Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tripp Shealy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Felicity Bilow, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

5 shows the frequency of human rating scores for the mental model dimensions, andFigure 6 shows the frequency of human rating scores for the mental model uses. The color ineach plot corresponds to temperature values. The rows of plots correspond to the model’srankings of the questions (i.e., top choice, second choice, and third choice). For example, “QRanking 1” was all the questions that the model ranked highest, “Q Ranking 2” was all thequestions that the model ranked second highest, and “Q Ranking 3” was all the questions rankedthird highest. Looking at the questions in this way illustrates our main findings. First, themodel’s rankings were not necessarily aligned with the human’s rankings. Second, thetemperature did not produce any

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Harpreet Auby, Tufts University; Namrata Shivagunde, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Anna Rumshisky, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Milo Koretsky, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, 2018.[29] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications, 2021.[30] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2013.[31] C. Raffel et al., “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified Text-to-Text Transformer.” arXiv, Jul. 28, 2020. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683[32] OpenAI, “GPT-4 Technical Report.” arXiv, Mar. 27, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774.[33] A. Q. Jiang et al., “Mixtral of Experts.” arXiv, Jan. 08, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.04088.[34] “AI Coding powered by

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Betsy Chesnutt Ph.D., University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Daniel Patrick Mountain, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

there anything that would prevent someone from being an engineer?In the second part of the interview, participants were provided with a list of 33 words or phrasesand asked to sort these based on how well they described engineers or engineering. Sort itemsincluded characteristics such as “prefer work as part of a team” and “great at math,” andparticipants sorted the words or phrases on a scale from “no engineers do/are/have” to “allengineers do/are/have.”The sort procedure used in this study was a modified form of Q-sort methodology [Brown –Computer monitor]. As the participants sorted the items, the researchers asked questions togather more information about their perceptions and any potentially unclear sort items.Participants were also given

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Houshang Darabi, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Rezvan Nazempour, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Peter C. Nelson, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Renata A. Revelo, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Shanon Marie Reckinger, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Didem Ozevin, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Anthony E. Felder, The University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

their major. Nazempour et al. [4] provide more details regarding the SBP structure,execution, and assessment.Summer Bridge Program for cohort III was held virtually via Zoom in the Spring of 2021 due tothe COVID-19 pandemic. During this 2-hour online workshop, cohort III of scholars becameacquainted with the program, faculty mentors, and some cohorts I and II scholars. There was alsoa Q/A session in that cohort III scholars asked questions from scholars of other cohorts andfaculties.Mentorship Program. To ensure that all scholars have access to resources and feel supported,each scholar was assigned to a faculty mentor from the academic department corresponding tothe scholar's major. Cohort I and II scholars were assigned to their faculty

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Geoffrey Brown, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Monica H. Lamm, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Md Imtiajul Alam, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

students' identification with engineering. Paperpresented at the Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE), 2010 IEEE.[6] Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world.Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273-307.[7] Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of aprofessional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. Paper presented at the Frontiers inEducation Conference, 2009. FIE'09. 39th IEEE [8] Patrick, A., & Borrego, M. (2016, June). A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity.In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,.[9] Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Meabh Kelly, University of Connecticut; Ido Davidesco, University of Connecticut; Aaron Kyle, Columbia University in the City of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

biology and medicine.” Genome Medicine, vol. 5, no. 9, Sep., 2013.[5] P. Pevzner and R. Shamir, “Computing has changed biology: Biology education must catch up,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5940, Jul., 2009.[6] T. Hsu, S. Chang, and Y. Hung, “How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature,” Computers & Education, vol. 126, Nov., 2018.[7] D. Kotsopoulos, L. Floyd, S. Khan, I. Namukasa, S. Somanath, J. Weber and C. Yiu, “A pedagogical framework for computational thinking,” Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, vol. 3, no. 2, Mar., 2017.[8] X. Tang, Y. Yin, Q. Lin, R. Hadad, and X. Zhai, “Assessing computational thinking: A systematic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Kaczmarczyk, Lisa Kaczmarczyk PhD Consulting, LLC; Daniel Pinedo, Lisa Kaczmarczyk PhD Consulting, LLC

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

culture - and incorporating those findings into asset based reflections ofSNA data - will enable project leadership to achieve the highest levels of project success. It isour sincere hope that readers of this work (and viewers of the accompanying poster) will developtheir own mixed method SNA - cultural analysis educational research studies and reflectsuccessfully on the findings.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (DUE-1626287,DUE-1626185, and DUE-1626148) including two Graduate Research Fellowships (DGE-133486). References[1] M. Q. Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4th ed.). Sage publications, 2008.[2] J. E. Grunig, “Qualitative methods for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Adrian Villalta-Cerdas, Sam Houston State University; David E. Thompson Ph.D., Sam Houston State University; Steven L. Hegwood, Sam Houston State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

CHEM1412 General Inorganic and course was the bridge Grade General Chemistry I Environmental taken in fall course Chemistry II Totals (%) Chemistry 2020 ABC 11 (46%) YES DF 8 (33%) n=24 Q 5 (21%) N/A ABC 11 (41%) 1 (100%) NO DF 12 (44%) n=36 QW 4 (15%) 2 (100%) N/A

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Anna M. Mostoller, Elizabethtown College; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, online, 2020.[14] S. K. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, M. F. Schar, Q. Jin, G. Toye, A. Harris, E. Cao, E. Costache,M. Reithmann and S. D. Sheppard, "Designing a longitudinal study of engineering students’innovation and engineering interestsand plans: The Engineering Majors Survey Project. EMS 1.0and 2.0 Technical Report.," Stanford, CA, 2017.[15] A. C. Kusimo, S. Sheppard, M. E. Thompson and S. A. Atwood, "2018 BEST DIVERSITYPAPER: Effects of Research and Internship Experiences on Engineering Task SelfEfficacy onEngineering Students Through an Intersectional Lens.," in Proceedings of the American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Kristin Nicole Bryant, Washington State University; Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University; Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University; Aminul Islam Khan, Washington State University; Olufunso Oje, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

and Q&A 3:15pm 3:45pm Instructional Philosophy Sola Adesope 3:45pm 4:00pm Break 4:00pm 4:55pm LC-DLM Set I: Breakout groups based on Hub Coordinators hub 4:55pm 5:00pm Closing BERNIE VAN WIE*Note: For day 2, please come with DLMs setup and prepared O CTO B ER 2, 2 0 20 START END ITEM SPEAKER TIME TIME 2:00PM 2:10PM Welcome to Day 2 – brief discussion of ac- BERNIE VAN WIE tivities 2:10PM 2:35PM Fluids DLMs Session 2:35PM 2:45PM Debrief / Questions 2:45PM

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Aly A. Farag, University of Louisville; Asem Ali, University of Louisville; Islam Alkabbany, University of Louisville; James Christopher Foreman, University of Louisville; Tom Tretter, University of Louisville; Marci S. Decaro, University of Louisville; Nicholas Carl Hindy, University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. 74, pp. 59-109, 2004.[4] N. Hao, H. Xue, H. Yuan, Q. Wang and M. A. Runco, "Enhancing creativity: Proper body posture meets proper emotion.," Acta Psychologica, vol. 173, p. 32–40, 2017.[5] V. R. Andolfi, C. D. Nuzzo and A. Antonietti, "Opening the mind through the body: The effects of postureon creative processes," Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 24, p. 20–28, 2017.[6] E. Skinner and M. Belmont, "Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Access," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 571-581, 1993.[7] K. E. Voelkl, "Identification with school," Journal of Education, vol. 105, pp. 204-319, 1997.[8] J. J. Appleton, S. L

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova, West Virginia University; Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

students.Furthermore, information about the ACCESS program was shared with the local and statecommunities and appropriate recruiting materials were developed.3.1 Recruitment of High School StudentsRecruiting efforts focusing on high school students included making presentations to prospectivestudents and their families at the WVU Statler College High School Visitation Days eachsemester (on-campus for fall 2019 and spring 2020 and virtually for fall 2020) and sendingemails to prospective and admitted incoming students for the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022academic years. Students in the Fundamentals of Engineering Program (FEP) learned aboutACCESS through presentations given by project personnel in fall 2019 (in-person) and fall 2020(recording and live online Q&A

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Michael F. Young, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291-324. [10] Zhu, Q., & Zoltowski, C. B., & Feister, M. K., & Buzzanell, P. M., & Oakes, W. C., & Mead, A. D. (2014, June), The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision Making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--23130[11] Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The delphi method (pp. 3-12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.[12] Reed, J.,Streiner, S., Burkey, D., Cimino, R., Pascal, J., & Young, M., "Mapping the Landscape of First

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew A. Verleger Ph.D. (He/His/Him), Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

–819.Guilford, W. H. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(3), 167–175.Lesh, R. A., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for Developing Thought Revealing Activities for Students and Teachers. In A. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 591–645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Moreira, D. de A., & da Silva, E. Q. (2003). A method to increase student interaction using student groups and peer review over the internet. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023926308385Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2003). Web-based

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynn L. Peterson, University of Texas, Arlington; J. Carter Tiernan, University of Texas, Arlington; Kevin A. Schug, University of Texas, Arlington; Ramon Lopez, University of Texas, Arlington; James A. Mendoza Álvarez, The University of Texas, Arlington

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

STEM graduation rates at our institution. We felt thatthe decision to focus on the introductory math courses was, for us, the correct approach.Likewise the General Chemistry I (CHEM 1441) and the Chemistry for Engineers (1465)courses also demonstrated substantially better pass rates for ESP students.Fig 1. Pass rates / drop rates in the first three semesters’ implementation of ESP coursesU Texas Arlington Composite Results Table Fall 2010 thru Fall 2011Fall 2010, Spring 2011 & Fall 2011 compositeCourse A B C Pass D F I Q W Drop TotalMath 1323* ESP 5 16 6 56% 3 8 0 0 10 21% 48Math 1323* non-ESP (1) 13 14 24

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: RED 2 / Civil Eng

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

-explored in engineering and the characterization of the formercan contribute to an understanding of the latter. A brief overview of the study is provided tocontextualize the research and its implications for workforce development.Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES)The first phase of the study was the development and distribution of a survey on students’ out-of-class activities and outcomes. The instrument, termed the Postsecondary StudentEngagement Survey (PosSES), was generated through a process involving a literature review,Q-study with focus groups, panel of experts, and think aloud sessions. The survey was designedto understand the activities in which students participate, the barriers to participating, theincentive for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Identity

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State University; Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

engineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1920421. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] National Science Board, "NSB-2018-2, Science and Engineering Indicators 2018," National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators[2] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, "Diversifying the engineering workforce," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73-86, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[3] Q. Clark

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omaima Almatrafi, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Huzefa Rangwala; Jaime Lester, George Mason University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

in the field studies reported here. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Arnold, A. (1999). Retention and persistence in postsecondary education: A summation of research studies. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, 5.2. Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555-580.3. Hayes, R. Q., Whalen, S. K., & Cannon, B. (2009). Csrde stem retention report, 2008–2009. Center for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University; Katherine M Ehlert, Clemson University; Dennis M Lee, Clemson University; Penelope Vargas

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

undergraduate research? Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q., 17(163).5 Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.6 Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.7 Gee, J. P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.8 Carlone H. B. and Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color : Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218.9 Cass, C., Hazari, Z., Cribbs, J., Sadler, P. M. and Sonnert, G. (2011). Examining the Impact of Mathematics Identity on the Choice of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University - Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

’ metacognition during an engineering design project,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115–134, 2010.[5] O. Lawanto and S. Johnson, “Student’s cognitive self-appraisal, self-management, and the level of difficulty of an engineering design project: are they related?,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2009.[6] B. J. Zimmerman and M. M. Pons, “Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 614–628, 1986.[7] A. H. Schoenfeld, “Episodes and Executive Decisions in Mathematical Problem Solving,” in Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, R. Lesh and M. Landau, Eds. New York

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Mehrizi-Sani , Washington State University; Robert G. Olsen, Washington State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, and F. Sanchez-Figueroa, “The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems,” Educ. Psychologist, vol. 46, pp. 197–221, 2011.[17] W. Ma, O. O. Adesope, J. C. Nesbit, and Q. Liu, “Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analytic survey,” in Amer. Educ. Res. Assoc. Conf., 2013.[18] J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The power of feedback,” Review Educ. Research, vol. 77, pp. 81–112, Mar. 2007.[19] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[20] N. Yelland and J. Masters, “Rethinking scaffolding in the information age,” Comput. and Educ., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 362–382, Apr

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Summerville, Miami University; Jennifer Blue; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Brielle Nikole Johnson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Dyczewski and K. D. Markman, “General attainability beliefs moderate the motivational effects of counterfactual thinking,” ​J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.​, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1217–1220, Sep. 2012.[16] M. W. Morris and P. C. Moore, “The Lessons We (Don’t) Learn: Counterfactual Thinking and Organizational Accountability after a Close Call,” ​Adm. Sci. Q.,​ vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 737–765, Dec. 2000.[17] T. Gilovich and V. H. Medvec, “The experience of regret: what, when, and why,” ​Psychol. Rev.,​ vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 379–395, Apr. 1995.[18] N. J. Roese ​et al.​, “Repetitive Regret, Depression, and Anxiety: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey,” ​J. Soc. Clin. Psychol.,​ vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 671–688, Jun. 2009.[19] A. G

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno; Tim Robinson, University of Nevada Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference &Exposition, Tampa, June 16 – 19, 2019.13. J.T. Downer, L.M. Booren, O.K. Lima, A.E. Luckner and R.C. Pianta, “The individualizedclassroom assessment scoring system (inCLASS): Preliminary reliability and validity of a systemfor observing preschoolers’ competence in classroom interactions”, Early Childhood Research Q,Vol. 25, 2010, pp. 1 -16.14. J.T. DeCuir-Gunby, P.L. Marshall and A.W. McCulloch, “Developing and using a codebookfor the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project”,Field Methods, Vol 23, pp. 136-155, 2011.15. J. M. Saldaña. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd edition, Sage Publications,Thousand Oaks, CA, 201516. Changing the Conversation, National Academy of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Brittany Lynn Butler; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Thoma. “A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT andschema theory.” ​Educational Psychology Review,​ vol. 11, pp. 291-324, 1999.[13] Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K. Feister, P.M Buzzanell, W.C. Oakes, & A.D. Mead. “TheDevelopment of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision-making in Project-baseDesign Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” in ​Proceedings of the 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN,​ 2014.[14] J. Borenstein, M.J. Drake, R. Kirkman, & J.L. Swann. “The Engineering and Science IssuesTest (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgement.” ​Science &Engineering Ethics,​ vol. 16, pp. 387-407, 2010.[15] L. Kohlberg & R.H. Hersh. “Moral Development: A

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.19 Schlossberg, N. K. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 2-18.20 Schlossberg, N. K. (1984). Counseling adults in transition. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.21 Schlossberg, N. K., Lynch, A. Q., & Chickering, A. W. (1991). Improving higher education environments for adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.22 Weiss, M. L., McKelfresh, D. A., & Yang, R. K. (2006). Transfer student marginality. Journal of Student Affairs, 15, 50-57.23 Diamond, A, M. (2012).The adaptive military transition theory: Supporting military students in academic environments (Doctoral dissertation

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan W. Klingbeil, Wright State University; Anthony Bourne, Wright State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, while the cumulative population of students who did not take EGR 101 isshown if Figure 4b. #))*$+,-$./.$0/120/3$456789:$&5;$0/<20/=$4561>8:$ +,,-"./0"#!#"1!'21!$" +,,-"./0"#!#"1!321!&"#*!" #!%" )*+$,-'$#&./$012$343$5446547$89:;;;;?8,80.9"60;,260"&*6%,>'==,@555A>'==,@55B,2'&6*6%,7278,!"%&"", M99N",-.)#)"K#&OK#'" M99N",-.)#)"K#POK#A" Q?C"R9E"M7N?:?0@",-." B0C?:,:0.;"60'==,@555A>'==,@55B,2'&6*6%,929

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qichao Wang, Virginia Tech; Montasir Abbas P.E., Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Annual Meeting. 2009.9. Qichao Wang, M.A., Lisa McNair. A Knowledge-Delivery Gravity Model to Improve Game-Aided Pedagogy. in ASEE Conference. 2015.10. Montasir Abbas, L.M. Game-Aided Pedagogy to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and En-gagement in Transportation Engineering. in ASEE Conference. 2014.11. Wang, Q. and M. Abbas. Using Game Engines for Designing Traffic Control Educational Games. in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on. 2015. IEEE.12. JMP, A.B.U.o.S., JMP Pro. 2013, SAS Institute Inc.: SAS Campus Drive Cary, NC 27513.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

://www.engineeringchallenges.org/National Science Foundation (2018). National Science Foundation’s 10 big ideas. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/big_ideas/Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Richard, J. C., Mendoza Diaz, N. V., Wickliff, T. D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2016). Enculturation of diverse students to the engineering practices through first-year engineering college experiences. Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA.Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A primer in theory construction. New York: Macmillan.Shavelson

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Rahouti, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Applying software-defined networking to minimize the end-to-end delay of network services. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review 18, 30–40 (2018). 3. Topham, L., Kifayat, K., Younis, Y. A., Shi, Q. & Askwith, B. Cyber security teaching and learning laboratories: A survey. Information & Security 35, 51 (2016). 4. Sharma, S. K. & Sefchek, J. Teaching information systems security courses: A hands-on approach. Computers & Security 26, 290–299 (2007). 5. Willems, C. & Meinel, C. Online assessment for hands-on cyber security training in a virtual lab. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2012 IEEE, 1–10 (IEEE, 2012). 6. Xiong, K. & Pan, Y. Understanding protogeni in networking courses for research and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oleksandr Kravchenko, Old Dominion University; Konstantin Cigularov, Old Dominion University; Tancy J. Vandecar-Burdin, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

,”Adult Educ. Q., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 267–285, Aug. 2015.[2] J. M. Ross-Gordon, “Adult Learners in the Classroom,” New Dir. Stud. Serv., vol. 2003,no. 102, pp. 43–52, Jun. 2003.[3] W. Naudé, A. Szirmai, “The importance of manufacturing in economic development:Past, present and future perspectives,” United Nations University, 2012.[4] “Advanced Technologies Initiative: Manufacturing and Innovation.” Deloitte andCouncil on Competitiveness, 2015. Available: https://www.compete.org/reports/all/3122-advanced-technologies-initiative-manufacturing-a-innovation[5] K. Bourzac, “Advanced Manufacturing and New Materials,” MIT Technology Review,2011. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/424631/advanced-manufacturing-and-new-materials/.[6