guidelines.This rubric, detailed in the appendix and earlier papers [1], is a work in progress, addressingsystemic issues that have persisted for centuries.The importance of such collaborations is echoed in recent National Academies reports. The 2019report Minority Serving Institutions: America’s Underutilized Resource for Strengthening theSTEM Workforce [2] highlights MSIs' critical role in diversifying the STEM workforce. The2023 report Advancing Antiracism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Organizations:Beyond Broadening Participation [3] underscores the need for sustainable partnerships betweenMSIs and PWIs, recommending PWIs draw inspiration from MSIs’ culturally responsivepractices. A January 2024 dissemination event by the National
. Thefindings suggest that such targeted early interventions can positively shape engineeringidentity and motivation. While further longitudinal study is needed to assess long-termimpact, the short-term results provide valuable insights for inclusive engineering educationpractices.I. IntroductionEngineering plays a vital role in addressing real-world challenges; however, a significantgender imbalance persists in the field, particularly in disciplines such as electricalengineering. Nationally, women constitute only 15.5% of electrical engineering graduates, astark contrast to their representation in environmental (57.8%) and biomedical engineering(51.5%) programs [1][2]. Despite ongoing diversity initiatives, engineering remains one ofthe most gender
and tenure track (TT) and non-tenure track (NTT) positions. The number ofadjunct faculty in the United States has significantly increased in recent decades - the increasehas even led to coining the term "adjunctification" as a descriptor of the growing reliance onNTT faculty [1]. In 2021, two-thirds of all faculty members at U.S. universities held contingentappointments, a stark contrast to fewer than half in 1987 [2]. This trend has led to a decline inTT positions, with 24% of faculty members holding such positions in 2021, down from 39% in1987.The growing dependence on NTT faculty has not resulted in corresponding levels ofcompensation or institutional support. Research through the Harvard Collaborative onAcademic Careers in Higher
which are perpetuated by Whiteness. Personal and social identities and theirintersections such as race, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, mold how people engagewith the curriculum, each other, and perceive their place within the engineering discipline basedon power differentials [1], [2]. Whiteness in engineering is not simply about the demographicmakeup of the profession; it encompasses the underlying assumptions, values, and practices thatdefine what is considered "normal" and "acceptable" in engineering spaces [3]. These normsinfluence hiring practices, workplace culture, educational curricula, and even the way problemsare framed and solved [1], [4]-[8].It is without question that predominantly white institutions and corporations
BSengineering graduates for future national economic growth [1-7]. Obvious methods foraddressing this issue are increasing engineering persistence [2] and increasing the participationof underrepresented populations that enter the engineering student pathway [6-8]. Although theannual number of total BS engineering graduates did increase over the last two decades, from66,852 in 2002 to 139,482 in 2022 [9], an increase of 209%, this increase was primarily fueledby the expansion of existing programs and the creation of new programs [10]. Thus, there is anopportunity to solve the engineering pathway issue by recruiting and retaining women.Unfortunately, the push to increase BS engineering graduates over the last two decades hasmarginally affected the
either a two-day intensive training, or could bebroken up into two weeks of six smaller training sessions (modules). Each module willconsist of 1) presentation materials mapping learning objectives and the relatededucational theories, 2) peer mentor created case scenario videos, and 3) an activelearning activity that practices theories and case study topics from the module.This short format is intended to be delivered at the beginning of each course semester,when students have returned to campus, in time for certification of new peer mentors, oras a refresher for returning peer mentors to be prepared to serve in the first-yearmakerspace classroom the same semester.Results and ReflectionsThe results of the portion of the research project
, 2018, p.6). This is the current teamwork student outcome. Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality Assurance of Many engineering schools use CATME to assess their students’ teamwork skills Engineering Education through Accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteriafor ABET accreditation (e.g. Beigpourian et al., 2019; Brawner et al., 2018; Lucietto 2000 and Its Global Influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 165–184.& Berry, 2017
solution is a new cloud service known as HPC-as-a-Service.In this paper, we present an HPCaaS platform called ASETS which uses Software DefinedNetworking (SDN) technologies to smooth the execution of parallel tasks in the cloud. Further,we provide application examples that could be used in a typical introductory parallel programingcourse. We argue that HPCaaS platform like ASETS can significantly benefit the users of HPCin the cloud as if their program is running on a dedicated hardware in their own laboratory. Thisis especially advantageous for students and educators who need not to deal with the underlyingcomplexities of the cloud.1. IntroductionCloud Computing according to NIST1 is a shared pool of configurable resources offeringservices with
three wheeled ground robot with an ultrasonic sensor tied in front of it as shown in Fig 1. Its compactness, robustness, user friendliness, the synchronization (both Android and EV3) in terms of programming paradigm and necessarily its cost effectiveness Fig 1: Structure of the robot have made it the ideal robotic platform for the implementation of this project.iii. Android platformAndroid is an innovative as well as a noble and open development platform launched in 2007 byGoogle, based on the Linux carnal. Besides enhancing the flexibility in using mobile devices andpromoting user experience, it has
current systems. (1, 2, 3, 4)The higher education arena interacts in a complex way with a variety of external partners whoserole, participation, and expertise must be harnessed to help overcome some of the challenges thathave beset engineering education in the Region. Perhaps the most notable partner in thisendeavor is the industrial sector whose role and participation in shaping engineering educationhas, unfortunately, been extremely modest by best estimates. Establishing a beneficial workingrelationship between colleges of engineering in the Region and industries at large, has proven tobe difficult, often short-lived, and appears at the outset, not to be rewarding to either side.Among the many factors contributing to this failure, is the
negatively affect the overall learning ofthe students as measured by their performance on a common, cumulative final exam. Studentsgenerally liked the opportunity to apply their knowledge to real world problems that werethematically centered on the biomedical industry and to be able to work in teams.IntroductionThe Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) supported by the Kern FamilyFoundation was created in 2005 to “champion the entrepreneurial mindset in undergraduateengineering students.”1-3 In an effort to achieve this goal, the Kern Family Foundation created anetwork made up of mostly private engineering schools that are committed to developing theentrepreneurial mindset in their undergraduate engineering students through the network
but not solarge as to invalidate the tools. Steps should be considered to educate students about potentialbias.IntroductionTeamwork is an integral part of Engineering and Engineering Education.1 Well-designed groupand team projects can help students gain valuable teaming skills, and accrediting bodies requirethese skills of engineering graduates.2,3 But teamwork is not without its problems. Social loafingand “I better do it myself, if I want an A” syndrome are part of many peoples experiences withgroup and teamwork.4 A well-designed peer evaluation process can improve the studentexperience and lead to more powerful learning outcomes.Peer evaluation can be used to foster a better team experience and to equitably recognizeindividual student’s
industries that had a great sense oftraditional values and environmental awareness, and explored Taiwan's culture through the eyesof local students. The cohort was a resounding success, with overwhelming positive studentfeedback. Overall, the SJSU GTI program has been very successful and has met the objectivesset for it. Embedding continuous assessment and improvement into this program has allowed usto adapt to changes and provide the participants with an intensive global experience.1. Purpose of the GTI ProgramIn the globally competitive 21st century, corporations have been aggressive in expandingmarkets and their workforces across the globe. In order for engineers to thrive in such anenvironment, they need to understand and prepare for this new
Satisfaction Table 4 Data collection procedures and schedules Phases Contents Duration(1) Pre-tests Demographics , computer experience, GPA Two weeks Knowledge on selected subjects through Concept Inventory Learning disposition measured through MSLQ(2) Collaborative learning Online discussion for collaborative learning Ten weeksthrough online discussion Students' Self-report on collaborative learning process Instructors
Children’s Hospital, and the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.Dr. Sheryl Elaine Burgstahler, University of Washigton Dr. Sheryl Burgstahler founded and directs the DO-IT (Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology) Center and the Access Technology Center. These two centers promote (1) the use of main- stream and assistive technology and other interventions to support the success of students with disabilities in postsecondary education and careers and (2) the development of facilities, computer labs, academic and administrative software, websites, multimedia, and distance learning programs that are welcoming and accessible to individuals with disabilities. The ATC focuses efforts at the UW; the DO-IT
of responsible science and social science writing. What is less often Page 26.1564.2addressed by even the most thoughtful researchers, however, is the available field of existingresearch options, as such; the universe of possible, credible methodological choices orevidentiary standards.1, 2 We believe that reflection on those parameters would support a morerobust inquiry into STEM education subjects, as would explicit contextualization of researchers’chosen methods or standards along societal terms: that is, attention to the question of whichsocietal conditions may determine researchers’ embrace of quantitative or qualitative methods
the German Institute ofEconomics, the country currently needs 117,000 engineers, scientists, IT experts and technicians. Page 26.337.2U.K is also faced with a chronic shortage of science graduates and especially engineers, whereseveral industries are struggling with a shortage of engineers in the area of power generation,aerospace and manufacturing. Sub-Saharan Africa alone needs 2.5 million new engineers andtechnicians if the region was to achieve the UN Millennium Development Goal of improvedaccess to clean water and sanitation [1].The number of engineering graduates enrolled in Asian countries and their population trendshows that the
terms of theundergraduate and graduate degrees they earn at colleges and universities. Yet, in spite ofsuch advances, most science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields stillremain sharply gender segregated, with men making up the majority.1 This is nowheremore evident than in engineering. According to statistics, women earn 57% ofundergraduate degrees, but only 18% of baccalaureates in engineering.2-3 These trendsare a cause for concern because occupational gender segregation fuels the wage gapbetween men and women, which perpetuates gender inequalities.4 Additionally, a dearthof women in engineering represents the potential loss of human capital that could help toadvance scientific and technological discovery.5In response to this
their faculty research advisors received $100.AssessmentDemographicsThe pilot Spring Break for Research program attracted 25 applications for the pilot program. Fromthese applications, a diverse group of 20 undergraduates and 20 graduate mentors were selected asseen in Table 1. 60% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 25.0% 24.3% 25% 20% 11.5% 10% 6.2% 0% URM Female Undergraduates in College of Engineering SB4R Undergraduates Graduates in College of Engineering SB4R GraduatesTable 1. Demographics
study was an interpretativephenomenology analysis (IPA)7; nine sophomore and junior biomedical engineering (BME) andmechanical engineering (ME) students at a southeastern land grant institution were interviewedabout their experiences in terms of connecting their future goals to their actions in the present.The themes that emerged from these interviews focused on the range of possible future selvesthat students described. These themes were then described graphically as being cone-shaped (seeFigure 1), where the three axes represent time-orientation, instrumentality, time attitude axis7.The second study was a phenomenography, focusing on the different ways in which students areperceiving the future5–7. This study was a continuation of the first
key steps: Chatbot development, educational intervention,and assessment design and survey development. Each step was critical in ensuring the successfulapplication of the chatbot as both a technical resource and an educational tool aimed at fosteringcritical thinking and ethical awareness in engineering students. Below the framework wasoutlined for the methodology and illustrated in Figure 1: 1. Chatbot Development 2. Educational Intervention - Ethical Training - Technical Training 3. Assessment Design - Likert and Open-ended Questions
ANSEPdeveloping the home away from home environment and what improvements have been madethat affect future improvement cycles and studies? The answers will help ANSEP improve itsUniversity Success component and also help ANSEP to continue to grow its pre-collegecomponents. ANSEP will also target funding support based on the findings and launch a newstudy in 2025.IntroductionAlaska consists of 22% Indigenous People, the highest of any state in the United States (US) [1].However, Alaska Native People are drastically underrepresented in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics degree programs and professions. At the University of Alaska(UA), Indigenous Students only represent 15% of its enrollment [2]. To improve thisunderrepresentation, the Alaska
the mountains “join” up). After mapping out the mountain, we can then lookto see if, for example, trees on different mountains have any systematic differences, such as theirgenus, average height, longevity, etc. The analogy of studying the location of trees on themountain is represented schematically in Figure 1 as a companion to the illustrative exampledescribed in this paragraph.Figure 1: Schematic representation of the illustrative example of use Topological Data Analysis. Here elevation profiles of mountains are examine to understand the different tree populations found in different elevation zones.In this same way, we use the Mapper algorithm to search the quantitative student response datafor patterns in the
Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the cate- gory Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-SoE’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 7 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 109 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 16 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research students and 11 under- graduate senior design project teams
institutionalization strategies thatwere eventually employed. We will also discuss this project’s contribution to a greaterSTEM presence and culture on campus which has resulted in our Latino/Hispanic studentsapproaching full representation in STEM and engineering majors on our campus. (Figure 1) Approaching Representation 50% Percentage of STEM majors who are Latino Percentage of Latino students 40% 30% 34% 32% 34% 20% 26% 23% 19% 20% 10
analysispresented here is part of a larger study of the “impact trajectories” (contributions, influences,challenges, successes) of pioneers in the field of engineering education. For the purposes of thisproject, “engineering education pioneers” are defined as those who (1) are/were active (throughresearch, practice, and/or service) in the area of engineering education; and (2) are recognized bymembers of the engineering education community as significant contributors to or shapers of thefield of engineering education.In this paper, we seek to explore in greater depth the nature of engineering education pioneers’perceived contributions and impacts in engineering education, and what these contributions andimpacts mean for the engineering education community
avoidenvironmental restrictions and tax obligations. Specifically, this paper examines the CostaConcordia incident as an illustration for the information to follow: questionable registrationpractices; pollution issues; and integration in technical classes, specifically, the field ofenvironmental engineering.BackgroundInterest in the environmental effects of the cruise ship industry is relatively a recent, dating backabout 20 years, which corresponds to the physical growth of the ships and the explosion ofconsumers in search of exotic vacations. Between 1980 and 2013, the number of passengersincreased from 1.4 million to 21.5 million,1, 2 with an estimated 24 million to sail in 2016.1Consequently, the size of ships has increased to accommodate higher
. Data collection has been underway since the end of year one,once IRB approval had been attained. For details from the group doing the research for thisproject, refer to another paper at this conference[1].What the goals and strategies mentioned above mean changes from year to year. Some ideaswork well, and others do not. In year 1, it became clear that it was necessary to identify at leastone key person at each institution and to find ways to facilitate the development of a solid,effective working partnership between the various schools in each node. Students at some CCsgot excellent advice preparing them to transfer, most did not. Some faculty at 4-year schoolsknew someone at a nearby CC, and something about the CC student experience, most
teach sustainability in engineering through a bell hooks lensIntroductionA review of the characteristics of classroom dynamics is presented in contrast to a specificcourse designed to act as an introduction to sustainability for multidisciplinary engineeringdesign students.Correlating pedagogy to presenceInterdisciplinary collaboration and innovative teaching methodologies can effectively bridgetheoretical sustainability concepts with practical engineering applications, ultimately preparingfuture engineers to address complex global environmental challenges and design moresustainable technological solutions [1]. Reviews of this topic highlight that to effectivelytransform engineering education, institutions must develop adaptive
— supported graduate engineering and computerscience students through financial assistance, mentorship, and professional development. A keyproject goal was to establish a graduate student association to sustain the student communitypost-funding. As of Fall 2022, retention for Cohort 3 (Fall 2021 entrants) reached 83%.Graduation rates by the fourth year were 100% for Cohort 1 (Fall 2019 entrants) and 86% forCohort 2 (Fall 2020 entrants). These outcomes are comparable to the institutionally reported fall-to-fall retention rate of 86% for master’s students, excluding those who had already completedthe program. Despite recruitment challenges, pandemic impacts, and post-grant sustainabilityconcerns, the project successfully cultivated a supportive