Education, professor of Higher Educa- tion and Student Affairs, senior research fellow in the Public Policy Center, and director of the Center for Research on Undergraduate Education at the University of Iowa. His research uses a social psychological lens to explore key issues in higher education, including student success, diversity and equity, admissions, rankings, and quantitative research methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 How Engineering Faculty, Staff and Administrators Enact and Experience Diversity ProgramsEmily Blosser 1*, Arunkumar Pennathur 2, Priyadarshini Pennathur 3, Nicholas Bowman41 Department of Sociology, University of Louisiana at
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Approaches to Evidencing Intra-Team Equity in Student Collaborative Design Decision-Making InteractionsIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper reports progress on our goal to find a means of identifying andevidencing behavior change in undergraduate engineering student teamwork following anequity-focused intervention. The intervention in question is implemented by Tandem, anin-house software platform that provides students with a space to give frequent feedbackregarding their teamwork experience, and then offers customized instructional material to theteam to change behaviors and improve the team dynamic [1]. The project on which this paperreports is part of a wider
Underrepresented Minorities in Aerospace EngineeringAbstractTraditionally, aerospace engineering disciplines are substantially underrepresented by AfricanAmerican, Hispanic, and female students. For example, Black and Hispanic American studentscollectively earn only 10.6%, 8.4%, and 6.4% of the BS, MS, and Ph.D.’s in aerospaceengineering, respectively. They are among the lowest percentages of all major engineeringdisciplines, leading to underutilization of the talent pool in the aerospace industry. 1 To tackle thisconcern, a multi-institution coalition sponsored by NASA is established to engageunderrepresented minorities in coordinated educational and professional development activities,including senior design projects, undergraduate research experiences
mentorship, scholarship, and external factors. Over the nexttwo years, additional data will be collected to determine how students' perceptions of themselvesas researchers change as these doctoral students progress through their program. This research addresses three key gaps in the current literature on engineering identitydevelopment: 1) the limited existing longitudinal research on the topic of engineering identitydevelopment; 2) the limited existing research on engineering identity development in doctoralstudents, and 3) the limited existing research on the process of engineering identity development.The practical impacts of this study relate to understanding the way engineering doctoralprograms are designed and how this design may be
analysis will be used toidentify any trends that might exist in the number of students enrolling in and successfullycompleting construction education programs as well as trends that might exist among minoritypopulations. IntroductionMuch of the discussion regarding the employment needs of the construction industry concerns thecontinuing shortage of skilled labor. One segment of the construction industry workforce that isnot discussed as much on an individual basis is construction management. The employment needfor construction managers is expected to grow by 7.6% between 2021 and 2031 [1]. The distinctionbetween the employment outlook for construction workers and the employment outlook forconstruction
solutions Student teams work on projects Sweeping Operations 10 Lab Safety Challenge 1: (remotely or in session) How to plan a 3D print 1030 Lab Tour Create school logo Multipiece/tolerance Concept Challenge 2: practice project 11 Intro
, Technology and Society in the University of Vir- ginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Elizabeth Opila ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student curiosity in engineering courses and researchexperiences: “I'm kind of torn between being a decent student and a decent engineer.”Abstract:This mixed-methods research paper investigates how classes and research experiences affectundergraduate engineering students’ curiosity. Students become curious when they recognize agap in their knowledge and seek to resolve this uncertainty [1]. When students are curious abouta topic, their learning better generalizes to new material and contexts [2]. Both the classroom andthe
learning management system(LMS), instructors can transition from traditional lecture-based use of course time and use thatinstructional period as an in-person meeting to facilitate collaborative engagements of students.Facilitative Instructor Model with Active Learning Modules A facilitative instructor model is a method of inverted classroom instruction wherecontent and supplementary material appear in an accessible location for students, such as withinan online LMS (1), and an instructor facilitates students learning through authentic learningexperiences during course time (2). Students can utilize times and locations where they feelcomfortable learning and practicing course content. During scheduled course time, students
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education focuses oneducating future generations to be successful in their professions. A decline in STEMproficiency has been reported in America, leading to significant regression from its position asa global leader in math and science. Debbie Myers, general manager of DiscoveryCommunications in STEM Diversity Symposium concluded: "International comparisons placethe U.S. in the middle of the pack globally." For the United States to achieve a competitiveadvantage, there is a need to encourage young people to develop a passion for learning andspecifically encourage minorities and females to pursue STEM careers [1]. Another report named "Rising above the Gathering Storm" indicated that the U.S. is
Competence for Engineering Formation (Work in Progress)1. IntroductionThe purpose of this project is to determine to what extent global engineering competence can bedeveloped in engineering students through the use of four minimally to moderately intensiveglobal engagement interventions. The specific global engagement interventions evaluatedinclude the use of international engineering case studies in a quantitative analysis course, theintentional formation of multinational student design teams within a capstone design course, aCollaborative Online International Learning (COIL) research project in a fluid flow (transportphenomena) course, and an engineering short course coupled to a community engaged project.The specific
. Thesestudies fall into one of three categories: First are the studies that use the final product to assessteam performance but test instructional techniques or teamwork frameworks. The objective ofthis first category is to observe if they can modify teamwork inputs to achieve improvedteamwork outputs (designs or reports). Examples of this kind of assessment study include thework by Rodriguez et al. [1] and Ogot and Okudan [2], where they measured the diversity of ateam or the personality of each member to determine the impact on team performance. The second category of teamwork assessment focuses on the ability of a team to adopt andemploy a specific teamwork framework. The work by Senaratne & Gunawardane [3] is a goodexample of applying a
LiberatedUniversities of Iraq 1. One of the focus areas of this project was the professional development ofeach University’s engineering educators because of its affordances for sustainable economicgrowth. Subsequently, Purdue University, World Learning, and an Iraqi University conducted ajoint needs assessment to identify the specific areas of interest for the engineering facultymembers. A population survey was conducted with all 161 faculty members of the College ofEngineering. The needs assessment identified student-centered learning, blended learning, andculturally relevant pedagogy as the faculty members’ core pedagogical areas of interest. Theseneeds were identified in a conscious attempt to navigate the disruption to normal day-to-dayclassroom practices
of stereotype threat and thetheoretical framework of epistemic injustice. Stereotype threat examined through the lens ofepistemic injustice offers an extemporaneous perspective on the epistemological interplaybetween culture and individual to tackle the long-standing problem of women’sunderrepresentation in engineering.IntroductionThe origins of engineering in the US stem from mid-19th century universities, in which the firstengineering societies began to form and establish values for the profession [1]–[5]. Becausewhite, cisgender, heterosexual men were the population of individuals that had the most access tostudying engineering in the 1850s, they established the culture and values of engineering basedon their shared identities [6]. As a
unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth." – Dr. Cornel WestIntroduction Leadership is a highly sought-after skill and experiential opportunity for engineeringstudents and professionals. Engineering leadership research has explored how engineeringincorporates and conceptualizes leadership in engineering professional and educational settings.For example, engineering leadership research has explored the definitions of what engineeringleadership is [1], [2]; the skills involved in engineering leadership [3]–[5]; and practices tosupport engagement in engineering leadership [6]–[11]. While there are studies that explore howengineering leadership is conceptualized, there is a lack of
-Based-Learning (PBL) for skillsdevelopment, motivation, and retention (both in terms of students staying in the major and interms of retaining learned skills) of engineering students. While all students take design coursesleading to their senior capstone projects, they do not all build prototypes of their work. Typically,in naval architecture and marine engineering programs, PBL projects focus on building smallmodels due to time, space, and cost issues with using full-scale vessels. Exceptions to thisapproach are taken at two colleges, where students may take elective courses that feature full-scale construction of 10-15 ft long plywood craft. At the United States Coast Guard Academy(USCGA), the first-year, 1-credit, course introduces
identified as male and four as female. The representation of the sample’s race and ethnicity makeup include: Black (n=1), Hispanic or Latino (n=1), Middle Eastern (n=2), and white (n=6). Table 1 provides additional co-researcher demographic information, as reported in the screening survey. Table 1 Co-researcher Demographic InformationPseudonym Race Gender Disability(s) Engineering Year-in-School International Major Student (Y/N)Joe Middle Male Learning Civil First-year Y EasternSammy Middle Male Cognitive
health related help seeking in undergraduate engineering students,a qualitative study was conducted based on the integrated behavioral model (IBM). Through thisstudy, 33 students were asked about their beliefs related to seeking help for a mental healthconcern, as guided by the IBM. The current study aims to characterize the messages that studentsreceive (either explicitly or implicitly) from engineering faculty and staff that might influence theirthoughts around help seeking. After qualitative analysis, three common themes were identified: 1)Supportive explicit and implicit messages around help seeking are often tied to an individualfaculty or staff member, 2) College level change around mental health is viewed positively ifappropriately
and the importance of close mentorship.We motivate further persistence research in ML/AI with particular focus on social belonging andclose mentorship, the role of intersectional identity, and introductory ML/AI courses.IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is now used in almost every industry [1]. As such, ML/AI courses, majorsand careers are increasingly sought out by university graduates. While ML/AI falls within theboundaries of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM), there are elements of this newfield, industry and type of work which set it apart; Thus, a study dedicated to understanding thedynamics of student perceptions of ML/AI can help us better evaluate how the field may beencouraging or discouraging broad
learning objectivesof the course. There are two options that students may choose for the final project: 1) theproblem-solving track and 2) the creativity, or open-ended, track. This paper describes the finalphase of the development of the project option and its assessment results regarding creativity andinclusion. The final project files from three semesters, between Fall 2020 and Fall 2021, and foursections were de-identified and rated for creativity by three experts in civil engineering, using theConsensual Assessment Technique. This paper reports the final project components and rubric,results related to students’ demonstrated creativity for the problem-solving versus open-endedtrack, and the lessons learned, impact, and challenges of
, women of all racial/ethnic backgrounds,and other underrepresented students [1-4]. While women account for over half of all collegedegrees earned in the United States, the National Science Foundation reports that womencomprise one of the lowest rates of engineering degree recipients [5].Within the engineering workforce in the United States, only 14% of engineers are women and13% of engineers are from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (African American,Hispanic, Native American/Native Alaskan, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) [6]. Thesediscrepancies of representation are addressed in this study as underrepresented minorities(URM). The national need to increase representation in the engineering workforce includesretaining URM students that
in the Public Policy Center, and director of the Center for Research on Undergraduate Education at the University of Iowa. His research uses a social psychological lens to explore key issues in higher education, including student success, diversity and equity, admissions, rankings, and quantitative research methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Systems Engineering Initiative for Student Success (SEISS) Framework for Transforming Organizational Designs Arunkumar Pennathur1*, Priyadarshini Pennathur1, Emily Blosser2, Nicholas Bowman3 1 Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso
perceptions of their own capacities; self-perceptions of STEM and engineering related strengths are predictive of persistence incoursework, participation in relevant co-curricular activities, and career exploration (Cabell,2021; Simon et al, 2015). Invention education includes a transdisciplinary range of pedagogical strategies that aredesigned to improve children’s inventive habits of mind as well as their awareness ofcommercialization related topics such as intellectual property and business model development(National Inventors Hall of Fame, 2019). Programs often teach invention processes such asidentifying problems, ideating, designing and testing prototype solutions, and sharing the ideawith others 1. Common formats for invention education
engineering computingcourse [1]. The revised course includes weekly readings followed by small-group discussions oncurriculum-aligned real-world justice topics. For example, students read an article onenvironmental racism that discussed how, contrary to popular belief, environmental pollutioncorrelates more strongly with race than with class. Discussion prompts drew students’ attentionto the data science implications: how what data is collected and how it is analyzed directlydetermines what conclusions can be drawn.This work-in-progress paper develops a case study analysis of post-course interviews of sixinternational students of color. We use a qualitative case study approach to analyze theseinterviews, focusing on students’ expressed identity and
Monitoring Industry-ClassroomProgram for Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Students Dr. Alexis Ortiz-Rosario,1 and Ali Kaveh Rahimi21 Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA; 2Ohio AtHome Health Care Agency, Columbus, OH, USA AbstractThe at-home remote monitoring sector of healthcare is a growing industry. This healthcaremarket is valued at $24 billion, and it is projected to reach $166 Billion by 2030 [1]. Thisgrowing industry has unique challenges and can promote unique learning opportunities forundergraduate biomedical engineering students [2]. A collaborative industry-classroomprogram was developed along with Ohio At Home Health Care Agency
, specifically: 1) the ways in which a brief ecological belonging intervention should becustomized for different course contexts; 2) the key mechanisms underpinning how theintervention supports proximal and distal student outcomes; and 3) the efficacy and mechanismsby which course onboarding strategies involving leadership messaging and community learningprocesses are successful across varied course, departmental, and university contexts intransforming each targeted course.In this paper, we focus on the third component and describe our process for building buy-in withleadership and faculty regarding this intervention. As a part of this process, we have gatheredsurvey information to understand instructor willingness to use this intervention in their
evidence-basedpractices to achieve transformative, systemic and sustainable change that will increase thegrowth rate in the number of BIPOC and women obtaining undergraduate/graduate engineeringdegrees and establish a future growth rate that can substantially close the participation gaps. Theshare of engineering degrees awarded to women and/or those who are Black, Indigenous andPeople of Color (BIPOC) in the United States over the past decade reflects only slow progress inthe efforts to increase representation of these groups at the undergraduate and graduate levels.And for men who identify as Black, Indigenous, and/or People of Color, the percentage ofmaster’s and doctoral engineering degrees being awarded has actually declined in recent years[1
plays a key role in addressing global inequity and injustice.Enabling engineers to address complex technological challenges like climate change requires thedevelopment of new skills such as evaluating justice dimensions of engineering andcollaborating with diverse communities [1].Conventional engineering education emphasizes technology-based attributes such as analyticalskill development, technical knowledge, and creative problem solving and leaves little time forstudents to deeply engage with the social implications of their work [2] [3]. However, in recentyears, there has been an increased effort to incorporate social justice into engineering education[4-9]. One method has been to encourage students to take social justice-based electives
engineering, the use of role models has been touted as one way to increase the number ofgirls pursuing engineering majors and careers, e.g., [1]. However, based on findings from fourth-and fifth-grade girls participating in an engineering outreach program, we question whetheryouth in this age group are looking for engineering role models, and we challenge theassumption that youth take up an individual as a role model simply because a program attemptsto position them in this way. This has led us to question what role these “models” play in theminds and lives of youth, and we argue that it may differ from what we have believed. In thisstudy, we seek to answer the following: 1) Are elementary-aged girls looking for role models?;2) How do girls perceive
software and hardware tools, and theneed to ensure students apply sufficient engineering rigor in their analysis and design of projectsolutions.IntroductionProject-based learning (PBL) is an active pedagogy in which student learning is achievedthrough the completion of hands-on project work, and it has become an integral aspect ofengineering curricula worldwide. This trend is largely a response to a perception that engineeringstudents graduate with insufficient design experience, underdeveloped professional competenciessuch as communication skills and teamwork, and a poor understanding of the many societalcontexts in which engineers must operate [1]. PBL is viewed as a powerful tool for addressingthese needs, as project work is self-directed in
and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Navigating Intersectional Identities in Civil Engineering Education and Practice1 Introduction:Underrepresentation is a well-known and researched topic in academia, specifically forengineering that remains a White, male-dominated field [1]. Underrepresentation is defined by “apopulation’s representation in education and employment that is smaller than their representationin the U.S population.” It is also defined by the uniformity of representation by field, forexample, “Although women have reached parity with men among S&E bachelor’s degreerecipients—half