revealed that students developed a considerable degree of spatialthinking throughout the course of the semester when compared with undergraduate students inother disciplines [8]. Similar to its relationship with undergraduate academic success, spatialability is a profitable asset for professionals engaged in STEM careers [7], [9]. Research hasfound that spatial ability can be learned through targeted interventions, exposure to spatiallanguage, and participation in spatial activities [10], [11]. Furthermore, once learned, spatialability is malleable and can be maintained and developed over time [12]. This is particularlypromising in the context of developing targeted interventions aimed at fostering spatial ability.Of particular interest to the
Paper ID #37125BIM: A Bridge to Promote Industry-Academic Partnership inConstruction EngineeringBrayan Alexander Díaz I am a Fulbright Scholar, currently in a program towards a Ph.D. in Learning and Teaching in STEM- Science Education at NCSU. I received a bachelor's and M.Sc. in Chemistry at the University Federico Santa María Technical University (UTFSM). I was very proud to receive a Trajectory Sport Award for athletes who have demonstrated leadership and highlighted sports careers at UTFSM and Undergraduate Research Grant from the Center of Ionic Liquids (CILIS- University of Chile). My interests are
-income communities, with an emphasis on water and sanitation. Prof. Louis holds a BSc. In Chemical Engineer- ing from Howard University, MSc. in Chemical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and a PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. He received the 2000 Presiden- tial Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from the National Science Foundation, is a 2006-7 AAAS Energy Environment and Natural Resources Fellow, a 2014 Design and Health Faculty Fellow at the University of Virginia, and a 2015 Jefferson Science Fellow as Science Advisor to the Office of Global Food Security at the U.S. Department of State. Prof Louis is a Fulbright Specialist in Environment &
engineering. She later earned a master's degree in mechanical engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in engineering education at Utah State University. In 2021, Angie's research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award to critically examine the professional formation of undergraduate student veterans and service members in engineering.Kevin Jay Roberts © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com LearnPIV: An Interactive, Web-Based Learning Tool for Particle Image Velocimetry BasicsIntroductionThis paper introduces LearnPIV.org, a freely available, interactive, web
ofengineering as a career option, and instilling confidence in them through their interactions.Mentors included teachers, coaches, and parents. M10 reflected on support from her father, “He[dad] was always really encouraging… So that was like part of the reason why I wanted tochoose to do engineering.” H13 recounted the support from her mother who was an engineer.”My mom, who is an engineer herself, was always just excited about getting me involved and likeseeing her daughters sort of like pursue those, like, interests.” There were 53%, (N=8) of allparticipants who had a family member who worked in engineering or a closely related field.Eighty percent (80%, n=4) of participants with the lowest levels of CSE reported that they had afamily member in the
students must achieve these skillset-based outcomes to be prepared fortheir professional careers, it is also necessary for engineering students to achieve additional mindset-based outcomes to be prepared to tackle the most pressing problems and become truly innovativeengineers [4].Recent work has focused on defining the entrepreneurial mindset (EM), which according to acommonly-used framework developed by Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN),is broadly categorized by curiosity, making connections, and creating value [5]. In the context ofthe EM framework, curiosity relates to the intrinsic motivation required to be forward-looking,making connections relates to the insight gained by connecting information from many sources,and creating
was performing well in math and scienceimpacted why I was encouraged to pursue engineering. I know there were large groups ofstudents at my school who were not explicitly encouraged to dream about longer termeducational pursuits and careers. Looking back at these experiences have made me seek outopportunities to try to improve college access, especially for students who, for whatever reason,are not encouraged to consider how their unique skills and experiences might align well withfuture engineering and technical careers. Also relevant here is that I have been a resident of the broader rural region in which thisproject took place for 15 years and while affiliated with the institution I have also been involvedwith several organizations
.) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comEquipando Padres: Apoya el éxito de tu estudiante (Empowering parents to make a difference.)Martínez, D.L., González, E., Douglas, K.D.MotivationStudies show that parent involvement is a critical factor in student’s success (Auerbach, 2004). Studentsthat experience parent support during their college career are more likely to persist and complete theirdegree (Engle & Tinto, 2008; Ishitani, 2006; Lightweis, 2014). Parents that have completed a universitydegree themselves are better positioned to help their children during their college years and are betterequipped to support them with making good decisions like what is a reasonable
. Harvey has an active research group, which integrates undergraduate and graduate students from a range of disciplines. Dr. Harvey regularly organizes outreach activities with area schools and student groups, and he is the recipient of a National Science Foundation CAREER award.Chase Landon Hibbard © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Enhancing the Undergraduate Civil Engineering Experience through 3D-Printing, Problem-Based Learning OpportunitiesAbstractThe relatively recent advent of additive manufacturing (or 3D printing) is an exciting opportunityto rapidly fabricate and test scale prototypes for
immediately after the first required seminar, HON 2150 (there is an optional foundationalseminar for first-semester first-year students), and consists of the first of the experientialcomponents. In practice, students often complete the Immersion later in their careers, after theyhave taken another seminar and/or other components. The metaphor of immersion is consciouslychosen: the idea is for a student to allow themselves to absorb an experience in 360 degrees, totake it in, and to begin to process it, but with an emphasis on observation. In this way, it’s mostclosely linked with the Honors Ability (our program learning outcomes) Embrace Ambiguity [8].Later components, including the Honors Project and Leadership/Mentorship, engage the Actwith Purpose
graduated from the United State Military Academy at West Point with a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering. She later earned a master's degree in mechanical engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in engineering education at Utah State University. In 2021, Angie's research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award to critically examine the professional formation of undergraduate student veterans and service members in engineering.Amy Wilson-lopez (Associate Professor) Amy Wilson-Lopez is an associate professor at Utah State University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
. Background, Motivation, and Goals for the CourseOur university, Loyola University Maryland, is a private liberal arts institution of approximately3800 students. Loyola focuses primarily on undergraduate studies and features STEMdepartments in engineering, computer science, physics, chemistry, biology, and mathematics.The proposed courses in quantum computing will be taught by professors in electricalengineering, physics, and computer science. The goals of the courses are as follows: 1. The courses will have prerequisites that can be typically met in the freshman year. This will make our courses accessible to students with more diverse backgrounds earlier in their college careers, which will help with inclusion and retention of students
average school gradesand weighing this result with a ranking associated with their school. This weighing aims toreduce the importance that a single selection test may have and so provide opportunities tounderrepresented groups in higher education. However, this system has been widely criticizedfor not fulfilling its central aim and worse still in that it increases discrimination against studentswho come from less favored sectors. In Engineering degrees in particular, the SUA calculates thescores by assigning different weights to the ranking, which may vary from 10% to 40%depending on the engineering career considered.This present study seeks to analyze the different sources of information that the SUA systemuses to determine the correlation that
1, 2019.[41] R. Pereira, C. Borges, and E. P. Ferreira, “Motivating Female Students for Engineering Courses”, in 2021 4th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), 2021, pp.1–5.[42] L. Drankoff, S. L. Furterer, and E. Hart, “Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering Mentoring Program to Enhance Gender Diversity Demonstrates Success During the COVID Pandemic”, in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[43] L. Schultz, “Gender Differences in Perception of Satisfaction, Inclusion, and Participation in Information Technology Careers: Insights for Recruitment and Retention of Female Students”, in Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference ISSN, 2021, vol
many kids get in their freshman year of college.Here Pam expresses the instrumental social capital that comes from participating in the cohortprogram. She shows that the program provided an opportunity to build a relationship with thefourth author. By creating that connection, the fourth author was able to encourage the student topursue extracurricular opportunities like joining the professional engineering organizationSociety of Women Engineers and traveling to their annual conference. She also shared that thesecond author provided instrumental social capital by sharing her career experiences.A required aspect of the cohort program was attendance at two required seminars and four choiceactivities on campus, ranging from career fairs to
Education, 2023 Analysis of Qualifications for Entry-Level Positions in Construction ManagementConstruction management graduates must possess a mixture of technical, soft, and technologicalskills in order to fulfill their job responsibilities as a project engineer, estimator, field engineer,etc. at the start of their career. There is a lack of information on the exact skills that are requiredof a recent graduate to occupy these entry-level positions in the construction industry. This studyanalyzed job listings in order to understand most common qualifications expected of graduatesand their most common responsibilities in construction. The researchers qualitatively analyzed agroup of 40 companies that
activities, lives, and careers. So, theimmediate response to these essentials: ✓ Directing more effort to enhancing informed decision making on technological issues [1]. ✓ Enhancing informed decisions furthers social justice and the common good [1]. ✓ [Technological and engineering] decision making can be interpreted broadly [1].is a qualified yes … yes, we are doing them … though aside from visible curriculum elements inthose institutions that have adopted technological and engineering literacy in their academics, theeffectiveness and discernability of the work of the division is just not in a way that is formallyand measurably discernable.So, what should we do; why should what we do be taken seriously; how can a uniformtechnological literacy
inestablishing standards for quality engineering education and accredits programs that demonstratetheir commitment to meeting these standards. We believe that the PV project is a testament to our ECE program’s dedication to providingstudents with a well-rounded education. Not only does this project enhance the quality of thecourse, but it also shows the program’s commitment to providing students with an education thatis both rigorous and relevant to their future careers. We address a few ABET impacts below: 1. Students The renewable-energy project provided students with hands-on experience in designing, building, and testing real-world applications of renewable energy technology. It
isresponsible for monitoring all departments. The Vice Provost for Graduate Studieshas less influence on undergraduate programs and accreditation, but plays animportant role in supporting undergraduate and graduate programs, and in improvingand supporting pathways to intellectual learning for students with career potential.The Vice Provost for Academic Affairs supports course evaluations, learning outcomeevaluations, surveys, and other aspects of course quality control, and works withdepartment chairs to ensure teaching excellence. The dean responsible forundergraduate study is mainly responsible for the quality and effectiveness ofundergraduate programs, cares about the vital interests of teachers and students, andguides the development of new
withinmovement building, an emergent line of research has turned to social movement schools (SMSs):organizational sites designed to bring together, educate, train and mentor individuals to beeffective and committed movement actors [6]. These intentional spaces empower theirparticipants to enact change [4], impact participants’ subsequent careers [7] and lead to thediffusion of a movement praxis across generations [5]. However, this literature has so faroverlooked the resource mobilization processes through which participants build the capacity forchange-making. This gap is important, because accessing, producing, and distributing resourcesare key to the survival and success of social movements [8], [9].Resource mobilization theory emphasizes the
core content areas when compared to entrepreneurship programsin higher education, that are often isolated to Business programs. For example, Rodriguez andLieber (2020) talk about the ways that high school programs that provided students with hands-on experiences working with small businesses were successful in developing entrepreneurialmindsets, competencies, and desires. They write: “Students in entrepreneurship educationshowed an overall statistically significant increase in entrepreneurial mindset, specifically incommunication and collaboration, opportunity recognition, and critical thinking and problem-solving. Moreover, there was a positive association between entrepreneurial mindset gains andperceptions of future career success.” (p, 87
Academia as a Minority Gender: A seminar featuring a faculty member from the Grainger College of Engineering, and one of the first female faculty to be hired in her department, was held. Students were invited to have cookies and coffee while they learned about the trials and tribulations of navigating academia as a woman. This was an opportunity for graduate students to visualize their own careers as future academics and scientists. Attendees also received engineering seminar credit for the event. This event targeted the ‘advice and support’ intervention. 5. Implicit Bias and Microaggressions Workshop: A workshop on implicit bias and how to recognize and respond to microaggressions in the workplace was conducted by
current hinted at but never explicitly named that gavestudents an incredibly strong sense of belonging. What I am referring to is the historical ortemporal aspect of belonging. Many of the traditional constructs are acute or snapshots of whatbelonging is at that moment in time. But what became clear through the interviews was thatmany of these students felt they belonged long before beginning their higher education journey,even though they had just begun their engineering career. This was especially prevalent in thetraditional engineering students, i.e. (white males) and was clearly contrasted when looking atthose traditionally minoritized. When Chad was asked to reflect on her engineering journey sofar, she began by describing. “I have my
Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief
tools for learning and practice (textbooks, homework, projects, etc.) and evaluations ofmastery (midterms and finals). Though ineffective teachers were undesirable, successful studentsknew how to learn for themselves by reading the textbook, by notetaking from both book andlecture, by practice on homework and projects, and by mutual sharpening through work withother students. Their undergraduate professors provided the “intervention of a single coherentand personal authority to direct the [student’s] will at its beginning … for it to be self-directingafterword” [10]. The authority of the “sage on the stage” provided the influence and the will toobey that motivated developing engineers toward graduation and future careers. These
Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN).Marisela Martinez-Cola ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-in-Progress: Towards advancing grassroots transformative advocacy strategies for work justice of BIPOCx contingent
faculty member’s approach is thestrength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threat (SWOT) analysis, commonly used in strategicplanning and management [2]. The purpose of this analysis will be to provide recommendationsfor growth and best practices in administering verbal engineering exams, regardless of thespecific engineering course.BackgroundDo any general Google search on skills that an engineer needs in the workplace andcommunication will be on it, with a few examples cited here [3]–[5]. These communication skillsare not just important for students to succeed during their engineering education, but also in theirfuture careers, regardless of the industry [6]. Despite this importance, communication has beenflagged by engineers’ employers as a
internationally, STEM majors experience more attrition and longer times tograduate than other majors. The high rate of attrition has been documented from a public policystandpoint at various universities in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and SouthAfrica [1]. The cost of attrition is significant. Students who attrite are personally burdened by thecost of a partial education when the costs of college are rising [2] and by the loss of income froma lucrative STEM career. Socially, attrition of STEM majors reduces the size of the workforce ata time of high demand for skilled college graduates [3]. The cost of attrition is particularlydetrimental to underrepresented minority (URM) groups who attrite in larger numbers [4], and tothe diversity of
more interdisciplinary andnon-traditional approaches to engineering [33]. One quote that Omitoyin et al. [21] wrote sumsup this idea of how to drive participation and motivation in underrepresented groups is: “Therefore, it may be salient to align engineering course content with how students identify engineers: content that more closely aligns with improving the world, helping individuals, and solving problems” [21, p. 14].Looking to their future careers: Another theme that prevailed was how students seem to have aneye towards their future careers as motivation in their programs. For example, students are mostmotivated to participate in learning interventions and experiences that would make them moreemployable in the future
University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associaate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She previously served as Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of in- terdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science