). Preface. In F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 13. Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92. 14. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 285-296. 15. Ross, B.H., & Spalding, T.L. (1994). Concepts and categories. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 119-148). New York: Academic Press. 16. Wittrock, M. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational
social theory of genre learning,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 160-185.8. Ceylan, T. “Thinking and writing in engineering education,” Proceedings, 2005, American Society for Engineering Education IL/IN Sectional Conference.9. Fisher, T., Usrey, M., and Beasley, H. “OWL: A wise way to enhance engineering students’ writing skills,” Proceedings, 2003, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.10. Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. See Methodology Boxes 4 and 5 for a description
participants’ description of thesituation in which a communication is embedded. Specificity of adaptation refers to whether ornot (and in how much detail) participants described how they adapted their communication to agiven situation.Level of complexity. Our working definition of situatedness includes the entire communicationcontext—for example, the intended audience(s), the purpose, and the conditions of use. The levelof complexity of the participants’ involvement with situatedness ranged from those whoacknowledged a basic concern for audience (all participants) to those who attended to the fullcommunication context. Some excerpts from participants’ portfolios and survey responses
disparity between thepercentage of ethnic minorities in the U. S. population and their enrollment in and graduationfrom engineering programs illuminates the importance of faculty actively seeking to understandand address diversity issues2. In order to improve activities and diversity efforts, one needs togather information on the issues specific to their institution and be willing to discuss the pros andcons of certain situations or classroom techniques. Improvement can be initiated by firstadmitting the possibility that we, as faculty members, may inadvertently contribute to anunfriendly climate and we must study ways to promote a healthy, welcoming environment for allstudents.Developing a diverse engineering workforce is of utmost importance for
challenges for educational practice and research. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2005; 39: 732-41 5. Hansen S: The supervisor in the project-organized group work should participate in developing the students' project competencies. European Journal of Engineering Education 2004; 29: 451-9 6. Hmelo-Silver CE: Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review 2004; 16: 235-66 7. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA: Cooperative Learning Returns to College: What Evidence Is There That It Works? Change 1998; 30: 26-35 8. Moust J: 25 jaar tutor in probleemgestuurd onderwijs, enkele beschouwingen over een nieuwe onderwijsrol. TVHO 2001; 19: 278-91 9. Weenk W, Govers E, Vlas H: Training in project-based education