) underGrant No. 1734347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] X. Chen, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr, “A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation Practices,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[2] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of Direct Matriculation, First-Year Engineering, and Post-General Education Models,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, 2012.[3] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, M. W. Ohland, and R. A. Layton, “The Effect of Required Introduction to Engineering Courses on
,WPI’sMassachusettssettingsurelymakesadifference:wherestatelawsprotectindividualchoiceingenderidentityandexpression,onewouldexpecttofindamorecomfortableenvironmentforLGBTQstudents.However,asnotedinourshorthistoryofNewVoices,WPI’suseoftheatretoexplorequestionsofsexualorientationextendsbackto1987,afullsixyearsbeforePresidentBillClinton’s“Don’tAsk,Don’tTell”policyandmanyyearsbeforemostpeopleevenentertainedthepossibilityoflawspermittinggaymarriageoradoption.Howmightthepresenceofthisvibranttheatreprogram,andopportunitiesforengineeringstudentstowriteandperformoriginalplaysontopics2Rich,A.(1980).“CompulsoryHeterosexualityandLesbianExistence.”Signs5.4:631-660.3Harris,S.(2014).“ThirdofGayEngineersHideSexualityfromColleagues.”TheEngineer.23July.4Cech,E.(2015).“LGBTProfessionals’WorkplaceExperiencesinSTEM-RelatedFederalAgencies.”ASEE.Paper#12513.5Trenshaw,K.etal
classrooms. AcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number EEC-1449500.References[1] C. T. Hailey, E. Becker, and M. Thomas, National Center for Engineering and Technology Education. The Technology Teacher, 64(5) 23-26, 2005.[2] S. Bell, Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43, 2010. doi:10.1080/00098650903505415[3] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering Education - Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning the Answer?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 2003.[4] Texas Education Agency Snapshot 2016, 2017
maximum resolution (2825 x 2124), which is sufficient for theexpected velocities near 0.2 m/s. The maximum recording speed of this camera is 1200 fps at336 x 96 resolution. This speed would allow for much greater flow speeds, but the clarity of theimages are sacrificed at higher frame rates. The higher frame rate images also containexceptionally more noise. Unfortunately, the Casio EX-F1 is no longer available for newpurchase in the United States, but plenty of similar cameras exist. For example, Ryerson andSchwenk [7] used the Casio EX-FH25, which has since been replaced by the EX-FH100. Thesecameras are cheaper than the EX-F1 and would work just as well in the present system. Since thehigh speed function is not high enough resolution for PIV
class room and allow them to address engineering solutionsfor the betterment of life.7. References[1] J. Hopewell, R. Dvorak, and E. Kosior, “Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Jul 2009.[2] C. Kieule, S. Emilie, and P. Morgane, "Life cycle of floating debris in the canals of Ho Chi Minh city," horizon.documentation.ird.fr, November 2016.[3] Working paper of Urban Development Management Support Centre - PADDI, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incineration[4] https://www.thebalance.com › ... › Sustainable Businesses › Resources[5] O. Farook and C. Sekhar and J. Agrawal and E. Bouktache and A. Ahmed, “Outcome based education and
Elements for Microwave Engineering, in Electromagnetics, 2014. He was the recipient of the 1999 Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE) Marconi Premium, 2005 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) MTT-S Microwave Prize, 2005 UMass Dartmouth Scholar of the Year Award, 2012 Colorado State University System Board of Governors Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award, 2012 IEEE Region 5 Outstanding Engineering Educator Award, 2014 Carnegie Founda- tion for the Advancement of Teaching Colorado Professor of the Year Award, 2015 American Society for Engineering Education ECE Distinguished Educator Award, 2015 IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award, and many other research and teaching awards.Prof. Ali Pezeshki
instructors to enhance the quality of language and literacy socialization in their midst and toaccommodate and support newcomers—from all language backgrounds—within these discoursecommunities more satisfactorily and seamlessly as well (pp. 186-187)”. Indeed, the implicationsof these findings for changes in support programs, institutional policies, and pedagogicalpractices can offer the field a more thorough perspective into the intricate and dynamic nature ofacademic discourse socialization and how institutions of higher education can better serveinternational graduate students.References[1] C.P. Casanave, Writing Games: Multicultural Case Studies of Academic Literacy Practices in Higher Education, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.[2] S.A. Myers, S
Paper ID #22466Promoting Academic and Career Success for Raleigh Future Scholars at NCState UniversityProf. Leda Lunardi, North Carolina State University Leda Lunardi received the BS and MS from University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), S˜ao Paulo, Brazil, and Ph.D. degree from Cornell University. Currently she is a professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, and engineering undergraduate student retention and graduation improve- ment. Her research has been mainly sponsored by the National
; Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38(2), 225-261.14. Cosier, R. A., & Aplin, J. C. (1982). Intuition and decision making: Some empirical evidence. Psychological Reports, 51(1), 275-281. doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.1.27515. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-797.16. Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33-54. doi:10.2307/2015927917. Dhami, M. K., & Thomson, M. E. (2012). On the relevance of
relation to others’ expectations.Acknowledgment:This work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (NSF EEC 1752897). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. International Universities Press: New York. 2. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press: New York. 3. Scheff, T. J. (2003). Shame in self and society. Symbolic interaction, 26(2), 239
lead to learning (formally or informally) and the development of newperspectives and ideas. Wenger’s ideas around communities of practice [27] which integratesocial learning theory and social constructivism, stem from this viewpoint. Wenger describescommunities of practice as a group of individuals, with a shared domain or area of interest, whoengage in collective learning to achieve a common goal [29]. This practice occurs withinhistorical and social contexts, and learning occurs within the community through socialconstructivism [27]. The Zone of Proximal Development, the distance between what a learnercan accomplish independently and what s/he can accomplish with help from peers [30], isutilized to push community members forward in their
Change, 2004. 52(3): p. 509- 542.2. Kumar, P. and S. Mittal, Agricultural productivity trends in India: Sustainability issues. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 2006. 19(2006).3. World-Bank. A report on Indian country summary of higher education. 2006; Available from: http://worldbank.org. .4. PATEL, D.J.I., Education System in India. Education, 2013. 2(2).5. Tinto, V., Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (second edition). 1994: ERIC.6. Lee, W.C. and H.M. Matusovich, A Model of Co-Curricular Support for Undergraduate Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 2016. 105(3): p. 406-430.7. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent, Teaching and learning STEM
in Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Design Thinking Process.The first step in our design thinking process is empathetic understanding and ethicalconsideration of the human problem being undertaken. Empathy is the process whereby thedesigner understands the needs, experiences, and motivations of the person(s) they are designingfor (end users) and the stakeholders. Both emotional and cognitive empathy play a role in thisstep. Empathy can be achieved by various actions and activities. This includes observation,immersion, direct interaction with the end- users and stakeholders, reading, and storytelling [38]- [42]. Through this the designer develops a deeper understanding of the people and issuesinvolved. Ethical
author failed to state it, deepened their conceptual understanding. In terms of Brown, et. al.’s[5] distinction between rule learners and example learners, these students appeared to be examplelearners relative to example problems, but rule learners with other activities.Learning problem solution strategies and not basic concepts from example problems is notsurprising at all. Example problems are placed in textbooks with the intent of teaching solutionstrategies. However, some students focus primarily on the example problems as an instrumentalmeans of doing homework problems. This practice, of course, places the student’s learning ofconcepts at a disadvantage.Changing study habitsAt the end of the semester the students completed a final journal
perception of disabilities in engineering and the literature gaps can be mademore apparent. Furthering research and understanding in this field can potentially lead to a betterunderstanding of the recruitment and retention of disabled engineering students. References1. Long, M., Steinke, J., Applegate, B., Knight Lapinski, M., Johnson, M. J., & Ghosh, S. (2010). Portrayals of male and female scientists in television programs popular among middle school-age children. Science Communication, 32(3), 356-382.2. Thomas, N., & Smith, A. (2003). Preoccupied with able-bodiedness? An analysis of the British media coverage of the 2000 Paralympic Games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20(2), 166
Science Foundation under award DUE-1626287.References[1] T. Grose, Ed., “Retention range: The wide variation among 2007 freshmen,” ASEE Connections, Feb. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://createsend.com/t/y-45B6B3EF48CE7A3C#databyte. [Accessed Oct. 4, 2017][2] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[3] R. M. Marra, K. A., Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bouge, “Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, Jan. 2012.[4] O. Eris, D. Chachra, H. L. Chen, S. Sheppard, L. Ludlow, C. Rosca, T. Bailey, and G. Toye, “Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in
). P-20 Interactions with Government The impact of government on P-20 cannot be ignored. The government defines themethods to assess the effectiveness of teachers and recommends the use of testing andassessment to determine student success. The government also provides the funding that allowsresearch and review of these educational activities (Education Research & Data Center, 2012). Many government programs are helpful in implementing reform to education in the USA.The Race to the Top is an example of one of these programs. This program advances new waysto educate students through a personalized approach (U. S. Department of Education, March 25,2016). Grants from these programs provide tools, information, and support to meet
development, 3) lecture highlights, 4) example problem(s),and 5) group work. The instructional team consisted of the professor, two graduate teachingassistants, and two undergraduate teaching fellows (UGTFs). Undergraduate teaching fellowswere undergraduates who had recently done well in the course and were embedded into thecourse to help with active-learning activities. The instructor, GTAs, and UGTFs walked aroundduring the group work time to assist groups and/or individuals with questions.Description of Homework Systems: In Fall 2017, the homework system changed compared toSpring 2017. The instructional team developed new homework problems, and a commonhomework template (example shown in Figure 4 at end of paper). The template included
science, law, and business, Zawada has interned with the NIH Office of Technology Transfer, the Law Library of Congress, the Goldwater Insti- tute, and Quarles & Brady LLP. Graduating from UA with a bachelor’s in biochemistry as the Class of 2015’s Gold Medal Senior, Zawada was the recipient of the General Electric/LULAC Scholarship (2012- 2015) and a NASA Space Grant (2012-13). As a U.S. Senate intern, she assisted in the development of a HELP Committee memo during the landmark Supreme Court case that ruled in favor of cDNA patentabil- ity. She has promoted science-policy dialogue as editor of the ABA Biotechnology Law Newsletter, an AMSA Just Medicine Committee member, and an international representative to the
ENGINEERING IDENTITY 10 ReferencesAuthor. (2017). [omitted for blind review]Bix, A. S. (2004). From "engineeresses" to" girl engineers" to" good engineers": A history of women's US engineering education. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 27-49.Bruning, M. J., Bystydzienski, J., & Eisenhard, M. (2015). Intersectionality as a framework for understanding diverse young women’s commitment to engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(1), 1-26.Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2013). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.Carlone, H. B
4MessagesaboutEngineering Somegroupsofstudents aremorelikelytobe interestedinengineeringif theyareabletoseehow engineeringcanmakea positiveimpactonour worldPersonalinterests arethecharacteristicsofapersonthatinfluencehisorherengagementininteractionswiththesocialornonsocialenvironments.Situationalinterests istheinterestingnessofthesocialornonsocialenvironmentsthatevokeorencourageinteractionswithpeopleorobjects.Krapp,A.,Hidi,S.,&Renninger,K.A.(1992).Interest,Learning,andDevelopment.InK.A.Renninger,S.Hidi&A.Krapp (Eds.),Theroleofinterestinlearninganddevelopment.Hillsdale,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.ResearchQuestion:Whatisthealignmentbetweenthepersonalinterestsofchildrenin3rd- 5th
experiences are asked to indicate the gender of thefaculty or other university employee (e.g. counselors or administrators) with whom they firstdiscussed their experience provided they have discussed it with a university employee and howimportant the employee's gender was in their decision to approach them with the situation. Ifstudents indicated that they have not reported the incident(s), they are asked to indicate why andare provided with information regarding how to make such reports. The following are a list ofhypotheses the authors wish to test with these questions: ● Harassment, discrimination and unwelcomed gender-related comments towards gender- minority students is negatively correlated with the minority gender’s representation
events. Faculty advisors and staff assistantsare available to help and advise, but the students are the ones who do most of the work.In addition to planning events for the UD engineering community, all department representativesare liaisons, or points of reference, for other women in their departments. Similar to anombudsperson, WIE members are available to provide their peers guidance or information, or alink to a supportive faculty member. WIE committee members have in the past made criticalconnections between a student and the dean’s office, resulting in interventions that improved thestudent’s situation.Officers The committee elects officers, including a chair, a co-chair, webmaster(s) andpublicist(s). The role of the chair is to plan and
-engineering Success?” Journal of Engineering Education,vol.97, no.4, pp. 467–479, 2008.[10] B.F. French, J.C. Immekus, and W.C. Oakes, “An Examination of Indicators ofEngineering Students’ Success and Persistence.”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol.94,no.4, pp. 419–425, 2005.[11] M. Pinxten, C. Van Soom, C. Peeters, T. De Laet, and G. Langie, “At-Risk at the Gate : Prediction of Study Success of First-Year Science and Engineering Students in an Open- Admission University in Flanders- any incremental validity of study strategies?” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol.145, no.3, pp. 229–45, 2017.[12] L. Moses, C. Hall, K. Wuensch, K. De Urquidi, P. Kauffmann, W. Swart, S. Duncan, and G. Dixon, “Are Math Readiness and
4.33 based applications that emphasize societal benefits. I currently use context-based approaches in my teaching that utilize technology 3.80 based applications that emphasize societal benefits. I think using context-based approaches in my teaching that utilize technology based applications that emphasize societal benefits will help my students learn content 4.56 covered in my course(s). I am currently engaged in research on current engineering topics. 3.62 I am aware of how to apply my research topics/projects to teaching that I am doing. 4.38 I connect the lessons and content that I teach to STEM careers
, ASMR, and several other professional societies. She is a certified distance education specialist and also practices and studies active learning techniques in engineering classrooms as well as the impact of climate on hydrology, water resources and related infrastructure.Calvin Wampol, South Dakota State University I am currently a graduate student at South Dakota State University (SDSU) pursuing my MS degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering with emphasis in Structural Engineering. I earned a B. S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at SDSU in 2016. I am currently employed by my graduate advisor, Dr. Suzette Burckhard, as a Teaching Assistant and Research Assistant at SDSU. The responsibility for the
to lab) Safety Injury to team, injury to end user, damage to equipment Environmental Team must dispose of significant excess material, design requires hazardous materials, selecting a low-cost component that could lead to shorter life and the need for additional purchases, design requires purchase of consumable items for end user Social Design choices cause harm to a team member or end user based on social issues (e.g.: loss of confidentiality, contradicts local cultures and customs) Action taken – how will the team will address (or not) the risk Prevent Action will be taken to prevent the cause(s) from occurring in the first place. Reduce Action will be taken
: Additional economies of scale •CON: Individual researchers and institutions may lose flexibility services across institutions •CAVEAT: Understand institution roles and responsibilities for shared governance, compliance, and cybersecurity processes Commercial hosting & •PRO: Allow s some risk transference to third party •PRO/CON: M ay be higher or lower cost, depending on vendor compliance services
Conference.Gordon, D. M., Iwamoto, D., Ward, N., Potts, R., & Boyd, E. (2009). Mentoring urban Blackmiddle-school male students: Implications for academic achievement. The Journal of NegroEducation, 78(3), 277.Greer, R. P., Henderson, J. A., Summers, R. G., & Morphew, J. W. (2017, June). Engagement inPractice: Success Gleaned from the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy. In 2017 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition. doi:105860/choice.41-1054Haik, Y., Sivaloganathan, S., & Shahin, T. M. (2015). Engineering design process. NelsonEducation.Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G. Sadler, P.M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physicsexperiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study.Journal of Research in