the Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs)implementation sequence (Figure 1). MEAs are open-ended modeling problems that challengestudents to work in teams to solve complex problems with realistic applications.10 Theimplementation strategy of these activities involves multiple iterative points that challengestudents to constantly and critically evaluate their team’s solution and improve their solutionusing external feedback. The solutions are submitted in the form of a memo in which students Page 25.1323.2communicate their developed procedure (or mathematical model or method for solving theproblem), their mathematical logic behind their procedure
reducing the amount of screen statically allocated tonavigation. This allows the user to switch OneNote into full screen mode, which hides thestandard interface, to allow more space for content while not sacrificing many of the necessarycontrols. These added navigation controls include page forward and backward for either windowdepending on whether or not the pages are synchronized, ability to change to other pages in the Page 25.1324.6current book and a table of contents accessible through a few quick mouse or touch movementwhich includes all books. The page forward and back controls, as shown in Figure 1, are locatedat the bottom left and right
taken to further develop an operational engine, in viewof performing an exergy analysis of the model engine. Developing and documenting this level ofanalysis is a significant goal of this project.backgroundThe purpose of this section is to familiarize the reader with a synopsis-level history of theNewcomen engine. The definitive book on this topic is The Steam Engine of ThomasNewcomen, by L.T.C. Rolt and J.S. Allen.1 The reader is encouraged to refer to this excellentbook for a more detailed history of the Newcomen engine.The beginning of the 18th century was an extremely important time for the advancement of thesteam engine. Many scientists who are familiar to us today contributed to the development ofpractical steam power, but one individual
the first years oftheir careers. Interviews were conducted by phone, audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, andthen coded.Through our analysis, we identified the initial paths chosen by ECPs simply as 1) entering theworkforce or 2) continuing in education. We then examined the robustness of initial choices bydetermining if participants stayed in their initial work/school pathway and if, at the time of theinterviews, they are doing what they thought they would be doing prior to graduating. Offeringinsight into the initial career decision process of ECPs allows academia and industry a betteropportunity to prepare undergraduate students for the decision process of graduate school versusentering the workforce directly from undergraduate
revised set of guidelines for the DirectedProject Process. The following flow chart (figure 1) defines the various steps and sequence of theproject: Page 25.1327.2Figure 1The recommended Directed Project outline is defined in Attachment A.Several modifications were made to the instructions for each process step in the Directed Project: 1) The selection of the project topic was mandated to be jointly done by the student and his manager with a focus on what would benefit the student’s organization in a measurable way. 2) The advisor matching process was facilitated by a surrogate who had knowledge of research interest of all
Level of achievement number and 1 2 3 4 5 6 title Know- Compre- Appli- Analy- Synthe- Evalu- ledge hension cation sis sis ation Foundational1. Mathematics B B B2. Natural sciences B B B3. Humanities B B B4. Social sciences B B B Technical5. Materials science B B B6. Mechanics B B B B7
integrate Policy Statement 465 implementation into theSociety’s broader strategic planning process. At this important juncture, there is a critical needto document the achievements of the past, discern key lessons learned, and chart an appropriatecourse for the future.PurposeThe purposes of this paper are (1) to summarize the decade-long process of developing andimplementing new accreditation criteria in support of the ASCE Raise the Bar initiative; (2) toidentify the principal lessons learned through this process; and (3) to provide recommendationsfor future developments in the accreditation domain of this ongoing effort to raise theeducational standard for civil engineering professional practice
Civil Engineering Page 25.1330.1 Division and the Middle-Atlantic Section of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012and as a member of ASCE’s Educational Activities Committee. Lenox also served as Co-principal In-structor of the NSF-supported Teaching Teachers to Teach Engineering (T4E) workshops at West Pointin 1996, 1997, and 1998. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army on Oct. 1, 1998, Lenox joined thestaff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as Educational Staff Leader ofASCE, Lenox led several
) in February 2004; a revised (second) edition was published in February2008 (BOK22). The BOK2 is a comprehensive list of 24 outcomes divided into three outcomecategories: foundational, technical, and professional. The BOK2 outcomes have the desired levelof achievement defined according to Bloom’s Taxonomy for the cognitive domain3. The BOK2has recommended outcome achievement targets for each stage of the fulfillment pathway: thebaccalaureate degree (B), post-baccalaureate formal education (M/30), and pre-licensureexperience (E) (see Figure 1).Detailed implementation guidelines are included in the second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century (BOK22); see www.asce.org/raisethebar/reports. Policy465 and BOK2 are
of several papers presented in recognition of the tenth anniversary of establishingCAP^3. The collective papers will provide engineering educators and practitioners with adescription of the history, lessons learned, and next steps related to the “raise the bar" initiative.Collectively these present the six different aspects of the “Raise the Bar” initiative: (1) Theoverall initiative, (2) The civil engineering body of knowledge, (3) changed university curricula,(4) draft guidelines for professional experience, (5) revised accreditation criteria, and (6)modified licensure laws and rules.IntroductionBeginning in 1995 at the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Civil EngineeringEducation Conference (CEEC ’95), key educational and
comparison of traditional tools of documentation andcommunication should be compared to digital forms of documentation and communication as thefoundation for this work.Research QuestionsThe research questions were: 1. What practices (design notebooks, photographs, storyboards, or video) help student reflection in the design process? 2. What does comparison of design notebooks, photographs, storyboards, and video provide for teachers when evaluating student learning?MethodsIn order to compare natural tendencies or previously learned behaviors in science journaling thatwould transfer to design notebooks, students took notes in daily lectures and completedhomework in journals without a formal structure given in how to do so for this
called “personaltransferable skills”.The implications of findings for educational policy makers are (1) that policy making should beundertaken from a systems perspective that embraces elementary education at one end of thespectrum and lifelong (permanent) education at the other: (2) that engineering educators togetherwith industrialists should pay much more attention to lifelong education, and therefore incontinuing professional development for engineers in both technical and personal dimensions:(3) that engineering educators should better prepare students with the skills of flexibility andadaptability required to cope with ever changing knowledge, that is “personal transferableskills”.These axioms are reinforced by a recent report from the
faculty office hours.In January of 2010 the first online course offering was delivered. Thirty-eight undergraduatesenrolled in the course with a minimum prerequisite of junior standing. Modifications for onlinelearning that were made to the course content as follows. 1. Camtasia (mp4) recorded lectures 2. ADA online learning requirements were met by providing typed dictation of lectures with each Power Point slide in PDF format. 3. A workbook with unit divisions, each with step by step instructions was annotated and provided to students in a PDF version with additional hints and suggestions. 4. Terms and theory quiz questions were entered into assignments in the online classroom and scored electronically
, 7, but there has been littleconsideration for student-athletes enrolled in STEM programs. The research that does exist islimited to American Division-I schools and the military8, 9. What is lacking within currentresearch findings is a general understand of how STEM student-athletes are able to succeed intwo challenging, yet distinctly different, pursuits while other students struggle to get by in just Page 25.1336.2one. A great deal of research has gone into time management issues for STEM and non-STEMstudents10, 11, and student-athletes12, 13. This work considers the research questions:1. “How do STEM student-athletes manage their time and
. Page 25.1337.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Role Model Affect and Its Effect on Underrepresented Minorities Pursuing Doctorates in Engineering Education1. BackgroundRegardless of race or ethnicity, engineering education began to see a decline in enrollmentbeginning in the early 1990’s. To address this concern, among others, ABET adopted theEngineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000), which introduced a new paradigm in engineeringeducation.1 The new paradigms in engineering education went beyond the need to keep studentson the cutting edge of technology, but required students to have interpersonal skills, beinquisitive and innovative, and most importantly, possess inter
findings examining the developmental appropriateness of introducingengineering at an early age suggest that activities and content relevant to engineering areappropriate for young children [1, 2]. Objects in children’s environment appear to be influential inthe development of engineering thinking as they contribute to exploratory learning [3] which islong recognized as a developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood education [4, 5]. Thepresent study investigates how children and teachers use artifacts in exploratory learning.In this paper we present a study designed to investigate the engineering environment present inpreschool classroom. The study builds on prior research related to young children’s interactionswith artifacts and
University, theUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte, Colorado State University, and Pennsylvania State Page 25.1339.2University. The courses were taught by a total of six different faculty members. Thedescriptions of the courses that the cases were used in are provided below.Cleveland State UniversityESC 211 Strength of Materials. Study of stress, strain and stress-strain relations; stress-load andload-deformation relationships for axial, torsion and bending members; buckling of columns;combined stresses, inelastic behavior.CVE 312 Structural Analysis 1. Truss and frame analysis, influence lines and load positioncriteria, deflection analysis
Seery, University of Limerick Page 25.1340.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Role of Observational Sketching in Forming and Manipulating Graphical LibrariesThe ability to externalize libraries of visual mental imagery through freehand sketching is acomplex cognitive skill. Lane [1] devised and empirically validated a model of developmentalexercises which ranged along a continuum from observation to imagination. The purpose ofthe model was to promote freehand sketching as a sense making tool while developing theability to form, manipulate, synthesize
Page 25.1341.2at the costs and effectiveness of their recruiting efforts. The Web and social media offer a meansto reach out to prospective students that is both economical and current. Like many others, theCollege of Technology at Purdue University has embarked on creating a presence in the realm ofsocial media. Social media can be defined as “a group of internet-based applications that build onthe ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, and that allow the creation andexchange of User Generated Content.”1 Facebook and Twitter are two of the most prevalentsocial media outlets utilized by the College of Technology. This survey was used to gauge theawareness level of incoming students and determine the effectiveness of recruiting
electronic mediums canencourage interactions and exchanges between and among faculty and students, creating a moreengaging learning environment 1. Recent advancements in slate enabled laptop computers andsmaller hand-held devices (e.g., Tablet PCs, iPads, HP Slate 500s), and their impact oncollaboration skills among engineering undergraduates is an area in need of further examination.Through a case study of an engineering course offered during a Summer Bridge Program (i.e.,STEP) at a Research I university, this research examines the role of slate enabled technologies incollaboration between and among course instructors and students. Our observations are guidedby the following factors: • The degree to which the collaboration is instructor led and
25.1343.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Leadership Advancement Program: Preparing Engineering, Math, and Science Students for Leadership SuccessIntroductionRecently numerous publications have focused on curricular changes needed in engineeringeducation to prepare students sufficiently to meet the challenges of their technical professions.These changes appear to relate less to revisions needed in the technical curriculum and more torevisions that will allow students to develop interpersonal skills, global awareness, and otherabilities before graduation.1-2 For instance, the National Academy of Engineering’s TheEngineer of
. If the student attends every class meeting (unless excused)and turns in every homework, then the instructor promises to spend as much time with thestudent outside of class, as is required, to help them do their best or at the very least, pass thecourse.Teaching Circuit Analysis“Begin at the End”This is a similar to Boylestad‟s Reduce and Return Approach.1 Although this approach isdescribed in detail in an example problem (one of countless excellent examples in Boylestad)nowhere is it explicitly stated that one begins the circuit analysis and reduction at the end of thecircuit opposite the source. Likewise, Nilsson starts at the end of the circuit but doesn‟texplicitly state a methodology2. Monier doesn‟t offer a methodology for circuit
to increase student involvement [1]. There is a broad consensus that studentmotivation is a perquisite of learning success [5], A high level of motivation is often a prerequisite forsuccess. There is a thus high probability that learning will not be successful if there is a lack ofmotivation. Therefore we also hypothesize that:H4: Students with higher levels of enthusiasm for the project will report higher learning outcomes.Data and Analysis:The data in this paper are based on a multi-year evaluation of the NSF-funded Vertically IntegratedProjects (VIP) Program [11], which brings together graduate and undergraduate students to solve appliedengineering problems. A common evaluative approach to student learning experiences involves
about teaching systemsand software engineering topics in a more integrated way.Table 1 presents the curriculum for the revised MSSE program. Applicants should have a B.S.degree in a computing-related discipline with proficiency in probability and statistics or a B.S.degree in an engineering discipline with proficiency in at least one high level programminglanguage. The MSSE is a 30 credit hour program. Students are required to take four core courses,two of which are from computer science (Software Modeling and Architecture, and SoftwareVerification and Validation) and two of which are from Industrial Engineering (ProjectManagement and Systems Theory). We chose to provide the broader systems engineeringperspective of project management as part
First-Year Engineering Projects CoursesFirst-Year Engineering Projects Courses (FYEP) courses have been found to produce significantretention gains. [1] Investigation is on-going into the reasons driving theses retention gains.Possible reasons include the development of self-efficacy, involvement in learning communities,the bolstering of professional identity, project-based learning and the unique set of skillspossessed by the teacher of the FYEP course. The present study investigates the last of thesereasons, the impact of the FYEP teacher on the course experiences that lead to retention.At a flagship western state university, the retention in engineering of seventeen cohorts ofstudents is found to be significantly greater for those who have
"skills necessary to functioning in society."1 The student's stakein preserving existing disciplinary goals and attendant institutional structures is thus assured.Contingency and Power in the Engineering CurriculumWithout attempting to paint a panoramic picture of engineering compared to other fields ofintellectual endeavor, we can articulate the ways in which engineering epistemologies make itparticularly difficult to interrogate matters of social and political power. Most obviously,engineering identifies itself with an almost extreme practicality. In a lengthy (and in certainways quite nuanced) 2009 report for the Carnegie Foundation on recent engineering educationreforms, Sheppard et al repeatedly have recourse to the belief that engineering
years [1].Atmospheric chemist, Paul Crutzen, first noted this change in 2000 [2]. He realized that we wereno longer in the Holocene but entering the “Anthropocene”: the age of man. During theHolocene, the Earth maintained itself but now, according to the article, “A Safe Operating SpaceFor Humanity”, “human actions have become the main driver of global environmental change.”The hot button phrase of this shift to the Anthropocene that seems to be the cause of mostconcern is “global warming”.Global warming, according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, is defined as “an increase in theearth's atmospheric and oceanic temperatures widely predicted to occur due to an increase in thegreenhouse effect resulting especially from pollution”. For millions of
asvalidity or reliability errors. The critical choice for data gathering was the survey respondentaudience, which was carefully designed to avoid gender, age, technical subject or experiencebias.The selected faculty members were split among gender, years of teaching experience, first yearvs. upperclass instructors and also split among departments. A total of 41 surveys were sent out.A total of 23 responses were received (Figure 1). An average of 56% of surveys was answered,with females answering at a slightly higher rate of 60% versus males at 53%. As can be seen,the respondents have a similar gender split as the original requested survey group
Page 25.1351.2terminology of electrical and computer engineering. The class meets once a week for 50 minutesof lecture and once a week for an hour and 50 minutes in the lab. The sole pre-requisite for thecourse is pre-calculus, and the course is designed more to inspire interest among students forelectrical and computer engineering while the students concurrently take the typical battery ofmath and science courses than to provide a rigorous introduction to the discipline. Detailsregarding the course have been published [1]. This introductory course is then followed by tworequired four-credit circuit analysis courses and a required four-credit electronics course. Thefocus of this paper is on the first of the two required circuit courses EELE
. They also developand improve their technical writing skills in generating the formal technical reports that arerequired by the CBA, and are occasionally asked to demonstrate technical presentation skills,again with computer-aided audio-visual support. The authors present data in this paper to explorehow effective CBAs are in achieving the learning outcomes regarding concept application,teamwork, and technical writing in those mechanics courses.IntroductionThe importance of integrating the use of computers in learning and teaching engineeringmechanics has been demonstrated and heralded in the literature.1-6 Students benefit from“instructional activities involving [them] in doing things and thinking about what they aredoing.”7 The emphasis in