Summary of six seminal learning opportunities including a course at theUniversity of Cincinnati (CEE600) and a course at the Missouri University of Scienceand Technology (CE390/CE4099).Description; Co-leaners Outcome(s)Time frameCEE600 MDG7: Ensuring Author Development and deliveryEnvironmental 3 additional faculty of a term-length, dual-levelSustainability (dual-level, approx. 80 undergraduate course with two tripsterm-length course) and 40 graduate students abroad to IndiaAutumn, 2004
problems in their communities and beyond using the Game Changers as examples of innovative solutions.• Q: If you were going to grade our infrastructure systems (at the local, state or national level), what grade(s) would you give and why? Can you justify the grade(s) using similar criteria as in the Report Card? o Activities: For older students, teachers assist in exploring why the various infrastructure categories received the grades that they did, bring in local infrastructure “experts” to assist with the discussion and assessment. Additionally, depending on the infrastructure that is being considered, teachers
) “Educating Generation Net-- Can U.S. Engineering Woo and Win the Competition for Talent,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 246-257. 3. Tavrou, S., Thong, C., & Steele, C. (2011) Increased female participation into engineering education through specialised courses, Australasian. 4. Matusovich, H.M., Streveler, R.A. and Miller, R.L. (2010) “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 289-303.5. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002) “Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students,” Journal of Research in
Learning Communities: Building Connections among Teaching, Learning, andTechnology. Jeffrey S. Nugent, R. Martin Reardon, Fran G. Smith, Joan A. Rhodes, Mary Jane Zander,Teresa J Carter. 1, s.l. : International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 20.51-58. 12AppendicesAll new faculty and academic staff are invited to participate in anonymous surveys at the end of eachsemester of their first year. This survey is Appendix 1: Biannual Survey. The post survey is for new facultyonce they have been at UW-Platteville for two years, and can be found in Appendix 2: Post SurveyAppendix 1: Biannual Survey 1. If you attended any meetings of the New Faculty Learning Community
. https://c9.io/ 4. Wu, L., Liang, G., Kui, S., & Wang, Q. 2011. CEclipse: An online IDE for program- ing in the cloud. In 2011 IEEE World Congress on Services, IEEE, pp. 45-52. 5. https://www.codecademy.com/ 6. http://cscircles.cemc.uwaterloo.ca/ 7. Pritchard, D. and Vasiga, T. 2013. CS circles: an inbrowser python course for begin- ners. In ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 591-596. 8. Guo, P. 2012. Online Python Tutor: Embeddable web-based program visualization for CS education. http://pythontutor.com/.9. Brusilovsky, P. and Sosnovsky, S. 2005. Individualized exercises for self-assessment of programming knowledge: An Evaluation of QuizPACK. ACM Journal of Educa- tional Resources in
to foster higher student retention rates inintroductory computer programming courses.References: DiSalvo, B., & Bruckman, A. (2011). From interests to values. Communications of the ACM,54(8), 27-29.Newhall, T., Meeden, L., Danner, A., Soni, A., Ruiz, F., & Wicentowski, R. (2014, March). Asupport program for introductory CS courses that improves student performance and retainsstudents from underrepresented groups. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium onComputer science education (pp. 433-438). ACM. Goldweber, M., Barr, J., Clear, T., Davoli, R., Mann, S., Patitsas, E., & Portnoff, S. (2013). Aframework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. ACMInroads, 4(1), 58-7Guzdial, M. (2009
unwillingness to answer the question.Some students expressed frustration about the fact that even if they have already applied whatthey perceive are effective learning strategies, their performance in the class was stillunsatisfactory (“I don't know… I put more effort into learning this material than all of myclasses combined, and then some more. To say that I was disappointed in the results is anunderstatement.”) There are a select few, however, who chose to provide ambiguous responses(“Nothing”; “N/A”; “not applicable”) or expressed unwillingness to comment on their learningprocess as part of the survey (This is a bad question please stop asking it. It[’s] not relevant, Iget it I could [have] done more but that’s not point of the spot surveys”). The
Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Guru is a computer scientist and educational researcher who focuses on curriculum development in both formal and non-formal educational settings. His expertise includes systems thinking and design, op- erations research, statistical modeling, and simulation. He has taught several graduate and undergraduate courses in statistics, systems engineering, operations research, and business analytics. Dr. Guru has pre- viously served as the Director of Research Strategy at the Jeffrey S. Raikes School of Computer Science and Management at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. In addition to his academic experience, Dr. Guru is an expert in supercomputing; he has 10 years of experience in building and
. D., and B. Stein. The Ideal Problem Solver. New York: Freeman, 1983.Brent, R., & Felder. R. M. (2014). Want your students to think creatively and critically? How about teaching them? Chemical Engineering Education, 48(2), 113-114.Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Siefert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103 (3), 417-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048Dannenhoffer, J. F., Green, M. A. (2017). Use of a Full-motion Flight Simulator for Teaching Aircraft Performance and Dynamics, 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 9-13 January 2017, Grapevine, Texas.Diaz, A. Freeing the Creative Spirit. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1992.Napolitano, M. R., Aircraft Dynamics