-doctoral Fellow at the NIST- funded Center of Excellence for Risk-based Community Resilience Planning at Colorado State University. She received her Diploma (2008) in Civil Engineering from the University of Patras, Greece, while she holds Master’s (2010) and PhD (2014) degrees from the University at Buffalo – SUNY. Her research inter- ests span the fields of structural dynamics, earthquake engineering, and multi-hazard performance-based design for system functionality and community resilience. Through these areas, her research focuses on developing novel sustainable structural designs and systems against natural and man-made hazards and formulating fundamental mathematical frameworks to assess system functionality and
, creativity, exploration, inspiration, planning, and organization ina project of limited extent. They offer an ideal mechanism for students to demonstrate theircompetencies, especially when merged with comprehensive teaching-learning-assessmentePortfolios to effectively document competencies, and to enable commenting (including the useof social media). In effect, ePortfolios, combined with mini projects, offer an opportunity totransform a traditional curriculum into one comprised of a succession of learning experiences.Objectives and significance of researchThe primary objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive Teaching-Learning-Assessment (TLA) ePortfolio tool, using Digication, an ePortfolio platform [25], for the 190engineering
. Reflection as a form ofmetacognition that involves stepping out, thinking about, and connecting forward [18] helped usmake sense of our experiences during the seminar as an ongoing practice. We designed reflectionactivities that took into account where students were in the quarter, what topics we had beendiscussing, and made use of a creative range of materials and formats.Iteratively designing the seminarCurriculum. We turned the notion of visual notetaking into a meaningful educational experiencewithin the constraints of a 10-week academic quarter. Originally, we planned on using anexisting visual notetaking online resource and then adapting the instruction for our seminar.Serendipitously, the online resource we found had 10 visual notetaking
length. The de-identified, verbatim transcripts werethen systematically coded and organized using an inductive and iterative process of thematicanalysis, within a collaborative team environment. The data analysis team consisted of threeengineering graduates, all with industry experience and two of whom are academics and licensedengineers, as well as two social science researchers and an engineering student. Coding of the 29transcripts was divided among team members. Team meetings were planned around the thematicanalysis of each salient professional moment that was explored in the interviews (e.g., struggles,proud moments, salient growing up experiences). At the meetings, members presented the codesthat emerged from their subset of transcripts
into perspective… safety… and societal deserve to be at least aware of what these aspects of this cannot be ignored.” societal aspects are.” 805: “… we should be knowledgeable about Responsibility for Impact & Public Needs the full impact of any work we partake in…” 701: “…it should be part of my job in designing… to take account the societal Responsibility for Impact & Public Needs impact of a design” 802: “… societal impact… Nuclear energy 703: “… engineers have a huge hand in systems are huge investments… planning societal
scientific community.Best Practices in Writing Instruction Developing students’ competence as writers within the discourse communities of theirdisciplines requires acknowledging the differences between school writing and professionalwriting practices [13]. In contrast to school writing that emphasizes knowledge telling and on-demand writing, best practices consistent with professional and disciplinary writing includeopportunities to communicate meaningful content to real audiences, extended writing processesthat allow time for planning, revision, and editing, and opportunities to act upon detailedfeedback [13, 14, 15]. Modern psychological theory conceptualizes writing as a social activity [16]. In thisview, writing is shaped by the
be anaid or detract from their agency to implement. These findings informed subsequent faculty andadministrative change plans. The change plans were ultimately implemented at the local level, andstudent and faculty data were collected to evaluate effectiveness, attitudes, and behaviors. As aresult, the authors were able to accelerate the adoption of RBIS at their institution.Other authors like Cruz et al. [43] built upon the work of Matusovich et al. [50] and Finelli et al.[49]. Cruz et al. [43] also incorporated additional elements of the system (e.g., cultural factors,change management processes, pedagogical knowledge, and student experiences to understandfaculty motivation to implement effective teaching strategies. This study explored
of the practice of professionalengineering (where a PE license is required), but they all generally conform to the definitionincluded in the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) ModelLaw (4) as follows: “The term “Practice of Engineering”, as used in this Act, shall mean anyservice or creative work requiring engineering education, training and experience in theapplication of engineering principles and the interpretation of engineering data to engineeringactivities that potentially impact the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The services mayinclude, but are not limited to, providing planning, studies, design, design coordination,drawings, specifications, and other technical submissions…”As the world
troubleshoot and ensure therobot can follow a practice track. We are finally seeing some real improvements in the quality ofthe projects, including the number of devices that worked in Term 3. We plan to continue usingthe milestones in the future.7 Effect of Arduino-Based Projects on Design SpacePrior to introducing Arduino based projects in Term 1, ME 250 focused only on mechanicaldesigns for the final project. Students use morphological methods to optimize their design byconsidering all relevant possibilities and then reduce the design space by considering theobjectives and comparing design alternatives [16].To simplify ordering materials, students were required to use a particular sensor in the projects.In eliminating options for sensors, the
the emphasis onformal features (grammar, organization, style, editing, content) of finished products, writingstudies would categorize these practices as emblematic of a traditional product orientation towriting [5]. Product-oriented approaches often ignore writing processes entirely or depict simple,linear processes of both writing (plan→write→edit) and writing instruction(assign→submit→grade). However, the field of writing studies has largely rejected the productapproach in favor of writing-as-process models for writing instruction since the 1970s [11].Writing-as-process shifts attention from the final products to the complex, cyclical processesthrough which writing is developed. Writing-as-process approaches attempt to account for
good at generating a bunch of different paths because that's how my brain works. Picking one, oh my God. It's horrible. It's terrifying. (Selyne)While Selyne had many ideas for her future, but was stifled by her fear of choosing one career topursue, Hannah expressed not wanting to plan for the future to avoid being disappointed: I'm going to be working, but I don't want to plan too specifically, I guess, and have plans change or something. …I just ... I don't want to be disappointed, I don't want to have ... I don't want to go in with a preconception that's going to affect how I make my decisions and things. I don't want to say oh, I thought I was going to be here, so I'm going to say no to this
includes engineering in her elementary and early childhood science methods courses and developed and taught an engineering methods course for middle school teachers. She also developed a graduate-level engineering education course for PreK-6 teachers. Dr. Lottero has provided professional learning experiences in multiple schools and school systems in Maryland. She has co-authored numerous engineering-focused articles for the teacher practitioner journal, Science and Children, and presents her research regularly through the American Society for Engineering Education. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how simulated classroom environments can be used to
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Lessons Learned from a Summer Bridge Research Partnership Between a Community College and a UniversitySummer Bridge PartnershipAs part of a partnership between a local community college and university, we have established a summerbridge program that has been proceeding since summer 2017. During the last three years, it has developed andevolved becoming larger and increasingly successful; even more so than originally planned. Targeted studentsfor our summer bridge program include students from diverse backgrounds including minorities, females andeconomically disadvantaged individuals.For the past three summers, community college students have spent
Tolerance curriculum, Association of American Colleges andUniversity VALUE rubrics and the Stanford d-school design process [12] [18] [19]. Existinglesson plans were revised to allow for greater exploration of empathy in engineering disciplinesand engineering design while maintaining the creative, innovative and cross cutting scienceconnections that were built into the lesson plans. The appropriateness of teamwork andcollaboration is reinforced throughout the program as students are encouraged to work in groupsor discuss their thought process in pairs. These pair-and-share and teamwork opportunities helpstudents understand their own and others engineering design, prototyping, testing andimprovement as they considered the people, stakeholders, who
students to confront theincident from a complex perspective and engage with the engineering tools used toidentify hazards, consequences, and risks used in practice to prevent incidents using theplan/do/check/act (PDCA) cycle. Incident case studies afford opportunities for studentsto engage in redesign, release modeling, procedural analysis, layers of protectionanalysis, and emergency response planning while they examine the leadership,management, and ethical implications of the incident. The case study experience withreflection can lead to an examination of their personal values and beliefs aboutengineering, sustainability, and their responsibilities in the context of engineeringpractice, leadership, and management.Lac Mégantic and MGPI Processing
reflection sessions; 2) submit a summative reflection that asksquestions related to the professional competencies and their role in their project; 3) complete avideo recorded mock interview in which they answer 4-5 behavior based interview questions;and 4) submit a reflection in which they review and assess their mock interview performance.It is during the reflection sessions that students are introduced to engineering problem typology.Through discussion, students consider the idea that engineers solve different types of problemsand that the most common problems in engineering include: design, engineering case analysis,selection, planning, troubleshooting, and diagnose-and-solve. Figure 1 provides examples of howthese problem types are explicated
42 54Evaluation Plan A psychology graduate student with expertise in quantitative analysis from the College ofEducation served as the program evaluator for this study under the guidance of Dr. ChuangWang, an education assessment expert and Professor in the College of Education at UNCCharlotte. The evaluation plan, which included both quantitative and qualitative assessmentinstrumentation, was developed to evaluate the educational impacts of flipping specific lectures.The skills, perceptions, and gains developed by student participants in a control group werecompared to the same data collected from the treatment group. While all quantitativeinstrumentation questions were identical for the control and treatment groups
Analysis and FindingsMuch of the literature on faculty retention relies on turnover intentions (i.e., plans or desires toleave) as a proxy for actual turnover [2], [5], [8], [12], [18], [20]. Very little of this workexamines faculty retention directly. Of those that do, samples are often constructed from collegecatalogues and online resources [1], [10]. Our study differs from previous research by examiningactual faculty departures and retention cases with the use of a comprehensive data set providedby UX’s Office of Institutional Research. In contrast to catalog data and online resources,institutional data sets are more reliable and allow for removal of retired faculty. In the first stage of our quantitative analysis, we examined faculty
scheduling assessment - Contact client, collect plant data to check its eligibility for assessment - Set up assessment date if client meets eligibility criteria - Organize team meeting for pre-preparation - Assign lead author for the assessment report(ii) Pre-assessment activities - Create client file, check utility billings for completion - Contact client, confirm assessment visit date, record pre-assessment survey form - Do the billing analysis - Prepare pre audit report - Program data loggers, charge assessment equipment(iii) During assessment activities - Deliver assessment kick-off meeting - Collect general information about plant operation, production process - Conduct plan tour - Develop
helped me plan out my schedule for everything. So, he’s actually one of—he’sthe reason why I ended up going to Rome, because I told him that I wanted to study abroad in Italyand he’s like, “Oh.” And, he pulled out this folder was like, “Yeah, we have this program.” And Iwas like, “Yeah!” But last fall he was great and answered questions. I actually took an elective notin an engineering class. I think I had the best professor I’ve ever had. This guy, you could tell heloved teaching. He loves teaching, and he was very open to feedback. He asked at the beginningof the term like, “How do you guys learn? What should I do?” and stuff like that. I rememberthinking, and I even said to him, “I wish my engineering professors were more like you.”Jordan: I
Engineering Management Program at the United Arab Emirates University. In addition to his experience in the academia, Dr Zaneldin has more than thirteen years of work experience in areas related to design, construction supervision, and project man- agement of mega size projects in North America and the Middle East. He has authored and co-authored several journal and conference publications in topics related to engineering education and course man- agement, design coordination, change management, site layout planning, constructability, claims and disputes, and simulation of design and construction operations. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
Planning and Design 3.0 PL300 Military Leadership 3.0 Senior Year 1st Semester 2nd Semester Solid and Haz Waste Treatment and EV394 Hydrogeology/Hydraulic Systems 3.5 EV488 Remediation 3.5 EV402 Biochemical Treatment 3.5 EV491 Advanced Engineering Design 3.0 EV490 Env Engineering Design 3.5 Elective Engineering
Paper ID #30496The Case for Data Sharing Policies and FAIR Sharing Principles:Analyzing Journals and Articles of Engineering and Medical FacultyChris Wiley, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Physical Science and Engineering Research Data Services Librarian American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Case for Data Sharing Policies and FAIR Sharing Principles: Analyzing Journals and Articles of Engineering and Medical FacultyAbstractNumerous government and private funding agencies require data management plans andencourage data sharing. These
work benches on castors, which allow rearrangement of the room.Power is provided to each workbench via retractable outlets installed on ceiling beams.Whiteboards are installed at the south and west walls of this space. The Design Studio isprimarily used for instruction, team planning, assembly of designs, and design validation. Teamswork at the benches, and may bring appropriate items from the other spaces into this area to beused. As can be seen comparing Figure 2a to 2b, though less floor space is used, this changeincreased the area of available and versatile work bench space, and consolidated student teamsinto one primary location, whereas in UOL they were spread across several walled-off spaces.This organization is meant to allow students
appears [15]. Manufacturing students learn thatfrom an operational viewpoint operating efficiency is quantified as percent utilization and yieldfor a given operation. Percent utilization is the actual amount of productive machine time(uptime) divided by the optimal amount time available for a given machine. This fundamentalmanufacturing concept can be more readily understood by students within a hands-on, activelearning environment [16]. Students can easily understand the numerous reasons for lower than100% utilization: preventative maintenance, machine set up and adjustments [17]. While otherdowntime issues are not planned such as unscheduled maintenance, lack of raw materials, staff
) The professor in this class often teaches in an organized way. The professor in this class often uses real-world examples or illustrations to explain difficult points. The professor in this class often stops to ask questions during class. The professor in this class is often funny or interesting. I have discussed career plans with the professor in this class. I have discussed academic work with the professor in this class. I have had intellectual discussions outside of academic work with the professor in Faculty this class. Contact I have discussed course selection with the professor in this class. (α
. Kristen L. Sanford, Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Education and Training. She previously has served
of student learning [5], [6].Several assessment instruments have been designed in the past to check student’s understandingof basic concepts [7], [8]. Research suggests that students feel the need to have access to andfeedback on any identified misconceptions early so that they can plan on making a move tocorrect them [9]. Bull et al. (2010) used a computer-based method called the open learner modelas a means of highlighting first-year introductory electrical circuits students’ interest inacknowledging their misconceptions as a first move towards dealing with their difficulties inlearning as opposed to just receiving general feedback. The early detection of errors inknowledge among students allows the instructors to be dynamic and proactive
surveys, journals, and semi-structuredinterviews. Study participants were recruited at each of the 4 sites through visits to capstonecourses and capstone team meetings. All capstone students received an email inviting them tocomplete an online screening survey that captured demographic information as well as post-graduation information such as career plans. The dataset for this study includes 62 participantswhere 33 participants identified themselves as male and 29 females. Of those participants, therewere 37 participants who self-identified themselves as White or Caucasian, 12 participants asAsian or Asian American, 6 as underrepresented minorities, 4 as other and 3 of the participantshave not disclosed. With respect to the sites, the dataset