, Operations Research, high performance computing, and visualization in improving educational systems and students’ learning. Dr. Darabi’s research has been funded by federal and corporate sponsors including the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety.Dr. Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr Jenny Amos is a Teaching Professor in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is an AIMBE Fellow, BMES Fellow, ABET Commissioner and Executive Committee Member, two-time Fulbright Specialist in engineering education. Amos has over a decade’s worth of experience leading curriculum reform implementing robust assessment strategies at
Instruments, Dallas, between 2011 and 2012. He was a Member of Technical Staff, IC Design at Maxim Integrated, San Diego, CA, between 2012 and 2016, and a Staff Engineer at Qualcomm, Tempe, AZ, between 2016 and 2019. In 2019, he joined the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Oklahoma State University, where he is currently an assistant professor and Jack H. Graham Endowed Fellow of Engineering. His research interests include power management IC design, hardware security, and energy-efficient computing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 What Does it Take to Implement a Semiconductor Curriculum in High School? True Challenges and The Teachers
curriculumsuitable for high school physics classrooms. This paper gives an overview of a curricularintervention, mixed methods research study, and analysis of a four-day soft robotics curriculumthat introduces the field, technical concepts, and allows for student experimentation and design.We employed a mixed methods research design to understand how the curriculum broadenedstudents’ understanding of engineering, their STEM identities, and career interest. Data analysisaims to uncover what students learned about the discipline of soft robotics, and how theycontextualize the lesson within their understanding of career paths in robotics, and their owninterests. Results to date demonstrate that integrating a soft robotics curriculum in high schoolsmay provide
with a Design-Based Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum In- and Out-of-SequenceChANgE Chem is a curriculum reform model which was created to address the retention ofengineering students taking general chemistry in their first two years as undergraduates [1],[2].Currently, we are using this model to develop a curriculum of laboratory activities called DesignChallenges (Figure 1), which translates the chemistry concepts into contextualized problems andmethods unique to the way engineering students are expected to learn, think and collaborate(Table 1). This new curriculum is designed to maintain student motivation for an engineeringmajor by helping them to better understand the profession and practice [3].Figure 1. Concept design for a
negatively impacted by the appearance of the equip- ment. Therefore, to attract new students to our area, it is important to utilize state-of-the- art and industrial-grade equipment. • At the University of Minnesota, an integrated Electric Energy Systems curriculum has been developed, which follows a top-down, systems-level approach to highlight interrela- tionships between power electronics, electric power systems, and electric machines and drives 15. Specifically, the topic of power electronics is intended to cover both the funda- mentals and practical design in a single-semester course. The experimental part of the course is based on using a pre-fabricated reconfigurable power electronic board called
, Satisfaction (ARCS) model of motivation to design an Internet-of-Thingsthemed curriculum for CS students in grades 9-12. The ARCS framework is used as aconceptual framework to unpack high school students’ motivational influences inengineering/computer science project-based learning via a series of focus groups. Using theinsights obtained from First and Second cycle coding based qualitative analysis, IoT-basedCS curricular modules that align with Grades 9-12 Computer Science Teachers Association(CSTA) standards were developed. The curricular design centered around creating learner-focused scaffolding in project-based learning environments, improving the relevance of theclassroom content with the real-world context that students have experiences in or
Paper ID #7713Organizing the curriculum: introducing engineering principles through biomed-ically related experiments: Module DevelopmentDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. She ob- tained her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an assistant professor of Chemical Engineering and ad- junct professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Dr. Farrell has made significant contributions to engineering education
innovation integration [6]–[8], service learning [9], orentrepreneurship [4], [10], [11]. The objective of the workshop was to examine the implementation of anexploration and design (E&D) project on new interventions or strategies and provide guidance on ways toaddress potential challenges to curriculum redesign toward the adoption of service learning and socialinnovation in an engineering curriculum. In other words, the frame of inquiry of the workshop can besummarized by a design question: how might we improve student engagement in engineering education bythe adoption of service learning and social innovation learning opportunities?It is imperative to understand the differences across the varieties of existing approaches to increase
USRPcontrol.The integrated system was demonstrated at the senior design fair in May 2010, to successfullyreceive from several FM radio stations. In fact, this project is more challenging than the FMradio lab that will be described in the next Section, since it also involves antenna design andembedded system design. The team completed the project independently and the demonstrationat the May 2010 senior design fair was quite successful. This senior design project clearly testedthe feasibility of the proposed SDR lab and other SDR-related curriculum enhancements forundergraduate students.SDR Term Projects for ELEC 3400—Communication SystemsIn addition to exposing undergraduate students to the modern radio engineering approach, theproposed SDR experiments
(depending upon variable) a total 71 to 73 ratings could be paired across twosemesters. On average across both semesters, relative to pre instruction, students rated all areashigher at post instruction, with five variables rated significantly higher on average. Thesevariables included: (a) Encouraged to be Flexible, t(1, 72) = (-2.08), p < 0.041; (b) Encouragedto Problem Solve, t(1, 72) = (-2.08), p < 0.041; (c) Encouraged to Integrate OutsideMaterials/Knowledge, t(1, 72) = (-2.00), p < 0.049; (d) Encouraged to Use Analysis, t(1, 72) = (-2.48), p < 0.016; and (e) Can Use Synthesis, t(1, 71) = -2.22, p < 0.030 (see Table 10).In the Reactor Design (both semesters) and Mass Transfer (one semester) courses, an integrationactivity was
Page 24.458.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Effectively engaging engineers in ethical reasoning about emerging technologies: A cyber-enabled framework of scaffolded, integrated, and reflexive analysis of casesAbstract: Training future engineers to effectively handle ethical dilemmas they will encounterin developing and implementing new technology is a critical and relevant challenge for a nationthat is advancing science and engineering technologies at an ever increasing rate. Each yearthousands of new engineers join the workforce and face novel issues raised by radicaltechnological advances. Concurrently, changing societal responses to new technologies
andexperiment with real wireless waveforms and applications.In this paper, we report our experience on the development of an SDR laboratory course at theundergraduate level to enhance the Bachelor of Wireless Engineering (BWE) curriculum atAuburn University, an ABET-accredited program and first-of-its-kind in the US. With the 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 200 Broun Hall, AuburnUniversity, Auburn AL 36849-5201, smao@ieee.org 2 Network Appliance, 800 Cranberry Woods Drive Suite 400, Cranberry Township, PA 16066,yzh0002@tigermail.auburn.edu 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 200 Broun Hall, Auburn
existing curriculum constraints. In particular, teachers found that the NextGeneration Science Standards [1] practice of “computational thinking” was the best lens fordeveloping their aligned big data instruction. After exploring a taxonomy of computationalthinking in mathematics and science [2], the teachers collectively eventually settled on a core setof four computational thinking skills [3] most likely to be productive for their teaching focus;algorithmic thinking, decomposition, abstraction, and pattern recognition. This paper reports onthe variety of connections teachers developed with the practice of computational thinking, fromdata clustering as an active practice for simulating early generation of the periodic table in achemistry class
Paper ID #25402Board 4: Leveraging Undergraduate Curriculum Reform to Impact Gradu-ate Education: a Case StudyDr. Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr Amos joined the Bioengineering Department at the University of Illinois in 2009 and is currently a Teaching Associate Professor in Bioengineering and an Adjunct Associate Professor in Educational Psychology. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at Texas Tech and Ph.D. in Chemical En- gineering from University of South Carolina. She completed a Fulbright Program at Ecole Centrale de Lille in France to benchmark and help create a new hybrid
Engineers. In his fi- nal year of academia, Nicholas worked with Professor Kaw as an undergraduate research and learning assistant for a numerical methods course to study the effectiveness of flipped classrooms with adaptive learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating adaptive learning lessons in a flipped STEM course: development, outcomes, and data analyticsIntroductionThe flipped classroom is currently a popular pedagogy [1] as it is believed to improve studentengagement, create self-regulation of learning, and establish habits for life-long learning [2]. Inaddition, the increased amount of in-class active learning created by the implementation of
University of Memphis Dr. Stephanie Ivey is the Associate Dean for Research with the Herff College of Engineering and a Professor with the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Memphis. She directs the U of Mˆa C™s Southeast Transportation Workforce Center and thDr. Craig O. Stewart, University of Memphis Craig O. Stewart (PhD, Carnegie Mellon University) is an associate professor of communication at the University of Memphis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Implementing the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Model at a Public Urban Research University in the Southeastern United StatesUnderproduction, low retention, and lack of diversity in STEM disciplines
, and a MEd degree in Instructional Systems Design Technology from Sam Houston State University. He is currently the General Chemistry Laboratory Coordinator at Sam Houston State University and has an interest in online and hybrid instruction. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integration of research-based strategies and instructional design: creating significant learning experiences in a chemistry bridge courseIntroductionBridge courses are often designed to provide undergraduate students with learning experiences toremediate pitfalls in understanding or facilitating the practice of essential skills related to specificcontent
process, also known as Genchi Gembutsu (or “go and see”), is an integral part of the PDCA problem solving. It requires that the teams gather data at the source of the problem while brainstorming in a structured way such as using tools like fishbone diagrams, decision trees or the 5 Why’s. This module ends with the team debriefing to the rest of the class on their A3 document from problem definition up to their proposed countermeasure plan. Then the teams go through the activity again per their proposed countermeasure known as implementation plan (step 6) to confirm the result (step 7). If the result is a success, then the standardize/control concept (step 8) is briefly discussed. Module 3 (session C): During the third
Paper ID #23803Increasing Impact of the Hidden Curriculum: Exploring Student Outcomesfrom Out-of-Class ActivitiesDr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Con- struction and in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engi- neering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. She has over 10 years of experience working for energy companies and
otherwise leave STEM majors due to lack of engagement and/or motivation1. Despitegrowing interest, many universities struggle with how to best update engineering curriculum andovercome barriers to adequately merge and teach new concepts, like sustainability, in an alreadyfull curriculum2,3.Two methods for integrating sustainability into engineering curriculum predominate theliterature; these methods have been generalized as a stand-alone course-based method and amodular-based method. In the stand-alone course-based method, an engineering programestablishes one or two distinct, stand-alone courses into the students’ curriculum that focus onsustainability in engineering. In the modular-based method, engineering programs integratesustainability
. Demonstrate proficiency in use of quality assurance methods and quality control concepts. 6.0. Demonstrate proficiency in using tools, instruments, and testing devices. 7.0. Demonstrate basic troubleshooting skills. 8.0. Demonstrate appropriate communication skills. 9.0. Demonstrate appropriate math skills. 10.0. Demonstrate an understanding of modern business practices and strategies. 11.0. Demonstrate employability skills and identify career opportunities.The full framework including all of the specialization outcomes is available in the appendix andalso at https://www.fldoe.org/academics/career-adult-edu/career-tech-edu/curriculum-frameworks/2022-23-frameworks/manufacturing.stmlAdjusting Standards to Meet the Skills GapThis project emerged from
Paper ID #27251Board 69: Integrating Computational Thinking, Engineering Design, andEnvironmental Science through Smart GreenhousesDavid W Jackson, Boston College, Lasell College, and Waltham (MA) Public Schools David W. Jackson is a PhD student in Curriculum & Instruction at Boston College, an Adjunct Professor with Lasell College, and an After-School STEM Coordinator with Waltham (MA) Public Schools.Helen Zhang, Boston College Helen Zhang is a senior research associate working at the Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Her research interest includes science education, design thinking, and learning from failure.Prof
. She is the Principal Investigator in a multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional research project, NSF EFRI-Barriers, Under- standing, Integration – Life cycle Development (BUILD). She has worked in the sustainable engineering arena since 2004. As the assistant director of education outreach in the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Pitt’s center for green design, she translates research to community outreach programs and develops sustainable engineering programs for K-12 education.Dr. Elizabeth A Adams, Mesa Community CollegeProf. Mikhail Chester, Arizona State UniversityProf. Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University Kristen Parrish is an Assistant Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the
(big data), and connecting to the Internet to allow for theexchange of data. As smart products become ubiquitous, they provide enormous opportunities forscientists and engineers to invent new products and build interconnected systems of vast scale. Asa result, the STEM workforce demands are shifting rapidly. Mechanical engineers will play asignificant role in innovating and designing smart products and manufacturing systems of theIndustry 4.0 revolution. However, the current mechanical engineering curriculum has not keptpace. In this paper, we present an overview of a new curriculum along with the design of aninexpensive smart flowerpot device that was used as an instructional tool throughout thecurriculum. We provide details about how two
curriculum design and development targetingprofessionals, undergraduates and community college students interested in advancing theirskills in data science in the context of Industry 4.0 and intelligent manufacturing. The projectteam has accomplished several main tasks towards the goals of the project in Year 1, to bedetailed in this paper.IntroductionNortheastern University (NU), in collaboration with three Manufacturing USA Institutes,proposes to build an Integrative Manufacturing and Production Engineering Educationleveraging Data Science (IMPEL) Program to address the current and projected skills gap inmanufacturing which is anticipated to leave an estimated 2.4 million manufacturing positionsunfilled between 2018 and 2028 [1]. This skill gap is
PBLis an appropriate strategy for teaching students to engage in complex problem solving, andindeed may be one of the only effective methods for doing so (Shepherd and Cosgrif, 1998,Tomkinson et al., 2008). The vertically-integrated problem-based learning (PBL) frameworkdeveloped in the course of this TUES project provides undergraduate students with bothknowledge and tools needed to address urban sustainability issues in their future careers, whetherin industry or academe. This framework is replicable and can thus be deployed acrossuniversities as part of the CCEM curriculum. In this TUES project, the researchers develop a problem-based learning framework that (1)introduces sustainability earlier in the undergraduate curriculum, and (2
, Cleveland State University Dr. Karla Hamlen is an Associate Professor of Educational Research in the Department of Curriculum and Foundations. She specializes in educational research relating to both formal and informal entertainment technology use among students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Simple SoC (System on a Chip) Platform for the Integrated Computer Engineering Lab Framework1. Introduction A “spiral” lab framework is developed for the computer engineering curriculum. It ismotivated by a study from the Carnegie Foundation [6], which recommends a “spiral model” toenhance the integration skills and to provide more effective learning
engineering profession to think more rigorously about sustainability and theenvironment. A growing number of academics and professionals in CCEM infuse sustainabilityprinciples, including alternative energy, energy efficiency, and others, into their research.Sustainability is generally taught in upper-level classes, yet lower-level classes may includesome supplemental sustainability course. Although undergraduate students may have an interestin sustainability, their exposure to it comes later in their educational curriculum [3]. Sustainability has been identified as a “wicked problem” [4, 6], unstructured and thusdifficult to model, with multiple interconnected and integrated aspects that spans policy domainsand levels of government. Research
education, her research interests include engineering education, particularly as related to systems thinking, organizational cultures, professional identity devel- opment, and supporting the success and ideas of underrepresented students within engineering.Mrs. Javiera Espinoza von Bischhoffshausen, University of Michigan Javiera Espinoza von Bischhoffshausen is a Master’s student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She has a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaiso (PUCV), Chile (2012). Before pursuing her M.A. in Higher Education, Javiera had an appointment at the College of Engineering at PUCV in the engineering
students within COSE, which supplied the funding for this study.BackgroundTheoretical FrameworkThe framework of Astin’s, Swail’s, and Tinto’s models are, in their simplest interpretation, aboutstudent involvement in their chosen college and program. Astin’s involvement model shows thatthe academic performance of a student is directly correlated to their involvement level within theircollege or program [2, 3]. Tinto theorizes that poor integration into the many facets of college life,including academically and socially, is an early indication of a student having a higher risk ofdropping out [4-6]. Finally, Swail et al.’s analysis of minority retention in institutions of higherlearning yields the Geometric Model of Student Persistence and