Research- Engineering Empathetic Engineers (E^3): Effects of the humanities on engineers' critical thinking and empathy skillsKeywords: Discourse Analysis, Interdisciplinary, Team Teaching, Post-secondary EducationTraditional disciplinary silos have separated engineering and the humanities, creating gaps inengineering students’ skills. Technical knowledge and aptitude have long been a mainstay inengineering education, whereas critical thinking, empathy, and ethical reasoning have been keyin the humanities. In an ever complex and interrelated world, society's grand challenges call forproblem-solving that provides technical innovations while considering and understanding thepeople involved and affected by that innovation. A holistic
syllabi and learning management system data was assembled into codes.Table 1. Original Course Change Typology dimensions and descriptions Dimension Description Significant Learning Degree of focus on engineering domain learning: ABET 1 (problem - Technical solving; STEM principles), 2 (design) and/or 6 (experimentation & data) Significant Learning Evidence of addressing professional skills development: ABET 3 - Professional (communication), 4 (ethics), 5 (teaming, leadership), or 7 (learning strategies) via course grade or course activity Significant Learning Evidence of bringing together technical and professional outcomes - Integration
training, andstatistics and statistical analysis of the data. While these undergraduate research methods are not as broadly available in the hardsciences and engineering, some are being offered.[6-8] Topics to improve the researchexperience are also starting to be incorporated into summer research experiences forundergraduates (REUs).[9] In contrast, similar research methods courses for graduate studentsare becoming more common and are broadly offered.[10-12] In contrast to the social sciencecourses, the graduate courses in engineering typically include such content as literature searches,reading the literature, delivering presentations, scientific method, research ethics, proposalwriting (including a research plan), patents, copyrights
apprenticeship related to clinicaljudgment and practice; and c) an apprenticeship to the ethical component of behavior ofthe profession.8 Interestingly, what is significantly different among the professions ofnursing and engineering is the degree to which students on their way to becomingpractitioners demonstrate an ability to empathize with others. A comprehensive study of1,872 undergraduate students enrolled at a large Midwestern U.S. research-universityidentified that nursing students have a significantly higher degree of empathy for othersas compared to students in a variety of other disciplines, including engineering.9This current study hinges upon the hypothesis that nursing theory provides a frameworkfor engineers from multiple disciplines to
literature that establishes the state-of-theart in liberal education for engineers, the aims of the research and analysis presented here aremore modest: to provide an initial sketch of the intellectual common ground of LEES and toassess the extent to which the fears and aspirations outlined above have been realized.After describing the approach used to analyze the corpus of work presented at the 2018 AnnualConference, this paper identifies 4 themes that constitute the intellectual common ground of andpossible future directions for research in LEES: (1) integration, (2) diversity and inclusion, (3)communication, and (4) the LEES-STS-engineering ethics relationship. Because these themesoverlap, a final section of the paper is devoted to papers that
civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data; design a system, component, or process in at least two more than one civil engineering contexts; include principles of sustainability in design; explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership; analyze issues in professional ethics; and explain the importance of professional licensure.Understanding the Proposed CriteriaThis section is intended to provide both civil engineering program faculty and programevaluators an improved understanding of the new Civil Engineering Program Criteria. Thefollowing is based largely on the draft new commentary7 and provides a summary of both“what” is intended by each criterion and “why” the provision is
. Jackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, stressed theimportance of leadership education for engineers and engineering technologists. A few ofthe many “soft skills” in which Dr. Jackson focused was leadership, ethics, teamwork,integrity, appreciation of diversity, the value of cooperation and respect for others, andthe ability to gain a wider and broader perspective. Norman Augustine, in 1994, coinedthe term, “Socioengineering” to describe the combination of the contextual and processskills with the elements of traditional engineering education needed for the twenty-firstcentury This paper will focus on ABET Accreditation and how it has expanded inrecognizing “socioengineering” by including soft skills, or professional skills, in
to identify, formulate, and solve (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems engineering problems (through “brain-teasers”) (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility* (g) an ability to communicate effectively* (g) an ability to communicate effectively* (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global
understand how the secondary experienceand knowledge modulated their ability to adapt, cultivate purpose, understand engineeringconcepts, and academic goals.This paper presents a study investigating the effectiveness of an innovative Holistic Engineeringpedagogy for secondary and postsecondary engineering students that includes a novel HolisticDesign Thinking methodology. The approach emphasizes a holistic and transdisciplinaryphilosophy to engineering education, beginning with a foundation of knowledge on love,empathy, and ethics, and with a focus on engaging students’ emotions in the learning process.The paper reports eight years of qualitative results in teaching this experiential pedagogy tosecondary and postsecondary engineering students, with
contrast with undergraduate courses, research methodscourses for graduate students are becoming more common.[9-11] Compared to the socialsciences courses, the graduate engineering courses include such content as deliveringpresentations, scientific methods, research ethics, proposal writing, literature searchers, andreading the literature. Since these topics match up well with the research requirements ofundergraduate students, many similar topics would also complement an undergraduate researchcourse in engineering and hard sciences. In the current apprenticeship model of undergraduateresearch, the student simply goes to work in the laboratory. The strength of this model is thetraditional reliance on one-on-one mentoring between the faculty and
literature; g) an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development; h) an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities, including a respect for diversity; and i) a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement. 5Criterion 3. Bachelor’s Degree a) an ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities; b) an ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to
the M.I.T. Wood’s Hole Joint Program, and her Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Johns Hopkins University. She has two children, aged 3 and 7. Page 11.687.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Hold Paramount: Designing an Engineering Education to Open Minds and Serve the Public Good Engineering and Public Policy Division ABSTRACT The NSPE Code of Ethics states engineers “shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the
AC 2011-884: GULF COAST OIL SPILL INSTRUCTION AT TUSKEGEEUNIVERSITYTamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee UniversityNadar Vahdat, Tuskegee University Dr. Vahdat is the head and professor of Chemical Engineering at Tuskegee University. His research area includes carbon capture and storage, adsorption, and transport properties of polymers. He has been one of the instructors for a new course in engineering ethics that is offered to all the engineering majors at Tuskegee University. Page 22.764.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Gulf Coast Oil Spill Instruction at Tuskegee
Page 6.57.2 Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationupperclassmen and leaders of engineering organizations. Representatives from EngineeringTribunal (an engineering college service organization), Tau Beta Pi (engineering honorarysociety), Eta Kappa Nu (ECE honorary society), two engineering fraternities (one of which is co-ed), Bearcast (internet radio broadcast club), the National Society of Black Engineers, the Societyof Women Engineers, and the Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers participated in thediscussions.The lecture portion of the class devotes a week to discussion of engineering ethics, with particularfocus on workplace ethics (since all of our students co-op) and ECE case
mandates from ABET are the following three.♦ an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility♦ the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context♦ a knowledge of contemporary issuesFor engineering programs that include the word “environmental” in their title, ABET mandatesthe following goals, among otohers.♦ knowledge of fundamental concepts of waste minimization and pollution prevention♦ understanding of the roles and responsibilities of public institutions and private organizations in environmental management♦ capability to apply environmental systems and process modeling techniques.Clearly there is new interest and stimulus to apply technology to saving the
recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning, i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.Only about half of the eleven criteria apply to technical mastery: all others cover “softskills” (i.e., creativity, communication, teamwork, problem-solving, life-long learning,and appreciation for diversity).Similarly, the Association of Technology, Management and Applied Engineering(ATMAE, formerly known as NAIT)4 also considers non-technical skills or professionalskills. In its standards for
countries and between genders, with statistically significant differences betweenstudents from Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, and South Africa (Whitely, 1999).Like other professions, lack of ethics or improper implementation of ethics is becomingwidespread problems among all professions including architecture, engineering and construction(AEC). It can be due to widespread availability of materials through web and/or lack ofunderstanding the importance of ethics as a professional responsibility (Banik, 2010). There canbe many reasons for student cheats including due to the poor preparation of faculty for the classand/or can be inadequate academic preparation of students. In a recent survey commissioned byKnowledge Ventures, an
surveys, notable changes are observed on improving the students’ communication skills,both spoken (26% increase) and written (21.6% increase), as well as improving collaborationwith peers who possess complementary skill sets (17.7% increase). These exercises not onlyimproved the students’ understanding of the technical content but also fostered the developmentof problem-solving skills, critical thinking, creativity, innovation, ethics, and professionalism.Consequently, this PBL-EML approach enhanced students’ preparedness for the workforce.IntroductionTechnical proficiency has long been the hallmark of achievement in undergraduate engineeringeducation. Engineering faculty and programs dedicate countless hours and other resources toeducate the
Paper ID #34988Teaching Social Justice to Engineering StudentsDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities. She also leads STEM outreach activities for
technological solutions that focus heavily onstudents’ technical skills. However, for innovations that create an impact, it is essential tolink this technical knowledge to societal considerations. This paper describes a problem-centered approach towards introducing mechanical engineering students to sustainable,ethical and collaborative innovation, through an analysis of student work and feedbackgathered from a ten-week long pilot conducted as part of a compulsory, Master’s level,academic year-long Mechanical Engineering course.During the pilot, student groups worked on broadly phrased challenges derived from anongoing EU project on developing societal applications for technology, choosing one ofseven challenges ranging from changing rain patterns in
. • Interdisciplinary research: liberal arts education, such as music and design, and engineering education, such• Other activities: as engineering design, programming, and electrical • A TED-like talk presented by faculty members, engineering. • Workshop on applying for graduate studies, • Workshop on different fellowships, • The project result was presented at ASEE 2020 virtual • Workshop on research ethics, conference in the student paper section
ENGR 482 - ETHICS AND ENGINEERING 040 ARCH 249 - SURVEY WORLD ARCH HIS I 050 ARCH 250 - SURVEY WORLD ARCH HIS II 050 Texas A&M University ARCH 350 - HIST/THEOR MOD/CONT ARCH 050 ENDS 101- DESIGN PROCESS 050 ENDS 115 - DESIGN COMM FOUNDATION 050 ARCH 212 - SOCIAL & BEHAV FACT DESN 080 ARCH 458 - CULT ETHICAL GLOBAL PRAC
Paper ID #34487Exploring Values and Norms of Engineering Through Responsible Innova-tionand Critiques of Engineering CulturesDr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster
;related academic support material (business and engineering) is integrated to meet themilestone needs. Every effort is made throughout the program to make the experience asrealistic possible (e.g., Boards of Directors are formed for each of the enterprises andfictitious funding is obtained from real investors). The thrust of the enterprise involves aspectrum of business organizational and operating issues that arise in a business withimportant engineering requirements. Other important issues that confront engineers whenoperating within the business environment are integrated into the cirricula. These issuesinclude such areas as, legal, ethical, environmental, safety and human resources. Beforethe conclusion of the second course, each team must
practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches in Humanitarian Engineering at CSM. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s connections of
focus primarily on mobile applicationdevelopment itself. These students, the makers of the future mobile technology, who areinvolved in app creation – from defining the concept to requirements gathering, to finalimplementation – takes into consideration how the app will work successfully and effectively.However, their design decisions are not always made thinking about how the application willinfluence the user, the community, and the society at large. To address this critical issue, in thispaper, we report our experience with weaving the notion of social and ethical computing whiledesigning and developing an upper-level computer science course on mobile questionnairedevelopment. Our primary course goals were twofold: 1) Teach students the
Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to micro-genetic and socio-cultural models of learning. He has been working on how learners’ emotions are coupled with their conceptual and epistemological reasoning. Lately, he has been interested in engineering design thinking, how engineering students come to understand and practice design, and how engineering students think about ethics and social responsi- bility.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park Chandra Turpen is a research
disciplines ofengineering, but furthermore, to have a balanced education in both technical and non-technicalskills and attributes. “These days, engineering is typically practiced in teams with severalengineers from different disciplines who work with contractors, business people, and sales andmarketing personnel” (Hsu, 2004, p.54). Therefore, in order to get hired, and later on be able tohave a successful long term career engineers need to be trained on human behavior skills so thatthey are able to talk, interact, and work with people from different backgrounds; be worldly; beleaders if the situation calls for it; be ethical; and know how to effectively conduct themselves atprofessional environments. This need for a more broad-based engineering
2 categories: “Engineering Skills” and “Professional in the WorkplaceSkills.”Engineering Skills Professional In the Workplace Skills• (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, • (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary science, and engineering; teams;• (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, • (f) an understanding of professional and ethical as well as to analyze and interpret data; responsibility;• (c) an ability to design a system, component, or • (g) an ability to communicate effectively; process to meet desired needs within realistic • (h) the broad education necessary to understand constraints such as economic
Michigan studying Engineering Education Research under doctoral advisor Aaron Johnson. Her research focuses on weaving macro ethics into existing aerospace engineering curricula and institutional support methods for working class engineering students. Elizabeth earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan in 2019 with foci in Biomedical Engineering and Applied Mathematics.Sabrina Olson, University of MichiganRicardo Elias, California State University, Los Angeles ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Developing Critically-Conscious Aerospace Engineers through Macroethics Curricula: Year 1IntroductionAbsent from the undergraduate aerospace