successful demonstrations in high-school classrooms as well aspotential remote laboratory use. Additionally, further development of the pen tablet controlalgorithm can be explored to determine if the pressure sensitive Z-axis control method is suitablefor precise laboratory applications or only general classroom use.1. E. Zamani, G. Giaglis, and A. Pouloudi, "Tactile Experiences: User Interpretations and Meaning with Tablets," presented at the International Conference on System Science, Waikoloa, HI, 2014.2. C. Romney, "Tablet PC Use in Freshman Mathematics Classes Promotes STEM Retention," presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD, 2011.3. S. Oviatt, A. Arthur, and J. Cohen, "Quiet Interfaces
officers—on how to go about seeking research funding. It does notdiscuss individual programs, though it does offer some suggestions for finding them.Rather, it concentrates on finding out about funding opportunities and building a personalnetwork to enable oneself to compete effectively for them.The first step in getting funded is to come up with an idea. The next step is to find anagency that is interested in the area. Then the researcher must make a credible case that(s)he can make a contribution in the area. Sometimes this is through a single-investigatorproposal, but more and more frequently, it is as a member of a team. In the latter case,networking is crucial.2. The ideaA good research topic must have many qualities. It must be inventive. An
Page 26.1639.14paperProceduresFigure 3: first stageThe first stage is triggered by group 2’s projectAfter triggered by group 2, we can assume the initial speed of the ball is v0 = 0 𝑚/𝑠.The second stage will happen when the plastic ball begins swinging. During the second stage, theplastic ball on the top would perform free fall with a string attached. Thus the projectile of theplastic ball will be circular. Since the team assume the initial condition of the ball is v0 = 0 𝑚/𝑠,thus at the beginning of second stage, the total energy is just potential energy where PE = mghwhere m is the mass of the plastic ball and h is the initial height of the ball. After the plastic ballfalls at the bottom location, it will swing back up and collide with a
.” Proceedings, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference.6. Mendoza-Garcia, J.A., Ngambeki, I.B., Behbehani, L.J., Evangelou, D., Rao, P.S.C., Cox, M.F. “Defining the Knowledge and Skills that Enable Engineers to Participate in Public Policy.” Proceedings, 2012 ASEE Annual Conference.7. Tull, K., and Jones, S. “A Sophomore-Level Engineering and Public Policy Course Required for B.A. Engineering Majors at Lafayette College.” Proceedings, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference.8. Ngambeki, I.B., Depew, D.R., Dark, M.J., and Chong, R.C. “Approaches to Integrating Policy into Engineering Education.” Proceedings, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference.9. Denny, F.I., and Robinson, R.L. “The Engineer’s Role in Public Policy.” Proceedings, 2003 ASEE Annual
. Page 26.1670.8Appendix A: K-12 Outreach instructionsOutreach Activity: Robotics andControl using LEGO MINDSTORMSNXT Activity 1:Objective: Build and program a robot (wheeled car) to drive into a space and exit asquickly as possible without touching the wall.1. Build the basic configuration. (see attached instructions). Connect the motors of the wheels through a cable to the motor ports (A, B, or C)2. Decide which sensor(s) your robot will need to complete the task. A description of each sensor and its function is attached. Connect the sensor through a cable to the sensor ports (1, 2, 3, or 4).3. Get into the “NXT program” on the panel. a. Turn on the panel by pressing the orange button b. Scroll right until you get to
Page 26.1673.13and Management Technology (ICEMT), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 362 - 366). IEEE ConferencePublications.5 Lawrence-Slater, M. (2002). On-line learning: a student viewpoint. Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32ndAnnual . 1, pp. T1E-19 - T1E-24 vol.1 . IEEE Conference Publications.6 Aippersbach, S, Alley, M., Garner, J. (2013)" How Slide Design Affects a Student Presenter’s Understanding ofthe Content ." 2013 ASEE Annual Conference. American Society for Engineerin Education, 2013.7 Jones, R., Plemmons, K., (2007) Addressing the Career Development Needs of Experienced Project Professionals,AC2007-1283, 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition8 Tian, Z; Abraham, J. (2014) Application of computational fluid
Paper ID #12482Using the Engineering Grand Challenges to Foster Critical Thinking andAwareness of the Engineer’s Role in the Global CommunityDr. Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville Dr. Angela Thompson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. Dr. Thompson received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Louisville. Her research interests are in biomechanics and engineering education, particularly related to critical thinking instruction.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and
Burmank, Visual Literacy: Learn to See, See to Learn. Association for Supervision and CurriculumDevelopment, ISBN 0871206404, p. 115, 2002 .5 H David, C Carr, and H Yueh, Computers as Mindtools for Engaging Learners in Critical Thinking. TechTrends43(2), pp. 24-32, 1998.6 D Jonassen and B Grabowski, Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Page 26.1193.10 Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.7 R Felder and L Silverman, Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681, 1988.8 S Montgomery, Addressing Diverse Learning Styles Through the Use of Multimedia
, K. (2007). Doctorate Recipients from United StatesUniversities: Summary Report 2006. Chicago, IL.4. Martin B., & Hanington BM. (2012) Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems,Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers5. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications.6. National Science Foundation, & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2012). Characteristicsof Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States: 2008 (pp. 1–83). Arlington, VA. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics /nsf13302/.7. National Science Foundation, & Statistics., N. C. for S. and E
variety of institutions across the US and those in the queue clearlyhold a positive view in regards to attaining tenure.References 1. Varma, R. (2004). “The tenure system and engineering institutions.” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. McKenzie, R. (1996). “In Defense of Academic Tenure.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(2), 325-341. 3. Sowell, T. (1993). Inside American Education: The Decline, the Deception, the Dogmas. Free Press: New York. 4. Aigner, D. (1993). “Quality Revolution due at Universities.” Orange County Register, July 25, B10. 5. Epstein, R. and S. MacLane (1991). “Keep Mandatory Retirement for Tenured Faculty
engineeringprogram a year later than those that begin in a calculus course or those that made a C or better intheir first mathematics course.Additionally, our results showed that fewer than 12% of graduating engineers during a singlesemester at our institution started in a non-college level mathematics course. In contrast, nearly40% of graduating engineering students entered the university with AP or dual enrollment creditfor single variable calculus.This quantitative study of trajectories of students who start out in non-college level mathematicswas conducted to identify the subject(s) for a future qualitative study of the factors thatcontribute to students’ persistence in engineering when they encounter difficulties in theircollege mathematics
the previous one (insufficient preparation can create Academic Challenges) and onthe individual characteristic (Personal Challenges). We suggest defining as “readiness” thepersonal attribute characterizing ability to make transition from one educational level to another.While introducing the term “readiness” we shall try to avoid a misunderstanding because thesame term is used for one of the principles in the theory of learning. There are eight principles:readiness, exercise, effect, primacy, recency, intensity, freedom, and requirement in this theory.In this context readiness is a psychology term that means a degree of concentration andeagerness of a student. It is obvious that a student will study better if s/he is ready to learn notonly
develop a new system that connects the free water surface and subsurface basinsin series for comparison with each running each line individually. Further experimentation ofvarying pumping rates, changing basin media composition, and collecting raw sample water fromvarious sources (including stormwater and greywater) provide potential for long-term use of thetreatment wetland as an on-going living laboratory.Bibliography1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2004. Constructed Treatment Wetlands. EPA 843-F- 03-013. Office of Water. August 2004.2. Campbell, C. S., and M. Ogden. 1999. Constructed Wetlands in the Sustainable Landscape. Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY.3. Living Machine. 2012a
, butseveral other options exist. To assure that students have sufficient and various kinds ofeducational opportunities to learn or develop desired outcomes, we engaged in curricular and co-curricular mapping.Part II: Determining timing, identifying cohort(s), and assigning responsibilities. This part of the Page 26.1290.3Assessment Plan focuses on how and when every Food Engineering Program faculty will beassessing desired outcomes, identifying appropriate times to assess students’ level of achievement of selected competencies. Assessing student learning over time known as formativeassessment provides valuable information about how well students are
type and level of degree; ABET cannot force a five-year curriculum into a four-yearprogram; and ABET will not mandate a five-year baccalaureate engineering degree.As such, licensure, not accreditation, must be the principal focus for implementing enforceablestandards that enhance the educational preparation of future engineering professionals.References1. “Model Law Designation,” National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES). Accessed at http://ncees.org/records/model-law-designation/, January 16, 2015.2. ECPD. First Annual Report of the Engineers’ Council for Professional Development, New York, NY, 1933, 1.3. Russel, Jeffrey S. et al. “ASCE's Raise The Bar Initiative: Master Plan For Implementation.” Proceedings of
make informed decisions. As theNuclear Engineering field makes strides towards the future, it should look to improving e-learning experiences and adopt the advancements in the technologies used by a variety of otherindustries.7. References[1] A. Shtub, "Project Management Simulation with PTB Project Team Builder," in Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, 2010.[2] "NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 17 July 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/pra.html. [Accessed April 2014].[3] S. Magennis and A. Farrell, "Teaching and learning activities: expanding the repertoire to support student learning," AISHE, vol. 1, pp. 45-54, 2005.[4] C. H. J. Davies
improved.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber EEC-1024628.References1. M. Miller, S. Sorby and J. De Clerck, “E-Learning Modules for Improving Lifelong Learning Ability,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, June, 2015.2. J. Barsch, Barsch Learning Style Inventory, New York: Academic Therapy Publications, 1996.3. P. R. Pintrich, D. A. Smith, T. Garcia and W. J. McKeachie, Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, NCRIPTAL, 1991.4. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education," Engr. Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, pp. 674-681, 1988
. 28, Issue 4 (Summer 2008), pp. 43-50.[5] Laursen, S., et al. Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010[6] Lopatto, D. Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement, 2009.[7] Taraban, R., and Blanton, R.L., Eds. Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science: The Transformation from Student to Scientist. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.[8] Russell, S.H., Hancock, M.P. and McCullough, J. "Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences" Science, Vol. 316, No. 5824 (27 April 2007), pp. 548-549.[9] Zydney, A.L., Bennett, J.S., Shahid, A. and Bauer, K.W
EDUCATION Rafael S. Gutierrez, Sergio Flores, Fernando Tovia, Olga Valerio, Mariano Olmos. ”Simulation Based Modeling of Warehousing Operations in Engi- neering Education Based on an Axiomatic Design.” MAS 2011: The 10th International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation, September 12-15, 2011. Rome, Italy. (Collaborators representing the University of Texas at El Paso; Universidad Autonoma de Cd. Juarez; Philadelphia University; El Paso Community College) RECENT COLLABORATORS Professor Rafael Gutierrez, UTEP; Professor Sergio Flores, UTEP; Ar- turo Bronson, UTEP; and Peter Golding, UTEP.Ms. Tonie Badillo, El Paso Community College Ms. Tonie Badillo is a Division Dean at the Valle Verde campus of El Paso
machines and basic computer organization. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE ’11, pp. 335–335, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.6. Sivilotti, P. A. G. and Pike, S. M. The suitability of kinesthetic learning activities for teaching distributed algorithms. SIGCSE Bull., 39(1):362–366, March 2007. Page 26.1373.8
translation and communication wereexperienced with the interesting solution expressed as Spanglish Software Engineering. We offerthe information as contribution to the body of knowledge on international faculty exchanges.There were lessons learned, results of a survey, and discussions on the feedback. We lookforward to more conversations, data and progress in this arena.References 1. Alkhairy, A., et al, Developing Globally-Competitive Engineering Education Programs Through Multi- National Collaboration. 7th Annual ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, October 19-23, 2008, Cape Town, South Africa. 2. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S. and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach
: • Only 2 of nearly 100 students reported recognizing Simon and Garfunkel’s Bridge Over Troubled Water, even minutes into the song. In fact, few students admitted to even being familiar with the song. • Songs that had been covered and re-released were often recognized, but students could not identify the original artist. For example, Life is a Highway was associated with Rascal Flatts, and Big Yellow Taxi with multiple artists but not with Joni Mitchell (in fact, the closest students got was John Mitchell). • Even songs considered to be cultural touchstones by the instructor may not have been familiar with the students. U2's Where the Streets Have No Name, for
. There were several lessons learned that will beincorporated into the Spring Quarter 2015 classes however the basic approach to the course isnot expected to change. We believe that each student’s experience in integrating a buildingstructural system into his or her studio projects has been very beneficial and will serve them wellin their future careers.Bibliography1 Dermody, R, “Get The Form Right!”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.2 Mac Namara, S, “Bringing Engineering into the Studio: Design Assignments for Teaching Structures toArchitects”, 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.3 Hitchcock, H, “The Structure – Design Studio Link”, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings
Students Underprepared in Math,” FYEE 2014, Session F2B.[2] S. A. Culpepper, C. Basile, C.A. Ferguson, J.A. Lanning, M.A. Perkins, “Understanding the TransitionBetween High School and College Mathematics and Science,” The Journal of Mathematics and Science:Collaborative Explorations 12 (2010): 157-67. Page 26.196.7
in the SLC? - their specific reason for leaving ERAU.123 Page 26.216.941 Rebello, S, and L. Cui. “Retention and Transfer of Learning from Math to Physics to Engineering” Proceedings ofthe 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22-25, 2008.2 Rencis, J.J. and Grandin, H.T., “Mechanics of Materials: an Introductory Course with Integration of Theory,Analysis, Verification and Design,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, Portland, OR, June 12-15, 2005.3 E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, 2005, “How College Affects Students Volume 2
of Windsor - Undergraduate Calendar - Current - Mechanical, Automotive, Materials Engineering - Courses. Available at http://web4.uwindsor.ca/units/registrar/calendars/undergraduate/cur.nsf/Search+Main/9B72CA03 9C14A10585257364004C63B8?OpenDocument, accessed March 12, 2015.8. McCahan, Susan; Romkey, Lisa (2012) Update on the University of Toronto Graduate Attribute Process. Proceedings of 2012 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA12) Conf., Paper 046.9. Davis, Denny C.; Gentili, Kenneth L.; Trevisan, Michael S.; Christianson, Robert K.; McCauley, Jeffrey F. (2000) Measuring Learning Outcomes for Engineering Design Education. Proceedings of 2000 Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Session
26.267.7References[1] Adecco. (n.d.). STEM skills drive innovation. Retrieved February 2, 2015, from http://www.adeccousa.com/employers/resources/Pages/infographic-stem-skills-are-driving- innovation.aspx.[2] FRC. (n.d.). Retrieved February 2, 2015, from FIRST Robootics Competition: http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprograms/frc.[3] Harriger, B., Harriger, A., Flynn, M., & Flynn, S. (2013, September 18). NSF Award Abstract. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from National Science Foundation: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1312215.[4] HealthDay. (2012, August 23). Modern Technology Adds to Worldwide Obesity Woes: Report. U.S. News & World Report: Health. Retrieved February 2, 2015, from http
. 2.http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855481.18554838. Beidel E, Magnuson S. Government, military face severe shortage of cybersecurity experts. National Defense.2011;96(693):32–34.9. Booz Allen Hamilton. Cyber In-Security: Strengthening the Federal Cybersecurity Workforce. 2009.10. Obama B. Remarks by the President on Securing out Nations Infrastructure. Office of the Press Secretary, TheWhite House. 2009.11. Bursztein E, Gourdin B, Fabry C, Bau J, Rydstedt G, Bojinov H, Boneh D, Mitchell JC. Webseclab SecurityEducation Workbench. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security Experimentation andTest (CSET’10). Washington DC: USENIX Association; 2010. p. 1–9.http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1924551.192455812. Fanelli
used to evaluate each individual milestone.A high weighting factor was assigned to “Degree of Completion” to encourage the team to stayon track and not let the project fall behind schedule. This milestone system added structure tothe project and increased timeliness, but the instructors were confronted with an unanticipatedside effect. If a milestone was completed poorly, and the student(s) received an appropriatelylow grade, there was no motivation to fix the problematic issues. Later, another student wouldneed to put in extra work to compensate for the first weak performance. A corrective action wasnecessary to hold the original student responsible for completing the task without letting the teamfall behind. In the year following the
learned the most from. The statistics lab was more of an “experience” than a lab, and was done using jellybeans rather than a chocolate product (so that all the students could eat the candy at theend and avoid food allergy issues). After a lesson on population statistics and some Excelbasics (focused on statistics and graphing), each team was provided a bag of jelly beansfrom the same company. Teams were to compare their number of each type (flavor) ofjelly bean to the total number as well as the results for all of the teams in the class. Asurvey of the student’s favorite flavor was also done to compare to see if the mostpopular flavor (s) were the most prevalent in the population. While the “lab” was simple,and many of the students were aware