teaching undergraduate engineers; the novelty of our approach is the focus onelectrical and computer engineers. This motivates our research question: Is PBL a more effectivepedagogy (than lectures) to teach ethical reasoning in support of social responsibility tofreshman ECE students during their primary introduction to the discipline?To answer this research question, the introductory course for electrical and computer engineering(ECE 121) at the University of Alabama (UA) has been redesigned to center ethics in theprofession. With this redesign, the course is offered in both PBL and traditional lecture style. Inthe following sections, we outline this project as a work-in-progress that includes: courseredesign, evaluation of student data on
Paper ID #32567Gamification of Chemical Engineering Pathways: Evidence fromIntroductory CoursesDr. Michael Geoffrey Brown, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Michael Brown is an assistant professor of Student Affairs and Higher Education at Iowa State Univer- sity. His research focuses on the development of curriculum, instruction, and instructional technology in undergraduate STEM courses. His current project focuses on the use of web-enabled student-facing dashboards designed to promote students’ motivation and their emerging engineering identities.Dr. Monica H. Lamm, Iowa State University of Science and
while also learning more about engineering education.Dr. James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor and chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu University it Nepal. At Cal Poly, he teaches the College of Engineering’s interdisciplinary, industry sponsored, senior project class as well as course in mechanics and design. He also conducts research in the areas of creative design, machine design, fluid power control, and engineering education.Dr. John Chen P.E., California Polytechnic State
Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research on sociotechnical systems—primarily water sector infras- tructure—aims to improve service to communities. Dr. Faust’s work spans the project phase during construction through the operations phase, exploring human-infrastructure interactions, infrastructure in- terdependencies, and the institutional environment. Current studies within her research group include: human-water sector infrastructure interdependencies in cities experiencing urban decline; disaster migra- tion and the resilience of the built environment; incorporating equity into water infrastructure decision- making; sociotechnical modeling of infrastructure systems including gentrification and food
Paper ID #32560Evolution of STEM Leadership Self-Efficacy within an NSF S-STEM Pro-gramDr. Bruce D. DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Bruce DeRuntz, PhD, is a Professor in the College of Engineering at Southern Illinois University Car- bondale where he teaches classes on project management and leadership. He consults with universities and companies on their leadership development of human resources for project management teams. He is the Director of SIUC’s Leadership Development Program and the former Editor of the ASQ’s Quality Management Forum. He is a Fellow with the American Society for Quality and holds
to University of Southern Maine. In the terms of broader impacts, the summer “BridgePrograms,” including the monthly seminars provided an increased awareness of STEM careeropportunities for a larger, more diverse population of non-traditional, underrepresented, first-generation students with the goal of being placed upon graduation.Rational and SignificanceCentral goals of the S-STEM Scholars project provided non-traditional (NT) students with both acomprehensive summer “bridge” program as an introduction to college experience, andfacilitated monthly developmental seminars as a framework to encourage scholastic success andsupport gainful employment in their selected academic STEM degrees. At the University ofSouthern Maine (USM), NT students
Paper ID #17773Rethinking Engineering Diversity, Transforming Engineering Diversity (REDTED)Mr. Tiago R Forin, Rowan University Tiago Forin is the Project Coordinator for the REDTED project at Rowan University. He is a PhD can- didate in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with XRoads Research Group, the Global Engineering Program and the Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Ef- fectiveness. He received a Bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Florida State University and a Master’s degree in civil engineering from Purdue University with a focus in environmental
she also created and taught a year-long, design-based engineering course for seniors. Forbes earned her PhD in civil engineering, with an engineering education research focus.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan has led the multi-university TeachEngineering digital library project, now serving over 3.3M unique users (mostly teachers) annually, since its inception. She is founding co-director of the design-focused Engineering Plus degree program and CU Teach Engineering initiative in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. With the intent of transforming en- gineering to broaden participation, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of
-year programs. It provides transfer students scholarships for tuition to attend sophomore-levelEngineering or Computer Science courses they have yet to complete. In year 4 of this grant, atotal of 499 students participated in our grant activities: 24 in Activity 1 during summer 2017, 44in Activity 2 during summer and fall in 2017, and 431 in Activity 3 during fall 2016 and spring2017. Also, activity 1, recruited and trained 22 mentors, tutors, and resident advisors, and activity4 also had 10 mentors. Additionally, in activity 5, 11 students have been involved so far in thebridge to engineering program and additional efforts are being made to recruit more.IntroductionThe goal of this project is to establish a sustainable ecosystem of success in
, intellegent transportation sysytems, and database systems for large projects. His research projects are funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT), and the UAE Research Foundation.Dr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology and Associate Director of its Institute for Teaching Excellence. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the
. Another issue is that ambiguityhas only been identified as a structural element of the problem, ignoring how problem solversmay experience ambiguity differently in the same problem. Without a better understanding ofambiguity in problem solving, it is difficult to develop educational approaches that will teachstudents how to deal with ambiguity.The goal of this project is to understand the different ways that students and practicing engineersexperience ambiguity during problem solving. We aim to interview 20-30 senior civilengineering students and 20-30 practicing civil engineers on their experiences of ambiguity.Interviews will be conducted using artifact elicitation, in which each participant will bring aproblem they have encountered which they
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Model Building in Engineering Education This paper reports on research that is part of a lager project taking place at a mid-sizedpublic HBCU funded through the National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineeringand computer science Departments (RED) program. The purpose of the RED program is toencourage and support innovation projects that develop new, revolutionary approaches andchange strategies that enable the transformation of undergraduate engineering education [1]. Avital component of this particular RED project involves the development and validation ofsurvey-based measures of Engineering Values, Self-Efficacy, and Identity: and a model thatcombines
and persistence of under represented populations, especially women, to pursue ca- reers in engineering and technological disciplines. She has presented at numerous conferences throughout the United States and was an invited speaker at the international Gender Summit in Belgium in 2016.Wendy Robicheau, Connecticut College of Technology-Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Wendy has been Project Manager with the College of Technology – Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing since 2012. In that time she has developed a passion for making middle and high school students, faculty and counselors aware of the educational and career pathways that are possible in STEM and manufacturing through various
fields reported the highest level of discomfort on campus, indepartments and in classrooms; those who were not comfortable were more than twice as likelyto consider leaving their institution [20].To respond to the need to improve LGBTQ inclusion, particularly in engineering departments, in2015 we launched a transformative project that links diversity research with a facultydevelopment initiative to promote LGBTQ equality in engineering. The aims of the research-education-advocacy project [32-34] are to (1) identify aspects of engineering culture that presentbarriers to LGBTQ equality, (2) build knowledge and skills to disrupt discrimination andpromote LGBTQ equality in engineering departments on college campuses and (3) to identifypromising
change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Prof. James A Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Cen- ter for Research on Education
in the engineering classroom.Dr. Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS and PhD Washington State University and made the switch from Instruc- tional Laboratory Supervisor to Post-Doctoral Research Associate on an engineering education project. His research area has been engineering education, specifically around the development and assessment of technologies to bring fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratory experiences into the classroom.Prof. Robert F. Richards, Washington State University Dr. Robert Richards received the PhD in Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. He then worked in the Building and Fire Research Laboratory at NIST as a Post-Doctoral Researcher
forother engineering majors. The changes include: • Addition of several hundred ConcepTests so that more than 1,600 ConcepTests are available to faculty. • Preparation of more than 350 screencasts so that links are now provided to more than 1,250 screencasts, which are located on YouTube. Screencasts are now available for eleven courses. Closed captioning was added for more than 400 of these screencasts. Page 26.1494.2 • Preparation of more than 70 interactive Mathematica simulations, which are located on the Wolfram Demonstration Project website and are accessible from
Technology. She received her B.S. in Engineering from Brown University, her M.S.E.E. from the University of Southern California, and her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California in 1999. Her area of research is centered around the concept of humanized intelligence, the process of embedding human cognitive capability into the control path of autonomous systems. This work, which addresses issues of autonomous control as well as aspects of interaction with humans and the surrounding environment, has resulted in over 180 peer-reviewed pub- lications in a number of projects – from scientific rover navigation in glacier environments to assistive robots for the home. To date, her unique
in the way thatfaculty teach and design courses. This process is moderated through our three-stage model ofchange (see Figure 1). First, faculty are organized into CoPs through which they will innovatetheir courses. Second, faculty commit to an implement-evaluate development cycle for which theCoP must commit to collecting data about their innovations and using the data to inform iterativedevelopment. Finally, we expect that the adoption of RBIS will naturally emerge without anymandates from the leadership team or administration. Page 26.419.3Figure 1: The three key levels of transformation that form the objectives of this project; eachlayer
andsupport. We envision that our research findings on what helps and hinders the transfer processcan be used to 1) make improvements and revisions to existing policy, and 2) serve as a guide forstates and institutions seeking to adopt new policies that promote upward transfer in engineering.Background & ObjectivesFor decades, there has been a strong demand for STEM professionals in the U.S. workforce.Based on national rhetoric, it is clear that the demand for skilled professionals in STEM fieldswill continue to be on the upswing for many years to come. To meet both current and futureworkforce needs, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology projects thatthat the United States will need to produce an additional 1 million STEM
widelyconsidered cryptography experiments (e.g., digital certificates, symmetric and asymmetric-keycryptography, hash functions). Students only have to download our pre-built virtual machine,import it into their own computers using a virtualization platform such as VirtualBox orVMware, and then just run it on their own personal computers. As an example, Figure 1 shows astudent’s view of the virtual environment after a successful login.Inspired by the SEEDLab project [4], our developed labs have been ported to the latest versionof Ubuntu18.04 VM. These labs mainly focus on in the following aspects. • Network security ranging from a variety of security attacks on TCP/IP and DNS to various network security technologies such as, Firewall, VPN, and
Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse
and doing research. She is on the USD team implementing ”Developing Changemaking Engineers”, an NSF-sponsored Revolutionizing Engineering Education (RED) project. Dr. Lord is the 2018 recipient of the IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF
learning theory.Mrs. Shannon M. Sipes, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Shannon M. Sipes has served as the Director of Assessment at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology since 2004. She is a unique resource for faculty with her background in social science and education combined with experience applying it to STEM fields. Shannon holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in psychol- ogy and is currently finishing her Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction with a focus on higher education. In her current professional role, Shannon performs assessment functions at all levels from small class- room projects through assessment at the institute level. Additionally, she spends a substantial portion of her time collaborating with faculty on
thesecourses implemented the EGC framework in a manner appropriate for their course. For example,students in the signal processing course investigated the EGC of “Reverse-Engineering theBrain”, which included a lecture/discussion led by a neuroscientist who uses signal processing,followed by a project assignment that applied spectral analysis and filter design to publiclyavailable data from a brain-computer interface contest. For all courses, baseline data werecollected from the same classes taught by the same instructors in the previous year.Results from the first year of implementation indicated significant benefits for the EGCframework, as well as differences in effectiveness across settings. Each student provided datathat included self-reported
. Edward’s University in Austin, TX and City University of New York on Staten Island. Her research includes qualitative case studies that engage youth in P-16 settings. Her initial foray into evaluation includes three years (2004-2007) at the National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching at Columbia Teachers College on the Bill & Melinda Gates funded Institute for Student Achievement project. As part of that project, she conducted appreciative evaluation of small school reform implementation at various school sites across the New York region. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 From Resistance to Readiness – Building
recorded, and notes were taken to support dataanalysis. Audio transcripts from the focus group were coded to support data analysis. Resultsare reported in aggregate.Figure 1: This image provides an overview of the conceptual framework developed to assess theimpact of project interventions on program students and their holistic learning experiences.3. Preliminary Findings In regards to workplace-relevant skills of program students, focus group participantshighlighted various instances in which programming activities provided them with real-worldcareer readiness. In discussing an application of software to workplace duties, one participantsaid “[their learning in the program] has really helped with using the software that we utilize herein the
of her students and industry constituents.Shakhnoza Kayumova, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024SCHOLARSHIPS TO ACCELERATE ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP AND IDENTITY IN GRADUATE STUDENTS (ACCEL)IntroductionThis paper presents the outcomes of the inaugural year of the Accelerated EngineeringLeadership (AccEL) program. The inception of the AccEL program responds to projections bythe U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicating a nearly 17% growth in employment formaster’s-level occupations from 2016 to 2026, marking the highest growth rate across alleducation levels [1]. Among the disciplines experiencing the most significant growth in master’sdegree
Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Math- ematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Pro- gram), and Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Col- leges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching Award for the ASEE/PSW Section in 2022.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor and chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received
engineeringdesign when applying the instrument in multiple disciplinary design contexts and by accountingfor how instructional design contexts and practices influence empathic formation. At the time ofthis writing, this project is concluding Year 1, but emergent findings have supported the need fora contextually valid assessment in engineering design. Moreover, this project has begun fosteringcommunity among a small group of design instructors. Upon completion of this work, thisproject will generate an instructional tool for assessing empathy in engineering design, newknowledge on best practices for promoting empathic formation in engineering design, andcommunity among design instructors who are interested in empathy in engineering design.Keywords: Empathy