Asee peer logo
Displaying results 961 - 990 of 1623 in total
Conference Session
Elementary Students: Computational Thinking, Reasoning, and Troubleshooting
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michelle L. Stevens, Lafayette School Corporation; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Elizabeth Gajdzik, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
et al.’s discussion of naming, setting thecontext, and reflecting to better fit the age of our participants and their instructional context.MethodsThis study explores if evidence exists to show that K-2 students can engage in meaningfulproblem scoping while participating in introductory problem scoping activities from a STEM+Cintegration curricula.ParticipantsUsing purposeful sampling, data from six different classrooms out of 17 were selected to beanalyzed. These six classrooms (two kindergarten, two first grade, and two second grade) wereidentified based on how well the educator followed the curriculum and the amount of interactions(students to teacher and student to student) captured. All of the teachers participated in a
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Best Papers
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jordan Orion James, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Chen Qiu M.Sc., University of New Mexico; Christopher Riley
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
No solution or Simple Detailed solution solution(s) to the problem very vague solution solutionResponsibility Describes who is responsible for or To For With should be involved in the solution, (Government (The (Farmer or with reference to the With / For / To needs to fix the designers community framework problem) know best) member involvement in
Conference Session
Developing Teaching and Mentoring Skills
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alison J Kerr, University of Tulsa; Bradley J. Brummel, University of Tulsa; Bret Austin Arnold, University of Tulsa; Michael W. Keller, University of Tulsa
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
with professional development and not knowing how to support thegraduate students in their pursuits. This study’s comprehensive examination of an activeadvisor’s experience with supporting graduate student development proves to be informative anduseful in determining potential next steps in the formative development of a program aimed atgraduate student professional development.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumber 1545211.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bryon Kucharski, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Joan Giblin, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Mehmet Ergezer, Wentworth Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Student
Institute of Technology. In 2012, he completed his PhD at the University of Rochester. He now focuses his efforts to further the areas of computer architecture, digital systems, cybersecurity, and computer engineering education.Dr. Joan Giblin, Wentworth Institute of TechnologyDr. Mehmet Ergezer, Wentworth Institute of Technology Mehmet Ergezer (S’06) received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA, in 2003 and 2006, respectively. He received the D.Eng. degree in artificial intelligence from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA, in May 2014. From 2003 to 2005, following his
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Conference Session
Internship, Co-Op, and Professional Development Programs
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Austin Barnes, Institute for Scientist and Engineer Educators; Tamara Ball, University of California, Santa Cruz; Christine R. Starr, University of California, Santa Cruz; Scott Seagroves, The College of Saint Scholastica; Kauahi Perez, University of Hawaii, Manoa; Lisa Hunter, University of California, Santa Cruz
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education
formalized as part of communitybenefit packages agreed to by advocates of proposed telescopes and representatives from thelocal community [1]. Opposition to the observatories has existed since the 1960’s when thegovernor and legislature, enthusiastic about development, set aside land for construction.Protests, demonstrations and litigation challenging previous and proposed construction of newtelescopes in Hawai‘i have focused on environmental protection and the sites selected as beingsacred to natives. For example, controversy over choosing Maunakea for the site location of anew Thirty Meter Telescope emphasizes that this is considered the most sacred mountain of theNative Hawai‘ian religion and culture. Yet a local workforce is also highly desired
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Conference Session
Embedding Sociotechnical Systems Thinking I
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Natasha A. Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
discuss here some of the benefits and challenges challenges of associated with the adoption of this technology (in a broader electric vehicle transportation context, not only related to [university]’s adoption transportation system) Quiz after Question 2 (Day Based on our discussion, please answer the following two Day 1 1) – Personal questions: a) What did you learn from today's activity? opinion about b) How did our discussion and activity change your personal electric vehicles opinion about electric vehicles? Quiz after Question 3 (Day How does the electric vehicles adoption change the Day 1 1) – Electric community's well-being? Are
Conference Session
Ethical Awareness and Social Responsibility in a Corporate/Team Context
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katharine E. Miller, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, University of South Florida; David Torres, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Danielle Corple, Purdue University; Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
social responsibility and moral decision-making,specifically in terms of engineering pedagogy.Keywords: social responsibility, embedded teams, human-centered design (HCD), engineeringeducationIntroductionSince Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was first introduced in the 1950’s to expandorganizational bottom-lines from profit and legal considerations to issues of social impact, CSRhas grown into a global force for linking corporations with the areas in which members live andwork. Extant research has explored CSR on a broader organizational level, without necessarilyconsidering how social responsibility manifests on the team level. Thus, we contend that feelingsand understandings of responsibility experienced by students working on design
Conference Session
Evidence-based Practices in Faculty Development
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Megan Huffstickler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joseph C. Tise, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sven G. Bilén, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development Constituency Committee
Conference Session
Engineering Leadership Competency and Skill Development
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering; Kate Roach, UCL; Emanuela Tilley, University College London; Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
development of a host of professional, interpersonal, andpersonal skills [8]. While these programs were developed independently of Rottmann et al.’s2015 work, there is a convergence between the explicit and implicit models of leadership thatemerge from these four programs, Rottmann et al.’s model, and other recent models ofengineering leadership, as discussed further below.The four programs that serve as case studies here have curricula that were developed, inengineering leadership and more broadly, from a similar starting point: careful consideration ofthe skills and abilities required of 21st-century engineering graduates in response to calls forengineering education reform from professional engineering bodies over the preceding decade.For example
Conference Session
Practice II: Curricular Innovations
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan M. Hicks, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
grading in the semester prior to the implementation of training versusthat of the semesters that used training. In the future, this data will be used to further modifygrading and training procedures, and data will continue to be collected and analyzed.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2017 - 2018,” 2016.[2] G. W. Clough, “The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century,” Washington, DC, USA, 2004.[3] P. E. Dickson, T. Dragon, and A. Lee, “Using undergraduate teaching assistants in small classes,” Proc. 2017 ACM SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ., pp. 165–170, 2017.[4] S. Ashton and R. S. Davies, “Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing
Conference Session
Professional Skills for Graduate Students
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Prasun Lala, École de Technologie Supérieure; Félix Langevin Harnois, École de Technologie Supérieure; Ghizlane El Boussaidi, École de Technologie Supérieure; Christian Desrosiers, École de Technologie Supérieure; Catherine Laporte, École de Technologie Supérieure
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
, TX, 2012, p. 25.1394.1-25.1394.13.[7] E. A. Erichsen and D. U. Bolliger, “Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 309–326, 2011.[8] J. L. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011, p. 22.1714.1-22.1714.13.[9] S. L. Gassman, M. A. Maher, and B. E. Timmerman, “Supporting Students’ Disciplinary Writing in Engineering Education,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1270–1280, 2013.[10] A. A. Kranov, “‘It’s Not My Job To Teach Them How To Write’: Facilitating The Disciplinary
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vibhuti Dave, Colorado School of Mines; Tyrone L. Vincent, Colorado School of Mines; Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines; Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2006.[11] L. Jing, Z. Cheng, J. Wang and Y. Zhou, "A spiral step-by-step educational method for cultivating competent embedded system engineers to meet industry demands," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 356-365, 2011.[12] C.-S. Lee, J.-H. Su, K.-E. Lin, J.-H. Chang and G.-H. Lin, "A project-based laboratory for learning embedded system design with industry support," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 173-181, 2010.[13] J. W. Bruce, J. C. Harden and R. B. Reese, "Cooperative and progressive design experience," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 83-92, 2004.[14] M. Lande and L. Leifer, "Prototyping to learn
Conference Session
Imagining and Reimagining Engineering Education as a Dynamic System
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Thomas A. De Pree, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
engineeringeducation compelled them to rely on quantitative standards for accreditation. Although ABET’sEngineering Criteria 2000 (EC 2000) reforms during the mid-1990s specifically worked to moveaccreditation beyond quantitative standards, namely the old “bean counting” approach, the actualimplementation of EC 2000’s “a-k” learning outcomes at some institutions still wind up in theend affirming Seron and Silbey’s findings: the new learning outcomes were often interpreted as alist of requirements to be met, rather than the starting point for a set of institutionally-specificcriteria that would require greater use of professional judgment on the part of both programevaluators and the faculty from programs undergoing evaluation (ABET 2016; also Pool 2016).This
Conference Session
Makerspaces
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tikyna Dandridge, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
, Senay Purzer, Anastasia Rynearson, Cetin Biller,Kayla Carter, Jessica Rush Leeker and Terri Sanger. References[1] C. M. Cunningham, “Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children,” Eng. Educ., 2007.[2] H. A. Diefes-Dux, M. Hjalmarson, T. Miller, and R. Lesh, “Model eliciting activities for engineering education,” in Models and modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students, J. S. Zawojewski, H. Diefes-Dux, and K. Bowman, Eds. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2008, pp. 17–36.[3] Ş. Purzer, M. H. Goldstein, R. S. Adams, C. Xie, and S. Nourian, “An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors
Conference Session
Accreditation and the BOK
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
13 13 18 11 4.5 A 2. Natural sciences 3 36 5 4.5A 3. Humanities 2 77 1 S -- 4. Social sciences 2 69 2 I -- 5. Material science 8 15 12 -- 6. Mechanics 14 12 11 13 -- 7. Experiments 3 41 3 S 3.7 8. Problem
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington; Ann Delaney, Boise State University; Katherine Christine Tetrick, Washington State University; Sonya Cunningham, University of Washington; Pamela Cosman, University of California, San Diego; Tanya D. Ennis, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jana Milford, University of Colorado, Boulder; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Kevin Pitts, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Michelle Ferrez, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
aimed at improvingthe engagement, retention, and graduation of students underrepresented in engineering. Thesecomponents include: “intrusive” academic advising and support services, intensive first-yearacademic curriculum, community-building (including pre-matriculation summer programs),career awareness and vision, faculty mentorship, NSF S-STEM scholarships, and second-yearsupport.This work in progress paper describes the implementation of the Redshirt program2 at each of thesix Redshirt in Engineering Consortium institutions, providing a variety of models for how an1 For brevity, we will use the acronyms listed in this table in place of the full names of theinstitutions throughout the paper.extra preparatory year or other intensive academic
Conference Session
Undergraduate Track - Technical Session V
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
J. Sonnenberg-Klein, Georgia Institute of Technology; Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Randal T. Abler, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Undergraduate Education
://www.vip.gatech.edu/how-vip- credits-count. [Accessed: 06-Feb-2018].[9] J. Sonnenberg-Klein, R. T. Abler, and E. J. Coyle, “Correlation between Academic Credit- use Policies and Student Persistence in Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Courses,” presented at the Manuscript submitted for publication, 2018.[10] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, “Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548–549, 2007.[11] S. A. Webb, “The Importance of Undergraduate Research,” Science | AAAS, 06-Jul-2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2007/07/importance- undergraduate-research. [Accessed: 27-Dec-2017].[12] J. C. Norcross, “Getting involved in research as an undergraduate
Conference Session
Undergraduate Track - Technical Session III
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Elizabeth R. Kurban, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Undergraduate Education
, piloting,and implementing new course content, we have been able to identify the strategies employed andthe challenges we have faced. As we continue to navigate this ongoing process, we areconsidering the lessons we have learned and continue building upon our strategies forimprovement. It is our hope that we can encourage further discussion regarding strategies forincorporating diversity and inclusion into curriculum, as well as programs and practices, invarious engineering contexts. 15 ReferencesBurgstahler, S. (2009). Universal design of instruction (UDI): Definition, principles, guidelines, and
Conference Session
Undergraduate Education Track - Technical Session I
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Ieshya Anderson, Arizona State University; Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Undergraduate Education
solutions for increasing diversity.Amy’s storyAmy is the youngest of five children and the only member of her family to have graduated fromcollege. Her father was one of eight children and he completed his formal education at the end ofeighth grade in order to find a job to help support the family. This was typical of the time(1930’s), and within his community and social economic status of first generation immigrants tothe United States. Amy’s father learned a trade (welding) that enabled him to have a lifetime ofsteady employment in order for him to provide for his family. Amy remembers that her father atvarious times worked overtime, double time, second or third shift, each of which had differentincentives that increased the hourly wage for the
Collection
2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference
Authors
Kyle Frederick Larsen P.E., Eastern Washington University; Nm A Hossain, Eastern Washington University; Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University; Abolfazl Amin, Utah Valley University; Heechang Bae, Eastern Washington University
, thermodynamics, heattransfer or other engineering laboratory experiments.(5) A Rockwell Hardness test and/or tensile test on number of specimens should be measuredand used for statistical inference, quality control analysis, etc.(6) Two Independent Samples and Paired Sample Tests using examples,such as comparing airpressure gauges (analog and digital) to determine if they yield the same average psi readings.(7) Simple Linear Regression and an Introduction to Multiple Linear Regression collecting thedata of the travel distance of rubber bands of different widths.(8) A final group project chosen by students to demonstrate various applications of statistics inan engineering setting.References1. S. Bisgaard, “Teaching Statistics to Engineers”, The American
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Debapriyo Paul, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
integrated approach to teacher professional development in stem. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13 (2), 69.[9] Bandura, A., (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: Macmillan.[10] Bandura, A. & Wessels, S., (1994). Self-efficacy.[11] Maddux, J.E., (1995). Self-efficacy theory. Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment. Springer, 3-33.[12] Stohlmann, M., Moore, T.J. & Roehrig, G.H., (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated stem education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J- PEER), 2 (1), 4.[13] Shaughnessy, M.F., (2004). An interview with anita woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (2), 153-176.[14
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Anna Montana Cirell, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Audrey Boklage, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[2] C. E. Foor and S. E. Walden, “‘Imaginary Engineering’ or ‘Re-imagined Engineering’: Negotiating Gendered Identities in the Borderland of a College of Engineering,” NWSA J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 41–64, 2009.[3] R. M. Marra, K. a Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012.[4] J. P. Gee, “Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–125, 2000.[5] P. L. Horta, “Identity in Education
Conference Session
Technical Session II
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Richard Tyler Cimino, ExEEd Department, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, FYEE Conference Sessions
://peer.asee.org/18001. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[6] D. D. Burkey, M. F. Young, “Work-in-Progress: A 'Cards Against Humanity'-style card gamefor increasing engineering students' awareness of ethical issues in the profession,” in 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/29190 . [Accessed: Mar 29, 2018].[7] Gulotta, J., Parisi, N., Bodnar, C. A., “Leveling Up by Gamifying Freshman EngineeringClinic” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016,[Online]. Available at https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/14871/view.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[8] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a
Conference Session
Communicating Across Cultural and Epistemological Boundaries
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
emotions of others”[10]. The latterhalf of this definition aligns well with the cognitive and affective dimensions of empathyin psychology literature. Crowley et al. also explicitly addressed empathy, recognizing itas a “foundational component of emotional intelligence.” Notably, while Welker andCarlson’s and Crowley et al.’s papers treat empathy respectively as a framework forengineering students’ moral and emotional development, neither one cites sources thatexplain the theoretical underpinnings of empathy. The lack of reference to academic sources on empathy lasted for a few more years,during which time a number of papers appeared in ASEE that explore the role of empathyin communication, teamwork, and design, and yet authors of these papers
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Collection
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mohd Iramul Hoque, CATME
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
PowerPoint slides that were discussed in lecture. Theslides included descriptions of common rating problems including giving everyone on the teamthe same scores across all dimensions, giving the same teammate the same scores across alldimensions, bimodal ratings (giving one teammate all 1’s and others all 5’s), etc. This lecturealso included a discussion of what information you are trying to give your teammates whenrating them and how the results of the evaluations can be interpreted in order to improve teamperformance. General comments were also made regarding what the rating patterns looked likein the class without identifying individuals or teams that used poor rating patterns. The goal wasto help students reflect on their own ratings and
Conference Session
Program Evaluation Studies
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona; Amy Annette Rogers, Delaware State University; James C. Baygents, University of Arizona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
,TheSaltRiverProject,NeuroTinker,Inc.,PurdueUniversityCollegeofEngineering,TheArizonaDepartmentofEducation,DelawareStateUniversityReferences [1]NationalAcademyofEngineering.(2008).ChangingtheConversation:Messages forImprovingPublicUnderstandingofEngineering.WashingtonDC:National AcademiesPress. [2]Noddings,N.(1992).GenderandCurriculum,fromtheHandbookofResearchon Curriculum,editedbyP.W.Jackson,NewYork:Macmillan. [3]Matyas,M.L.&Malcolm,S.(1991).InvestinginHumanPotential:Scienceand EngineeringattheCrossroads.AAAS,Washington,D.C. [4]Rosser,S.V.(1990).Female‐FriendlyScience.PergamonPress,Elmsford,NY. [5]Rosser,S.V.(1995).TeachingtheMajority:BreakingtheGenderBarrierin
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Mayari I. Serrano, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Rachel Ann Baker
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 125(4):470–500, 1999. [8] Antony S.R. Manstead and Sander A.M. van Eekelen. Distinguishing between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic achievement intentions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15):1375–1392, 1998. [9] Carroll Seron, Susan S. Silbey, Erin Cech, and Brian Rubineau. Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43 (2):178–214, 2016.[10] Mary E. Fitzpatrick, Manuela Romero, and Jennifer Sheridan. Changes in undergraduate engineering college climate and predictors of major commitment: Results from climate
Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Matthew Walker, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
-based grading and reporting will improve education,” Kappan, pp. 64-68, Apr 2015.11. P. J. Parker, B. Bocher, & A. Polebitski, “Assessing Student Writing Competencies in Environmental Engineering Courses,” In Proc. 121st Am. Soc. Eng. Edu. Annu. Conf. & Expo., pp. 24.205.1–12, 2014.12. S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Fluid Mechanics Course,” In Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Edu. Annu. Conf. & Expo, pp. 24.1099.110, June 2014.13. S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Thermodynamics Course,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173–182, 201714. J. B. Hylton & H. Diefes-Dux, “A Standards-based Assessment Strategy for Written Exams,” 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016.15. Marbouti, Farshid, "A standards-based