Reflect components. The students work in teams for each module completing ashort team project related to the module topic. They also complete a self-reflection exercise at theend of each module as well as a culminating reflection at the end of the course. Of the 61 studentsin the fall 2022 cohort, 37 were civil engineering majors and 24 were environmental engineeringmajors.Exploring CEE: Stories There were multiple story-telling interventions throughout the course. During the firstweek, the instructor and TA shared their personal stories about how they ended up in college andstarted their personal career path. The students were then asked to share their personal storieswithin small groups about how they ended up at Georgia Tech. The small
educational programs in engineering dis- ciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and Communica- tion Engineering from India.Dr. Shane A. Brown, P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Are all ‘EBIPs’ created equal? An exploration of engineering
slowlyincreased (Cunninghame et al., 2016), this group still remains largely underrepresented in STEMdisciplines (Moon et al., 2012). This discrepancy in representation reflects larger issues ofmarginalization in STEM fields and higher education at large. Current support structures fordisabled people remain ineffective, as accessing necessary resources requires navigatingphysical, cultural, and bureaucratic barriers (Groen-McCall et al., 2018). These barriers onlycontinue to widen for disabled students planning to pursue engineering careers (Prema & Dhand,2019), as seen in the high unemployment rate for disabled scientists and engineers, which isgreater than that of the entire U.S. labor force (Lee, 2010; NSF, 2017). Yet, disability is rarelyincluded
most impactful time toenergize students about careers in STEM is in K-12 settings. To emphasize and spotlight the importance ofbuildings on humans, along with providing an interactive learning experience for potential future STEMstudents, a five-day summer camp focused on multi-disciplinary building design was held at (insertuniversity name). The camp curriculum included hands-on, design-oriented projects from severaldisciplines: architecture, mechanical, structural, construction, sustainability, acoustics, and lighting. Inaddition, tours of several buildings on campus were conducted along with after-hours relaxation time forcampers. The implementation of activities and the well-designed hands-on projects not only increased thestudents
racialidentity. Collins [10] defines the external environment as the institution of schooling, the workspace, andthe career space in which a Black student in STEM is situated. This environment influences a Blackstudent’s STEM identity because it houses the academic interactions Collins [10] defines as themicrocosms that develop a STEM identity. The external environment should also reinforce a Blackstudent’s gender-based racial identity. However, Collins [10] identifies how external environmentstraditionally threaten a Black student’s gender-based racial identity by perpetuating a chilly STEMclimate through stereotypes and gender biases. Nevertheless, she points out the need for Black studentsto cultivate STEM identities in external environments that are
with axis of what and how: individual to group activities, and “domainspecific content knowledge” to “key design qualities.”Research MethodsTo identify common features and distinguish elements across courses, studied three designcourse sequences at [university]. Methods involved in the research included documentationanalysis (course syllabi, course descriptions in academic course catalog) [28, 29] as well asstudent and alumni feedback obtained through structured qualitative interviews. This qualitativeset of descriptions are augments to a larger research project surveying alumni of each course [31-33] with respect to its short- and long-term effectiveness such as impact on career andprofessional development, and big takeaways on effectiveness
to do with research outcomes, and the difficulty of “playing thegame” or “following the money,” aligning our research goals with those we know would havethe best chance of receiving recognition, funding, and career mobility. In our experience, wenoticed that this approach could limit how we frame the work in which we engage. I find myselfperpetuating and acting within this system regularly as an engineering education researcher,often questioning the “so what” of work I do, attempting to frame any work I do to the NSF’sgoal of developing a diverse, innovative body of engineers for U.S. global competitiveness.There are tangible benefits that are gained from these endeavors, but these underlying valuesdirectly or indirectly influence any
that provide a foundation for the career. As a newgraduate, this person could not perform many designs quickly and required the guidance of asenior engineer. In this thought experiment, the person is not asked immediately upon graduationto stamp engineering drawings or provide recommendations to clients alone. On the contrary, inthe office, the person is placed in a diverse group of peers and experts. The person is tasked toperform a set of activities. The results are then reviewed by more senior and experiencedengineers, who provide comment and instruction for revision and iteration. Revision anditeration are part of the engineering process [5]. The person revises the work until it issatisfactory for providing to the client as judged by the
aremainly academic degrees and professional degrees. In terms of the research on connotation, somescholars have explored the difference between the training objectives of professional degree andacademic degree in engineering. Different from academic degrees, which emphasize advancedknowledge and top-notch research, professional degrees attach more importance to the closeconnection with engineering practice7. The professional degree is a kind of degree that takes Intoaccount academic, career-oriented and practical elements of training. From the perspective ofknowledge production mode, the knowledge production of academic degree is more centered ondisciplines and universities, that is, it is adapted to the traditional knowledge production mode I
Paper ID #39783What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy forDoctoral EducationDr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the
, Srihari must take thepath of least resistance to protect her mental and physical health by requesting accommodationsfor her and her group. This is not a choice she would make on her own volition, which is also atheme she experiences when making decisions regarding her engineering career path as aninternational student. And another big part with the international status is I started off as an aerospace major. And when I was trying to make connections, talking about how I would, you know, go get a co-op or an internship, I was told I probably wouldn't because most aerospace engineering jobs are defense based. And since I don't have like, a green card or something like that in the country, it would be very difficult
top four career competencies most valued by employers,as reported by the National Academy of Colleges and Employers (NACE). In a 2019 job outlooksurvey, oral and written communication was rated consistently high in the past three years. Also,proficient communication is essential for engineers in the 21st Century to create an inclusiveenvironment and engage multiple stakeholders, as indicated by the National Academy ofEngineering. In particular, the ability to communicate effectively to various audiences across theSTEM disciplines and the public is a great need. The engineering program at the University ofSouth Florida (USF) aims to fulfill the NACE’s professional competencies for career readiness bydevising new methodologies for communication
it beyond the classroom. As a teaching center, ourjob is to provide support or problem solving where needed and provide pointers to new tools,ideas and papers, and share opportunities to disseminate their teaching. For those interested inscaling their teaching further, assistance with applying for grants is valuable. Supportdepartments in nominating these teachers for university level teaching awards and teachingawards at a regional or national level. These are the courses that impact career choices andsuccess well beyond the classroom.Results - assessing the reach of the teaching centerAs a complement to assessing whether individual teaching center programs are effective, it isimportant to assess whether the overall suite of programs is
, user-centered design principles and multidisciplinaryteamwork. It is expected that students will increase in understanding about how social andemotional competencies impact user-centered design. With increased understanding, students willintegrate these principles into their class projects and other learning activities. It is also anticipatedthat students will positively reflect on the contributions of their team members and betterappreciate the impact of multidisciplinary teams on the design process. Students from bothengineering and non-engineering programs will correctly identify how these same principles canapply to their specific career field and in context of their communities, enriching the professionalformation not only of engineers
Curitiba, Brazil; native communities in the Amazon in Villavicencio, Colombia; and underserved communities in Piura, Per´u. Dr. Santiago is passionate about providing experiential learning opportunities to both undergraduate and graduate students with a focus on Hispanic and female students. She is currently Co-PI of UTEP’s NSF-AGEP program focusing on foster- ing Hispanic doctoral students for academic careers; the Department of Education’s (DoE) STEMGROW Program to encourage students Latino(a) students and students with disabilities to pursue STEM careers; and DoE’s Program YES SHE CAN that provides support and mentoring to female pre-college students. She is also a member of two advisory committees to the UTEP’s
. Waidzunas, “Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM,” Sci. Adv., vol. 7, no. 3, p. eabe0933, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[11] J. B. Yoder and A. Mattheis, “Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers,” J. Homosex., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632.[12] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed., in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Dordrecht
information that may be directly applicable to my career or academic goals.While all increases in student ratings for the PBL version of the course as compared to the exam-based instructional model were found to be statistically significant, the largest increases werenoted in the questions elucidating perceived relevance of assessment to content covered in thecourse, and impacts on critical thinking and communication (bolded rows in Table 1). Graphicaldata showing each course section individually is presented in Figure 2 for visual comparison.Figure 2. Student learning experience evaluation data from exam-based sections of the course(gray) and project-based offerings (dark red
: everyday experiences,designed settings, and programmed settings [5]. Informal learning environments can supportchildren’s interest, engagement, and understanding through self-directed learning experiences[25]. Moreover, informal learning experiences that focus on developing children’s knowledge,skills, and positive attitudes can also impact children’s development [26]; [27]. As Vela et al. [4]assert, informal settings can act as a “catalyst for students to become interested in STEM-relatedfields and motivate them to pursue STEM-related careers” [p. 105].In pre-college education, studies have explored children's engagement in CT and engineering ininformal settings [20]; [28; [29]. Consistent with the global movement referred to as “InformalComputer
Preferences and/or interests (n = 9) STEM Family members (n = 4) Career path (n = 3) 8 Information before College preparation course (n = 3) coming to college Confidence in choosing a major (n = 2) Short videos regarding important topics and resources in college (n = 1)Results and Discussion(1) Challenges/StrugglesWhen students were asked to identify personal challenges and struggles they faced in the firsthalf of the fall semester, students discussed academic, personal, and
- personal behaviors and leadership for early-career engineers. She teaches engineering leadership and an engineering leader coaching course. Her research focuses on coaching skills, inclusive leadership, and career development.Ms. Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Imperfect Interventions for Speaking Up and Supporting Women in STEMKristen R. Moore, University at BuffaloMeg Handley, Penn State UniversityJessica Menold, Penn State UniversityIntroductionDespite numerous calls within engineering to broaden participation of racially and ethnically minoritized(REM) people in the field, racial diversity remains a systemic problem. Many engineering
itself — a key macro-objective of the course. Indications of this appear in suchcomments as: I really enjoyed it! Definitely an engineering discipline for me to think about possibly exploring! I didn't think I would be good at geotech but I'm glad I took the class because I love it and can see myself doing geotech as part of my career. I know so much about soil now! I go around thinking about all the soils I step on, what type they are, how saturated they are, how strong they are, and how they would drain or consolidate. Especially at the barn because it’s so muddy, I’m trying to think of ways to drain it better. Maybe installing wick drains would help
?” Results from the surveys werereported by Hopkins and Dong [10] and Kam-Biron et al. [7] and are synthesized here, in thecontext of preparing students for a career in structural engineering. ● Considering both surveys, 90% of practitioners considered 9 of the 12 core courses as necessary for students to complete; courses on structural analysis III: matrix analysis (85%), prestressed concrete (70%), and masonry design (87%) were viewed as necessary by fewer than 90% of respondents. ● The three most important subjects identified by practitioners were structural analysis I, reinforced concrete I, and steel I. In addition to the top three, practitioners stated that the list of the top five most important topics included two
impacts of research, embedded computer systems, system level design, parallel and distributed systems, and performance analysis. Dr. Rover began her academic career at Michigan State University and has served in department and college administra- tive positions at MSU and ISU, including associate dean of engineering. She has engaged with many academic institutions and professional organizations, including community colleges, both U.S. and inter- national universities, and various boards. She has served in various leadership roles within IEEE, ASEE and ABET. Dr. Rover is a Fellow of the IEEE and of ASEE.Dr. Henry Duwe, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Mani Mina, The Ohio State University Mani Mina is with the department of
B.S.E.E degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, in 1977. He has 35 years experience in the linear IC industry in the design and development of high resolution and high speed data converter products. Since joining Analog DeviDr. Daniel D Stancil, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Daniel D. Stancil is the Alcoa Distinguished Professor and Head of the Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing Department at North Carolina State University. His early interest in radios and electronics launched an engineering career that has been–and continues to be–fun and rewarding. Along the way he picked up engineering degrees from Tennessee Tech (B.S.E.E.) and MIT (M.S., E.E. and Ph.D.). He has spent many years as a professor
on theirown, but overall, 83% did discover the challenges with help from other students. Studentcomments expressed how inquiry-based activities promoting curiosity are valued by students.IntroductionLifelong learning is a critical component of any technical career, and its importance is evident bythe ABET requirement that accreditation requires engineering programs to teach lifelonglearning skills [Naimpally, 2011]. In addition, engineers must not only learn how to use newtechnologies but also comprehend the underlying principles and physics that govern them. Thisknowledge helps them make informed design decisions and evaluate the pros and cons ofdifferent technologies better. Moreover, by grasping the fundamentals of a component'soperation
Ebony McGee and Lydia Bentley The Equity Ethic: Black and Latinx College Students 2 reengineering their STEM careers toward Justice 8 Donna Riley Hidden in Plain View: Feminists Doing Engineering Ethics, 1,2,3* Engineering Doing Feminist Ethics 9 Cindy Rottman and Douglas Reeve Equity as Rebar: Bridging the Micro/Macro divide in 1,2,3 Engineering Education 10 Ramzi N. Nasser and Michael H. Social Justice and the Engineering Profession: Challenging 1,2 Romanowski
engineering fields, and often topics of their achievements, goals, and motivationsflourished with these questions. Some students spoke about their current positions, while alumnaexplained what they currently do and how they wish to become a leader or see themselves asone. This was a core part of the interview that allowed women to develop more internal thoughtsabout themselves and their place in their career or program. Becca, who serves in a leadership role for the American Society of MechanicalEngineering (ASME) student group, mentioned how she felt her natural leadership tendencieswould serve her well in her future endeavors. She is hopeful that when she enters the workforceshe’ll gain skills and end up in her own leadership position. “I'm
example, the commontrend across reviewed studies was that they used a spatial visualization assessment (such as theRotations component in the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test, or PSVT:R , Mental Cutting Test,both of which are cited with examples by Sorby and Baartmans [9]) to measure the improvementof engineering students at some point in their undergraduate engineering careers. Literature wasexcluded if it did not illustrate how assessments measure spatial visualization development or ifit did not discuss how graphics and 2D/3D modeling curricula are developed. The area ofliterature we primarily wanted to understand is how spatial visualization skills are measured andpracticed in order to use the skills as scaffolding in 2D/3D modeling
student interviewsThemes are explained in order of the frequency with which they appeared during studentinterviews. 5.1.1 | Need for improvement in first-year students’ experiencesTo positively influence students’ MHW in undergraduate engineering, the student participantssuggested their institution take steps when students were in their first year. They thought thatexposing students to hands-on experience, while they were in their first year, was important forthem to engage with their course content. More steps need to be taken to do so. If students wereinformed more effectively about what engineering major career choices they could make in thecoming years while they were in the first year of their studies, they will be able to make
in Brazil and focused on advances in sustainable energy paired with traditional engineering curricula. In the future, Chaney hopes to pursue a career in biotechnology with a strong emphasis on sustainable, renewable, and clean energy.Aidan J. Kane, Northeastern UniversityDr. Courtney A. Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger received her PhD at Northeastern University in 2011 and began as an Assistant Teaching Professor in First-year Engineering Program at Northeastern where she redesigned the curricu- lum and developed courses with sustainability and clean water themes. In 2017, she moved to ChE Department where she has taught core courses and redesigned the Capstone design course. She has also