mechanicalengineering largely due to the existence of the liberal arts core curriculum comprised of 84semester credits outside the ME major. Also, it is the opinion of the author that engineeringstudents could greatly benefit from exposure to system dynamics topics and there has beenoccasional anecdotal evidence to support this claim. In response to the above observations, anew 4 semester credit technical elective course entitled Simulation and Visualization of DynamicSystems was created that integrates aspects of visualization (including animation) with atraditional system dynamics course. Prerequisites include Linear Algebra and DifferentialEquations and Engineering Graphics with 3 hours per week being allocated for lecture and 3hours per week for a
. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of
gained. When students are involved in creating new artifacts, they are actively engaged in the subject matter. • Evaluate: At this stage, students are asked to judge an idea. This may involve predicting, experimenting, critiquing, or making an argument from evidence. • Analyze: Students begin to develop higher order thinking. They may be asked to compare and contrast or take a concept and break it into parts to explore the relationships present. • Apply: At this level, students begin to put the information they are learning into context. Here they are able to integrate ideas across multiple situations, or utilize the content in a new way. • Understand: At this level, students demonstrate that
technical development and an afternoon session focused onprofessional development. Lesson plans were scheduled five days a week during a regular workweek. Fig. 1. Major technical and professional topics introduced in the five-week program.In the technical session, important topics such as Python, microcontroller and circuit basics,machine learning, 3D modeling, PCB design, and app development were covered. These topicswere selected as they lend themselves to preparation for certain advanced coursework in thedepartment curriculum. In the professional session, networking, resume building, industry andfaculty interaction, campus resources, mock interviews were introduced in the form of guestspeakers or workshops. In the last week of the program
that work in the real world, with all the attendantconstraints. Therefore, “a new kind of engineer is needed, an engineer who is fully aware of thesystemic nature of the challenges we face” [10]. In response to this and recently revisedaccreditation requirements, there are currently many efforts to introduce sustainable developmentconcepts in various courses across engineering departments to promote an awareness ofsustainability and environmental impact issues and produce sustainability-conscious engineers.Embedding sustainability within the curriculum does not simply mean including new content[11]. If engineers are to contribute meaningfully to sustainable development, sustainability mustbecome part of their paradigm and affect every day
capstone course. It utilizes skills and knowledge acquired in various courses in the curriculum and general education courses to produce a real-life project. In this course, students follow a faculty driven structured process to integrate various components of a project. This course introduces very little new material, rather it helps the student to synthesize skills and knowledge learned in other courses to apply in real-life situations. Prerequisite(s): Department Approval, Upper Division Status, recommended in the final semester, CON357, ARC 364 and CON401W. Level: 400 Credits:3 (FSC Website) The syllabus adapted for the course in 2017 guided students to demonstrate integration ofthe various skills for
curriculum developer,with several challenges. These challenges include defining the applied cryptographycourse with respect to course goals, scope, content, and organization. While there arewell-established cryptography courses offered in the Computer Science and Mathematicsdisciplines, these classes tend to focus on mathematical foundations rather than servicesand applications. Consequently, the developer of such courses finds that resourcesparticularly those relating to “hands-on” activities are lacking.For a lab module designer, creating modules that support an applied cryptography classpresents several unique challenges. For example, the choice of laboratory softwarepresents a unique challenge. This is especially true since most commercial
, Cornell University Matthew Ford received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and materials science from the University of California, Berkeley, and went on to complete his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at North- western University. After completing an internship in quantitative methods for education research with the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), he joined the Cornell Active Learning Initiative as a postdoctoral associate. His teaching interests include solid mechanics, engineering design, and inquiry-guided learning.Dr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the
Paper ID #34773Re-inventing a Mechanical Properties of Materials Laboratory Course forOnline LearningDr. Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis Dr. Susan P. Gentry is an Associate Professor of Teaching Materials Science and Engineering at the Uni- versity of California, Davis. In her current position at UC Davis, she is integrating computational modules into the undergraduate and graduate materials curriculum. She is specifically interested in students’ com- putational literacy and life-long learning of computational materials science tools.Gianmarco Sahragard-Monfared, University of California, Davis Gianmarco
-concept learning sequence presents a sample through whichquantum concepts can be introduced within a middle school drug discovery learning sequence,while attending to existing educational policies, including NGSS 3D Design. Extending this proof-of-concept sequence for integrating QIS in middle school settingswill require implementation, practitioner feedback and collaboration, and ongoing evaluation.Our approach to the learning sequence represents one means that resources such as IBM QX canbecome relevant to middle school teachers and students. The teacher toolkit and curriculum thatwill come out of this work will support practitioners to visualize qubit states and facilitatelearning activities that address how quantum computing is an
myDAQ by asoftware interface for virtual experiments. The output of the board can be digitized and sent to thestudent's PC for visualization. The proposed setup can be time-shared with multiple students and canalso be easily replicated. This framework is modular (i.e., other components like an extra breadboardwith new designs can be added) and is also useful in the longer-term by allowing the students topersonalize their learning. The effectiveness of the board has been assessed via a limited piloting ontwo Senior Undergraduate students who have been involved in this project.1. IntroductionThe existing research and curriculum alarmingly lack hands-on learning of analog and mixed signal andRadio Frequency (RF) Integrated Circuits (ICs). Analog
Paper ID #34073Student Motivation and Engagement Across Time and Context Through theCOVID-19 PandemicDr. Matthew J. Ford, Cornell University Matthew Ford received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and materials science from the University of California, Berkeley, and went on to complete his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at North- western University. After completing an internship in quantitative methods for education research with the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), he joined the Cornell Active Learning Initiative as a postdoctoral associate. His teaching interests
and marine mammal ocean acoustic signal processing, and engagement and retention in engineering education.Dr. Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017. As a STEM educa- tor, she is interested in the effect of emerging technology and research on student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees from Duke, Santillan taught at the United States Naval Academy as an assistant professor and at the high school level, where she taught across the four-year math curriculum, including advanced courses. She also designed, proposed, and taught two introductory engineering courses for high school
used in the Army Corps ofEngineers and a more formal French military model preparing elite state engineers. Subsequentinstitutions largely imitated this engineering curriculum, although alternative models such as themore democratic, hands-on polytechnical also developed. At many schools the engineeringcoursework was simply an add-on to B.A. requirements, “grafted” in Reynolds’ language, withvarying degrees of interconnection.The origins of American engineering education can thus be understood as (1) motivated by therapid transcontinental expansion of transportation networks that relied on exploitative laborpractices and seizure of indigenous land; and (2) imbued to varying degrees with nationalist,military values. Such values were reinforced
for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33551Dr. Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Structural Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering, in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Luciana has been with Texas A&M University since 1999, and in that time has taught multiple different courses ranging from the freshman to graduate levels. She has been active in academic program and curriculum devel- opment from the department level to the university level, where she served as co-chair of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP
curriculum that is responsive and respectful [41]. One aimof the writing examples to be described is to do just that.The sections that follow will help to connect the dots between the use of writing activities in twodifferent introductory physics classes and their use in enhancing their respective learningcommunities. First, an overview of the two introductory courses and the student populationsthey serve will be shared. Some additional techniques used at the beginning of the term in eachclass will also be shared as they help to set the stage for the writing activities; and, to help createa respectful and inclusive learning community starting on the very first day of class.Overview of Physics Classes and Their Student Clientele Pre-CovidTwo
, named Envision, also allows professionals to obtain a sustainabilitycredential (ENV SP) to certify their knowledge on how to apply the Envision framework andconcepts to their daily work. However, infrastructure projects have typically been left out ofsustainable construction and teaching efforts, which may be due to the many additionalchallenges that integrating sustainability into an infrastructure project can represent.Sustainable infrastructure (SI) and infrastructure management (IM) are typically seen as twodifferent and distinct topics, and yet these are strongly related. Coupling FEP and sustainabilitypractices can significantly increase project performance. In fact, existing sustainable ratingsystems [i.e. Leadership in Energy and
Hands-On Group Project work during COVID-191AbstractCOVID-19 has impacted delivery of the first-year engineering design curriculum throughout thepost-secondary system. At Vancouver Island University (VIU), instruction of the first-yearcurriculum shifted to an entirely remote learning environment where students were not expectedto be in physical contact at any point during the term. This presented a significant challenge todelivering its learning outcomes and activities, particularly hands-on, team-based project work.At VIU, students typically complete a cornerstone design project in the second term of their first-year of studies. Due to COVID-19, this project was modified to allow for completion within avirtual learning environment. Teams of
, open-ended project involving a minimum of 3 sensorsand/or controllers to perform a student-defined integrated objective. An analysis of the studentperceived outcomes showed significant learning relative to traditional classroom laboratoryinstruction. Student engagement was high, and a primary contributing factor perceived by thestudents was their ability to create or choose their projects, select the sensors, and design theirexperimental set-up. In summary, we conclude that this anytime-anywhere experimentationlaboratory is a viable option for keeping remote students engaged and will continue as asignificant enhancement in student learning opportunities.Introduction: The course was developed at an academic institution that has a long
second year students and serve as a motivating introduction to the program. The coursesoften use prototype boards to interface sensor and actuator modules from a system-levelintegration perspective. There are also courses at the other end of the spectrum that focus on thelow-level development of microcontroller firmware and how microcontrollers interface withindividual sensors, actuators, and other devices. Due to the detailed nature of the material, it canbe challenging to present these topics and labs within the context of an overarching project whilestill limiting the scope to fit within a single term.Pinball machines integrate many core topics of electrical engineering, computer engineering,mechanical engineering, and computer science in
bring the material alive through the use of student driven interactive graphics and dynamicperformance metric calculations. In-line interactive questions are included to provide thestudents with rapid feedback regarding their understanding of the material. The ebook was usedas the required text in EECS 562 Introduction to Communication Systems at the University ofKansas in the Spring of 2021.KeywordsCommunication systems, electronic textbook, faculty paper.IntroductionIt is common for electrical engineering curriculum to include an introduction to communicationsystems course, either required or as an elective. There are many books in the market to teach anintroduction to communication systems course, e.g., [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8
concept. In the engineering curriculum, courses are sequenced intoprerequisite chains of three to five courses per subfield — a design aimed at developing andreinforcing core concepts over time. Knowledge retention of these prerequisite concepts isimportant for the next course. In this project, concept review quizzes were used to identify thegaps and deficiencies in students’ prerequisite knowledge and measure improvement after aconcept review intervention. Two quizzes (pre-intervention and post-intervention) drewinspiration from the standard concept inventories for fundamental concepts and include conceptssuch as Free Body Diagrams, Contact and Reaction Forces, Equilibrium Equations, andCalculation of the Moment. Concept inventories are
. Tooran Emami, United States Coast Guard Academy Tooran Emami is an associate professor of Electrical Engineering at the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. She received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Wichita State University in 2006 and 2009, respectively. Dr. Emami was an adjunct faculty member of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Wichita State University for three semesters. Her research interests are Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controllers, robust control, time delay, compensator design, and filter design applications, for continuous-time and discrete-time systems.Mr. David Fournier, United States Coast Guard Academy Holds a BA and MS from Southern New
Paper ID #34487Exploring Values and Norms of Engineering Through Responsible Innova-tionand Critiques of Engineering CulturesDr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster
programs: a project-based learning (PBL) and a traditionalengineering curriculum. The PBL students do not take classes; 100 percent of their learning isdone in the context of industry projects to develop graduates with integrated technical andprofessional knowledge and competencies. The traditional curriculum involves classroominstruction, homework, and assessments. Using a qualitative research approach, the current studyfocused on students that completed two years of a new PBL program in a Midwest university,and compared their learning experiences to students that are graduating from a traditionalprogram at a different university. Initial results suggest positive outcomes are more pronounced for students associated withPBL as compared with
specifically looked at algorithm bias instruction, we did not find recent publishedwork in the field. However, compared to when we began our research in 2018, we find thatmany computer science programs now recognize and incorporate courses on algorithm bias intothe curriculum. An article published in 2019, “Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics Across CSEducation” by Grosz et al. [14] outlines efforts at Harvard University to create amultidisciplinary approach to teaching ethics to CS students, utilizing instructors fromphilosophy and computer science to teach courses that address various ethical issues that facecomputer scientists.The Embedded EthiCS approach is being embraced at other institutions as well. StanfordUniversity [15] is one of the
. During his time at Rose-Hulman, Sriram has served as a consultant in Hadoop and NoSQL systems and has helped a variety of clients in the Media, Insurance, and Telecommunication sectors. In addition to his industrial consulting activities, Sriram maintains an active research profile in data science and education research that has led to over 30 publications or presentations. At Rose-Hulman, Sriram has focused on incorporat- ing reflection, and problem based learning activities in the Software Engineering curriculum. Sriram has been fundamental to the revamp of the entire software engineering program at Rose-Hulman. Sriram is a founding member of the Engineering Design program and continues to serve on the leadership
. Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University Dr. Hertz earned a B.S. in Ceramic Engineering from Alfred University in 1999 and then a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006. Following this, he worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology as a National Research Council postdoctoral fellow. He joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware as an Assistant Professor in September 2008, leading a lab that researched the effects of composition and nanostructure on ionic conduction and surface exchange in ceramic materials. In 2014, he moved to Northeastern University to focus on teaching and developing curriculum in the
energyefficiency. These incredible solutions and many others were discovered by observing the naturalenvironment all around us. Biomimicry is an invaluable tool that can be employed by engineers tocontinue to improve the lives of people and advance humanitarian efforts.The Biomimicry course taught in Villanova University’s Sustainable Engineering programprovides students the opportunity to assess current engineering solutions in areas they are mostconcerned. These topics have ranged from issues associated with current approaches to energysystems, building practices, and agricultural landscape. The course structure allows students tounderstand the benefits and issues associated with their chosen topic, observe and analyze naturefor examples of relevant and
of any other mechanical engineering course in the undergraduate curriculum. Thus, thisrepresented the identification of the first quantitative criterion used to assess the “health” of thecourse design: the non-completion rate. A discussion amongst department faculty members wassubsequently initiated for redesigning the course with an aim to improve the non-completionrate. This discussion led us to identify a second concern, which was that the statics knowledgeand skills of students who passed the course could not meet faculty expectations in downstreamcourses within the program. We, therefore, identified a second evaluation criterion regarding thequality of the course: the mastery level of specific knowledge and skills of students passing