focus (right in Figure 1) is referred to as inductivelearning12. - Deductive: In a deductive classroom, the teacher conducts lessons by introducing and explaining concepts to students, and then expecting students to complete tasks to practice the concepts. The students should demonstrate that they have understood the concepts by repeating what the teacher just told or did. - Inductive: In an inductive classroom, the teacher presents or exposes the students to examples that show how the concept is used. The intent is for students to “notice”, by reflecting around the examples, how the concept works. The students should demonstrate that they have understood by re-inventing the concepts based on their own
“CurriculumGuidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Engineering,” also known asCE2004. The presenters are members of the steering committee leading production of the new“CE2016” document and represent the ACM and the IEEE Computer Society (IEEE-CS). Theywill summarize the new and refactored areas, discuss the additional focus on learning outcomes,and engage participants on ways of improving the report so that it reflects the state-of-the-art ofcomputer engineering education and practice that is relevant for the coming decade.GoalsThe goals of this session are to present the work of the CE2016 steering committee, to solicitsuggestions for improvement through audience participation, and to share results with theprofessional community.Session
can be conducted in class, online or a combination of both. Inthe discussion question shown in Appendix A for the Cost of Production module, the instructorposes an open-ended problem with a clearly stated learning objective. Students are required torespond with an initial post that outlines their planning solution in response to the problemposted. Each student will review the initial responses from peers and reflect on their solution tothe problem. Finally, everyone must respond to the posts and comment on at least two otherposts in the follow-up discussion. Students are requested to follow netiquette protocol and extendan observation or comment on an insight they did not consider.Description of Select Modules The online modules target
designed with the help of contemporaryunderstandings of effective instruction methods (e.g. table 1 below), also relying extensivelyon available mechanical design texts such as Dieter & Schmidt.7Table 1: Instructional practices that create effective learning experiences8Affective • Arouse interest to students of contrasting abilities and goals • Provide stimulating, interesting, and varied assignments that are within the range of students abilities but challenge them to reach for the top of that range • Make connections to students interests and intended careersMeta-cognitive • Build self-regulative abilities by explicitly teaching students about them • Promote reflection to enhance attention to meta-cognitive
learning styles and levels of motivation. Both modules begin with an instrument(learning style inventory or motivation questionnaire), then a tutorial that gives students a firsthand experience of the influence of learning style or motivation, then questions of understanding,then a tutorial about learning style or motivation strategies, then reflection questions, and finallyan evaluation of the module.Learning Styles Module The learning styles module begins with a Barsch learning styleinventory2. This module creates the “first hand experience” by asking students to learn materialthat is presented in different learning styles. It presents tutorials on mitosis and Punnett squares
or service-learning but these are not often connectedto the engineering, math or science. Linking these offers a multitude of opportunities to changethe conversation about STEM, engage the next generation of leaders and make our owncommunities a better place to live. It can also impact the diversity in our classrooms. Thisinteractive workshop engages participants in developing a plan for linking service-learning andSTEM. The Learning Objectives are:1: Describe at least 1 STEM community project2: List at least 3 standards that could be enhanced through service-learning3: Describe how to use reflection to enhance learning4: Describe at least 3 examples of engineering service-learning
applied, transformative, purposive knowledge and growth.51, 52Because professionalization is also an important goal in engineering education, our listculminates with several goals that build from affective, ethical, and cognitive foundations to themore specific abilities we expect of graduating engineering students. Each student and program instructor will be able to 1. recognize in context, discuss, and demonstrate attitudes, behaviors and personal reflection about their rights and responsibilities to themselves, others, society, and the natural world 2. recognize in context, discuss, and demonstrate attitudes, behaviors and personal reflection about their habits and growth, as well as others’, and the implications of
. Off the six groups in the class, only two did a complete analysis of the water balloon drop incorporating both the physical device and video footage. While all groups tested their devices and redesigned them for second and third attempts, it was a little disappointing to see only two groups actually incorporate the video footage into their design recursion process. For instance, the group “Team Six” used the video footage from the first drop to see how the balloon actually broke. One member of Team Six, reflected on this process saying “the high speed camera was extremely useful in the process of designing the
” were structured to encouragestudents to reflect, respond, and share new ideas. Early topics introduced different designaesthetics and covered broad background, such as the theory of design, a historical approach todesign, or how design paralleled art in the 20th century. Other class sessions explored theaesthetic properties of styles from Romanticism and Gothic Revival to current trends like 8-bitand steampunk. Case studies from art, industrial design, architecture, music, and engineeringincluded successful designs such as the Treepodb, Philips Pavillionc, Piaggio Vespad, BoxAppetite, REMLshelff, Paipei 101g, Soccketh, Zendrumi, Oyster Pailj, London Telephone Boothk,John Deere Tractorl, and the Apple IIm.a Two of the six Flow Vis assignments
-up,educational goals, challenges and opportunities. In Part II, we then move on to a closer look atthe technical design of the project. Finally, in Part III, we revisit the educational goals set out atthe outset, make a reflective assessment of the experience, and propose insights andrecommendations for instructors working with similar experiences or sets of challenges. Page 26.468.2Part I: Educational Goals, Challenges, and OpportunitiesBefore diving more deeply into reviewing the educational goals, it would be important to explorethe background of the institution and other contextual matters that scaffolded the experience.The project was
and varying models have been developed. For example, Crismond and Adams5present a robust matrix illustrating the design learning trajectories of K-16 students. Their matrixderives from existing literature and explores nine design strategies, from “understanding thechallenge” to “reflecting on the process.” Compared to beginners, informed designers aredescribed as continual learners who work creatively and make decisions based on their skills andknowledge. Similarly, Cross10 compares the behaviors of expert and novice engineeringdesigners. For instance, when solving a problem, expert designers focus on “breadth-first Page 26.1131.3approaches
answer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help graduate students and leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping, to prototyping some more - and to delivery. Barbara likes to paint pictures.Mr. Ville Mikael Taajamaa, University of Turku Ville M. Taajamaa, MSc (TECH) is in his fourth year of Ph.D studies focusing on engineering education reform. The main focus in the action based research is to create a new model for global interdisciplinary engineering education: O-CDIO where emphasis is more in the
Page 26.844.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 High School Engineering Class: From Wood Shop to Advanced Manufacturing (Evaluation)AbstractThe maker movements, a general term for the rise of inventing, designing, and tinkering, and theaddition of engineering standards to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) havespawned a major evolution in technology classes throughout the country. At Georgia Institute ofTechnology, a new curriculum attempts to bring the maker movement to high school audiencesthrough both curricular and extra-curricular channels. The curriculum is structured aroundengineering standards and learning goals that reflect design and advanced
seek to bring about change – helps us understand the different ways in which peoplesolve problems individually and as part of a team. When team members’ cognitive styles arediverse, creating an effect known as cognitive gap, the team may experience the advantages ofapproaching problems in diverse ways, but the likelihood of conflicts and misunderstandingsincreases6.This study investigated the relationship between cognitive style and the perceptions of studentsworking in teams about their own ideation. Through the analysis of reflection surveys from 202pre-engineering, engineering, and design students participating in an ideation study, we exploredthe following questions: (1) how does working in teams impact students' perceptions of theirown
, reflective observation,abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation framework of Kolb’s experiential learningparadigm. It is anticipated the paper will serve as a reference document for those experiencingsimilar issues with small UAV based aerial imaging efforts.Project based Interactive and Experiential LearningIn order to aid in the differentiation of learning activities Chi [1] proposed a taxonomy forclassification of active, constructive, interactive. Active learning activities have been defined asdoing something physically. Constructive learning activities include the overt actions ofhypothesis generation, explanation and elaboration, planning and prediction of outcomes, as wellas integration and synthesis of concepts. Cognitively
serve community interests and to developcareer awareness. Lima1 describes key components of service-learning as: service for thecommon good, academic content, reciprocity, mutual learning, and reflection. Thus, effectivelearning can be accomplished through action, interaction, and reflection.Research has shown that well-designed service-learning experiences have a positive impact onlearning and developmental outcomes for students2,3,4. Astin et al (2000) provides acomprehensive study that shows participation in service positively impacts student academicperformance, self-efficacy, leadership, choice of career, and service participation aftergraduation3. Their report indicates that the positive effects of service-learning are strongly
. Interestingly,the importance of evaluation to successful management of a construction project is very similarto the importance of self-evaluation to students’ academic success, especially during their firstyear of college7.During their first year of college, students are faced with many changes that they are often notequipped to handle2. Students’ academic success often depends on how successfully and quicklythey learn to navigate these changes during their first year of college6,8. The development of self-reflections skills has been identified as a significant contributor to both their academic andprofessional success7. However, it is often assumed that students will learn these skills while incollege and that no specific instruction is needed in this
Theory (ELT). Experiential learning was introduced byJohn Dewey in 1938, and later refined by Kurt Lewin and David Kolb. Dewey describedlearning as a process of participating in an activity, reflecting on that experience and later usingthe conclusions when doing other activities.3 Lewin, a social psychologist, believed that thechallenge of modern education was how to implement “concrete experience” based on Dewey’sprocess.4 Kolb unified the process in 1984 as the “Experiential Learning Cycle”, which connectsthe four actions of learning.4 Kolb’s cycle depicts experience explained by reflection, reflectioncreating new concepts, and new concepts used to plan new experiences. He refers to the cycle asconcrete experience (CE), reflective observation
eye ailments, checking blood pressure and heart rythyms, administring first aid, and offering medical advice. 2,3The teams of students visiting since 2008 have noted the hospitality of the Ghanaian people andtheir willingness to accept them into their homes and villages. Many students reflected on themutual respect that they shared with those they encountered; as the 2014 team described theirexperience, they said “we also owe a lot of our success and happiness to our new friends we metalong the way in Ghana… [They] helped transform Ghana [for us] from a place to do someprojects into a second home.” 4 This team undoubtedly experienced the importance ofinterpersonal relationships and their strength in accomplishing the teams
. Integrated class experience refers to an at-home effort that includes activities that range from education in the language, customs, history, and government of the country in question. (Downey et al.2)This paper describes the evolution of an international collaboration between the University ofCalgary (UCalgary) in Alberta, Canada and Shantou University (STU) in Guangdong Province,China. The collaboration is best described as a hybrid between International enrolment,International project, and International field trip. The paper begins with a history of theprogram. Next is a description of how Transformative Reflection was used to help the programevolve. This section is followed by how the program and workspaces have evolved from year
first course. Results of thisqualitative assessment were analyzed using a rubric developed to measure growth in perceptionsand attitudes. In addition, students wrote reflection papers about practical leadershipexperiences during their industry internships, using the guiding principles and themes of theprogram to illustrate what they learned. Students also synthesized their observations of industryleaders after shadowing each of two C-Level leaders.Early results from assessments conducted after the first year in the program indicate students aredeveloping significant self-awareness, building life-long skills and habits that will serve themwell as they assume greater leadership responsibility. Early results also indicate the necessity ofcreating
how it can be represented in a particularengineering discipline (Stages 1-3). Students then learn technical skills that can be applied to areal-world data derived from that same GC (Stages 4-5). Students end by reflecting on the skillsrequired for their problem solving and the relevance of those skills to other aspects of the GC(Stage 6). More details about each stage are provided in the following sections.Stage 1: Multi-Disciplinary Overview. The course instructor provides an overview of a GCtheme, often incorporating information from outside engineering (e.g., a guest technical expertfrom another field; general-interest or political/economic assignments; an in-class debate). Thisoverview (and the interactions with students) provides the
leading STEMeducation transformation by capitalizing on and challenging organizational norms to facilitateand secure meaningful change.9,10 We intend to foster co-establishment of new routines towardsSTEM education improvement that build on and attend to the social resources within theinstitution11 by uniting those possessing pertinent pedagogical and content knowledge and skillsand those with typical administrative power via a distributed leadership model.12 Our intent is tofoster a continuously growing “choir” that can enact and sustain change through their work atvarious organizational levels and structures via emergent change strategies to create reflective
bereplaced by new and scientifically correct ones. Most importantly, learners’ naive theories needto be taken into account. Some strategies therefore begin by triggering the learners’ priorconceptions and allowing them to reflect on their thinking. Next, students are provided withcontrasting evidence to generate a contradiction to their former naïve theories. In essence, theconceptual change framework suggests inducing a cognitive conflict between an individual’sideas and contrasting evidence.Research has shown that in science such instructional strategies are effective in changingstudents’ ideas. For example, Hake6 showed that student-centered learning methods improveconceptual understanding more than traditional learning methods. In this manner
engineering education.Dr. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Dr. Sattler is a Research Scientist for the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) and a Multi-Campus Coordinator for the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE) at the University of Washington. Her research interests include understanding and promoting self-authoring engineers.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Page 26.1783.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 “I realized that I myself am on the path to being a pioneer”: Characterizing the
components of a SHPB. The main four components are the Striker,Incident bar (Input bar), Transmitter bar (Output bar) and Specimen. The specimen is placedbetween the incident and transmitter bar. The striker acts as a projectile applying a high impactforce on one end of the incident bar creating a compressive stress wave. The wave propagates ina uniaxial direction into the incident bar reaching the interface of the incident bar and specimen.A part of the wave reflects back as a tensile wave traveling in the incident bar while the restcontinues to propagate into the transmitter bar as a stress wave. Striker Incident bar Specimen Transmitter bar Figure 1- Schematic of Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB
insights not only into what engineering students gain fromHumanities immersion, but also what their engineering approaches may bring to this field.BackgroundLast year, these approaches were studied more formally through a paper delivered in a science and theatrepanel at a theatre studies conference, a setting that provided insights from scholars on the other side of thescience/theatre divide. This study used Kolb’s learning styles inventory as its theoretical framework toanalyze specific behaviours and strategies found in the Representing Science on Stage classroom. Kolbclassifies learners along two basic dimensions of abstract-concrete and active-reflective learningto generate four general profiles: the converger, diverger, assilimator and
. Page 26.1141.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Measuring the Effects of Pre-College Engineering ExperiencesAbstractThe implementation of co-curricular and extracurricular pre-college engineering programs hasexpanded dramatically in recent years. Many states now include engineering as part of theireducation standards for both students and teachers, reflecting the increasing acceptance ofengineering at the K-12 level and its potential value to students. In addition to promotingoutcomes that benefit all students regardless of career aspirations such as increased math andscience achievement and greater technological literacy, K-12 engineering programs have beenidentified as a means of
be reflected in the different types of resourcesprevalent within these “worlds.” The research described in this paper aims to deepen insight ofengineering concept representation, description, and usage in academia and practice (i.e. theworkplace).Two specific issues guided the use of roundabout design as the medium for analyzing conceptuse, representation, and description: 1) roundabouts are specific transportation design facilities emerging in use and design within the United States, and 2) the design of roundabouts served as the larger context for an ongoing case study exploring concept use, representation, and interpretation in engineering activity and interactions.The application of roundabouts as a
Paper ID #12492Exploring Ethical Validation as a Key Consideration in Interpretive ResearchQualityDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in