the course experience.In the Fall of 2017, planning began for a refresh of the course and laboratories. New laboratorystations were designed and built. Lecture and laboratory experiments were updated to use theAllen-Bradley PLCs. The stations were first used in January 2018.The new laboratory structure delayed the start of programming topics by a week. In the firstlectures and labs, students used a basic system wiring ladder diagram including safety circuitry.In lab they learned the fundamentals of electrical controls wiring and performed basic wiring forsensors and actuators. This was facilitated by a lab station design where the students began witha rolling cart that had a back panel with DIN rail mounted. (Note: DIN is the acronym for
popularwith the youth, the staff found them more suitable for testing skills or knowledge in acompetitive way rather than questions involving self-reflection. The staff mentioned that animportant value at the center is to support youth work at their own pace. Many of the activitiescompleted by youth are self-directed by design and so if someone needs to take more or less timethey can do that. According to one of the staff, a common moto at DHF is that “we can all learnfrom each other.” This value contrasted with the format of the assessments that requiredeveryone to complete the activities at roughly the same time.Finally, the staff identified logistical challenges that impacted the post-course assessments. DHFcourses are often planned such that the
%of the total yearly energy consumption by the MGH is used for heating and cooling of the facility.By implementing the plan outlined in this paper, the MGH facility would see up to 60% savingsin heating and cooling costs annually, resulting in a savings of $1,218,626 per year.KeywordsGeothermal Energy, Heating and Coooling Systems, Renewable Energy, Vertical Closed LoopSystemI. Introduction and BackgroundGeothermal SystemsA growing source of renewable energy is geothermal heating and cooling. Geothermal power isbased from the heat energy stored underneath the ground, which means that it is 100% renewableenergy. This procedure is considered clean because it works without the burning of any fossil fuelsand only requires the extraction and
2017 AAAS Science & Diplomacy Leadership Workshop.Dr. Linda R ShawDr. Marla A Franco, University of Arizona Marla A. Franco, Ph.D., serves as the Director of Assessment and Research for the Division of Student Affairs, Enrollment Management, Academic Initiatives, and Student Success at the University of Arizona, where she leads the design and implementation of research, assessment, and evaluation plans across 45 units and departments to support a data rich environment for improved student learning and strategic de- cision making. Dr. Franco has close to 20 years of experience in higher education, which has brought her countless opportunities to assess, research, and inform educational practice, particularly in
) together for the three quarters of their firstyear. The students were notified of their placement in the cohort and encouraged to studytogether, but there was no enforcement or expectation to do so. Surveys are planned to gaugemarkers like GPA, change of major, sense of belonging, how much they connected with orcollaborated with their cohort. It is hoped that since this cohort requires minimal intervention orstaff support, this might be a low-cost retention tool. Figure 3 shows the design of courses thesestudents are taking together.Figure 3. A schematic of the degree program cohort scheduling pilot for 3 different majors forfirst year engineering students.Impacting other engineering students with Engineering Success CoursesBy virtue of the NSF
first survey statements. The full assessment of activitiesand the control cohort's post assessment will be completed by June 2018.Results and DiscussionLessons learned from recruitingThe project was officially awarded July 1 2017, and the first summer professional developmenttraining was offered July 24 through August 3, 2017. Although PI team starting advertising atthe beginning of June when they heard from the program director that the project was beingrecommended for funding, the turn-around was still too quick. Several potential participantswho were interested indicated that the short notice kept them from applying as they already hadprior travel plans or scheduled experiments. Similarly, some potential students could notparticipate as his
are conducted by phone and the committee meets in person once a year to pairthe next cohort of mentors and mentees and to plan the year’s orientation and core workshopevents. The approximate time commitment to serve on the Executive Committee is 25 hoursannually for members and about 50 hours annually for the Chair.Matching Mentoring PairsOne of the primary duties of the Executive Committee is to match the mentoring pairs. Afterlearning from several cohorts, it has worked best to gather applications using SurveyMonkeyduring the month of May, as faculty have some breathing room after finishing their springsemester. The application process has evolved from a lengthy multi-page pencil and papersolicitation to a simple 20-minute online survey
lines, one student said it was important to make personal connectionsand eliminate the isolation created by high engagement with social media, computers and videogames. It is necessary to be social in order to manage the high level of stress. It it is important toget out, explore campus opportunities, and engage in professional organization activities. Severalstudents emphasized that it is important to use time management to plan study, class and relaxationtime in order to maintain yourself physically, mentally, and emotionally. Some students encourageexpanding your horizon beyond your major to learn about other areas and talking to a wide arrayof people across campus. One student encouraged finding a study group with a mixture of peers,not
in 3 or fewer grammatically correct sentences.5. What do you like about the professor’s field of engineering? (A bullet point list is acceptable.)6. What do you dislike or what concerns you about the professor’s field of engineering? (Abullet point list is acceptable.)7. Please print out the flowchart for the major (and concentration, if applicable) you’re interestedin pursuing. Circle a 300 level or higher course (excluding senior project) that you’re interestedin taking (you may need to write in the course if it’s an elective). Write your name and sectionnumber on the printout and staple it to the rest of this assignment.8. For the 300 level or higher course you circled in question 7, please fill out the table belowshowing when you plan to
). “Cultivating diversity and competency inSTEM: Challenges and remedies for removing virtual barriers to constructing diverse highereducation communities of success,” Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, vol. 11no. 1, p. A44. [Online] Oct. 15, 2012.[10] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” Amer. Assoc. Engr. Ed., 2016.[11] A. Kezar and C. Sam, “Special issue: Understanding the new majority of non-tenure-trackfaculty in higher eudcation--demographics, experiences, and plan of action,” ASHE Higher Ed.Report, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1-133, 2010.[12] National Education Association, “Update: Full-time non-tenure-track faculty,” (September1996). Available: National Education Association, http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/v2no5.pdf[13] P. M
by the Department of Education (DoE) through the MinorityScience and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP). This program aims to strengthencommunity college students’ foundation in the academic fields of science, technology,engineering and mathematics. Five community college students participated in this program in2017 and performed research in the earthquake-engineering field. The internship experienceenabled the interns to realize how trained civil engineers in the field will have to collaborate withother members on their team. Trained civil engineers will need to make weekly meetings withtheir supervisor to discuss their progress on their design and provide feedback on what they canimprove. They will need to make a detailed plan that
solve.Yardley Ordonez, Canada College Yardley Ordonez is currently a sophomore at Canada College working on transferring to a four year university. His plan is to become a Robotics Engineer and have his own consulting business in the future.Mr. Edgar Sanchez, Canada CollegeMr. Andres Lee, San Francisco State University Recipient of a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Robotics and Control Systems from San Francisco State University.Dr. Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, his MS in Geode- tic Science from the Ohio
of a design problem.Figure 1. Framework describing the potential influence of students’ learning of entrepreneurialmindset on their cognitive operations for problem framing and finally on their mentalrepresentations of a design problem. First, to investigate high school students’ mental representations of design problems, wewill collect the data through participant interviews with a design scenario getting them engagedin problem framing and then analyze the data according to the work described by Bjorklund(2012). For the participant interviews, the given design brief will describe a complex andambiguous design scenario. To evoke participants’ entrepreneurial mindset, the design scenariowill be developed in the way asking them to plan
project, we examined the impact of micro-interventions aimedsolely at increasing the students’ sense of community in the early career course. These included,for example, a focus on classroom norms, strategies to increase peer-to-peer interactions, andpeer testimonials to enable discussions of the challenges faced by first-year engineering students,among others. For the third and final iteration of the project, we examined the impact ofinterventions aimed at both classroom community and relevancy.Based on the findings of this study and considering the context of the research plan, we have thefollowing concluding observations. There were important instructional differences seen betweenthe two courses as shown by the COPUS observational data
thispaper, the authors also share their evaluation strategy and results of assessing the effectiveness of the games-based course modules via a comprehensive evaluation plan.The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the authors describe the project’s goals andobjectives, followed by a brief introduction to their module-based educational game framework and theGUI-based game creator. Section 3 describes the pilot project introduced to apply the developed gameframework in digital forensics courses through a sequence of entertaining and engaging forensic gamemodules for first-year college students. In section 4, the authors share their evaluation strategy andcomprehensive evaluation plans. The results of assessing the effectiveness
, intentional faculty mentormatching and regular meeting, peer mentoring, annual leadership development retreat, andresearch and service experience, among other approaches.In summary, we believe that to successfully secure S-STEM award and implement the project oncampus, a flexible but comprehensive plan is not only necessary but also crucial in the success ofthe project. Such a multi-facet project needs to be monitored and evaluated from each and everyperspective: project management, student support activities and programs, scholars, faculty, andsupporting staff. On the other hand, the project plan needs to be flexible enough so that certainaspects of the project implementation can be adjusted to best serve our students. A flexiblemindset is necessary
that attendingthe REU site increased their interest in research (M= 5.50, SD= .71) and in pursuing graduatestudies in engineering (M= 5.70, SD= .48). That the REU site experience had a significant impacton these intentions is also reflected in participants’ responses to the open-ended questions on thesurvey: “Before contact with the CCIS REU, my plan consisted of: Graduate with a somewhat reasonable GPA and try to find a job with a BSEE without even considering a MS or PhD in any major. This REU has forced me to reevaluate those plans.” (REU site participant, Male, open-ended survey response) “I entered into the program after nearly failing out of college. I didn't have any confidence that I would be able to
ofagency, they are acting on their self-reflections, goals, and motivations to impact their future.Program design to embed early-staged internships into the degree plan enables students to buildupon their preliminary studies with real-world experience that they then bring back to theiracademic environment and enhances their goal pursuit and academic experience.At Texas State University, students majoring in engineering technology must complete a 400-hour, sophomore-level summer internship as a degree requirement. The grading component ofthe course requires first-, fifth-, and tenth-week evaluations from both the student and industrysupervisor with the student’s evaluations consisting of open-ended questions about theirexposure to and development
art facilities.One of the more effective ways to increase knowledge about science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) careers is to increase the knowledge of teachers. As part of a National ScienceFoundation Advanced Technological Education project, a group of high school teachers wasoffered the opportunity to work in advanced manufacturing labs with engineering faculty. Theseprojects included additive manufacturing (AM) of ceramics, surface characterization of AMmetal parts, and surface alteration. The teachers were tasked with developing lesson plans whichincorporated the advanced manufacturing concepts that they had learned.As part of the assessment of the program, teachers were given pre- and post- research experiencesurveys
, simultaneous linear equations, regression, and integration.Not available in Smart Sparrow were lessons for topics of scientific computing, differentiation,interpolation, and ordinary differential equations.In designing the assessment plan for this study, we adapted the approach used in our prior NSF-funded research on comparing blended versus flipped classrooms for numerical methods (Clarket al., 2016; Clark et al., 2018). In particular, we used a mixed-methods approach consisting ofsurveys, student focus groups, instructor interviews, and final exam comparisons. Our surveys,which enabled indirect assessment of learning and student perspectives, consisted of the Collegeand University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI) (Fraser & Treagust, 1986
Paper ID #21673Normative and Non-Normative Engineering Student Experiences in Navigat-ing the Cultures of EngineeringMr. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Nevada, Reno. He graduated from the University of Nevada, Reno in May 2017, and plans to pursue a career in academia in the future. His research interests are in graduate student attrition rates within academia, engineering identity development and the factors that influence decision making on persistence.Ms. Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue
and outcome assessment. Formative assessment, or implementation evaluation,analyzed the activities delivered, participation in activities, and participant satisfaction. Outcomeassessment, or impact evaluation, analyzed changes in participants’ knowledge, perceptions, andskills as a result of the summer program.1.1 RecruitmentThe REU plan for recruitment that was stated in our proposal was executed. Electronic formswere uploaded on our REU web site and on the NSF web site. Although our grant was approvedin late January of 2017, we had more than 80 applicants. In our evaluations, we have focused onpast performance, statement of purpose documents, providing research opportunities tocommunity college students, and we emphasize diversity. Our
vs. project schedule, design/prototyping/testing updates, and problemtracking. Students are encouraged throughout the course sequence to focus on the connectionbetween these deliverables: How is risk management driving design decisions? How is theprototype progress affecting your schedule? How are design decisions affecting the identifiedrisks?Prior to the instructor’s EAC participation, students completed an in-class workshop on riskmanagement that included an exercise where students observed an activity and identified ways inwhich the planning team practiced risk management, with a heavy focus on technical andresource risks. These risks are the ones that could prevent the team from completing theirproject, but they have little bearing on
vision wand. Regardlessof the project student teams created a plan, an engineering notebook, parallel prototypes, finalreport with market research, and a presentation.The University of Iowa developed a dedicated space to support first-year project development.Upon investigating other university makerspaces their library found that three areas were mostcommon for integration of coursework and makerspaces. Almost all makerspaces rely onprototyping tools including 3D scanning, 3D modeling, and 3D printing. Many makerspaceswere also using virtual reality as a tool for students to explore new technology. In order forstudents to implement their ideas they need to have resources for computer programming andcircuit building [7].At Portland State
trends.Lifecycle Assessment, Planning, DesignStudents were also introduced to the concepts of Biomimicry and Lifecycle Assessment (LCA)in this course. Life Cycle Assessment, as defined by SETAC, is “a process to evaluate the environmental burdens associated with a product, process, or activity by identifying and quantifying energy and materials used and wastes released to the environment; to assess the impact of those energy and material uses and releases to the environment; and to identify and evaluate opportunities to effect environmental improvements'' [7, 8]. …. Its main advantage over other, site-specific, methods for environmental analysis, such as Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Environmental Audit
potentialdesign solution and what they plan to build in order to test the questions. Mockups should bequickly fabricated using simple and readily-available materials. Students conduct user testingsessions to gain feedback on their mockups, which is used to further refine and evolve theirpotential solutions.Performance testing of key functional aspects of their designs help students to determinequantitative values (specifications) that will meet the identified needs. Performance testscombine engineering analysis and experimental testing to learn the range of values for eachparameter that will result in the design solution working as specified.Building a Working PrototypeStudents will have settled on an optimal design solution near the end of the term. A
et al., “Curriculum Guidelines for Graduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering,” ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009.[4] A. Pyster et al., “Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSETM),” 2012.[5] US News, “The 10 Best Colleges for Engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering-doctorate. [Accessed: 17-Mar- 2018].[6] “The 10 Best Colleges for Engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best- colleges/rankings/engineering-overall. [Accessed: 17-Mar-2018].[7] Stanford University, “Mathematics and Statistics Courses 2017-18 | Undergraduate Handbook.” [Online]. Available: https://ughb.stanford.edu/courses-and-planning/approved- courses/mathematics
course.IntroductionAs universities strive to graduate engineering students who can make an impact on society,engineering leadership programs have become more prominent. The National Academy ofEngineering [1] as well as various engineering professional societies highlight the importance ofleadership skills in engineering [2-6]. This trend is reinforced by the newly approved ABETCriteria for the 2019-20 review cycle that includes “the ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership … establish goals, plans tasks, and meet objectives”[7]. With these ABET changes come questions about how to assess leadership. Because theconversation among educators on developing leadership in engineering students is growing, thisresearch seeks to
redesigned to include active learning techniques but will not utilize the flippedmethodology in order to establish a proper baseline of student knowledge. IET 22400 - Produciton Planning and Control Course Assessment Tool – Instructor and Student Course Objective Assessment Semester: Spring 17 Instructor: Course Embedded Assessment of Student Performance Student Evaluation (% ) Supported Program Educational Outcome
written-oralcommunication were also the key components of that experience.In general, the transformation took three school years, starting from 2013 to 2016. Inthe 3 transformation rounds, it has established a practical framework to share withengineering educators. The goal of this case study is to illustrate how initial plan ofcapstone transformation containing only partial perspective has been challenged.Through various self-improvement mechanisms (illustrated in Figure 1), challengeshave been overcome and the capstone course gradually evolved towardcomprehension and optimization from 2013 to 2016.Figure 1: The evolution process (rounds 0-3) in Dynamic Control System capstone transformation from2013 to 2016 in the current case study. The