Engineering Teacher, pp. 30-35, May 2014.[2] International Technology Education Association, “Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology,” 3rd ed., 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf. [Accessed: 01- Apr-2015].[3] D. Sianez, M. Fugere, and C. Lennon, “Technology and Engineering Education Students’ Perceptions of Hands-On and Hands-Off Activities,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291- 299, Nov. 2010.[4] M. Milojkovic, M. Milovanovic, D. Mitic, S. Peric, M. Spasic, and S. Nikolic, “Laboratory CNC Machine for Education of Students on Control Systems Engineering,” Facta Universitatis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117-125, 2014.[5] D. Rijmenants
showing that on average, women with Page 26.327.6a science or engineering degree, employed full-time in STEM, earned $75,100.16 On average,men of the same status earned $91,000, a difference of almost $16,000. In 1999, MIT conducteda study on women faculty in their life science departments and found resource discriminationsuch as differences in salary, laboratory size, funding, award nominations, and startuppackages.37 In regards to academic commercialization, according to Murray,40 faculty are ofteninvited to engage in this type of activity by former students involved in entrepreneurship. Thereis some evidence to show that resource discrimination
-mentoring. Incorporation of engineering design experiences across the undergraduatecurriculum with linkages to the university’s engineering innovation laboratory for access toindustry projects contributes to increased student retention and persistence to graduation.CASCADE uses promising practices from research to create a retention program that includesintegrated curriculum, peer-mentoring, learning communities, and efforts that build innovationand creativity into the engineering curriculum. CASCADE vertically aligns 32 problem-baseddesign efforts from the first-year to senior-year (capstone) courses. Research on engineeringstudent learning communities indicates increased retention and student satisfaction with theirfirst-year experience 18, 33
in the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post-doc at University of Pennsylvania in the area of Haptics and Virtual Reality. His research interests are in the areas of unmanned vehicles particularly flapping flight, mechatronics, robotics, MEMS, virtual reality and haptics, and teaching with technology. He has ongoing research in flapping flight, Frisbee flight dynamics, lift in porous material and brain injury He is an active member of ASEE and ASME and reviewer for several ASME, IEEE and ASEE, FIE conferences and journals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Fluids Friday! A Method for Improving Student Attentiveness
part files were imported into the 3D printing machine as STL files. Figures 4 and5 show the Makerbot® and Lulzbot® machines used in printing the tensile test specimens. Eventhough these machines were easily accessible to the students, they had to be trained on how torun them by the laboratory technician. Figure 6 shows some of the tensile specimens that were3D printed and tested. All tensile test specimens were 3D printed at 100% fill with ± 45º rasterangle. After 3D printing the specimens, they were conditioned for over 40 hours at roomtemperature and at ~50% relative humidity, according to the standard practice for conditioningplastics for testing described in ASTM D 618-14. Following the conditioning of the specimens,an Instron materials
Paper ID #15165Middle School Teachers’ Evolution of TPACK Understanding through Pro-fessional DevelopmentMr. Anthony Steven Brill, New York University Anthony Brill received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently a M.S. student at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering, studying Mechanical Engineering. He is also a fellow in their GK-12 program, promoting STEM education. He conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory, where his interests include using smart mobile devices in closed loop feedback control.Colin Hennessy Elliott, New York
300 has standard first-level fluid mechanics content that includes fluid properties,hydrostatics, shear stress, the Bernoulli Equation, control volume analysis, dimensional analysis,and open channel flow. The three credit hour course has enrollment that varies betweenapproximately 90 and 175 students, and is dominated by junior and senior civil engineeringstudents (about 60%), with a smaller percentage of students typically from agricultural andbiological engineering and other engineering disciplines. Most (>80%) students enrolled in CE300 are also enrolled in a companion one-credit laboratory course, but there are no recitationsections for the course.Flipping CE 300During the Fall 2013 semester, CE 300 was structured as three 50-minute
paper, and time spent in the laboratory environment. Theclass was evaluated by the professor to assess the students’ success in learning and theeffectiveness of resources that may be required for future engineering-related interdisciplinaryclasses.II. ObjectivesThe main objective of the projects in this course is for interdisciplinary students to work as teamsto develop and/or improve hands-on skills as they work with other students from different fieldsof study. The projects are assigned to obtain objectives which involve the design anddevelopment of a variety of engineering and technology-related projects in order to fulfill theeducational goals of their field of studies. Students are also tasked to learn how to workeffectively with others as
unit, soil and irrigation water analysis laboratory, nursery,earthworm production unit, medicinal and aromatic plant garden, sheep and goat farm, fruitorchard mother block, shade-net, and hydroponic project. The college has departmentallaboratories that are renovated and furnished with state of the art equipment. The college isaccredited by the university through 2018-19 and offers a three-year diploma program, whichadmits 90 students after graduating from high schools. The admissions are based on students’performances in the high school graduation examination, which is a government managed state-wide examination. The main objectives of the diploma program are, 1) to develop competence amongst itsstudents for solving problems related to
chapter and research papers on machining of composites. He has a diverse industrial experience for 27 years, in design, research and manufacturing of electro me- chanical systems, such as design of various types of gear and gear boxes, antennas and light and heavy fabricated structures, for communication, TV telecast, natural disasters management and Telemedicine application. Dr PS, designed and manufactured various types of antenna’s weighing from 200 pounds to 100,000 pounds. He was also actively involved in configuring the antenna controls and selection of motor and motor controllers. Dr PS, has advised more than 40 senior/capstone projects. One of his project won the national award from Airforce Research Laboratory
Environment Association (CWEA), and Engineers Without Boarders (EWB) stu- dent chapters. Additionally, Dr. Palomo is the CE Water Analysis laboratory director and coordinates all teaching, research and safety training activities in the engineering laboratory. Dr. Palomo conducts research in surface water quality improvement via natural treatment systems, water and wastewater treat- ment processes, and water education. She is involved in outreach programs for K-12 students to increase the participation of Hispanic female students in STEM fieldsDr. Natalie Mladenov, San Diego State University Dr. Natalie Mladenov is an associate professor and William E. Leonhard Jr. Chair in Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering
students work with faculty members atthe host university, they typically work most closely on a day-to-day basis with graduate studentor postdoctoral mentors who work in the faculty member’s laboratory. The majority of theengineering mentorship literature is focused on faculty as mentors, not graduate student mentorsor postdoctoral researchers. Generally, much of the existing literature relating to mentorship in engineering exploresthe mentor’s experience (typically focusing on faculty as mentors) (Dolan & Johnson, 2009;Mena & Schmitz, 2013; Revelo & Loui, 2016; Tsai, Kotys-Schwartz, Louie, Ferguson, & Berg,2012, 2013) rather than the mentee’s experience (Ahn, 2014; Ahn, Cox, Diefes-Dux, &Capobianco, 2013; Faurot, Doe
Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests include energy and thermodynamic related topics. Since 2007 she has been actively involved in recruiting and outreach for the Statler College, as part of this involvement Dr. Morris frequently makes presentations to groups of K-12 students, as well as perspective WVU students and their families. Dr. Morris was selected as a Statler College Outstanding Teacher for 2012, the WVU Honors College John R. Williams Outstanding Teacher for 2012, and
thanone MDT plan of study, or have variants of a single plan.- Upon completion of the proposed plan of study, that draft plan is submitted to the MDTCurriculum Advisory Committee for review, audit of requirements, and a vote to approve theplan for the company -- or to revise and resubmit.- Industry partners who desire stackable certificates, or micro-credentialing, will identify thosecurricular subsets after the B.S. plan of study is fully approved.Example Degree Subject/Course RequirementsPurdue University CorePurdue University has core, minimum subject requirements, common to all Purdue degrees,which are required and included in all BS-MDT plans of study:English compositionSpeech communicationMath/quantitative reasoningScience and laboratory
female engineering students, engineering faculty, alumni,and industry representatives. CPP WE Open House is an annual event for admitted students, held in conjunction withEngineering Scholar’s Day to encourage more young women to make the decision to enroll inthe College of Engineering. Students meet the College of Engineering staff and faculty, take acampus or College of Engineering laboratory tour, and attend an engineering club fair. Each semester, a WE Chat is held. A WE Chat provides the opportunity for femalefaculty and students to connect and learn about each other. The program provides femalestudents in the College of Engineering an opportunity to have lunch with female faculty fromtheir respective departments. Faculty
Paper ID #25901A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Pre-College Preparation and Use ofSupplemental Instruction during the First Year on GPA and Retention forWomen in EngineeringMr. Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University Bradley Priem is a fourth year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in chemical en- gineering and minoring in biochemical engineering. He has been involved in the Connections Chemistry Review program for three years. He has also held an undergraduate research position in a biomaterials laboratory on campus. He has completed two co-ops in the biotech industry, and is currently
interaction (a conceptual knowledge competency), and within Mechanical Engineeringthe method was used to build mastery of experimental testing (a practical skill competency).4.2 – SEEF activities to move forward an agenda of active learning in experimentalcourses—a course designed around active learning.Example 1: A SEEF being the lead in course design – With the support of the MechanicalEngineering Undergraduate Curriculum Committee, Professor Sheri Sheppard, the members ofthe Designing Education Laboratory, Scott Crawford, and Lester Su, a key focus for the SEEFwas developing the ME2: Experimental Problem Solving for Engineers. In the Department ofMechanical Engineering, the need to master a wide range of math-heavy topics common to alldegree
Paper ID #30318EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF THE PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE(PEM) HYDROGEN FUELCELL PERFORMANCE WITH NANO-GRAPHENE OXIDEDr. Hazem Tawfik P.E., State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale Prof. Tawfik obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, from University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. He has held a number of industrial & academic positions and affiliations with organizations that included Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Stony Brook University (SBU), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Atomic Energy of Canada Inc., Ontario Hydro
Management at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1989. Dr. Woehr served on the faculty of the Psychology Department in the I/O Psychology program at Texas A&M University from 1988 to 1999 and as a Professor of Man- agement at the University of Tennessee from 1999 to 2011. He has also served as a Visiting Scientist to the Air Force Human Resource Laboratory and as a consultant to private industry. Dr. Woehr is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), the American Psychological Associa- tion (APA), and the Association for Psychological Science (APS). His research on
. Thinking about the different classes you take, comparing the lectures and labs. Which wouldyou say you prefer or like more than the other?Q. Think about the time you spend in class and out of class, like working or studying. Howwould you say the two balance out?ResultsStudying vs. Completing AssignmentsStudents divided the idea of studying into two categories. The first was completion ofassignments, ranging from homework assignments to laboratory reports. The second wasstudying for the purpose of understanding the knowledge discussed in class in order to be readyfor tests and examinations.Some of the students’ comments give a sense of how the idea of completing an assignment is notnecessarily considered ‘studying’: “[In] my Math class, I
Education Annual Conference, Tampa, Florida, June 2019[3] E. Scott, R. Bates, R. Campbell and D. Wilson, “Contextualizing Professional Development in the Engineering Classroom”, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC, October 2010[4] J. Sharp, “Interview Skills Training in the Chemical Engineering Laboratory: Transporting a Pilot Project”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 2008[5] J. Sharp, “Behavioral Interview Training in Engineering Classes”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012[6] E. Glynn and F. Falcone, “Professional Development for
Transferable career skills, trajectories, open Q&A discussion2:30PM Intro to Research: Ethical Laboratory and Data Practices - Dr. Hogan3:15 PM Intro to Research: How to Keep a Lab Notebook - Dr. Ishan Goswami4:00 PM Explore Riverside: Hike to Mt. Rubidoux6:00 PM Dinner | Mission Inn Restaurant7:30 PM Social | Organized on site5Appendix II. Evaluation SurveySection 1: Please rate the following experiences Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Overall, I would rate the instructors as: DAY 1: Being a Researcher DAY 1: Welcome to ATP-Bio and Center Overview DAY 1: ATP-Bio Research Overviews Part I DAY 1: ATP-Bio Research Overviews Part
, preparing for graduate school, and attending a professional society organization conference relatedto the topic, and visiting and presenting research to key industry stakeholders. Students also tour otherresearch laboratories at Penn State, engage in bi-weekly check-in lunches where they report out to eachother how their projects were progressing, and have a chance to network informally with other facultymentors and students involved in the REU program. Students also had the opportunity to take part inseveral informal social community-building activities, including a hike and potluck/picnic, which werewell-received and helped build community immediately at the beginning of the summer.Table 1: Example Topics and Project Titles for REU Projects
includes both instruction set and assembly language. The first half of the semester focuseson the exploration of combinational and sequential logic circuits, which correspond to layers fourand five in Fig. 1. Thereafter, students can design an Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) circuitcapable of executing fundamental arithmetic and logic operations. This design exercise can aidstudents in grasping how binary opcodes can effectively govern digital circuits. Furthermore,students also design a functional CPU circuit using the essential components provided by thecircuit simulator. This practical laboratory experience contributes to athorough comprehension of the operations associated with basic App. Softwareassembly code
laboratories. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Computer Architecture using VHDL Simulation and FPGA PrototypingAbstractAn Instructional Processor design example has been expanded to facilitate teaching of aComputer Architecture course. The system is modelled in VHDL and simulated using Xilinxdesign tools to demonstrate operation of the processor. A basic microcontroller is created byadding memory-mapped input/output (I/O). The system is implemented in hardware on a fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA). The processor can then be interfaced with peripheral devicesto demonstrate functional applications.A key component of the Computer Architecture course is a student
: Engineering identity formation is not simply the result of technical knowledgeacquisition, but also that of enculturation. Both processes are intricately linked to the places (i.e.,physical infrastructures) in which they unfold such as laboratories, classrooms, communal areas,and other engineering spaces on a university campus. Places act as a conduit for engineeringenculturation, as it is within these settings that students are inundated with value-laden symbols& representations, participate in engineering activities and rituals, and are expected to adopt andembody dominant engineering mindsets and attitudes towards technical problem solving.Recognizing that the physical infrastructure of a place can serve as a tangible manifestation ofbroader
fields [4], [5], [6].In recent years, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been gainingpopularity as a way to engage undergraduate students in authentic scientific inquiry on a largescale [7]. While CUREs have many similarities to traditional laboratory courses or courseresearch projects, the work students do as part of a CURE is framed in a fundamentally differentway. Research projects within CUREs ideally have direct and indirect impact on the broaderscientific community and offer students the opportunity to share study findings with externalstakeholders [8]. Consequently, CUREs represent an overlap between the triumvirate of studentlearning, stakeholder impact, and promotion of a faculty’s research program.In this work
competition in detail, including goals,implementation, and challenges. The paper also discusses the challenges introduced by theCOVID pandemic and how the event was moved to a virtual platform to ensure social distancing.Finally, lessons learned and future plans are presented. IntroductionIt is currently well understood that team competitions are an important component of engineeringeducation1-3 and support education in teaming, communications, leadership, design and open-ended problem solving. While classroom and laboratory learning are the backbone of engineeringeducation, extracurricular competitions, especially those that involve teaming, are an excellentway to augment learning. Not only does competition
California.Prof. Grace D O’Connell, University of California, Berkeley Grace O’Connell is the Associate Dean for Inclusive Excellence in the College of Engineering and As- sociate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. She is the co-director of the Berkeley Biomechanics Laboratory, and her research interests are in soft tissue mechanobiology and tissue engineering. O’Connell received a PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania in 2009, where her research focused on intervertebral disc biomechanics with age, degeneration, and injury. O’Connell’s research group employs computational modeling and experi- mental approaches to study the effect of aging and
precalculus and trigonometry courses they would take in the fall. Most math courses lastedabout two hours per day.Hands-On STEM ActivitiesMany STEM Core students report a lack of connection to the STEM economy in general and lackwhat research identifies as a clear “STEM identity.” In order to develop the critical STEM identity,make clear connections to real-world math applications, and provide resume-worthy projects thatwill inform their impending internship search, STEM Core Summer Bridge students completehands-on STEM projects. To assist with the creation of accessible and engaging content, GrowthSector worked with Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE), based at Oak RidgeNational Laboratory. ORISE developed hands-on projects based on