thefollowing: is the research question significant, and is the work original and important; have theinstruments been demonstrated to have satisfactory reliability and validity; are the outcomemeasures clearly related to the variables with which the investigation is concerned; does theresearch design fully and unambiguously test the hypothesis; are the participants representativeof the population to which generalization are made; did the researcher observe ethical standardsin the treatment of participants; and is the research at an advanced enough state to make thepublication of results meaningful.Design and reporting researchWhen preparing their manuscript, authors should familiarize themselves with the criteria andstandards used by the journal to
education focusbetween the pre and post-World War II; specifically following the 1955 Grinter3 3 year study.The current ABET criteria reaffirm a set of core engineering skills coupled with a second set of Page 21.65.2professional skills. The professional skills focus on communication skills, teamwork, ethics andprofessionalism; in addition to “awareness skills” as coined by Shuman4 et al, which translatesinto engineering within the global and the societal contexts coupled with life-long learning andthe knowledge of contemporary issues. Moreover, there is a recent trend of what can be called“Add-on” skills that come to complement the core engineering
, in this case the cost of batteries. Until the new technology can approach the market cost-per- Page 22.15.3 function, benchmark comparisons will be poor 4 and there will be a natural reluctance to move away from the familiar technology. The commodity market is the hardest for any emerging technology to penetrate. Energy is a commodity. 3. International standards relating to quality, safety, environment, ethical applications and warranty have to evolve and be met. It can be a slow process but if standards are not met, the evolution of the technology will be curtailed 5.These three constraints are a formidable ‘catch
units through class lectures and individual study during team project execution. 4. Develop students’ skills for technical communications/presentations in a team environment. 5. Provide a learning environment that stimulates students' curiosity and interest in addressing important engineering problems through practical solutions. 6. Provide a learning environment that encourages students to conduct their professional activities in a manner consistent with the engineering code of ethics. Page 22.30.3with the expectation that the student taking this course will learn to: 1. Apply engineering principles to
State University – Pueblo is a regional comprehensive university. All freshmanstudents who are interested in engineering are welcomed to take a broad-based preliminarycourse Introduction to Engineering at the Department of Engineering. It was initially offeredonce a year in fall. Later, due to increasing enrollment, it has been offered in both fall and springsemesters since the 2009-2010 academic year. It meets for two 50-minute sessions each weekduring a 15-week semester. Roughly, the content is divided into two parts: lectures and labs. Theprimary goals of the course are fostering strong study skills, learning about the variousengineering disciplines, and introducing the concepts of engineering ethics in the lecture sectionwhile introducing
AC 2011-1266: A STUDY OF TRADITIONAL UNDERGRADUATE STU-DENT ENGAGEMENT IN BLACKBOARD LEARNING MANAGEMENTSYSTEMJulie M Little-Wiles, Purdue University, West Lafayette Doctoral Student, College of Technology, Purdue UniversityDr. Linda L Naimi, Purdue University Dr. Naimi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University and an attorney at law. Her research interests focus on leadership and innovation, in which she examines ethical, legal and global issues in leadership and explores the unintended consequences of technology innovation on culture and the quality of life
AC 2011-1264: AN EXAMINATION OF FACULTY PERCEPTIONS ANDUSE OF BLACKBOARD LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMJulie M Little-Wiles, Purdue University, West Lafayette Doctoral Student, College of Technology, Purdue UniversityLinda L Naimi, Purdue University Dr. Naimi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University and an attorney at law. Her research interests focus on leadership and innovation, in which she examines ethical, legal and global issues in leadership and explores the unintended consequences of technology innovation on culture and the quality of life. Page
; • formulation of design problem statements and specifications; • consideration of alternative solutions and their feasibility considerations; • production processes and detailed system descriptions; and • concurrent engineering design.ABET also indicates that the design experience should5, 6: • include a variety of realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics, and social impact; • be a meaningful, major engineering design experience that builds upon the fundamental concepts of mathematics, basic sciences, the humanities and social sciences, engineering topics, and communication skills; • be taught in section sizes that are small enough to allow interaction between teacher and
Spring 2010 students. Althoughthe sample size was small, the comparison of the survey results shows that the changes improvedthe course significantly.1. IntroductionIn the National Academy of Engineering’s The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century1, strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity, good communication skills,mastery of the principles of business and management, leadership, high ethical standards, a senseof professionalism, dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility, and an attitude of lifelong learningare identified as attributes that will be required of successful engineers in the 21st century. Manyof these attributes, including practical ingenuity, creativity, and communication skills, are
AC 2010-1868: IMPLEMENTING AN INVERTED CLASSROOM MODEL INENGINEERING STATICS: INITIAL RESULTSChristopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Christopher Papadopoulos is a faculty member in the Department of General Engineerng at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, where he coordinates the Engineering Mechanics Committee. His research interests include nonlinear structural mechanics, biomechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics, and he serves as secretary of the ASEE Mechanics Division. He holds BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He was
- Understand the importance of sustainability concepts.• PLO # 2- Acquire scientific knowledge and methods required to evaluate the sustainability of systems.• PLO # 3 - Learn to design, manufacture, and operate processes in an environmentally conducive manner.• PLO # 4- Demonstrate critical thinking skills required to analyze problems in their social and environmental context.• PLO # 5 - Develop economically, environmentally, and socially sound sustainable decisions• PLO # 6 - Evaluate the impact of products, processes, and activities through life cycle assessment• PLO # 7 - Communicate through graduate level oral and writing skills.• PLO # 8 - Demonstrate understanding of professional and ethical
Description PEO 1 Apply discipline-specific theory, experiments and real world experience to interpret, analyze and solve current and emerging technical problems. PEO 2 Communicate clearly and persuasively with technical and non-technical people in oral, written and graphical forms. PEO 3 Function individually and on teams to design quality systems, components or processes in a timely, responsible and creative manner. PEO 4 Demonstrate behavior consistent with professional ethics and are cognizant of social concerns as they relate to the practice of engineering technology. PEO 5 Strive for professional growth and engage in lifelong learning.The Applied Engineering
(for each module) KM2: Ethics and Legal Policy for Nanotechnology Growth and Fabrication of Nanostructures: Post-module Post-module HW & quizzes
profession where a fresh rawgraduate takes up teaching work without any prior training contrary to otherservices. Lifelong education can provide a response to the growing job volatility thatmost forecasters predict. Increasingly, people will be changing jobs several timesin a lifetime, and education can no longer be limited to offering a singlespecialization, but must develop each person‟s ability to change course during hisor her lifetime, and to cope with economic and social change. The process ofcultivating a lifelong learning ethic can be a fascinating and rewarding learningexperience by itself for human resource specialists. A graduate engineer is not trained to take on the broader responsibilitiesthat jobs demand and is afraid of
thinking, encouraging, thinking out of box, looking of problems from multiple points of view, generating ideas and solutions including those which appear at first sight to be highly improbable, providing access to experimentation. Engineering graduates to-day require not only adequate technological ability and problem solving skills, but also be endowed with softskills like co-operative working, communication and presentation skills, business ethics and Inter – personnel relationships and posses a deep commitment to safety, reliability, quality and sustainability of all engineering activities.1.6 New Learning Paradigm and Alternative Delivery Systems The
as the participants apply them: optimism in persisting,systems thinking in combining many materials that each have different effects on the sound,ethics as they share materials, communication as they pitch their solutions, collaboration as theywork on a team to develop a solution to the problem, and creativity as they use materials thatthey have likely never used for the purpose at hand before. The engineering practices are allused, as outlined in the links to standards above. Finally, the facilitators will outline theconnections to electrical engineering, materials engineering and mechanical engineering.Diversity. This year is the American Society for Engineering Education’s “Year of Action on
leadership roles. Through the program’s rigorous academic and extra-curricular requirements, I have found that these graduates have an exceptional work ethic, take initiatives, and strive for excellence much more than typical college graduate (James Hefti – ATS Vice President of Human Resources).” Page 19.14.5 4 5Brazilian Junior Enterprise Movement The Brazilian Junior Enterprises Movement is a movement formed by
Context 0.41 4.7 Leading Engineering Endeavors 0.62 4.4 Designing 0.74 2.1 Analytical Reasoning and Problem Solving 0.62 2.3 System Thinking 0.45 4.3 Conceiving, System Engineering and Management 0.61 3.2 Communication 0.44 2.5 Ethics, Equity and Other Responsibilities
project as an empirical example.Part I: Initiating and fostering international relationshipsAchieving success in initiating cross-cultural international collaborations, especially withdeveloping nations, requires an alternative kind and of commitment different from taking on asimilar endeavor in one’s own culture. To be successful researchers must make a decision to goto another country personally, and ultimately to be truly successful at building criticalrelationships they must go a step further, that of total immersion in another culture. We can readbooks about a country or culture, however, it is another matter to experience and learn to managedifferences in cultural norms, customs, food and the way food is eaten, greetings, ethics andvalues
grouped into eleven subcategories see Table 1. below: Sorted Reported concept learned responses percent Cultural differences 33 52% German manufacturing methods 30 47% Technology and innovation 20 31% Living and working - Transportation 18 28% Time management - work ethic 14 22% Relationships and communication 14 22% Table 1. Sorted responses to open-ended question on concepts
31% to a B+ (89%). In the mid-semester evaluations for the Spring 2014course, 98% of students noted that working in a group has contributed to their understanding ofthe course material. Engineers in the workforce are constantly working with others on variousprojects. Another student explains that working in a group motivates students to stay on top oftheir work load as well as encourages them to produce higher quality work. This student states,“Working in a group allows me to work harder to guarantee that I do not let my partners down.”This accountability not only improves the students’ work ethic but also improves the way theyinteract with their peers. By exposing teamwork early in student engineering development theygain a sense of
with a technical background should acquire the necessary professionalcompetences of an engineering educator. These general professional competences consist oftwo main groups: Technical expertise Specific engineering pedagogical competencies.Educational theory offers different lists of competences7. The IGIP concept of engineeringeducational competences is to be summarized as follows: Pedagogical, psychological and ethical competences Didactical skills and evaluative competences Organisational (managerial) competencies Oral and written communication skills and social competences Reflective and developmental competencesOther categorizations might operate with the terms “technical expertise
(legal, safety,reliability, biocompatibility, and ethics) concerning the use of biomaterials.Prerequisites: ENGR1610, ENGR2180, and ENGR35103 CreditsENGR 4520 Design and Manufacturing of Biomedical Devices and SystemsThis course details the conception, modeling, analysis, design, manufacturing and assembly ofBiomedical devices and systems. Students select, formulate, and solve a design problem andmanufacture a prototype, as appropriate. Applications include, but are not limited to, diagnosticinstrumentation, prostheses, and cardiovascular devices against the background of ethicalconsiderations, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, and product-liability issues.Prerequisites: ENGR2180 and ENGR35104 Credits
technical curriculum. Ibelieve that we need to do more to connect how we understand technology to the world’smost pressing challenges, and I attempt to emphasize this in my own teaching.Through this proposed research, I am working in a relatively new area that isn’t well-defined by existing theory and methodology formed in higher education. Although thereis a body of research on the teaching of engineering ethics and the integration of thesocial sciences with engineering, and that is certainly relevant to examining thetechnology/society interface, I am examining faculty beliefs and processes aroundcurriculum choice with respect to contextualizing science and technology curriculum.After some early reviews of existing literature, I decided that the
Page 10.316.5served as manager of F-5/T-38 Engineering. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationPATRIC McELWAIN, Ph.D.Currently teaches technical communication, film, science fiction, and ethics at ERAU/Prescott. He is Chair of theHumanities and Communications Department, and his research interests include film studies, Anglo-Americanscience fiction, and cultural studies. He believes that everything one needs to know about life can be gleaned fromthe television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer
(AALANA) students at RIT. The center’s philosophy focuses on the importance of promoting a deeper understanding of what it takes to live in a rapidly changing and highly interdependent world where science and technology are transforming the globe. Students are supported and encouraged to excel academically and enhance their ethical/character development while simultaneously learning about their own and other cultures. Other goals of the center are community development and maintaining wellness. The center sponsors several different K-12 partnership programs in the Rochester community and encourages AALANA students to participate in these programs. Each AALANA student is assigned an
which the sameinformation can be organized.One early class session is devoted to a discussion of research and publication ethics, coveringsuch topics as misrepresenting data and plagiarism. Related to plagiarism is the need forscrupulous documentation and citation practices. Students are instructed to write down completereference information for any sources they consult. At the third class, they are required to submita draft of their reference list for the literature review. Many students have had little or no priorexperience with documentation of sources, or if they have, they only may have been exposed tothe Modern Language Association (MLA) style in an English course. Because many of thejournal articles and conference proceedings the
thepromotion of project management abilities. The development of written and oral communicationproficiency was also highly emphasized. Additional goals included providing a historicalperspective of engineering and instilling engineering ethical values through the discussion oflessons learned and industry related case studies.To attain the goal of fostering an enjoyable design experience, student teams were required todesign, construct and program Lego® Mindstorms robots as a primary course objective. Theserobotic systems allow students to program a central control unit which responds to inputs fromtouch and light sensors, as well as infrared signals. To further develop engineering designproficiency, all students were required to demonstrate basic
professional ethics.• Development of personal skills, such as communications, report writing and teamwork skills.Unfortunately, educational institutions often lack the resources needed to help students tobecome proficient with equipment. For example, a Manufacturing Automation and Roboticscourse typically uses programmable logic controllers, sensors, robots, and machine visionsystems in teaching automated manufacturing system design. However, students’ learning ishindered by obstacles such as:• High faculty-to-student ratios: For example, the ratio for Manufacturing Automation and Robotics at one major university is 1:36 for lectures and 1: 18 for each of two lab sections.• Limited lab access: Students may only use equipment during scheduled
, newimmigrants in science and engineering, engineering ethics, and management of industrialresearch and development. She can be reached at varma@unm.edu. Page 10.979.6Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering 6 Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright . 2005, American Society for Engineering Education