specifically civil engineersTwelve of the 17 students were engineering majors and nearly all students expressed a strongintent to pursue an engineering career after graduation (4.29 and 4.12 scores on pre- and post-surveys). Furthermore, a majority (9 of 17) students were Civil Engineering majors. This mayindicate that the course was perceived as a civil engineering course (perhaps based on the courseidentifier code: CEE 409, and the published syllabus). One non-civil engineering majorexpressed frustration with engineering content, “I understand it's an engineering class, but thelength of time spent at San Clemente and Baths of Caracalla talking about cracks in wall. I'm notan engineer so I'll need to get over it.” However, comments from the non
Knowledge does. Most curriculum leave untouched what ethical situations an engineer might face in the future, and the BOK is a great resource to learn about these circumstances before there are consequences. Not only do I think this is important for civil engineering students in general, but this is a topic that I personally feel I lack a thorough understanding of. The only class that has impressed upon me the important of making strong, personal, moral decisions in the future is my philosophy ethics class, which was not a part of my engineering curriculum.”As this assignment preceded the full case study, I hoped that this student might revise thisopinion that no engineering course asked him to consider ethical issues.By the end
color, queers, nonbinary and trans people with disabilities.” For more information, visithttps://www.sinsinvalid.org/.Ableism is very much present in higher education settings. In his book, Academic Ableism,Timothy Dolmage [2017] provides an in-depth exploration of the history of ableism in academia,where disabled people have long been treated as inferior or faulty specimens to be studied, ratherthan as vibrant, valuable, contributing members of the scholarly community [40]. Althoughdisabled students and scholars gained a certain degree of legal protection in educational settingsunder the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, this protection did little to change thefact that post-secondary environments are designed for non-disabled
communityinvolvement and academic engagement said that connecting with important communitiesprovided them with a sense of belonging which improved their affective state and allowed themto re-engage in their studies. The authors’ findings point out the personal and academic relevanceof community-based involvement for engineering students.Finally Cynthia Finelli, Brian Burt and their respective research teams examined the impact ofengineering students’ curricular and co-curricular experiences on their ethical development 29, 34.Finelli et al. found that 88% of engineering students reported some kind of co-curricular activitywith an average of three activities per student. When they were asked about ethics, most studentsreported encountering ethical dilemmas
[12].Social capital can be considered to consist of resources such as information, influence, andreinforcement that support individuals who belong to a social network through purposive actions[31]. This ‘capital’ is generated through investment by individual members of the social network,such as participants and facilitators of a teacher PD, in building trust and creating channels formutual recognition and acknowledgement. The returns can be seen as resource exchange, creationof intellectual capital, and cross-functional team effectiveness [32]. Researchers have reported thatthe quality of teacher-student personal relations and teachers’ enthusiasm for science teaching areimportant indicators for effective teaching [17]. Theories championed
education.Goal 6: National Impact: Contribute to the national dialogue on educational bestpractices in technology education. Our Values Academic Excellence Professional Excellence Personal Excellence Inclusive ExcellenceAcademic Excellence ○ Students develop a lifelong love for learning and discovery not only in the classroom, but also through applied learning and co-curricular experiences.Professional Excellence ○ We send our graduates into the next stages of their lives equipped with the knowledge and tools to effectively navigate their careers. ○ Students are enabled to be change agents in creating technology workplaces
in Fig 1), ECD projectshave been motivated by faculty and students desire to help, personal and career goals, desires tostudy and work abroad, and desires to solve problems and to gain hands on experience onimpactful work [1][2]. Since then, some scholars have called our attention to how the focus ofwell-intentioned ECD projects on technological fixes and deliverables tend to leave out criticalreflections of engineers’ motivations to be in these projects, and of the processes required tobuild trust and determine communities’ priorities and desires [3][4]. Unfortunately, these calls tocritical reflection in the ECD space are often overshadowed by the continued emergence ofmilestones and challenges (e.g., UN Sustainable Development Goals, NAE
Emily Macdonald-Roach is an MASc student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering identity formation, engineering culture, and equity, diversity, and inclusion in engineering career paths.Ms. Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto Saskia van Beers (she/her) is a MASc. student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She holds a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on understanding how Canadian engineers reflect on the impact that their social location has had on their career.Sasha-Ann Eleanor Nixon, University of Toronto ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Why would
Institute of Engineering & Technology (IET) in 2015 and inducted as a charter member of the University of Arkansas Academy of Computer Sci- ence and Computer Engineering in 2017. He established an endowed faculty award in Computer Science, an endowed undergraduate scholarship in Chemical Engineering and an endowed undergraduate scholar- ship to attract under-represented students to Engineering to help establish the College of Engineering’s Early Career Awareness Program (ECAP). Dr. Schubert lives in Tontitown, AR, USA with his wife Kathryn, and son Tucker.Dr. Manuel D. Rossetti P.E., University of Arkansas MANUEL D. ROSSETTI is a Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Arkansas. He
focused on creating stronger partnerships between faculty and staff at a 2 yearand 4 year institution supporting engineering transfer students found that faculty and mentors played amajor influence on students’ decision to choose an engineering major [25]. Students also reported on thechallenges that they faced finding detailed and locally relevant information on engineering careerpathways outside the classroom environment and several of them were struggling with issues related toengineering identity development and sense of belonging. Furthermore, students articulated that whatdrew them to engineering was their desire to develop their quantitative and critical thinking skills, andtheir love of innovation and design, all of which are closely
systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real live ”customers.” Dr. Kleinke is currently the Director of the Graduate Engineering Professional Programs, emphasizing Systems Engineering and Graduate Product Development programs. In addition to academic work, Dr Kleinke continues his involvement in industry as he conducts seminars on innovation which are
-related mentorship opportunities for Black,Hispanic, and Indigenous K-12, undergraduate, and graduate-level students in the state ofIllinois.One of the premier programs of the IDEA Institute is the GIANT Program, which is a seed grantprogram that provides an opportunity for Institute members to research DEI issues they arepassionate about in a way that is otherwise not possible. The GIANT program is modeled afterthe Strategic Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) for faculty-led teaching initiatives [7] butis modified to focus on DEI topics and allows students, postdocs, and staff to propose and leadprojects. Central to the GIANT program is: (i) proposing evidence-based strategies fostering DEIin STEM, (ii) conducting research and collecting
began working as Co-PI on another NSF-funded study to reduce barriers in the hiring of underrepresented racial minority faculty in data science and data engineering fields.Dr. Tammy Michelle McCoy, Georgia Institute of Technology Tammy M. McCoy is the TA Development and Future Faculty Specialist for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this capacity, she works closely with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars interested in pursuing careers in college teaching through teaching assistant (TA) training and support, academic career development programs, and training and certification in college teaching. Specifically, she teaches courses and facilitates workshops to
Participants watched a 7.5-minute QUAL video, which highlighted several examples of HC involving a marginalized Latino student and faculty member. Participants then defined HC in their own words and provided personal examples of engineering HC. (4) Emotions Participants selected an emotion QUAN & QUAL they felt corresponded to six HC statements and whether their emotion was
, and educators have advocated moving from educating engineers in a waythat reinforces that engineering is a purely technical endeavor to one that recognizes that it issociotechnical, and happens in a global context. As part of a National Science Foundation -funded project, our engineering program is exploring ways for engineering educators to do thiswithin required engineering courses. In this paper, we present an example of how content relatedto sociotechnical and global context was integrated into a required senior-level Heat Transfercourse in mechanical engineering. We describe the design of the Social Relevance and GlobalContext Module and its use with students in Fall 2017. The module is designed for use in theHeat Exchanger section of
engineers capable of solving the grand challenges this new century brings.Reviewing the LiteratureStudent engagement theory pioneer Alexander Astin hypothesized that the more involved astudent is socially and academically in college, the more he or she will learn due to increases inmotivation and interaction with faculty, fellow students, and other campus activities. 4,5,6Unfortunately Astin found that choosing an engineering major had “negative effects on a varietyof satisfaction outcomes: faculty, quality of instruction, Student Life, opportunities to takeinterdisciplinary courses, … the overall college experience, … writing skills, listening skills,[and] Cultural Awareness.”6 He did find that engineering majors reported the highest growth
redesigned course (n=53,taught in Fall 2016).Course and instructional materialsThe purpose of this course is to help students learn about the process of becoming a chemical orbiological engineer, the scope of careers open to chemical or biological engineering graduates,and to introduce students to engineering design practices, laboratory safety, and professionalethics.Original course. The original course included guest speaker presentations, one laboratory sessionpaired with a redesign assignment, and a culminating design challenge. Presentations typicallyincluded a research-active faculty member presenting his or her research, though there were alsovisits from student organizations and advisors.In the laboratory, students filled out a worksheet
begun planning inter-threadevents for the upcoming semester.5.4 MIT levelEvents organized included lab tours, graduate student and postdoc presentations from variousparticipating labs, individual mentoring by the faculty co-leads and most notably a Lunch & Learn serieswhere interested students got to have lunch and chat in an informal setting with faculty members fromthe seven majors currently in the thread. We organized a panel-based information session addressingtopics surrounding the graduate school application process for the broader MIT undergraduatecommunity. Attendance of thread students was much lower than we had anticipated; the main reasonturned out to be conflicts with the classes they were taking. Going forward, we will
Entrepreneurship-related Factors Teachers consistently discussed how they valued teaching engineering andentrepreneurship to their students, but their reasons for valuing this content differed. One highschool teacher noted the importance of teaching students about understanding your customer andrecognizing that business decisions entail constant risk analysis and cost-benefit tradeoffconsiderations; his reasoning behind the value of entrepreneurship education focused on specific,practical considerations within a business setting. An elementary school teacher noted thatlearning about entrepreneurship can prompt a variety of career interests, possibly ones thatstudents had not previously considered; her value on entrepreneurship education relates
origins ofthis separation, and where and how engineering-SJ connections actually took place (ProgressiveEra, New Deal, Counter-culture movement of 1970s, Counter-neoliberal movement at turn of21st century), and what conditions led to their separation (and seeming incommensurability)throughout the late 20th century. The grant gave us the legitimacy to develop, pilot and makepermanent our course Engineering and Social Justice, in an institutional setting that tends to beconservative and aligned with powerful corporate interests. The official course description statesthat it “offers students the opportunity to explore the relationships between engineering andsocial justice through personal reflection and historical and contemporary case studies
Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2002 — the highest honor bestowed upon scientists and engineers in the early stages of their careers. Most recently, he was a recipient of the 2007 ASCE Walter L. Huber Civil Engineering Research Prize, the 2015 ASCE Charles Martin Duke Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Award, the Georgia Tech Outstanding Doctoral Thesis Advisor Award (2010), and the Georgia Tech ANAK Award (2008). The ANAK award is the highest honor the undergraduate student body can bestow on a Georgia Tech faculty member. Dr. DesRoches earned his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering in 1990, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering in 1992, and a Ph.D. in Structural Engineering in 1998 — all from the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemicoffers a complex context in which students can experience ambiguity with an engineering designchallenge as an iterative process of divergent-convergent thinking while focusing on the bigpicture. Students can learn with an emphasis on systems thinking, making decisions in acollaborative team environment; and managing uncertainty in social processes [1]. Theconversations around how schools could function during the pandemic offered a uniqueopportunity to engage students in problem solving about a situation that they are experiencingthemselves.In the US Southwest, three state universities came together during the early stages of the 2020pandemic lockdown to create a virtual design competition for high school students. The
spur innovation and tackle societal problems. Awealth of untapped intellectual and economic potential exists among historicallyunderrepresented racial/ethnic groups – including Blacks and Latinos – who have not hadequitable access to engineering and related STEM fields. For Blacks and Latinos who areaccepted into engineering and related STEM fields, they face a number of barriers to theirsuccess which lead to low retention and graduation rates. In historically male-dominated fieldssuch as engineering and related STEM disciplines, Black and Latino men have remainedunderrepresented at the student and faculty ranks. To uncover and tackle the “institutionalbarriers” that men of color face, nearly 50 interviews with Black and Latino collegians
served in various roles in student affairs administration and as a faculty member in several Gender Studies and Communication Studies departments. She holds a Ph.D. in Com- munication Studies from Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, an M.A. in Psychology from South- ern Illinois University-Carbondale, an M.A. in Higher Education Administration from the University of Louisville, and a B.A. in Psychology and English from Illinois College. Jamie has published chapters in edited book collections and in a number of scholarly journals, including: AFFILIA: Journal of Women and Social Work; Kaleidoscope: A Journal of Qualitative Communication Research; Journal of Research in Personality; Experimental and Clinical
to facultymembers who had expressed an interest in becoming more involved. Of the initial round of 36invited faculty members, 22 enthusiastically joined the Working Group. Those faculty comefrom multiple engineering disciplines and programs as diverse as music, political science,medicine, physics, sociology, engineering, classics, and information sciences. At the same time,the Working Group’s student representative began to recruit volunteers to create a GlobalSTEAM blog on the Working Group’s website and rapidly assembled a half dozenundergraduate and graduate students from across the campus to act as advisors and curators to arunning blog feature.A third initiative emerging from the roundtable was the establishment of a graduate
- out-of-school activities.A key component in the development of the out-of-school-time framework is that theseprograms should generate a positive atmosphere, conducive to learning and exploring, thatdoes not resemble or look like the traditional school setting where students spend the vast partof their day [9]. For many students, as presented in the report on the “2009 High SchoolSurvey of Student Engagement,” in-school framework is not the place where they want to beand learn. More than 66% of the surveyed students asserted that they are bored every day. Atrend identified in this survey was that an open-ended question, Question 35, resulted innegative feedback. “Negative comments about schools were quite common in response toQuestion 35
Engineering and Mines (CEM)[4]has enthusiastically begun the process of infusing UAS and aerospace materials into the curriculum,this year initiating an aerospace engineering minor and developing numerous aerospace courses andresearch opportunities for seniors/graduate students. One such course incorporates the application ofUAS SEDP to satisfy operational needs of UAF’s Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft SystemsIntegration (ACUASI)[2] and associated research mission requirements.Aerospace Systems Engineering is a new multidisciplinary course intended to give students practicalexperience in aerospace engineering, specifically by providing new opportunities to learn about UAS.The students learn first-hand about systems acquisition and the SEDP by
approach still leaves two questions unresolved.First, it is unclear whether it is realistic to expect that the global codes of ethics be used to guideengineering practice in different countries, beginning with their introduction to students informal coursework and later as guidelines for conduct in the workplace. Second, given thatAmerican societies encourage their members to apply their codes of ethics universally, theirforeign colleagues might know very little (if anything) about these codes. It might therefore beineffective or unfair for two sides of a collaboration to have an unbalanced understanding of thecodes of ethics that are supposed to guide their collaborative engineering practice. And third,there is the question of how to avoid
undergraduate students (2 from community colleges, 1 from a 4-yearuniversity) are challenged to solve real-world Navy engineering design problems over a periodof eight weeks during the summer. Each team is assigned a UCSB graduate student, from arelevant STEM field, and a Navy engineer that serve as mentors. From Monday throughThursday, student teams work at the Base in Port Hueneme on their separate projects. OnFridays, students come to UCSB to attend career exploration and professional developmentseminars, as well as a course in engineering innovation, designed to stimulate creative thinkingand problem-solving. The program culminates with a Design Challenge Award, where teamspitch their project to a jury of faculty and Base engineers. Key
key words in both topics relate to the structure andrelationships built into “Engineering and. . .” programs. Topics 2 and 4 fall under the theme ofidentity and culture, as the key words focus on an engineer’s sense of self and career. Topic 3falls best under the teams and groups theme, as the key words relate to the features of individualsand groups that contribute to teamwork. 14 Topic 1: Program Topic 2: Topic 3: Team Topic 4: Topic 5: Design Learning Skills Identity MentorshipKeyword 1 student engineers kgi identity mentorsKeyword 2