minded learning alongside other pedagogies,” ASEE Prism, vol. 28,no. 6, pp. 33-34, February 2019.
-Underrepresented Minorities," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019.2. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1997.3. Bandura and D. H. Schunk, "Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self- motivation," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 586, 1981.4. L. Bowen, A. W. Johnson, and K. G. Powell, "Critical Analyses of Representation and Success Rates of Marginalized Undergraduate Students in Aerospace Engineering," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, July 2021.5. G. E. Brannon, M. M. Zhan, K. Sakarwala, F. Lu, and L. Zhang, "Factors affecting undergraduate student
the Assistant Director. In this role, he serves as the engineering lab coordinator for the EDD 111/112 courses. Mr. Gieskes received both his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Binghamton University. In 2019, he received the SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-In-Progress: 1st-Year Engineering Students and Factors in Their Selection of a MajorIntroduction1st-year engineering students often are unsure which field of engineering they want to pursue. Totrack the impact of its 1st-year engineering program, students in the Watson College
, conference presentations,and plan for future research.AcknowledgementsFunding was provided by National Science Foundation grant EEC- 2306099.References[1] A. Godwin, “The development of a measure of engineering identity,” in 2016 ASEE annual conference & exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[2] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 227–243, 2013, doi: 10.1002/jee.20010.[3] “Engineering by the Numbers,” ASEE, 2019.[4] M. S. Aruguete and A. V. Katrevich, “Recognizing Challenges and Predicting Success in First-Generation University Students,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, Jul. 2017
STEM Summer Bridge Program,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2020-June, 6 2020.[21] S. T. Tripathy, K. Chandra, H.-Y. Hsu, Y. Li, and D. Reichlen, “Engaging Women Engineering Undergraduates as Peer Facilitators in Participatory Action Research Focus Groups,” 7 2021.[22] D. Feil-Seifer, M. Parker, and A. Kirn, “Examining Faculty and Graduate Student Attitudes on Stress and Mental Health,” 8 2022. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[23] J. G. Liang, R. Evans, and S. E. Kulesza, “We are Thriving! Undergraduate Women in Engineering Student Project Teams,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 6 2019.[24] K. Redmond, G. Panther, M. Asadollahipajouh, R. Evans, S. Kulesza
, June 2019.[30] G. Rulifson and A. R. Bielefeldt, "Evolution of Students' Varied Conceptualizations About Socially Responsible Engineering: A Four Year Longitudinal Study," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 25, pp. 939-974, 2019.[31] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.[32] F. Bilow, J. DeWaters and G. Hoople, "Work-In-Progress: Examining the Impacts of a Sociotechnical Approach to Energy Education on Engineering Students' Sense of Belonging and Attitudes Toward Engineering," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference, 2021.[33] C. J
First-Year Programs (FPD) and Computers in Education (CoED) divisions, and with the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation, Interdivisional Town Hall Planning Committee, ASEE Active, and the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Estell has received multiple ASEE Annual Conference Best Paper awards from the Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell received the First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019 and the 2022 Computers in Education
efforts related to improving equity and inclusion, with specific attention to supporting premajor students. Women in WWU ENGD Underserved Students in WWU ENGD Vs. National Average vs National Average25.0% 25.0%20.0% 20.0%15.0% 15.0%10.0% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019
-revision-method-for-homework-a-homework-method-for-metacognition- improves-post-secondary-engineering-students-attitudes-toward-homework[10] D. Breid, T. G. Wilson, and A. D. Christy, “Scalable Implementation of Metacognitive Homework: Comparing Experiences at Large and Small Institutions,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/scalable-implementation-of-metacognitive- homework-comparing-experiences-at-large-and-small-institutions[11] D. Breid, “Replacing Cheating with Metacognition – Reevaluating the Pedagogical Role of Homework in Foundational Engineering Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
Paper ID #36187Remote Professional Development Opportunities for K-12 Teachers during aPandemicDr. Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology HOWARD KIMMEL is Professor-Emeritus of Chemical Engineering and Retired Executive Director of the Center for Pre-College Programs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. In 2019 Dr. Kimmel was a recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring, one of 15 awardees nationwide. In addition, Dr. Kimmel has received numerous awards in recognition of his service, including: ASEE 1985 Vincent Bendix Minorities in Engineering
participate in follow-up activities and 87% would recommendsuch activities to their teachers and classmates. Thus, based on this first offering, this summerschool activity appears to be a good alternative to internships which provided valuableopportunities for students. We plan to incorporate students’ feedback into improving the secondoffering of the summer school planned for Summer 2019.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all the students and Lecturers participating this Summer Schoolevent. The program is financially supported by Brand Major Program of Jiangsu Province andEducation Research Project of Southeast University (2017-025).References[1] ASEE College-Industry Partnerships Division (CIPD) http://cip.asee.org/[2] Conference on
in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Technological University in 2007. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev’s research interests include high energy laser propagation through the turbulent atmosphere, developing advanced control algorithms for wavefront sensing and mitigating effects of the turbulent atmosphere, digital inline holography, digital signal processing, and laser spectroscopy. Dr. Sergeyev is a member of ASEE, IEEE, SPIE and is actively involved in promoting engineering education.Dr. Mark Bradley Kinney, West Shore Community College Mark Kinney serves as the Vice President for Academics and Student Services at West Shore Community College in Scottville, MI. Formerly, he was the Dean for Business and Technology at Bay
theory, which has been used to analyze students’motivation to persist in rigorous engineering programs (Matusovich, 2013).Similarly, religious identity refers to similar characteristics, values, and beliefs and directly affectsbehaviors of many individuals within the communities. For more than a generation, studies have shownreligiously engaged individuals to be more civically engaged (Wuthnow, 1999; Lewis, Mcgregor &Putnum, 2013; Rockenbach, 2020). This characteristic may directly relate to women from religiouscommunities finding more meaning in careers such as engineering as they relate to contributions tobroader society.Women are less prominent in engineering fields than men (Pawley 2019). While there has been growthand change in recent
differences instudent background would help determine whether elements of the course should be adjusted toachieve a suitable balance of challenge and support for the students.This paper shares some of the motivation in developing the course structure, outlines the exercisedeveloped to gather information from the students, details an initial analysis of the data thatresulted, and describes next steps.Context: History and Structure of the ProgramCourse History and Student PopulationThe first-year engineering experience at CWRU began as a pilot course in 2019. The motivationbehind developing the program was to improve student satisfaction and retention, as has beenexperienced at other universities implementing similar programs [1, 2]. There were
toundergraduate students from the various STEM (aerospace engineering, electrical engineering,mathematics, mechanical engineering, chemistry, biology, computer science, sociology, andpsychology), and non-STEM majors (political science, and English). The questionnaireadministration was repeated in Spring 2019 to students from the STEM and non-STEM majorswho had not responded in Fall 2018. The questionnaire included few additional items (gender.academic standing, GPA, design/project experience). These demographic items preceded theAT-20 items. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The studentswere invited to respond to the survey through their instructors who were provided copies of theinformed consent forms. The survey
treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork
. 12The demographics of the engineering faculty at Cal Poly Pomona are shown in piecharts with gender (figure 4) and race/ethnicity (figure 5). This includes fullprofessors, associate professors and assistant professors according to ASEE (CaliforniaState Polytechnic University, Pomona, 2018). 13About CPP WEThe Cal Poly Pomona Women in Engineering (CPP WE) program was established in2012 as a Dean’s Office initiative to provide young women the resources andsupportive services to succeed in engineering. CPP WE focuses on recruitment andretention efforts, as well as overall environment enhancement programs. CPP WE isopen to all College of Engineering students and
. Springer International Publishing, 2014.[7] J. Cullinane and L. Leegwater, "Diversifying the STEM Pipeline: The Model Replication Institutions Program," Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington D.C., 2009.[8] M. J. Graham, J. Frederick, A. Byars-Winston, A.-B. Hunter, and J. Handelsman, "Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM," Science, vol. 341, no. 6153, pp. 1455-1456, 2013, doi: 10.1126/science.1240487.[9] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, A. Rayna Carolan-Silva, S. Boukdad, and J. C. Alarcon, "Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Society for Engineering Education, Tampa, Florida, A. Genau, Ed., 2019: ASEE.[10] E. J
assignments contributed to improvements in oral andwritten communications. Dry-runs for presentations were especially effective with significantimprovements in formal presentations after critique and suggestions from faculty.One of the important undertakings was integration of material learned in several coursessupplemented by independent learning of subject matter not covered in the program.Students were required to present their projects at annual SUNY Buffalo State Student Researchand Creativity Conference as well as to present at ASEE St. Lawrence Section and Zone 1conferences. Two teams working on a microgrid project presented at the poster session atDistribuTECH 2018 and 2019 conferences. Development and clarification of career paths
learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance is influenced by aptitudes, spatial skills, personal interests and direct manipulation of mechanical objects.Samantha Schauer, Boise State University Samantha Schauer is a student at Boise State University, graduating in May 2020 with a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering and a minor in Applied Mathematics. Samantha works as an Undergraduate Research Assistant under Dr. Krishna Pakala. She is also actively involved in the Honors College, the Society of Women Engineers, and the Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Happy Hours are a
&Claypool, 2010), and Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities (Springer, 2013). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 EAGER: Broadening Participation of First-Generation College Students in Engineering: Backgrounds, Experiences, and Strategies for Success- An Executive SummaryIntroductionWhen researchers have turned their attention to first-generation college students, it has been tounderstand why they appear to be losing ground in comparison with their peers. Multiple studiessuggest that first-generation college students attend less selective institutions, have lower GPAsand drop out at higher rates when compared with
Engineering programs received initialABET accreditation in 2012, followed by Computer Engineering in 2013. Mechanical Engineeringbegan in 2014 and produced its first graduates in 2018, with ABET accreditation currently (as ofJanuary 2019) pending. The Electrical, Computer, and Industrial & Systems Engineering programs wereall reaccredited by ABET in 2018. The Computer Science programs were transferred to the School ofBusiness in the spring of 2018, resulting in the renaming of the Liberty University School ofEngineering (LUSE). Civil Engineering will start in the 2019-20 school year, and ComputationalEngineering is planned for 2020-21. The number of declared engineering majors has grown steadilyreaching a peak enrollment of 518 in the 2018-2019
Traits of Engineering and Computing Students (Part II),” ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[17] H. Koğar, “Development of a short form: methods, examinations, and recommendations,” EPOD, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 302–310, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.21031/epod.739548.[18] R. F. DeVellis, Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Applied Social Research Methods), 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc, 2011.[19] B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th ed. Pearson, 2012.[20] R. B. Kline, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Second Edition (Methodology in the Social Sciences), Second. New York: The Guilford Press, 2004, p. 366.[21] J. Wang and X. Wang, Structural equation
Minoritized Students," in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE), 2022: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[21] K. Shanachilubwa, M. Ellery, G. M. Sallai, and C. G. Berdanier, "“I Wish IWould Have Known…”: Characterizing Engineering Students' Reflections onTheir Graduate Experiences," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, 2021.[22] E. Walsh, "A model of research group microclimate: Environmental and 2cultural factors affecting the experiences of overseas research students in theUK," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 545-560, 2010.[23] L. McAlpine, M. Jazvac-Martek, and N. Hopwood, "Doctoral studentexperience in education: Activities and
multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Pub- lication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala. Dina was a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an
students”, 2021 Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Proceedings. http://ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/536.pdf[14] Ranabahu, N., Almeida, S., & E. Kyriazis (2020). “University-led internships for innovative thinking: A theoretical framework”, Education and Training, 62(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2019-0031[15] Wilson, S., & Kaufmann, R. (2020). “Communication expectations to industry realities”, 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34305[16] Trent Jr., J. L., & R. H. Todd (2014). “Bridging Capstone Design with Industry Needs Through Communication, Training and Involvement
, C., Phillips, S. M., and Allee, D. (2019). Online Undergraduate Laboratories in Electrical Engineering. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-4.[7] Astatke, Y., Scott, C.J., Connor, K.A., Ladeji-Osias, J.O., (2012). Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Laboratory Courses, 2012 ASEE Conference.[8] Perales, M., Pedraza, L. and Moreno-Ger, P. (2019). Work-In-Progress: Improving Online Higher Education with Virtual and Remote Labs, 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1136-1139.[9] Wijenayake, C., D'Souza, M., Khatamianfar, A., Bialkowski, K., Ros, M. and Sutton, P. (2021). Managing Hands-on Electrical and Computer Engineering Labs during the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021 IEEE Intl
Ethics for Engineers,” Jul. 2007.[7] J. M. Smith et al., “Critical Approaches to CSR as a Strategy to Broaden Engineering Students’ Views of Stakeholders,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: May 30, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/critical-approaches-to-csr-as-a-strategy-to-broaden-engineering- students-views-of-stakeholders[8] E. W. B. Canada, “Mining Shared Value,” EWB Canada. https://www.ewb.ca/en/venture/mining-shared-value/ (accessed Mar. 08, 2021).[9] “Can Engineers Without Borders Build the Bridge Between STEM and Social Awareness?,” Columbia Daily Spectator. columbiaspectator.com/the-eye/2019/10/31/can- engineers-without-borders-build-the-bridge
/304[18] Slim, A., Kozlick, J., Heileman, G. L., & Abdallah, C. T. (2014). The Complexity of University Curricula According to Course Cruciality. International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (pp. 242-248). Birmingham: IEEE.[19] Grote, D. M., Knight, D. B., Lee, W. C., Rowe Erwin, A., and Watford, B.A. (Revise and Resubmit). Navigating the curricular maze: Examining the complexities of articulated pathways for transfer students in engineering. Community College Journal for Research and Practice.[20] Heileman, G. L., & Thompson-Arjona, W. G., & Abar, O., & Free, H. W. (2019), Does Curricular Complexity Imply Program Quality? Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual