engineering company to help undertake today’s global challenges.Mr. Fletcher Ray Hendrickson, Tennessee State University Fletcher Hendrickson is a Mechanical Engineering Student enrolled at Tennessee State University. He aspires to perform engineering design under research and development to develop the latest technologies, specifically in the aeronautical field. In addition, he plans to earn his private pilot’s license while at Tennessee State University.Fatemeh Hadi, Tennessee State University Dr. Fatemeh Hadi is an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engi- neering at Tennessee State University. She received her PhD in mechanical engineering at Northeastern University, working on
influence in predicting a career in engineering industry, while having a high physics identitynegatively predicts FGCS’ pursuit of a career in engineering industry. Taken together with theresults from the other regression analyses conducted for non-engineering, STEM-related careers(Table 6) and educational career pathways (Table 7), our results indicate the FGCS with higherphysics identities are more likely to choose engineering as a stepping stone to other careerpathways.These results have implications for how engineering courses are taught, especially for FGCS. Ouranalysis suggests that FGCS may have alternative career plans or long-term goals and motivationas non-FGCS for studying engineering. Providing opportunities to engage in other
RubricsAt the end of the week, students were asked to give a short, five minute presentation on theirweek-long project along with a functioning prototype of their project idea. These presentationswere evaluated with a rubric by several people with expertise in the education field. Table 3shows the mean scores (graded on a 4 point Likert scale) from those experts on the rubriccategories. The categories are defined as follows: Design - Does the student show evidence of planning the project thoughtfully? Knowledge - Does the student demonstrate the understanding of ideas? Application - Does the student use a variety of skills to apply knowledge to the project? Presentation - Does the student effectively communicate the central ideas of the
their lab partner improve and to develop a plan for their own leadershipdevelopment.As part of a funded leadership grant, the instructor kept an online journal of each day’s activitiesand the opportunities students had to engage in leadership through each of these activities. Onelab session was also videoed to formalize the observation of student leadership. This video wasreviewed and coded to assess the types of interactions the students had with their lab partners,other peers, and the instructor. Various leadership qualities were noted including askingquestions when having difficulty, seeking help from other students, seeking help from theinstructor, and collaboration in teams.IntroductionThe development of engineering students into
engineering affects or shifts the way educatorsthink about science and the ways it should be taught in K-12 schools.While there has been much progress in K-12 science education over the past decade, researchcontinues to show that many science teachers do not hold adequate views of Nature of Science(NOS) and struggle to teach in more inquiry or project-based ways.5,6,7 Specifically, Anderson5found that many teachers have limited experience with scientific inquiry and hold naıveconceptions of the process by which scientific knowledge is generated. This lack of knowledgeand experience likely puts limitations on teachers’ abilities to plan and implement moreprogressive lessons that will help their students develop an image of science that goes beyond
anddeleting is much easier than reshooting a 20-minute video. Third, the physical facilities,software and hardware demands are greater for the video production. Finally, the skills requiredfor good videos are not always available to the faculty; often a production team is required,which increases cost. Naturally, the animations and audio are synchronized, giving the impression of a well-planned lecture presentation. Animations enable material to be introduced sequentially and toshow temporal relationships, as in the following examples. • Model derivation: A mathematical model can be presented in stages, with each stage explained via audio and students given time to think how they would perform the next step. Key variables can be
importantcontributor to their team’s success. We did not attempt to pursue or resolve this paradox in thisstudy, but it continues to present an opportunity for future research.External events – transitions in university or college leadership or new strategic plans – do seemto have had at least some impact on the teams. High-performing teams, in particular, report thatthese changes were positive developments. We did not explore the extent to which this wasdisproportionately a matter of perception for high-performing teams.AreasforcontinuingandadditionalresearchThere is much yet to learn about the dynamics of making change in engineering education. Whilethe data presented here shed some light on some of the factors that may have an impact onwhether a change
over 10 years in the spaceindustry as a practicing engineer before joining academia, is illustrative: As the development of a satellite was ending, we (team members) started to talk to each other about what was coming next for us. One of my colleagues said that he was planning to write the continuation of Harry Potter. Intrigued by the idea, we asked him why. His answer was enlightening: “I have had to write so much science fiction in this project, that I feel totally capable to do it!”Engineering work affects society. Consequently, engineers have an inherent responsibility as partof their engineering practice for public safety and environmental sustainability, which requiresengineers to practice engineering
toconcepts in the prerequisite physics course (e.g. vector analysis, particle equilibrium, and free-body diagrams). It could be interesting to compare these pre-course survey responses withstudent grades in physics. Perhaps the survey could replace other pre-course assessment toolsused to plan review topics to emphasize during class sessions and/or identify students foracademic support services such as tutoring.Knowledge Surveys to Support Learner Skill DevelopmentAs discussed above, one of the goals of developing the knowledge survey was for students to usethe tool to improve their academic skill and confidence. Several of the survey items underoutcome 1 specifically ask students to reflect on their confidence regarding tasks associated
doctoral research8. Drawing on experiencesand ideas from multiple contexts, which for returners may include their work context anddoctoral program context, can be a source of innovation9. Further, returners bring anunderstanding of real-world engineering needs to their academic work, and their academic workmay have more immediate applications within the engineering community7. Peters and Daly8shared the example of one retuning student who sought a PhD to address an issue that arose inher industry work experience with the plan to pursue work related to that issue upon completingher degree. One study on adult undergraduate returners suggests that, because of their pastpersonal and work experiences, mature students were highly motivated and goal
participate in the senior design course (CEE 486). The seniordesign project at UA encompasses a comprehensive land development plan involving engineeringroles of due diligence, drainage, traffic circulation, water, wastewater, structural, and geotechnicalanalysis. Students work in teams of five to seven people per project and within each team studentsselect a civil engineering sub-discipline role based on their interest. The teams are partnered with alocal engineering firm whose role is to support students throughout their projects through mentor-ship and, in many cases, serve as ‘clients’ for student projects. The senior design project requiresstudents to produce engineering design plans for their development, compile a comprehensivewritten report
isunable to treat the anticipated sewage generated by the population, space might be an issuedepending on their site layout for vehicle parking and bed down areas, and the solid wastemanagement plan needs to be adjusted. The fall 2016 term (17-1) consisted of 54 students, wherethe project was completed in groups of 4-5 students. The project itself has three graded portions: 1. Executive Summary. The course instructor provides the groups with the project’s scenario, detailed submission requirements, and affords groups over two hours to reconnoiter the proposed site’s existing infrastructure. The groups compile a table quantitatively summarizing the capacity of each infrastructure system on site (i.e., water, wastewater, solid
engineering and computer science classes are taught, (d).computer laboratories are open for required study periods all afternoon (graduate student tutorswho attend morning lectures are available), (e). Fridays are set-aside for trips to engineeringemployers where students receive briefings and tours that always include some Jackson StateUniversity engineering alumni, (f). Two Fridays, during the second summer term, are set-asidefor students to pre-register for the fall semester and meet their engineering advisor one-on-one,(g). Activity directors plan weekend functions and are accessible 24/7, (h). SEEP strives to createa permanent community of Engineering Learners and (i). SEEP is cost free to the student exceptfor incidental expenses.Previous
28%. These large percentages are of concernconsidering the same equipment is used by the students 3 to 4 times per semester. Our labstudents typically work in groups of 4 to conduct experiments, and do not have a lab practicalexam on how to use the equipment. We have observed that when lab groups are not closelysupervised some students wait for others to acquire the lab exercise data, which they share, anddo not gain as much experience using the equipment. Since they know there is no exam theyknow they will not be held accountable. Our plan is to try to increase student accountability byexperimenting with smaller lab groups, requiring a practical exam, and then repeating theassessment. 5) Conclusions The technology program students were
program administrators to better understand the potentialof the SI program to help students find success in the ECE department.IntroductionThis complete research paper will examine the effects of a Supplemental Instruction (SI)program on the academic success of first-year Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)students at the university. The SI program offers optional, non-remedial discussion sessions tostudents enrolled in a required freshman-level course with historically high percentages of D’s,F’s, drops, and withdraws (DFQW percentage). The current degree plan advises incomingfreshmen to enroll in EE 302 Introduction to Electrical Engineering during their first fullsemester; the majority of the course enrollment is in the fall. The spring
finalprototype a bill of materials is created in order to estimate the cost of the project. The scope ofthe final prototype is also defined and presented to the sponsor for their approval. In this contextthe scope includes the planned functionality of the prototype as well as the intended use of theprototype. For instance a prototype may be built to answer a technical feasibility question.Another reason to build a prototype might be to gather more user feedback. Finally, someprototypes will be put to use by the sponsor. Many assistive technology prototypes willimmediately be put to use. The purpose of the prototype impacts the cost and time required tocreate the prototype.During the design refinement phase, students predict the performance of the
desire to pay careful attention to standards was largely driven by the college’s plan toincrease its ranking. Thus, “every hire has to actually, in some respects, move the needle interms of ranking. So it’s tough. It’s tough to do that and keep an eye on diversity.”He did describe some solutions to this dilemma. One was simply working to get a criticalmass, as the college did several years previously with a cluster hire of Black faculty. He alsoproposed ways to increase the pipeline. For example, he has been considering creating aprogram whereby promising undergraduates from his college would be mentored to entergraduate school somewhere else and then have preferred consideration for later hiring. Healso suggested a consortium model whereby
named specific strategies (e.g.,using Twitter, mapping course content) that they planned to try moving forward. Beyond specificstrategies for a particular class, one GTA emphasized the benefit of becoming familiar with thebroader concept of curriculum mapping via the group.In addition to seeing benefits to group participation, the GTAs also identified challenges toparticipating and made suggestions for how to address these challenges in future groups. Themost common challenges mentioned were related to meeting scheduling, organization, andparticipation. GTAs suggested that more structured meetings with specific topics for eachmeeting, as well as a meeting schedule that was established well beforehand, would likelyimprove participation. They
𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟]𝑖 = 𝛼0 + 𝛽1 𝐻𝑆𝑇𝑖 + 𝛽2 𝑇𝐸𝑆𝑇𝑖 + 𝜸′𝑋𝑖 + 𝜀𝑖 (3)2 “Multiple measures” are additional indicators used by each college in the A&P process. There is variation across the LUCCD schools in termsof the measures used, ranging from HS GPA, HS math course-taking information, college plans, and indicators of student goals and aspirations.These measures are converted to points that are added to the placement test score to determine final course placement. See Ngo and Kwon (2015)and Ngo, Chi, and Park (forthcoming) for a more complete description of the A&P practice.Here 𝐻𝑆𝑇𝑖 are various relevant variables from the high school transcripts (e.g., grades in mathclasses, state standardized test scores, HS GPA), and 𝑇𝐸𝑆𝑇𝑖
separately, participant surveys areconducted for the Women in Engineering (WIE) Summer Camp as a whole. This camp includedadditional workshops that also provided insight into other engineering disciplines. Data from the2016 summer camp survey revealed that 35 of 36 participants felt the camp was influential inregards to choosing a plan of study for college. These results are especially encouraging comingfrom young women who are faced with pivotal decisions in choosing a career path that hastypically been dominated by males. In addition to the Likert type survey questions, studentswere also given the opportunity to express general comments about their camp experiences. Afew of these comments are included below, again illustrating the positive impact
end. Instead, knowledge is experiencethat is acquired through interaction with the world, people and things and built on a student’sprior knowledge. Constructionism builds upon Piaget’s constructivism and claims that theconstruction of knowledge happens remarkably well when students build, make, and publiclyshare objects [1]. His theory is at the very core of what “making” and digital fabrication meansfor education, and underlie what many enthusiasts of the “maker movement” propose – even ifmany are not aware of it [1].Makerspaces as novel learning environments in engineeringIn 2011 and 2012 alone countless museums, schools, community centers, and librariesannounced plans to build digital fabrication and ‘making’ facilities – it became
Paper ID #19341The Impact of Healthcare-Related Workshops on Student Motivation and Re-tention in EngineeringDr. Grisselle Centeno, University of South Florida Dr. Centeno is an Associate Professor in the department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineer- ing and an affiliated faculty in the College of Medicine at the University of South Florida. Her research has examined optimization-based approaches for the planning and control of operations in healthcare, transportation and manufacturing industries. She possesses experience in working with large-scale math- ematical programming models, developing heuristic
far have been focused on encouraging mathematicalthinking at the junior year, but we plan to extend our work to the freshman and sophomore yearsas well. Our approach has been to dissect and rearrange the calculus sequence into small modulesand to deliver each module at the right time, as the math becomes necessary to develop intuition inan ECE LSM. Our hope is that this approach makes the connection between mathematics and ECEmore evident and compels our students to view mathematics as a powerful tool for deeper learningin ECE.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis work is supported by the NSF, IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: RevolutionizingEngineering Departments (RED), Grant EEC-1519438. Any opinions expressed in this paper arethose of the authors
UIUC, the freshman composition course sections are ledby graduate students and lecturers. To develop a course that would be scalable to meet the needsof our large freshman engineering class, we adopted a similar model for the Writing inEngineering Fields course. The course is overseen (coordination level) by engineering andEnglish faculty, and the section (current enrollment is 12) is taught by one English graduate TAand one engineering graduate TA who worked collaboratively in the development stage andcontinue to work collaboratively in course delivery, including implementing lesson plans andproviding feedback to students. While engineering
a positive effect. However,at this time, it is too early to determine with certainty the causality of this result. In the future wewill design surveys that allow quantitative measure of satisfaction of the project sponsor. Wealso plan to conduct a study to document students’ perceptions on the impact of the projectexperience in their academic and professional careers. We also intend to design pre-test andpost-test that permits us to measure the level of knowledge reached by each group and to developsurveys as an instrument of course assessment. These tools can demonstrate possible differencesin the impact of this course on students with different profiles.AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the Department of Engineering Sciences
? Did the company plan ahead for X success and future growth? What are the manufacturing costs for the game? (How do these costs compare to market X X average) What percentages of these costs are focused on the pieces, board, labor? (Do the costs adequately X X reflect the quality of the game?) What is the manufacturing
role models from the respective disciplines. To help students develop successskills, the classes include workshops on time management and growth mindset. For the activity,students will create an Individual Development Plan to help them evaluate and develop strategiesto improve their skillsets needed to achieve their short-term and long-term goals. A survey will bedesigned and administered in these classes to obtain student feedback on the learning activities.B. Faculty Development WorkshopsFour professional development workshops were held for faculty and staff on social-emotionalfactors that contribute to student persistence and retention. The factors include but are not limitedto reducing stereotype threat and unconscious bias, providing
preparation, commitment, confidence, value, and internal motivatorfactors across a diversity of gender and ethnicity for this paper. (We had more difficulty inestablishing reliable measures of learning styles, as students would not report their preferencesconsistently; and external motivators and influencers were confused. Some influences wereviewed as supportive, others as pressure.)Purpose and HypothesesThe purpose of the current study is to identify correlations among preparation, commitment,confidence, motivation, and perceived social value, and successfully completing an engineeringprogram of study. We developed a questionnaire to be used with all students taking theIntroduction to Engineering course. Utilizing this instrument, we planned to