. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Lecturer in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance experimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and mentoring and guiding student teams through the senior design capstone course and a translational course following senior design. To promote biomedical/bioengineering, Marcia works with Women in Engineering to offer outreach activities and is engaged at the national level as
Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research
and students with a more gradual introduction to FOSS tools andpractices. OpenPath also leverages Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) [4,5] tohelp students develop skills in communication, critical thinking, problem solving, and teamwork,which will make them more successful participants in HFOSS [6].Together, the OpenFE and OpenPath projects have supported over 90 faculty from over 65institutions to participate in POSSE and explore ways to help their students participate in HFOSSprojects. A website (http://foss2serve.org) has more information about OpenFE and OpenPath,POSSE and other events, and learning materials.IntroductionTo prepare students for professional practice in computing careers, most undergraduatecomputing degree
students, defined as financial eligibility for Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN). • Demonstrate academic potential as evident by academic achievements, previous work and experience, letters of recommendation, and letters of intent.Each scholarship has a maximum value of $10,000 (average award size is expected to be $6000),with the actual award depending on the “remaining need” demonstrated by FAFSA after theexpected contribution from the student family is taken into account.Table I shows the rubric developed to consistently and fairly judge the academic potential andpreparedness of students while recognizing their diverse background and career goals. This rubricincludes multiple indicators to gauge both academic merit
dialogue. The adaptive learning environments he and his colleagues develop have been used by thousands of students in K-12 and college classrooms throughout the US and internationally.Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, University of FloridaDr. Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is a Professor in the Department of STEM Education at NC State University and Senior Re- search Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. Dr. Wiebe works on many different facets of STEM Education, including the design and evaluation of innovative uses of computing technolo- gies in STEM instructional settings, the use of multimedia tools for teaching and learning, and student engagement and persistence in STEM career
classroom so that teachers can inspire their students to envisionengineering as an attractive and important academic and career opportunity, and to fill thedesperately needed talent gap in the high tech economy of today and tomorrow.This paper will briefly discuss the organization of this program including Application andRecruiting, Program Structure and Activities and Teacher Research Project. This paper willfocus on the Program Assessment. Some lessons we learn while running the program will be alsoprovided.Recruitment and ApplicationIn order to advertise the program, flyers with information about the program and a link to thewebsite were e-mailed to the superintendents of schools districts in metro-Detroit area in earlyJanuary. A link to the
education and careers in science.7 Researchunaccompanied by dissemination, however, makes the research process incomplete. Publishingoriginal research is the culminating step in the research process and an exceptional piece ofresearch will not matter if no one ever gets a chance to read it and to use it to inform futurescholarship, policies, and/or decision making.8 Not only does publishing the results of theresearch complete the project, but it also provides its own set of benefits including professionallypresenting a representation of completed undergraduate work, receiving feedback from a broadercommunity, increasing chances of graduate school acceptance, and distinguishing oneself in thejob market.8 Dissemination activities include poster
posed aboutstudent interests. Furthermore, the type of examples used can stress characteristics about thecontent not typically addressed by existing quiz banks. For example, highlighting how thematerial contributes to the overall public welfare of society, or how the field that uses thismaterial serves others, can change the perception that a student might have about a discipline.This is especially important when trying to increase diversity in a field such as engineering as ithas been shown that women and first-generation college students tend to choose careers that aremore other-oriented5, and engineering is commonly not perceived as such. Thus, adaptivelearning has the potential to have a much broader impact on education and
American Institute of Chemical Engineers Nanoscale Science and Engineering Forum’s Young Investigator Award (2012), the Presidential Early Career Award for Sci- entists and Engineers (2010), and a National Science Foundation CAREER Award (2009). Her Auburn University awards include the Excellence in Faculty Outreach (2015), an Auburn University Alumni Pro- fessorship (2014), the Auburn Engineering Alumni Council Awards for Senior (2013) and Junior (2009) Faculty Research, the Faculty Women of Distinction Award (2012), and the Mark A. Spencer Creative Mentorship Award (2011). Dr. Davis is the past chair of Auburn’s Women in Science and Engineering Steering Committee (WISE) and the faculty liaison to the College of
, scholarship recipients during the first semester. This course also providesthe students with professionalism skill training, career development and guidance for success inSTEM careers. Transfer-GEMS’ ultimate goal is to increase the number of transfer studentsgraduating from CEFNS with STEM majors and decrease their time (number of semesters) tograduation.In Fall 2014, 349 STEM transfer students entered CEFNS out of 2,782 new transfers to NAU. Ofthese, 26 in some way joined the Transfer-GEMS program. Fifty-seven students switched intoCEFNS during the year, for a total CEFNS transfer population for the 2014-2015 school year.This is the first cohort of three total that will be supported by the current grant, with 14scholarships to be awarded in each of
. Finally, at the end of thepresentation specific examples of biased actions were explicitly addressed. For example, thedean said that biased activities such as racist or sexist jokes were not tolerated in the College ofEngineering. Directly following the presentation, the CIVE 102 instructor indicated that sheliked the content and thought it was very relevant.Panel of Professional Engineers. Around mid-semester we hosted a panel of engineers in bothclasses. The panels informed students about engineering practice and hopefully provided somerole models to the students. In putting the panels together we attempted to represent at leastsome racial and gender diversity as well as diversity in engineering career paths within thepractical constraints
students improve their problem-solving approach?7. Do students feel more confident and efficacious in their engineering skills?8. Do students believe that they have a better understanding of what working engineers do?9. Are students more interested in, committed to, and positive about their studies and/or their future careers?Assessment instruments to address each question are being developed during both phases of theproject.Project statusThe project is currently in Phase I. A summary of project accomplishments to date follows.1. The heat transfer course was taught in spring 2014 using a traditional format. This will provide the control for the study.2. During the spring 2014 offering, detailed assessment data was collected on
(ICT) for learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in support- ing distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering.Dr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Purdue University, West LafayetteKrishna Madhavan, Purdue University
, interconnects and inte- gration techniques using MEMS and other advanced fabrication processes, RF fluidics, and high speed material’s characterization. She has authored or co-authored over 85 professional journals and conference publications and 4 book chapters. Dr. Franklin was the recipient of the 1998 Presidential Career Award for Scientists and Engineers by the National Science Foundation. She is an active member of the MTT-S society in the technical area of passives, packaging, integration and microwave education and is currently an Associate Editor of the IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters.Dr. Jeff Frolik, University of VermontDr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is a Principal
, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published ten book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his ar- eas of the research interests. He has also been PI or Co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting, renewable energy, microgrids, wave and turbulence, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education. Page 26.1009.1 c American Society for
mechanics, and transport processes.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the
University, Polytechnic Campus Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU she served as a program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education, and was on the faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Segal Design Institute at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.Rocio C Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education Rocio Chavela is Director of Education and Career Development at the American
faculty. Some initial inclinations were foundduring the data analysis. Faculty tended to have the most holistic view and were able to makemost connections between different courses. The senior student held a more holistic view butless long-term and made a fair amount of connections between various courses. However, shestruggled with the balance between breadth and depth, and tried to figure out which career pathshe wanted to take in the future. The freshman had the least holistic view: lacked the connectionsbetween different courses and lacked the balance between breadth and depth.Career-Mindedness. What the students had in common was that they both wanted to take coursesthat might be helpful for their future careers. However, before they figured
that allowstudents to build on what they bring.”(4) Working with educators. In our paper, “Designing and enacting weekly micro-reflections as ameans of professional development of early-career educators: Voices from the field,” (Turns et.al, 2019) we focused on educator design and enactment of reflection activities of 3-5 minutes(micro-reflection activities). As articulated in the paper, “we asked: under what circumstancesand in what ways can engagement in micro-reflection activities during one’s teaching contributeto advancing one’s teaching?” In the project, three educators with different levels of teachingexpertise engaged in adding micro-reflection activities to weekly 2-hour classroom sessions. Thiseffort gave us an opportunity to
applications in target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal Processing, Communications, and Education Societies.Dr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is a Professor in the School of Education at George Mason University. Her research interests include engineering education, mathematics education, faculty development and mathematics teacher leadership.Prof. Anastasia P Samaras, George Mason University ANASTASIA P. SAMARAS is Professor of Education in the College of
students understand thatKWS is a simplified, specific instance of a general problem-solving framework that they willneed to use throughout their careers in addressing novel challenges.Minor interface adjustments might make KWS and chat more accessible and integrated, or theinstructors might need to do some modeling of collaborative problem solving. For example, chatis currently designed to be launched through onscreen menu. A “You Got a Message” type ofnote will pop up on the top right corner of the game GUI whenever a group member initiates chatwith the player. The current design raised a lot of suggestions from the students during their play
4.26 1.52 1.80 4.43 2.63 OPNET to explore and learn new network protocols*9. I am confident that someone like me can 4.48 4.74 0.26 3.60 4.57 0.97 succeed in an engineering career.10. I think that engineering is the best (most 4.65 4.59 -0.06 3.60 4.14 0.54 fitting) major for me.11. I feel at home when working with other 4.22 4.30 0.08 4.20 4.43 0.23 engineers.To better visualize how different student groups responded to CPBL, group difference is definedin equation 1 to represent the difference in reported growth in domain-specific efficacy betweenLatino students and the class average
Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison. She directed the graduate program in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech for 18 months before accepting a 2010 Sci- ence and Technology Policy Fellowship from the American Association for the Advancement of Science. She is an Associate Editor for Journal of Engineering Education (2012-2014). Dr. Borrego has earned NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) awards for her engineering education research. Her results are published in 30 articles in peer-reviewed journals including Journal of Engineering Education and Review of Higher Education. She is the recipient of
Paper ID #9372Collaborative Research: Identifying and Assessing Key Factors of Engineer-ing InnovativenessDr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette S¸enay Purzer an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. In 2011, she received a NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She is also a NAE/CASEE New Faculty Fellow. Purzer conducts research on aspects of design education such as innovation and information literacy.Dr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering
faculty members. This relationship extends to both the mentoring andproject development aspects of the program. Personalized mentoring sessions delve intocurriculum planning, postgraduate education pathways, and career opportunities, providingtailored guidance to each student.Living Learning Community (LLC): As first-year students, INNOV scholars reside in an LLCsituated in the HC residence hall. This arrangement immerses students in an environmentoptimized for academic endeavors and offers direct access to HC programs. Additionally, itenables natural cohort bonding and integration into the Honors College's vibrant academic andsocial ecosystem.Honors College (HC) Programs: Students demonstrating exemplary academic performance (GPAof 3.5 or higher
(Tsui, 2007). Flynn(2016) found that Black STEM students have a higher probability of not continuing their education inSTEM compared to their White counterparts. Underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, such asBlack, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American, and Indigenous communities, face unique challenges inaccessing and succeeding in STEM education and careers. Structural barriers, lack of resources,limited role models, and systemic racism contribute to lower representation and retention rates forSTEM SUCCESS AT AN HSI COMMUNITY COLLEGE 7these groups in STEM fields (Corbett & Hill, 2015). Overcoming these challenges requires concertedefforts to provide equitable opportunities
participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business
Review of Higher Education, vol. 22, pp. 55-72, 1998.[5] A. B. Diekman, E. R. Brown, A. M. Johnston, and E. K. Clark, "Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers," Psychol. Sci., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1051-1057, 2010.[6] E. Clark, E. Brown, A. Johnston, and A. Diekman, "Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of STEM careers," 2017.[7] E. S. Weisgram and R. S. Bigler, "Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls' attitudes toward and interest in science," Psychol. Women Q., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 262-269, 2007.[8] R. H. Wade, "Feeling Different: An examination of
Award for Employee Recognition, and induction into the Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, placing her among the top 10% of Purdue Graduate students. Her academic journey reflects a commitment to advancing knowledge and contributing to technological innovation in XR control systems. Her professional aspirations include applying for an Assistant Professor position upon completing her Ph.D. This career trajectory aligns with her desire to leverage her accumulated experience and knowledge to mentor and guide emerging talents. A central component of her vision is inspiring and supporting aspiring scholars in pursuing academic and professional excellence, facilitating impactful change within our field.Dr. Farid Breidi
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography[1] J. R. Morelock, “A systematic literature review of engineering identity: definitions, factors, and interventions affecting development, and means of measurement,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1240–1262, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1287664.[2] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26122. doi: 10.18260/p.26122.[3] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career