of president appointed members. The two-party system in the USmeans that with a change in administration, the decision of graduate students as employees alsochanges. Most recently, the National Labor Relations Board has decided that graduate students atprivate institutions are in fact employees and deserve all the rights that employees in the US areentitled to, including unionization [20]. For graduate students at public universities,determination of graduate student workers as employees is left up to state legislature and/or theuniversity depending on how the state law is written. Sometimes state legislature will allowuniversities themselves to classify graduate student workers and other times, the state legislaturewill explicitly exclude
Paper ID #41935WIP: Exploring Concept Maps as an Innovative Assessment Tool in Teachingand Learning Outside the ClassroomChloe Grace Hincher, North Carolina State University Chloe Hincher is a first-year graduate student pursuing a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering at North Carolina State University. She is interested in the application of extracellular matrix biomaterial scaffolds to support stem cell therapy for cardiac applications. She is also the graduate assistant for the Grand Challenges Scholars Program, where she supports the program’s summer research experience for undergraduates, aids in program development, and
anticipated. This issue was further compoundedby general public apprehension towards participating in in-person activities, which limited thediversity and number of participants, potentially affecting the representativeness andgeneralizability of our findings. In addition, students at some technical colleges in SouthCarolina received free tuition for their studies, decreasing their motivation to seek scholarships.Effects of Project Personnel TurnoverThe research project also faced significant turnover in personnel, primarily with the faculty andadministrators on the project. There is now only one member of the original proposal team, aseveryone from the original team has left the institution. The loss of key team members at variousproject stages led
students at University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) to promote DEIA initiatives through allyship education.The original organizers established programming that consisted of six virtual workshops targetedat UIUC graduate students utilizing personal stories from minority leaders and educational toolsfrom DEIA professionals in Spring 2020. The topics chosen for the first year’s programmingincluded a graduate student experience panel, the interconnectedness of the Black Lives Matter(BLM) movement and STEM; a lesson on personal advocacy; allyship through everyday actions;conflict resolution techniques; and a panel of professionals in academia, industry, andgovernment on allyship throughout one's career. The introductory programming mostly
experiences and lessons learned in the design and development of aprofessional development course designed for first year graduate students in an interdisciplinarycomputational science program, under an NSF S-STEM grant funded project titled "AcademicSupport, Career Training, and Professional Development to Improve Interdisciplinary GraduateEducation for the Next Generation of Computational Scientists and Engineers". Herein wediscuss the development and implementation of this two-semester course sequence (1 credit eachsemester). The course modules included (a) Understanding the academic challenges, goals andtimelines in the interdisciplinary computational science program, (b) Individual DevelopmentPlanning, (c) Career Exploration, (d) Communication
network had significant impacts was in the retention of engineeringmothers in the workforce. Data showed that the support provided by the group contributed to theretention of the group’s members in the workforce, and assisted in their efforts to balance workand personal life. This paper will address these particular aspects of the group’s value to themembers, and recommendations will be made for how to leverage the knowledge to bettersupport this particular group in the workforce as they transition throughout their career fromrecent graduates to seasoned professionals while raising families.IntroductionPhrases like retention, work-life equilibrium, family, and career are frequently used, yet whencombined, they can become perplexing or overlooked
’ personal, livedexperiences of their interactions with their faculty. In these interviews, we initially askedparticipants to narrate their life stories to give us further context and understanding of theirexperiences [14], consistent with the norms of unstructured interviews beginning with a singleplanned question [15]. We then focused more specifically on the interactions that participants hadwith faculty both inside and outside traditional class hours. In keeping with an unstructuredinterview style, we asked probing questions to uncover and further explore salient experiences ofstudent-faculty interaction. For example, after a participant offered their life story, we wouldmaybe focus on their chapters concerning their decision to major in
include interdisciplinary higher education, focusing on organizational systems theory and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate programs; the identity development and experiences of interdisciplinary engineering graduate students and faculty; and the decision-making processes and factors impacting implementation of interdisciplinary graduate education initiatives. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Xiaoqi Feng, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Xiaoqi Feng is a Doctoral Researcher at Aalto University. Her research area includes
five architectural studio courses. She is an active member of numerous on and off-campus committees, including the Applied Learning Review Board (Chair 2022 – 2023, member since 2016), Farmingdale Executive Committee (Chair 2018-2022, member 2016-2022), ASC, AAS, Public Art Task Force (former Chair), Calendar Committee (former Chair), Sustainability Committee, the American Society of Engineering Education Middle Atlantic Section (former Chair and Secretary and Treasurer). Professor LoPiccolo served as department chair from 2017-2021. She prepared and oversaw three successful ABET re-accreditation reports and visits, streamlined the department processes for student success, and actively linked students and graduates
influence of cultural differences hasemerged as a prominent factor shaping their acculturation style. Curtin [12] and Glass [13] havereported that international students may have encountered more adverse experiences whencompared to their domestic students. Trice [14] explored the viewpoints of faculty members acrossfour academic departments—architecture, public health, mechanical engineering, and materialsscience and engineering—pertaining to international graduate students. A recurring observationamong faculty members was the challenge of English language proficiency. The temporaryresidence status of international students (i.e., F-1 visas), in contrast to that of domestic peers andother immigrant groups, may contribute to the different contexts
experience? (2) What do students wish that their research mentors had done differently?This qualitative study is part of a larger study that explores the experiences of undergraduatemechanical engineering students who participated in an academic year-long research labexperience. Data collected for this study includes interviews at the beginning and end of theirresearch experience with this paper drawing specifically from the post-experience interviews.The findings highlight avenues for strengthening mentor-student relationships and advocates forthe apprenticeship model as a tool for engaged learning.KeywordsUndergraduate research, apprenticeship, faculty mentor, mentoringBackgroundUndergraduate research has gained prominence across U.S. higher
, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including tDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He
. universities on 2,966 individual faculty assistantprofessors in science and engineering who were hired since 1990 [4]. Results showed that theretention probability of any given faculty member in science and engineering departments overtime was less than 50% [4]. Additionally, the median departure time was 10.9 years after enteringthe academic workforce as an assistant professor [4]. Due to the declining trend that U.S,- trainedPh.Ds. are less likely to secure a faculty position, universities began to collect data on the careeroutcomes and started assisting science and engineering graduate students in obtaining internshipand networking opportunities [3].Out of the instruments reported in the literature around workforce skills development, The GlobalSet
also point out the variation among those who educate in engineering (tenured/tenure-trackfaculty, graduate students, and contingent/adjunct faculty), which is not always acknowledged.By not paying attention to such variation, the impact of work done in engineering educationresearch may be limited. In an effort to illuminate these variations, we report on research thatexplores some details of the educator experience. In this paper we ask: what does it look like tobe an educator working to adapt an existing curriculum for a new term, in our case a curriculumpreviously taught in Autumn 2021 and adapted for use in Winter 2022? Broadly, the curriculumwas a 10-week seminar titled Dear Design: Defining Your Ideal Design Signature where
Paper ID #44815EARLY CAREER ENGINEERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON LEADERSHIP COM-PETENCYDEVELOPMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATIONMrs. Tracey Carbonetto, Pennsylvania State University, Allentown Joining the Penn State engineering faculty a year ago, my professional interests as an instructor of engi- neering are developing and refining methods of engineering instruction that will allow students to gain confidence and to increase their own success. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024EARLY CAREER ENGINEERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION
womenprofessionals (script, growth stage). Her mom was a teacher but left her career to stay at homewith her when she was born (script, growth stage). Her mom had a friend who was a lawyer andran for office. She recalls her mom sometimes questioning her friend’s decisions, but other timesshe was very proud of her. Even though her mom left teaching to stay home, Louise thought shewould continue working once she had children (script, exploration stage). However, she didn’thave any role models or examples to guide her in how this could work. When graduating fromcollege, a pregnant woman interviewed her for a job. She vividly remembers thinking it wasgood that this woman could balance working and being a mom (script, exploration stage). Onceshe started working
reveals significant gaps in the literature, particularly withinthe field of engineering.The engineering field is often characterized by markedly different working requirements thanother fields, which presents unique challenges for engineering faculty, particularly juniorengineering faculty. These experiences have not been thoroughly investigated [3], [4]. Juniorengineering faculty must navigate complexities in research, teaching, and identity developmentwithin the academic environment [4]. Most studies of STEM-related mentorship focus onundergraduate students, graduate students, and, to a lesser extent, postdoctoral researchers [5].The lack of exploration into the challenges engineering faculty encounter in their early careerstages reinforces the
promising findings of this research and the encouraging feedback of the student community motivated him to pursue this line of research in his NSF CAREER award in 2017. Since then, he has built a coalition within the university to expand this work through multiple NSF-funded research grants including IUSE/PFE: RED titled ”Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Because of the importance of neurodiversity at all levels of education, he expanded his work to graduate STEM education through an NSF IGE grant. In addition, he recently received his Mid-CAREER award through which, in a radically novel approach, he will take on ambitious, transdisciplinary research integrating
differentinstitutions.As described in [1], US graduate engineering research remains focused on preparing students fora shrinking pool of academic jobs and most students are dissatisfied by the lack of socialrelevance of their research. An article detailing the state of graduate education points out, “mostgraduate programs will, in fact, fail to deliver the training that students desire and societydesperately needs. Graduate training remains focused on preparing students to addressdisciplinary knowledge gaps valued in a shrinking pool of faculty positions. While we invitestudents to apply for degrees based on their motivations to change the world, once they arrive,we do not prepare them to be successful change-makers. Current students report beingdiscouraged from
example, teams can gothrough multiple rounds of ideating, prototyping, and testing their designs to iteratively developa solution that is co-created with community members. As another example, during producttesting the teams may learn more about the users and the community that may support anupdated definition of the problem statement. Thus, teams must document their design process tocreate a compelling set of evidence to support their design decisions and tell an impactful designnarrative.Community stakeholder participation is crucial for a successful design project. Students aretaught to use a stakeholder map to identify how individual community members are involved inthe design process. For example, some community members are highly involved
faculty so we can't use them." and "getting feedback from students on whatworks well".Go it Alone. Definition: The instructor either creates their own IM, modifies existing IM to suittheir course needs, and/or indicates they select existing IM using their own judgment andknowledge.Seven instructors mentioned creating or selecting IM alone, without the involvement of others, inresponses to questions 5, 6, & 7. Examples include "I write and distribute some materialsmyself" and "Materials developed by colleagues and myself".Peers & Colleagues. Definition: When an instructor mentioned persons or groups of personsthat influence their IM selection decisions, such as faculty, instructors, or institutional employeesboth within and outside of the
Engineering EducationIntroductionThe transition from high school to college can present significant challenges for students, creatinga need for a strong support system. In modern engineering education, mentoring has emerged asan important component in supporting the growth and success of undergraduate students. It isgenerally recognized that relationships with faculty members impact student success[1].Mentoring has gained significant attention for its role in providing personalized guidance andfostering a sense of belonging within the community.Mentors play an important role in helping students navigate academic challenges and makewell-informed decisions[2]. Furthermore, the mentor-mentee relationship establishes a nurturingatmosphere dedicated to
UnderstandEngineering (TRUE) initiative as part of the capstone design; d.) designing and implementingthe Professional Formation of Engineering (PFE) courses; e.) establishing Track-FocusedAdvisory Boards with industry-faculty-student members; and f.) Stakeholder (Student)Empowerment in the Faculty Evaluation process [4].In this study, the main focus will fall on the PFE layer (which consists of a series of classes takenthroughout an undergraduate’s engineering schooling to prepare students for the professionalengineering world) and the TRUE-Capstone projects (which are the culmination of the new EEdegree, in which undergraduate student teams will be formed to provide an engineering solutionto an industry-sponsored or community-sponsored project). A recent
seeing and modeling the writing behaviors, methods, and self-regulation practices of other group members. To foster members' sense of self-efficacy in writing,the group provides an environment that encourages collaborative and vicarious learning. Writingabilities such as self-monitoring and self-evaluation can be developed using group feedback.Individually, members can enhance their writing skills by exercising human agency together.These social interactions make it easier for people to learn together.MethodologyThe graduate student writing workshop was designed as a peer-facilitated program, convening foreight hours, five days a week, over 10 weeks during the summer and three weeks during the winterfrom 2020 to 2022. The workshop was led by
entrepreneurial mindset as required student attributes for graduation. Oncerequired as learning outcomes, faculty would benefit from training on teaching these professionalskills and assessment methodology for professional skills development.The site has already added acquiring an entrepreneurial as a student learning outcome andteaches entrepreneurial mindset in stand-alone courses. Still, recent research suggests it shouldbe integrated into technical content. It seems dangerous to off-load these important professionalskills to be only taught outside of the engineering curriculum in either humanities or other stand-alone courses. A more integrated approach is needed. Engineering programs can consider addingentrepreneurial mindset to the engineering
A PDF with a sentence explanation ● EECS faculty or grad interviewing) a mentor of who you correspond with and students to discuss engineering about what as well either ● Internship skills or professional screenshot of an online thread or supervisors or senior development email and your personal notes from colleagues the interaction. ● EECS Career Center advisor meeting Completing A link to your portfolio site -EECS faculty or grad Professional Portfolio
DaytonDr. Gul G¨ul E. Kremer received her PhD from the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering of Missouri University of Science & Technology. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision analysis methods applied to improvement of products and systems. She is a senior member of IIE, a fellow of ASME, a former Fulbright scholar and NRC Faculty Fellow. Her recent research focus includes sustainable product design and enhancing creativity in engineering design settings.Prof. Nigel Forest Reuel, Iowa State University of Science and TechnologyDr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ann Gansemer-Topf is a Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs and
privilege in terms of her race (i.e., operating as a Whitewoman in predominantly White spaces) in civil engineering. She understands that due tointersectionality one's identity and experiences are a result of interconnected socialcategorizations such as race, class, and gender [37]. The first author made an effort to continuallyconsult with the existing literature and the participants (via member checking), and peer debriefwith the second author and other graduate students in her lab (a Black man and Black woman) toensure trustworthiness of the findings.Research QuestionWhat do inclusive engineering spaces look and feel like to early-career women in civilengineering?MethodsThis exploratory research is a part of a large qualitative study following
Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She was an inaugural faculty member of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is currently a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her role in the College of Engineering at UNL is to lead the disciplinary-based education research initiative, establishing a cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses
Paper ID #43367Board 423: What Drives You? Exploring the Motivations and Goals of Low-IncomeEngineering Transfer Students for Pursuing EngineeringAnna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the