U.S.filled in 47% of all jobs but only 24% of the STEM jobs [6]. In other words, 76% of the STEMjobs are held by men. In community services, women had a volunteer rate of 27.8% in 2015compared to men 21.8%. Women volunteered at a higher rate than men and this was true acrossall age groups, educational levels, and major demographics characteristics (such as race andemployment status) [7].Influence is closely associated with leadership. A capable leader provides guidance at theworkplace, home, and/or community [8]. It follows that, those influencing are consideredefficient leaders that motivate their colleagues, family or community [9, 10]. Transformativeleadership idealizes influence which reflect standards of moral and ethical conduct; it
Paper ID #26409Board 39: The In/Authentic Experiences of Black EngineersDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Associate Director for Research of the Institute for Excellence in Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the Uni- versity of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida
engineering students to work at the overlap with public policy, business, law, ethics, human behavior, risk, and the arts, as well as medicine and the sciences Entrepreneurship • Preparing students to translate invention to innovation; to develop market ventures that scale to global solutions in the public interest Global Dimension • Developing the students’ global perspective necessary to address challenges that are inherently global as well as to lead innovation in a global economy Service Learning • Developing and deepening students’ social consciousness and their motivation to bring their technical expertise to bear on societal problems through mentored experiential
Project courses for all majors. The importance of understanding risk andliability, of continuous professional development including licensure, and of ethics inengineering practice, all of which are relevant concepts for an entrepreneurial approach toengineering, have been stressed. Historically, senior projects that have led to longer-termstudent-private sector collaborations or even student-initiated business have been rare.Recently, entrepreneurship at Pitt-Johnstown has experienced a revitalization. A renewed pushto create an Entrepreneurial Studies program came from Pitt-Johnstown President Jem Spectar in2011. This led first to an agreement with Johnstown Area Regional Industries (JARI) to supportentrepreneurial internships for Pitt-Johnstown
A – Model Introductory Infrastructure Course Outline# Module Topic Level1 Fundamentals What is infrastructure and why do we care?2 Fundamentals Basic infrastructure functions3 Fundamentals Systems/network analysis4 Fundamentals TBL/Sustainability5 Fundamentals Social Impacts of Infrastructure6 Fundamentals Teamwork7 Fundamentals Ethics I8 Fundamentals Ethics II9 Fundamentals Traits of effective written and oral communication10 Fundamentals Financing public works11 Fundamentals Safety/licensure12 Fundamentals Land Use and Planning/Growth/Forecasting13 Fundamentals Resilience and risk14 One
demographic attributes (e.g., gender and ethnicity)and incoming metrics (e.g., standardized test scores, high school grade point average). Althoughhigh school GPAs and standardized scores are considered as part of the application, the decisionfor acceptance into SB is a combination of a student’s expressed work ethic, letters ofrecommendations from high school counselors and teacher, and overall transcript courseevaluation. All incoming URM students are encouraged to apply for the program; however, withan average acceptance rate around 90%, not all applicants are accepted.Summer Bridge StructureThe SB program runs for five weeks and coincides with the second summer session. Students areadmitted into the program at no cost as part of the funding
, personnel, existing processes,stakeholders, mission, values and culture), as well as from outside the company (e.g. legal,regulatory, macroeconomic, ethical, and market dynamics). In using the Product ArchaeologyCanvas, students must “excavate” public information on all of these factors for an over-the-counter medical device. Like an archaeologist, they needed to create a plausible and coherentnarrative of the decisions the company made in moving that product idea to the customer. Withthis background they become forward-thinking intrapreneurs – proposing a way to increase thevalue of their product but in a way that balanced all of the various constraints and perspectives. Figure 3 – Product Archeology CanvasInnovation
and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Prof. Jeffrey Miller, University of Southern California Dr. Miller is an Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Computer Science Department at the University of Southern California. He earned his BS, MS, and Ph.D. from the University of Southern California in 2002, 2002, and 2007, respectively. He has taught collegiate Computer Science for over 10 years at California State University, Los Angeles, the University of Alaska Anchorage, and now at USC. His research in two discrete areas - Computer Science education for K12, undergraduate, and graduate students and intelligent transportation systems, specifically related to vehicular networking and ethics
program, students will have a concentration in engineering leadership notedon their transcript.Formal coursework is designed specifically for undergraduate engineering students. The coursesexplore topics including: self-awareness and emotional intelligence, leadership styles andtheories, servant leadership, team dynamics, motivating and guiding others, diversity in theworkplace (cultural, gender, etc.), communication, conflict management, ethical leadership,leading change, leading technology and innovation, market analysis, product development,entrepreneurship, and strategic and financial planning.A variety of assessment methods were employed in the first year. A pre- and post-testleadership inventory was administered to students to during the
competent field. The National Academy of Engineering, for example,have stated in their vision of “The Engineer of 2020” that engineering activities should beframed in the context of rapidly moving technological changes, global interconnection ofresources, and an increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary population of individuals involvedin or affected by engineering developments. Among the NAE aspirations for the engineeringfield is “a future where engineers are prepared to adapt to changes in global forces and trendsand to ethically assist the world in creating a balance in the standard of living for developing anddeveloped countries alike”3. This vision reflects the need to embrace global competencies framedwithin ethical considerations, where
the socio-economic dynamicsand business culture globally even to succeed locally. Recognizing the need, many engineeringschools in the U.S. have started offering ethics and study abroad programs to their undergraduatestudents. Our research shows that selection of countries for study abroad programs have widenedsignificantly in the recent years. For example, in the nineties, the US Universities were offeringstudy abroad programs mostly in European and few other developed countries in the Asia pacificregion. In recent years, that list has grown significantly including many other countries aroundthe world like South Africa, Brazil, Russia, China, Chile, and India to name a few. This paperpresents a survey of select U.S. engineering schools
underserved communities globally.Prior research shows that difficulties often arise as students arrive unprepared to addressthe cultural and technical challenges international work entails. For example, oneparticular case study in Gary Downey’s book highlighted the challenges inimplementation of a program to connect student engineers with underserved communitiesin an international setting. Differences in culture and language coupled with thegeographical distance compounded made the project untenable and it had to stop. Someof the reasons she cited included that “the large body of knowledge in the developmentarea was not readily accessible or available to engineers,” and students did not activelyseek out the ethical and social understanding necessary
not be true. We have added some catalyst strategies during class study, the observation is very interesting. Third, collaboration and ethics. WReSTT-CyLE is an environment that emphasizes the collaborative learning strategy through a team based approach. At the same time, as an online learning environment, out of class study would be suitable for students and is one of the main purposes of this project. Does the organic collaboration bring efficient results and learning outcomes? Does gamification emphasize independent and team wide learning? Is each team learning on an independent based XP? If some of the answers to the above questions are no, how do we adjust the bias in the results?After the study, we retrieved the data and
, developmentally appropriate way to enable them to evaluate evidence critically, make informed judgments, and act ethically. Creat[ing] a vibrant campus learning community that blends curricular and cocurricular learning opportunities and capitalizes on the roles of all constituents (faculty, staff, and students) in promoting student learning.” (p. 19)In the summer of 2011, the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU)introduced a comprehensive professional development program to complement its existingundergraduate summer research internships.12–16 As part of this EnSURE (Engineering SummerUndergraduate Research Experience) program, students participated in weekly professionaldevelopment seminars and periodic
through theREU program were also made available to the participating students in this ASPIRES program.These workshops include Responsible Conduct of Research and Ethics, Research Process,Literature Review and Conducting Research, Verbal and Written Communication Skills,Learning to Give Powerful Oral and Poster Presentations, The Elevator Pitch: Advocating forYour Good Ideas, and project-specific topics, such as structural dynamics, topologyoptimization, and training tutorials for prevalent software. These workshops intend to helpstudents develop independent research ability, better present research outcomes, and effectivelypromote research findings. Since MATLAB is one of the essential tools needed for this particularresearch project, all interns
California Polytech- nic State University where he teaches courses in materials selection and polymers. He has presented his research on engineering ethics to several universities and to the American Bar Association. He serves as Associate Editor of the journals Advances in Engineering Education and International Journal of Service Learning in Engineering. He has served as program chair and division chair for several divisions within ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Self-Efficacy and Mental Wellness Goals in Materials Engineering and Mechanical Engineering StudentsAbstractThe mental well-being of undergraduate students is a growing concern among
evaluator).# Debriefing. Onboarding. Campus tours. (WEEK) RESEARCH PROJECT EXPERIENCE (VIP TEAMS) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (COE USRG)* May Define project objectives, methodology, timeline Welcome breakfast. Orientation. General lab (Week-1) & outcomes. Ethics training courses. safety training. Welcome Bar-B-Q. Ethics. Jun. Research plan due! Overview of metrology/ GRE workshop: What to expect. Seminar: TAMU (Week-2) inspection principles & labs. Safety courses. early admissions program. Jun. Research questions & tasks. Training & practice GRE workshop: Maximize your study time. (Week-3) on relevant laboratory equipment. Seminar: Applying to graduate school
to focus our study on the items that had morevariability in the responses, so we eliminated these two items and re-ranked the other 5 itemsbelow to study the relationship between students’ personality types and these topics: • Orthographic drawing (Visualization) • Sustainability and ethics • Term Project (Entrepreneurship, creativity, and customer interaction) • Math, physics and mechanics • Communication (Writing and presenting)Dominating Personality Types of Engineering Students Figure 1 shows a comparison of the personality types of University of New Haven first-year students and the ASEE-MBTI data. The data is also displayed in tabular format in Table A.1in Appendix A. The ASEE-MBTI survey includes results from
reach to other majors. Wedesigned a Minor is Sustainability with a new SUST prefix that is open to all UHD undergraduates. Weare proud of this innovative, cross-disciplinary curriculum as solving future issues with social andeconomic components will require majors outside of the environmental sciences.The Minor in Sustainability is 18 hours (6 courses). Three of these courses can be selected as part of thedegree plan of most students if they choose wisely from the list of course options. For these three coursesstudents must take one course from each of three course areas. The areas include 1) environmentalscience fundamentals, 2) social and ethical considerations and 3) technical and business applications. An important addition to the technical
1 2% 1 2% 1 3% 1 2% Funding 26 52% 21 46% 19 51% 19 46% Language 1 2% 1 2% 1 3% 2 5% Low Study Participation 8 16% 8 17% 8 22% 8 20% Publishing Challenges 6 12% 5 11% 4 11% 5 12% Research Ethics Approval 8 16% 8 17% 4 11% 6 15% Research Interest 7 14% 7 15% 4 11% 7 17% Lack of Admin Training in CER 12 24% 12 26% 11 30% 11 27% Social-Familial Influences 4 8% 3 7% 3 8
#6 / #10 (differentiating memorization from understanding), #9 / #125 Pseudonyms are used for privacy and ethical concerns.(metacognitive awareness), and #10 / #13 (course performance) reinforce the model’s role inpromoting an integrated learning experience. Specifically, the correlation between items #6 and #10in both pretest and posttest phases suggests that students’ self-perceived learning skills align withtheir ability to distinguish between rote memorization and genuine understanding—a central goalof the LHETM approach.The positive correlations between item pairs #6 / #13 ( = 0.579, p = 0.012) and #7 / #13 ( = 0.542,p = 0.020) in the pretest phase alone reveal an intriguing predictive relationship: students’ initialconfidence in
of a wider range of ethical implications and societal impacts. Byembracing DEI, the engineering discipline is better positioned to tackle the grand challenges ofour time, from climate change to equitable access to technology, with solutions that are as variedand complex as the issues themselves [14], [15]. In essence, the integration of DEI into theengineering discipline enhances the field's ability to generate transformative solutions that areequitable, sustainable, and reflective of the needs of all segments of society. It is not just an idealto aspire to but a practical necessity for the continued relevance and progress of the engineeringprofession.Chemical Engineering, like many engineering fields, grapples with the underrepresentation
: Entrepreneurship and theU.S. Economy”. Retrieved on March 26, 2024.https://www.bls.gov/bdm/entrepreneurship/entrepreneurship.htmDawkins, C. (2015). Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly,25(1), 1-28.Desai, V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories oforganizational legitimacy and learning. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 220-244.Dube, B. (2021). Why cross and mix disciplines and methodologies?: Multiple meanings ofInterdisciplinarity and pluralism in ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 179, 106827.Dubey, A. K., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Basu, B. (2020). Interdisciplinary Engineering Sciences:Concepts and Applications to Materials Science.Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J
credit hoursbased on their desired workload. Many students enroll in the course for multiple semesters tocontinue their project work, and in doing so, can fulfill a general education “global challenges4”requirement and/or a major-specific technical elective. The learning outcomes for the coursesequence include, but are not limited to: project planning, application of knowledge frommultiple disciplines, problem recognition and design processes, sustainability, leadership,teamwork, communication, application of humanitarian ethics, cultural awareness, and globalperspectives. The learning outcomes are intentionally inclusive of the seven ABET CriterionThree standard student outcomes5. As part of the program, students are regularly presenting
room.The theme of the CE483 escape room aimed to introduce the students to forensic engineeringand engineering ethics in addition to reviewing course concepts. The escape room was themed asa case study of the Harbour Cay Condominium collapse [25]. The students were given 90minutes to determine who was at fault for the collapse. The results of the investigation conductedby the National Bureau of Standards were used to create puzzles to assess the students’ ability toachieve the course objectives [25]. However, the numbers were changed to facilitate appropriatecodes for the combination locks, but the puzzles followed the storyline. The six course conceptscovered were moment envelopes, detailing reinforcement, punching shear, nominal momentcapacity
) identified a significant lack of JEDI-relatedcontent in professional engineering societies, underscoring the urgent need to strengtheneducation in these areas to prepare inclusive and socially committed engineers. Armanios et al.(2021) highlighted how a curricular restructuring led to an increase from 17% to 69% in theincorporation of social justice concepts in students' final reflections, demonstrating the ability toinclude the social impact of engineering decisions. Similarly, Hess et al. (2024) emphasized theconnections between ethics and DEI, identifying the need to integrate and unify strategies thatenable engineering students to address both the social and technical aspects of their profession.Finally, Gupta, Talluri and Ghosh (2024
ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2025, American Society forEngineering EducationIn general, the web provides democratized access to information. Printed materials are onlyavailable to those who have them. AI uses information from the web. AI helps overcomebarriers because it makes the web easier to use, so information is even more democratized.Q9: What challenges or limitations do you foresee in integrating AI into engineeringeducation (e.g., cost, ethical concerns, technical barriers)?All learning should be from basic theory up to application. AI adds one more level of learningthat is required. It is one more thing that must be taught. This adds to the burden of education.There are many ethical concerns. For example, AI will
English), Can. J. High. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 71-88, 2024. [Online]. Available: ://WOS:001267821600006.[11] W. B. Johnson and N. Nelson, "Mentor-protege relationships in graduate training: Some ethical concerns," (in English), Ethics Behav., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 189-210, 1999, doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0903_1.[12] A. M. Snyder and J. R. Hartwell, "Development and Evaluation of an Experiential Career Planning Assignment to Train Students to Assess Organizational Fit," (in English), J. Vet. Med. Educ., ; Early Access p. 11, 2023 Jan 2023, doi: 10.3138/jvme-2022-0095.[13] J. H. L. Koh, "Designing and integrating reusable learning objects for meaningful learning: Cases from a graduate programme," (in English
useof “everyday morality” is an extension of the “ethics” Lambek speaks to above, but it drawsattention to a specific set of “moral questioning and actions” that ethnographers can contributeinsights on through their ethnographic products, but not solve. The artifact-focused curriculumdesign presented here represents this line of thinking and anthropological engagement withengineering and related building processes. The AlaskaCraft game situates its creators andplayers in a design setting that requires seeking information from many sources to design homesappropriate to geographical and sociocultural contexts in remote Alaskan communities, whichvary widely across the region. The students who designed the game collaboratively researchedreal-world
to leadership roles [7]. Similarly,minority groups face systemic obstacles, including cultural biases and a lack of role models,which hinder career progression [8]. As a result, as the construction sector becomes increasinglyglobalized and complex, the need for DEI has grown, not only for ethical reasons but also todrive innovation and problem-solving [9].To address these systemic issues, higher education institutions play a crucial role in shaping thefuture workforce of the construction industry. Many universities have implemented initiatives toaddress enrollment gaps and foster inclusive learning environments. For example, programsaimed at increasing minority student participation in STEM fields have improved retention andgraduation rates