Illinois School Report Card. Lincoln Junior High School. http: //www.lasalleschools.net/files/filesystem/Lincoln Junior High Report Card.pdf.16. Center for Nanoscale Chemical-Electrical-Mechanical Manufacturing Systems. http://www.nano- cemms.illinois.edu.17. National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity Education Foundation. Stereotypes turn girls off to math and science. www.stemequitypipeline.org/_documents/MythstcchCopywr.pressversion1.pdf.18. Clason, D. L. and Dormody, T.J. Analyzing data measured by individual likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education. 35:4. 1994. pp. 31-35. http://pubs.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol35/35-4-31.pdf. Jamison. S. Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education: Blackwell
of:_______________ Reviewer:_____________ Item Check CommentsStyle/Grammar/StyleSentences are complete _____ ________________________________No repetition within abstract & LOT _____ ________________________________ASTM # included in methodology _____ ________________________________Sentences don’t begin with #s/symbols _____ ________________________________Numbers < 10 written in words ____ ________________________________0 placed before decimal _____ ________________________________Professional language (not colloquial
the material? The paradigm illustrated in Figure 2 will help in considering the origin of the properties. 4. a. Identify class of materials that should meet those properties b. Select 5-10 candidate materials from a database or other sources 5. Select equation(s) and calculate changes to material performance for each alternative 6. Does material need to be processed to achieve the desired properties? 6a. If yes, develop material processing necessary to meet the desired/required material properties. 7. Examine candidate materials in greater detail 8. Determine pros and cons for candidate materials 9. Develop argument in favor of final choice
. Page 22.822.106 Treisman, U. 1992. Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students inCollege. College Mathematics Journal 23(5), pp. 362-372.7 Wilson, D. 2008. Does it Matter? Psychological Sense of Community & Belonging in Engineering Education.Frontiers in Education 2008.8 Johnson, D.W., Johnson, D.T. & Smith, K.A. 1998. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, 2ndEd. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.9 Hausfather, S. J. 1996. Vygotsky and schooling: Creating a social context for learning. Action in TeacherEducation. (18) 1-10.10 Jones, D.W. 1996. Empowering teams in the classroom can work. Journal for Quality and Participation, 19(1),80-86.11 Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J
. American Association of University Women. 2000. Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC. AAUW Educational Foundation.11. CIO Insight: Strategies for IT Business Leaders, Women in IT: Where Girls Aren’t, April 2007. Available on-line at http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2110749,00.asp12. Daley, W. Speech of U.S. Commerce Secretary. Delivered at 1998 National Information Technology Workforce Convocation, Berkeley, California, January 12, 1998.13. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., and Leifer, L.J., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning”, J. Engineering Education, pp. 103 – 120, January 2005.14. Conley, C. H., Ressler, S. J., Lenox, T. A., and Samples, J. W., “Teaching
each of thefollowing questions. a. ______________________ b. ______________________ c. ______________________Rate the members of your team (including yourself) for each of the following statements. You do not need to write theindividual names for each question, but make sure the letter for each individual corresponds to the letter for the individualidentified above (keep the same order). 1) Followed all of the agreed upon rules. (1 to 5: 1 strongly disagree –– 5 strongly agree) a. _______ b. _______ c. _______ 2) Attended lab(s) for this assignment. (Yes or No) If no, indicate how much notice was given to team members. a. _______ ________How much notice
value can bemade. Page 22.845.10References1 Carlson, C., and Wilmot, W. “Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want,” CrownBusiness, ISBN 13:978-0-307-33669-9, 2006.2 Thursby, M., Fuller, A., and Thursby, J., “An Integrated Approach to Educating Professionals for Careers inInnovation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 389–405, 2009.3 Sager, B., Fernandez, M., and Thursby, M., “Implications of a Multidisciplinary Educational and ResearchEnvironment,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, pp. 57-69, 2006.4 Kingon, A. I., Thomas, R., Markham, S. K., Aiman-Smith, L., Debo, R.. “An
2009-304.8. W. Akili, Integrating practical experience in a geotechnical/foundation engineering class: The role of the adjunct faculty, proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 8423-8436. Page 22.862.109. S. Nasrazadani and R.A. Mirshams, Teaching heat transfer through industry participation, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-832.10. S.D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby and W.M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, Jossey-Bass, San
implementing thechosen option(s). Even so, implementing the menu of CT tools that are currently beingdeveloped will require the leadership and time of experienced experts. It is also essential to keepresources and training models up to date based on the needs of the ISU community andcoordinate these efforts with current related research findings.To sustain these three areas of strength and institutionalize ADVANCE successes, three areas oftraining have been identified – some focused on audience (e.g. department chair or searchcommittee training), some on the training topic (systemic unintended bias).DEPARTMENT CHAIR TRAINING:In collaboration with the university level administration, ADVANCE-ISU has provided trainingworkshops for all department chairs
-948, Oct. 2006.[5] A. Gadre, D. Maczka, D. Spinello, B. McCater, D. Stilwell, W. Neu, M. Roan, and J. Hennage, “Cooperativelocalization of an acoustic source using towed hydrophone arrays,” in Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, 2008.AUV 2008. IEEE/OES, Oct. 2008, pp. 1-8.[6] E. Marques, J. Pinto, S. Kragelund, P. Dias, L. Madureira, A. Sousa, M. Correia, H. Ferreira, R. Goncalves, R.Martins, D. Horner, A. Healey, G. Goncalves, and J. Sousa, “AUV control and communication using underwateracoustic networks,” in OCEANS 2007-Europe, June 2007, pp. 1-6. Page 22.986.13
., Cabral, M. T.,Frodeman, R., Hogenhuis, C., Heyd, T., Lemons, J., McKinstry, R., Lutes, M., Meulller, B., Domingos,J., Miguez, G., Munasinghe, M., Muylaert de Araujo, M. S., Nobre, C., Ott, K., Paavola, J., Pires deCampos, C., Pinguelli Rosa, L., Rosales, J., Rose, A., Wells, E., Westra, L., (2006), White Paper on theEthical Dimensions of Climate Change, The Collaborative Program on the Ethical Dimensions of ClimateChange, accessed from the Internet, January 2011.[3] Brown, D., 2002, American Heat, Ethical Problems with the United States Response to GlobalWarming, Roman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland Page 22.906.9Appendix ASTS 201 Ethics
methodology.2. Overview of QFDQFD method was documented in Japan in the mid 1970’s and was first introduced to theUnited States in 1983 by Professor Yoji Akao. Since then, remarkable development andimplementation of QFD for curriculum design and improvement have been observedworld-wide 5. QFD method is a technique linking customer demands and productdevelopment. Ranking system in QFD method helps to identify and prioritize customer’svoice clearly.One of the main principles used in QFD is to determine directly from customers whatthey expect in a particular product or service viz., quality of curriculum in the instantcase. This is called Voice of Customer in parlance of QFD. There are different
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Keys to Success in the IEEE Region 3 Student Hardware CompetitionAbstractSince the 1980’s, IEEE Region 3 has had an annual conference, named SoutheastCon, thatinclude student and professional programs. The student hardware competition is considered thecentral event within the student programs. It continues to maintain its original focus of thedesign and building of Robots that compete by performing a pre-defined task. Earlier names ofthis competition were solar car contest, “seeker” car and design contest. On the average about 49of the 101 member universities participate in the student competition each year. Electricalengineering programs continue to take advantage of this contest
studentlearning.AcknowledgmentsThe views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the position ofthe United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense. Page 22.917.15Bibliography1. Boettner, D., Norberg, S., Melnyk, R., Highley, J., Rounds, M., and Arnas, A. Ö., 2006, “Teaching theFundamentals of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics through an Integrated Systems Approach,” Proceedings ofthe International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 5-10, 2006, Chicago, IL, Paper #:IMECE2006-13815.2. Boettner, D.D. and B.G. Crawford, “Consistency Considerations for Integrated Thermodynamics
writtenreflections after each focus group, the students are instructed to follow the SAID framework inwhich they describe specific situations (S), their reaction (affect) to that situation (A), theirinterpretation of the incident (I), and their decision making as a result of the incident (D).[19-21]For the process reflection report, students are instructed to look back at their progress over thesemester by referring to their journals and their written reflections. They then write a processreflection report that describes their learning and development over the semester. This reportprovides a synthesis of each student's learning over the course of the semester and is based onmultiple forms of reflection.Narrative ResearchThis phenomenological study used
Summit on the Future of Mechanical Engineering. Washington, D.C., April 16-18.4 National Academy of Engineering (2004). The Engineer of 2020. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.5 National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.6 Duderstadt, J. (2008). Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. The Millennium Project, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, http://milproj.dc.umich.edu.7 National Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the Conversation. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.8 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009
] Celebrating 50 Years of Robotics, www.icra2010.org.[8] From Internet to Robotics: The Next Transformative Technology, Computing Communication Consortium Roadmap, 2009. Available at www.us-robotics.us/ and www.cra.org/ccc/robotics.[9] Engineering Criteria 2000, 2nd Edition, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc, Baltimore, MD, 1997.[10] Kinzel, G., Kumar, V. and Wei, S., “An educational experiment in teaching mechanism design and manufacturing using multi-university teams,” Proceedings of the 4th National Applied Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Dec 10-13, 1995.[11] David Cappelleri, James Keller, Terry Kientz, Peter Szczesniak and Vijay Kumar
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0930229. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 22.1271.10
science and technology students the institution wanted to know more about the current status and health of STEM majors. As is happening at many campuses over the past few years the university has become majority female. That fact coupled with the institution‟s strong liberal arts tradition makes it an interesting place to test ideas about attracting and retaining females and underrepresented groups into STEM. In the national context it is well known that women are still not represented in the sciences in accord with their numbers in the population though the representation varies by field where about half of undergraduate degree earners in the life sciences are female but only 25% in physics are female. Women earn 35% of the chemical
:[1] TIME.com (Partners with CNN), (February 4 2010), The Unsustainable U.S. Health Care System, http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/02/04/the-unsustainable-u-s-health-care-system/. (Web visited in December of 2010).[2] CardioNet, see http://www.cardionet.com/. Visited in May of 2009.[3] V. Shnayder, B. Chen, K. Lorincz, T. R. F. F. Jones, and M. Welsh, “Sensor networks for medical care,” Technical Report TR-08-05, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University , 2005.[4] Ohno-Machado et al., “SMART: Scalable Medical Alert Response Technology,” http://smart.csail.mit.edu/.[5] Lenert et al., “WiiSARD :Wireless Internet Information System for Medical Response in Disasters
://www.nanoscience.com/index.html15. Veeco Caliber User Manual , www.veeco.comAcknowledgementThis paper is based upon work supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation underGrant DUE # 0737204. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation Page 22.1668.12
. ABET Student Outcomes, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/home/keycomponents/assessment_eval/ ec_outcomes_summaries.html2. Mastascusa, E. J., Snyder, W. J., & Hoyt, B. S. (2011), Effective Instruction for STEMDisciplines: From Learning Theory to College Teaching, Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.3. Meriam, J. L. & Kraige. L.G. (2010), Engineering Mechanics – Statics, 6th Edition,Wiley.4. Steif, P.S. & Dollar, A. (2005), “Reinventing the Teaching of Statics,” Int. J. Engrg.Ed., Vol.4, pp. 723-329, Templus Publication. 174Appendix A. Bloom’s Taxonomy used in Engineering StaticsAppendix B. Student Feedback and Comments on DPT:What aspects of the course or the instructor’s approach contributed most
B in this ABET accredited EI program make them eligible toget three JHU college level credits.Acknowledgment: PT thanks Michael Karweit for designing engineering innovation program andnurturing it. PT also thanks Kathleen Dowell of EvalSolutions for the data analysis.References: 1. ASEE First Bell September 2, 2011 News Letter and http://www.ajc.com/opinion/strong-u-s-needs-1155439.html 6502. US News Education Blog by Jason Koebler September 28 2011, http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/high- school-notes/2011/09/28/survey-stem-engagement-begins-early & http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2011/sep11/09
Learning,from the Visible Knowledge Project. Academic Commons January 2009 issue.http://www.academiccommons.org/files/BassEynonCapturing.pdfMehlhorn, Sandy; Parrott, Scott; Mehlhorn, Joey; Burcham, Timothy; Roberts, Jason; andSmartt, Philip. Using Digital Learning Objects to Improve Student Problem Solving Skills,Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Corpus Christ, TX, Feb 6-9,2011 http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/98763/2/LivescribeSAEAPaperFINAL.pdfHannon, Charles., Paper Based Computing , Educause Quarterly, #4, (2008)http://hubscher.org/roland/courses/hf765/readings/hannon.pdfPowers, Mary F.; Bright, David R.; Bugaj Patrick S. A brief report on the use of paper-basedcomputing to supplement a pharmaceutical
October 14, 2010, from http://odysseyteams.com/programs/helpingHands2. LEGS For All. LEGS For All . Retrieved January 19, 2011, from http://legsforall.com/projects/kneeproject.php3. Hansen, A. H., D. S. Childress, and E. H. Knox. "Prosthetic Foot Roll-over Shapes with Implications for Alignment of Trans-tibial Prostheses." Prosthetics and Orthotics International 24.3 (2000): 205-15. Print.4. Carberry, A., Lee, H.S., Ohland, M.W. (2010) Measuring engineering design self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education. 99(1): 71-79.5. Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., and Blanchard, C. (2000) “On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS)”. Motivation and Emotion. 24(3
college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/89/1d.pdf.7. Goldberg, J. & Sedlacek, W. (1996), Summer Study in Engineering for High School Women, Maryland University, College Park, Maryland.8. Pantano, J. (1994), Comprehensive Minority SEM Programs at Santa Fe Community College, Paper presented at the Annual International
/acquisitionworkforce, April 2010. 2. The Defense Acquisition University provides a full range of basic, intermediate, and advanced certification training, assignment-specific training, applied research, and continuous learning opportunities for DoD personnel. Information can be found at http://www.dau.mil/default.aspx . 3. Bloom B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956. 4. Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 1956. 5. Information regarding graduate programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology can be found at
studentsfrom majors other than engineering. Page 22.65.13References 1. Bransford, J., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2. McKenna, A.F., B. Yalvac, and G.J. Light. 2009. The role of collaborative reflection on shaping engineering faculty teaching approaches. Journal of Engineering Education 98(1): 17-26. 3. Ohland, M. W. Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eirs, O., Chacra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3), 259-278. 4
encouraged.AcknowledgementsThis work presented herein was supported in part by Texas Workforce Commission under theaward number 2908WSW000 and U.S. Department of Education ARRA grant award numberS397A090044.Bibliography1. U.S. NRC, “Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” Sep 22, 2010, available online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.2. U. S. Energy Information Administration, “Electric Power Industry 2009: Year in Review,” Nov 23, 2010, available online at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html.3. K. Bozynski and J. D. McCowan, “Recruitment to the Profession: A Student-Led Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 257-261, July 1995.4. J. Gleason, K. Boykin, P. Johnson, L. Bowen, K. Whitaker, C. Micu
Annual Conference & Exposition (2004)3 A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula, Macias-Guarasa, J.,Montero, J.M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., Nieto-Taladriz, O., IEEE Transactions onEducation, 49 3, 389-3974 Project based learning as a pedagogical tool for embedded system education Rui Hong Chu.Lu, D.D.-C., Sathiakumar, S., IEEE Transactions on Education, 51 1, 108-1135 PeopleMover: an example of interdisciplinary project-based education in electricalengineering Daems, W., De Smedt, B., Vanassche, P., Gielen, G., Sansen, W., De Man, H.,IEEE Transactions on Education, 46 1, 157-1676 Online Labs and the MARVEL Experience Dieter Müller and José M. Ferreira, International Journalon Online Engineering, 1 1, p