-cost and versatile hardware kit for a remote first-year mechanical engineering design classI. IntroductionEngineering design courses with hands-on laboratories are a critical component of an engineeringundergraduate curriculum. In particular, incorporating design courses early has been shown tohelp with retention rates in engineering, as well as with improved ability of students to solve open-ended problems [1, 2]. These courses have also shown student progress in academic achievementby helping to build confidence in their engineering skills, and by expanding their perspective onproblems and solutions [3, 4]. Introduction to Engineering Graphics and Design is an introductorylevel course, usually taken by
aseither an undergraduate or graduate student, and asked respondents to rate their experiences on ascale of 1 to 4, where 1 indicates a “poor experience, decreased my overall confidence ofsucceeding in structural engineering” and 4 indicates a “great experience, increased my overallconfidence of succeeding in engineering”. The most popular courses (as reported in Table 8)among the survey respondents were structural analysis and earthquake engineering. Senior(capstone/integrated) design, finite element analysis and foundation engineering were given thelowest ratings. The finding that capstone design was unpopular was somewhat surprising, but thesurvey questions did not allow us to uncover reasons behind these responses.Table 8. Respondents’ ratings
Paper ID #15236Exploring Interdisciplinary Design in Relation to Workplace Success andCampus CommunityDr. Lisa M. Del Torto, Northwestern University Lisa Del Torto is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the Bobbie & Stanton Cook Family Writing Program at Northwestern University. She teaches and coordinates Northwestern’s first-year design course, Design Thinking & Communication, a collaboration between the Cook Family Writing Program and the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. Del Torto completed her PhD and MA in Linguistics at the University of Michigan and her BA in Linguistics and Spanish
complexity and scale of the types of problems engineers solve[1]. Students’capability of working effectively in engineering teams is cognizant among employers in industrywho seek to hire new talent into their organizations [2]–[4]. One of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) student outcome criteria is to have the ability to functioneffectively in high performing teams. This requires universities to better prepare students withteamwork skills and to incorporate teamwork as an important part of engineering curriculum [5]In today’s world of engineering, companies are shifting towards working in larger team sizes dueto the complexity of solving engineering problems [6]–[8]. Engineering programs need to findways to effectively
Paper ID #29355Creating value in project-based multidisciplinary design coursesMr. Klaus Castr´en, Aalto University Klaus Castr´en has a MScBA degree in International Design Business Management and works at Aalto University as an Innovation Ecosystem Specialist in Aalto Design Factory, where he promotes collabora- tion between students, academia, industry, and the society. His interest are focused on creating meaningful learning experiences for learners in all stages of life as well as on creating organizational change towards better learning environments.Dr. Sine Celik, Aalto University Sine Celik is a postdoctoral
Education, 2021 Culturally Responsive Engineering Education: Creativity through “Empowered to Change” in the US and “Admonished to Preserve” in Japan Author(s) InformationAbstract:Enhancing creativity is an indispensable goal of many engineering courses. However, withflourishment of global collaboration in various engineering classrooms and best educationalpractices being replicated across cultures, there are not many curriculum interventions thatoriginate from students’ diverse cultural needs. When cultural differences are ignored, studentsmay get culturally biased grades and face confusion and difficulties. For instance, the notion of“disruption” and “breakthrough” in product design innovation is
as these and present solutions for such challenges through acombination of technology and approach to teaching.1. introductionA primary goal of engineering education is to provide students with requisite technicalgrounding along with practice and experience in the design and evaluation of real andpractical systems. This goal becomes increasingly difficult with the expanding body ofknowledge, integration of concepts across disciplines, and complexity of design toolsneeded in engineering industries.1 While an expert/apprentice model of education maybe more fitting to preparing engineers for professional practice, traditional instructionmodels include in-person lectures covering fundamental technical concepts with thebulk of practice and
by managing uncertainty and complexity. The key question he is investigating is what are the principles underlying rapid and robust concept exploration when the analysis models are incomplete and possibly inaccurate? His quest for answers to the key question are anchored in three projects, namely, Integrated Realization of Robust, Resilient and Flexible Networks Integrated Realization of Engineered Materials and Products Managing Organized and Disorganized Complexity: Exploration of the Solution Space His current education focus is on creating and implementing, in partnership with industry, a curriculum for educating strategic engineers—those who have developed the competencies to create value through the
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the ASEE. She was the recipient of the 2002 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education and the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award. Dr. Atman holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University.Prof. Janet McDonnell, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London Janet McDonnell is Professor of Design Studies at Central Saint Martins, London where she is Director of Research. She holds a PhD for work on modelling engineering design expertise, an MSc in Computer Science and a BSc in Electrical Engineering. She is the editor-in-chief of the International Journal of CoDesign.Mr. Ryan C. Campbell, University
Professor, Electrical/Computer Engineering, UAF Earth & Planetary Remote Sensing, UAF Geophys- ical Institute Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration 2009-2012: Director, Air Force Research Laboratory Air Vehicles Directorate 2006-2009: Deputy Director, Air Force Office of Scientific Research 1999-2003: Deputy Head, USAF Academy De- partment of Astronautics 1992-1996: Assistant Professor, USAFA Department of Astronautics 3. PUB- LICATIONS 1. Cunningham, K., M. C. Hatfield, and R. Philemonoff, Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Alaskan Civil Research, 2014 Arctic Technology Conference, 2014 2. Hatfield, M. C., and J. G. Hawkins, Design of an Electronically
relatively new feature of HCD modes of contextualization, butthis emphasis on the bigger picture is a cornerstone of other approaches to contextualizingengineering education. Appreciating complex interactions not only between designers and users,but also between engineers themselves, other human and non-human actors, and broader socialand cultural factors is an important aspect of a mode of contextualization that we describe associotechnical thinking. In this mode, contextualization is a key aspect of curriculum because ithelps students to understand what engineering is: namely, that engineering work is asociotechnical endeavor [10], [38]. Educators who practice this type of contextualization pursue“sociotechnical integration” as a learning outcome
Paper ID #15656UAS Design in Active LearningDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.Dr. John Monahan, University of Alaska
, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life." Computers and Education 53.1 169-182, p. 170, 2009.[4] C. Traver, and D. Klein. "Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship through the Integration of Engineering and Liberal Education." In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[5] A. Sharag-Eldin, and O. Nawari. "BIM in AEC education," In Structures Congress, pp. 1676- 1688, 2010.[6] S. Azhar, M. Khalfan, and M. Tayyab. "Building information modelling (BIM): now and beyond." Construction Economics and Building, 12, no. 4, 15-28. P.16, 2015.[7] S.Vassigh, W. Newman, A. Mostavavi, A. Behzadan. “Hybrid Technologies for
-employment experience hason students can help engineering education researchers (EER) understand the role that diverseteams, particularly in the capstone environment, can have for engineering students in thedevelopment of their collaborative abilities.In the long term, this study seeks to better understand how the social norms that are present ininterdisciplinary teams influence the development of effective collaborative behaviors. Thesebehaviors can be considered as belonging to a larger grouping of skills, sometimes called “meta-competencies,” that have become an increasingly important part of what employers look for fromengineering graduates [11]. However, this paper will focus directly on the curriculum design ofan interdisciplinary capstone
had an enthusiastic response fromstudents interested in both Robotic projects and interest in learning more about Robotics. Roboticsis an interdisciplinary field that incorporates the integration of many systems in software,electronics, control systems, actuators and sensors. The Robotics of today imparts the mostimportant attributes such as the nature of motion, the motions available to rigid bodies and the useof kinematic constraints to organize motion. Because the growing field of Robotics covers manyareas of EET education we decided we would develop curriculum for an introductory course inRobotics. This paper explores the curriculum design and the Lie Algebra and Lie Group that arekeeping track of the variables involved in arm robotic
to meet 7 outcomes.Outcome 4 states “Design appropriate solutions in one or more application domains usingsoftware engineering approaches that integrate ethical, social, legal, and economic concerns”. Itis through this outcome we expect students to design solutions that address ethical, social, legal,security, and economic concerns. The importance of security in the curriculum guidelines can benoted from the change in SE education Knowledge Areas. In the 2004 Curriculum Guidelines forUndergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering [4] security was listed as an area ofstudy. However in the 2014 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs inSoftware Engineering [5] there is now an increase in the visibility of software
(items 16-46 on the AWE LAESE survey), including the original twenty-one 7-point Likert scale questions, plus the ten 7-point Likert scale questions asking “to what extent doyou agree.” The LAESE subscales include: (1) Engineering career expectations, (2)Engineering self-efficacy 1, (3) Engineering self-efficacy 2, (4) Feeling of inclusion, (5) Copingself-efficacy, and (6) Math outcomes efficacy. The two subscales measuring “engineering self-efficacy” are differentiated in what they seek to measure as follows: (1) The “Engineering self-efficacy 1” subscale measures a student’s perception of his or her ability to earn an A or B inmath, physics, and engineering courses and succeed in an engineering curriculum while notgiving up participation in
to add thecomposite material manufacturing into an engineering curriculum were shown by Zhang et. al. in2011 [9] and Sengupta et. al. in 2016 [10]. Hence, the engineering faculty of Univalle requestedthe aid of the Fulbright commission through its Specialist program as an initial approximation toa hands-on approach for the improvement of the manufacturing techniques in fiber reinforcedcomposite materials.The main objectives of the composite materials training at Universidad del Valle were: toimprove the education of Colombian mechanical/aeronautical engineers based upon theprinciple of applying theoretical knowledge into practice. The focus of the training was oncomposite aerospace structures. Secondly, establishing a lasting relationship
environmental engineering and science [10]. These authors call forand propose new paradigms, new practices, and new policies, as related to environmentalengineering and science. In this paper, we discuss the transformation of the EE undergraduate degree program atPurdue University. This program integrates a systems-based approach to studying anthropogenicimpacts on the natural environment, helps to embed themes of environmental sustainabilityacross different majors, and incorporates pedagogical innovation. In this paper, we discussspecific courses in the EE program that illustrate innovation of curriculum content. We alsopresent data demonstrating undergraduate engineering student participation and interest inenvironmentally-related courses
students. Statics’ position early in the curriculum for many engineering majorsresults in it being one of the first courses where students must synthesize knowledge gained inprerequisite math and physics coursework and apply it to higher-level analytical problemsolving. In addition to the technical skills emphasized in the traditional course content, students’ability to self-assess and regulate their own learning (i.e. metacognition) becomes increasinglyimportant. As Grohs (2015) writes in reference to Statics: Though the written learning outcomes of a typical undergraduate mechanics course may be exclusively technical, the timing and nature of the course in the overall scheme of an engineering curriculum position it as a course that also
essential knowledge and skills in 2015 and,while engineering is now a recognized subject, many K-5 teachers, especially, do not feelprepared to integrate engineering into their pedagogy [2]. The idea of early childhood makerspace as a place to facilitate engineering teaching andlearning is a relatively new notion. While the makerspace concept began in the early 21stcentury, it’s standing in higher education settings and high school curricular activity is steadilyincreasing in acceptance and practice. The idea of a makerspace in public school Kindergarten isnovel, and especially in the southwest region. This paper describes an ethnographic case study ofa kindergarten makerspace and researcher lead collaboration within a local elementary
and experiential learning experiences. Integration of thesetechnologies added an additional dimension to the value of scientific inquiry and shows how toapply scientific knowledge, procedures and mathematics to solve real problems and improve theworld we live in. The curriculum supports the Next Generation Science Standards and containeda strong emphasis on math and science literacy for 21st century learners. Students participating inthe outreach program completed a total of thirty-six (36) to forty (40) hours of hands-onexperience.Hands-on learning was provided through the AEL, a state-of-the-art laboratory that featurescollaborative learning environment and equipped with hardware and software to supportcurriculum enhancement activities. The
setting of this study was the redesign of a second-year embedded systems course that wasrequired for electrical, computer, and software engineering students. The redesign effort was partof a federally-funded initiative to facilitate change in the Electrical and Computer EngineeringDepartment at a large university in the Midwest United States8. The course redesign effort wasone several such efforts in the initiative tasked with helping to shift the departmental paradigmtoward student-centered teaching and learning practices and greater integration of professionalformation throughout the curriculum, in a bottom-up fashion9. As an established course in thedepartment, the course had undergone revisions in the past, but as part of the
andexplains to them the role of a faculty mentor. This initial invitation from a senior professor instils a feelingof trustworthiness in the students and ensures that there is someone closer to them with moreprofessional and academic experience, and with whom they can speak freely about their academic as wellas other professional and personal problems.A checklist is maintained in a file called “Student Folder” for each student, and it is continually updatedafter each meeting with the mentor where the mentor makes sure that each student under her/hismentorship progresses smoothly in an ABET accredited curriculum. This activity is further reinforced byadditional record keeping in the office of the Dean of Engineering. According to one of the mentors
standards organizations, how could standards get integrated into theclassroom if not currently done and to consider adding other SDOs to the panel. In addition,many respondents commented on the enthusiastic presentations and interactions betweenpanel members and between the panel and audience during the first half of the workshop.Based on the survey questions and additional comments, the majority of the attendees wouldprefer an interactive workshop format that would be smaller in size. This would also allowthe ability to target more specific topics in standards education and implementation. How could future events be improved? Make the panels more interactive
and academic success[1], specially of students from underrepresented groups [2]-[5]. Identity is neither a monolithicconstruct nor its development is a one-dimensional process. An individual may have severalintersecting identities such as a personal identity (individual characteristics), social identity (groupcharacteristics, cultural characteristics), and professional identity [6]-[8]. The development ofprofessional identity has been studied in context of various professions such as medicine [8], healthcare [9], pharmacy [10], and higher education [11], [12]. One definition of professional identity is“internalization of the norms of the profession into the individual’s self-image . . . [and] theacquisition of the specific competence in
Paper ID #38355Fostering Educational Equity in EngineeringMiss Katrina Marie RobertsonHadi Ali, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Hadi Ali is an Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He studies the influence of the future of work on curricular innovation, with a focus on exploring the relationships between and among adaptability, risk taking and value making. In an effort to characterize engineering education as an (eco)system, his approach integrates analytical methods of data science to address changes in systems and society. More broadly, he is interested in
, Construction, and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), and the Director of the UAB Sustainable Smart Cities Research Center. Dr. Fouad is a fellow of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Dr. Fouad’s research interest is in the area of infrastructure design, maintenance, and rehabilitation with a focus on sustainable green building design and construction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Sustainability Education in a Global EraAbstractWe live in an era of expanding globalization. The interconnectedness of the world has beenincreased in all aspects of life. The
the proportion of content related to micro- versusmacroethical issues. Only 30 ASEE conference papers returned from a search on “macroethics”,suggesting that macroethics is less commonly taught in courses and/or co-curricular activities.Ethical instruction methods in courses have been categorized into multiple types: ethics acrossthe curriculum; professional codes of ethics; humanist readings; ethical problem-solvingheuristics; groundings in theoretical ethics; case studies; debate; role-playing; and service-learning.27,29 Many programs teach ethics through a number of these methods. For example,Catalano16 at SUNY-Binghamton describes ethics integration that includes theory, case studies,and humanist readings. Two studies suggest that one of
Assessing Grassroots Engineering Applications in BrazilIn Brazil, service learning or community service is an integral part of every university’sfundamental duties, along with teaching and researching. The type of learning or service to beprovided, however, depends on the hermeneutics applied, which can either lead to groupempowerment and socio-technical change or to mere paternalism.In the early 2000s, during the two terms of Lula as president of Brazil, many community service/service-learning teams were established and institutionalized, linked to engineering courses andfaculty members. From the conjugation of social technology and solidarity economy movements,some of these teams developed a form of engineering practice that is now called