thing. Our PI is also very present. He's in lab every day and always walking around asking if you know what you're doing and that kind of thing.”This aspect of her research project allowed for several mediums to which she could seek helpand guidance from. The participant had a positive outlook on the research experience based onthese circumstances. This concludes that a well-rounded mentoring experience can impact aresearch experience in a positive way and introduce a greater amount of knowledge to thestudent. Multiple research experiences entail multiple mentorship experiences that come alongwith it. The different experiences add more depth to a student’s overall research experience.Whether the participant decides to choose a career
Transportation Science, University of California Transportation Center Student of the Year Award, New Faculty Award by the Council of University Transportation Centers, the Cunard, Fred Burggraf and D. Grant Mickle outstanding paper awards by the Transportation Research Board, Harry West Teaching Award by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Penn State, Out- standing Teaching Award by the Penn State Engineering Alumni Society, and Faculty Early Career De- velopment (CAREER) Award by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Professor and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the
graduates add to the state's economy," fourresearchers from West Virginia University5 conducted a sophisticated economic analysis by firstconsidering the additional income earned during their career by highly educated graduates employed inthe state. Next, they determined the multiplier due to "demand-side effect" of additional spendingfrom purchasing goods and services in the state as well as "supply-side effect" of additionalProceedings of the 2019 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2productivity from companies in the state employing these college educated graduates (compared tohigh school graduates). As
) Content centered approachesFaculty centered approaches - Creating more faculty timeAs mentioned above, time is limited. Faculty members need to balance their time in terms ofthe three main responsibilities: research, teaching and service. In some faculty memberscases, complicating the time issue can result in creative ways to carve out more time forthemselves.Creating time for oneself is important as faculty members need to juggle between multipleroles and responsibilities within their positions. Most of our participants commented aboutthe three components of a faculty career – research, teaching, and service – have arbitraryand complicated boundaries. In the examples below, three participants claimed that it washard for them to make the
programming to create balanced teams using aprogram entitled Balanced Student Assignment Team Macro (BSTAM) implemented withMicrosoft Excel® spreadsheets. The method has been used by the Krannert Graduate School ofManagement at Purdue University over the past six years for assignment of individuals to teamsin the Professional Masters Program, encompassing the Master of Business Administration(MBA), Master of Science in Industrial Administration (MSIA), and Master of Science inHuman Resource Management (MSHRM) programs.One especially positive outcome of using the BSTAM method is that the course instructors havea much better understanding of the attributes of each class. The course instructor’s work with anMBTI expert in the Center for Career
time on teaching than on research. Colbeck also notices that theproduction of research was somewhat constricted by the narrow definition of what someinstitutions considered as “acceptable” scholarship.The book by Wankat11 is a great resource for new engineering educators. It concentrates on thedevelopment of time management skills in new faculty and discusses effective and efficienttechniques for teaching, scholarship, and service. Reis9 addresses his book mainly to graduatestudents and postdoctoral researchers preparing for academic career. However, the last chapter ofthe book is dedicated to the first years in an academic position and includes advice on timemanagement, teaching, research, professional responsibility, and tenure.3. Choosing
-driven design. While the curricular goals are to provide value-added experiences forstudents that go well beyond the scope of a traditional, discipline-centered BS degree program,an additional benefit of the program lies in its ability to transform the perspectives of thecollege’s faculty in regards to the vital role that multidisciplinary, team-based productdevelopment will play for engineering graduates who strive to add value to the global economy.Individuals often choose an academic career for the freedom it provides to explore and extendthe boundaries of knowledge in a particular sub-discipline for which they have a passion. Butthis orientation runs counter to the broad-based, customer-oriented perspective needed in productdevelopment and
AC 2007-2197: GATEWAY INTO FIRST-YEAR STEM CURRICULA: ACOMMUNITY COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY COLLABORATION PROMOTINGRETENTION AND ARTICULATIONMichele Wheatly, Wright State University Michele Wheatly (PI) is Dean of the College of Science and Mathematics at Wright State University. She has had a 25 year history of continuous NSF funding to support her lab research, as well as significant experience directing large projects targeting increasing representation in the STEM disciplines (including the Creating Laboratory Access for Science Students, heralded as one of the most innovative projects in undergraduate STEM curriculum in the US). Her career funding from competitive sources has totaled
strategies for effectivelyincorporate writing and speaking into engineering courses1-41. The approaches include writing-to-learn exercises to enhance students’ mastery of technical concepts, individual courses thataddress specific types of documents and presentations (e.g., the design report, the laboratoryreport), and integrated curricula that support students throughout a curriculum. What all of theseapproaches share is a commitment to helping students learn to use writing productively in theirengineering careers. Whether it be an emphasis on writing to learn, where students come to seewriting as a tool for thinking, or introducing students to the types of genres common in aparticular discipline, engineering faculty are seeking ways to support
for the day, one student turned to me and said, “That wasincredible. I have never had the experience where I was the one that everyone else wanted to be.I never thought that would happen in engineering or school.” This past year, we had one studentwho had set plans to get an MBA and go into marketing after graduation, assuming that theywere not a good engineer and they were therefore uninterested in doing it as a career. At ourfinal lunch the team member said, “I never knew I was this good of an engineer. Now I have torethink my whole career plan.” Competition programs run well give these sorts of opportunitiesmore readily than the typical industry sponsored programs. Competition programs run poorlygive no such opportunities.One other
research, and increase the enrollment of women and minorities in STEM degree programs. 5. Service to scientific and engineering community - Member of Rotarian Club, community and global outreach activities. Lectures at area schools and organizations regarding the importance of diversity in higher education, minority education issues, and women in engineering. Dr. El-Hakim has built a bridge program in Colorado that is expanding the educational and career opportunities for diverse populations. It was her vision to create a partnership among Colorado’s institutions of higher education to address the needs of women and underrepresented students. The Louis Stokes CO-AMP program
, particularly women and minorities in engineering and routinely volunteers in Utah's K-12 schools as an engineering mentor, science educator, and engineering career guidance counselor and is active with the Society of Women Engineers, Junior Engineering State, Expanding your Horizons, School-to-Careers, MESA, Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts. Dr. Furse was the Professor of the Year in the College of Engineering at Utah State University for the year 2000. She is the Director of the Center of Excellence for Smart Sensors, an active, funded research program including electromagnetics for biology and remote sensing. The Center focuses on imbedded antennas and sensors in complex environments, including
US Department of Labor10. This funding hasresulted in the development of the various curricula and has provided start-up funding forthe IPD program and Entrepreneurship minor.K-12 entrepreneurship outreach: The Integrated Product Development program hasteamed with Lehigh’s Iacocca Institute for Global Entrepreneurship (www.iacocca-lehigh.org/cap/) to sponsor Career Awareness Programs (CAP) for highly qualified,underrepresented high school students. The focus of these one-week summer programsincluded business, engineering and design arts, all with a technical entrepreneurshipfocus11. In 2001 in conjunction with Lehigh’s Global Village, the Lehigh team from theIacocca Institute and the College of Education was awarded a grant for a
. Many architecture studentstend to defer the required analysis of their design, and many AE students avoid extensiveexploration. However, as its name suggests, the Comprehensive Studio must integrate bothreason and intuition, or technology and design.Architecture and Architectural Engineering ProgramsOur Architecture and Architectural Engineering (AE) programs are five-year professionalprograms. Professors of each program work closely together in designing and teaching bothcurriculums. The curriculums are virtually identical during the first two years allowing studentsto experience the core issues of both programs before making a career choice. AE students takefive design studios along with architecture students (See Figure 1).ARCHITECTURAL
packaging of micromachined sensors and actuators and their interface circuits. Prof. Gianchandani is the recipient of a National Science Foundation Career Award, and he has published about 150 papers in the field of MEMS, and has about 25 patents issued or pending. Prof. Gianchandani serves on the editorial boards of IOP Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering and Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, and served as a section editor for Sensors and Actuators for 5 years. He also served on the steering and technical program committees for the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) for many years, and served as a General Co-Chair for this meeting
supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a National Science Foun- dation CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios for graduate students to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. Page 23.647.1 c American Society for
value of role models when people like engineering faculty, “Lead by example. Act theway you want other people to act. Think about what you are doing and how it will affect otherpeople. Make good decision that can be passed on. Do you say things that someone mightrepeat? If yes, than make it something good.” 2By the time students reach the junior and senior levels they have become engineers. They arelistening to their instructors as mentors to the challenging careers that lie ahead. The captivatingquality of the engineering curriculum lends itself to be the base upon which communication skillsare presented to engineers. Professors would not have to spend great amounts of time discussing thecommunicating that they do. But knowing that professors
design and arduino development.Miss Chanteal Maria EdwardsMr. Cedric Stallworth, Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing Cedric Stallworth’s 20 year career as an educator has centered on helping students and their parents make successful transitions from high school to college and from college to the work place. He has developed and run bridge programs that give students and parents practice at the college experience. He has run mentoring programs that contribute to the academic and personal development of students and provide parents with supportive feedback. He is in constant contact with high school and undergraduate students, providing them with encouragement, advice and a sympathetic ear. He considers
Challenges at a Science Center AbstractMany engineers attribute their careers to early interest in STEM. Interest, not performance, hasbeen shown to be a greater predictor of choosing to concentrate in STEM1. However, schoolsoften neglect the engineering component of STEM. Consequently, extracurriculars such asscience centers must play key roles in influencing children by fostering interest in engineering.Taking advantage of the popular tinkering and Do-It-Yourself Maker movement, increasinglymore science centers are offering engineering and maker programs. But are they empoweringvisitors to engineer?This paper details the study of the Ingenuity Lab, an engineering maker space at the LawrenceHall of Science. The space is open to drop-in visitors on
and robotics in STEM education. The NSF projects are SLIDER:Science Learning Integrating Design, Engineering, and Robotics and the re- cently awarded AMP-IT-UP:Advanced Manufacturing and Prototyping Integrating Technology to Unlock Potential.Mr. Fred Stillwell, Georgia Tech - CEISMC Fred Stillwell is a program director for Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathe- matics and Computing (CEISMC.) He recently joined CEISMC after a 20-year career in the Cobb County, Georgia schools, most recently at East Cobb Middle School in Marietta, Georgia. At East Cobb, Mr. Stillwell developed and taught an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) course as well as mentoring
motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans. Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2010. 99(4): p. 319-336.22. Ryan, R.M., Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1982. 43(3): p. 450-461.23. Self-Determination Theory: An Approach to Human Motivation & Personality. 2012 [cited 8/21/2012; Available from: http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires/10-questionnaires/50.24. Williams, G.C., Z.R. Freedman, and E.L. Deci, Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control. Diabetes
Technical Committee on Healthcare and Medical Systems. She has co-authored more than 30 peer reviewed articles, is a senior member in IEEE, and received the NSF CAREER award in 2009. Page 23.434.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Development of Verification and Validation Engineering Design Skills through a Multi-year Cognitive Apprenticeship Laboratory ExperienceAbstract:In this study, a sophomore-level Biomaterials and Biomechanics laboratory, junior-levelBiotransport laboratory, and senior-level Professional Elements of Design
.” Today’scollege-bound student’s needs and interests are substantially different than thirty years ago. Tothis end, our faculty has worked over the past few years to find a unique selling proposition. Byworking with current and incoming students in the program, it was determined that the conceptof a career in electronic product and system development (actually participating in the design anddevelopment of the devices they use every day) resonated better with new students. While this isnot a new concept especially in mechanical and manufacturing programs2,3, a literature searchindicates that this idea is unique among electronics programs. In addition, based on efforts atother institutions, a focus in product development lends itself well to teaching
problems with theguidance and some tutoring provided by peer mentors; these peer mentors are upper-levelundergraduate students in the college. PLTL groups aim to develop student confidence in Page 23.114.3collaborative problem solving skills and teach students during their first year in collegehow to practice independent problem solving methods. This procedure requires deepthought, time, discussion and risk taking; these are all skills beneficial for careers inengineering and computer science. For this reason, peer mentors do not have solutionmanuals. The peer mentors act as facilitators who work with students to solve problemsmethodically while
in most engineering programs over the last decade. Many studentsdecide to pursue a career in electrical engineering based on counselor advice, performance inmath, while others may like to work with electrical gadgets and decide that electrical engineeringis the right path to pursue. However, most of these students are not exposed to the electricalengineering profession and practice thereof. Some of the students enter the program expecting to Page 23.187.2start building circuits and programming microprocessors at the very beginning of their education.However, in most programs they face a tough time working through theoretical courses
. Page 23.191.2Given this great loss of potential engineers, the Kern Family Foundation (KFF) has partneredwith several engineering institutions to implement means by which to raise the success rate ofstudents throughout the course of their engineering career starting at the educational level first byevaluating students with a trimetric analysis tool developed by TTI. As one of the KEEN (KernEntrepreneurship Education Network) institutions embracing this challenge, MUSE has alreadybegun to make a step forward towards optimizing its level of undergraduate academicachievement by providing 104 enrolled students with TTI’s trimetric survey tool in the academicyear 2011-2012.BackgroundGenerally speaking, most institutions only address subject-matter
-learning from over 500 universities and colleges and from both public and politicalorganizations and representatives 7. Although engineering courses often provide opportunitiesfor project-based experiential learning, service-learning is not implemented as frequently inengineering courses as it is in other disciplines. This is unfortunate since most descriptions ofengineering careers include service to society or meeting societal needs as a goal or requirementof the profession 2, 8. Furthermore, service-learning in engineering courses provides theopportunity for experiential learning that can not only help develop technical and soft skills, butcan also help establish the skills for practicing engineering in an ethical and civically mindedmanner 2
concept to most stu-dent researchers. In previous years, the idea that one can utilize university resources to commer-cialize technology has been received with utter surprise by many student researchers at Michigan.But even with these resources, students begin to ask themselves, how can a business plan bedeveloped? How can one learn about business development while pursuing an engineeringdegree? How can capital be raised to support an emerging business? Who can help? And quitesimply, where should one start? It is our contention that an engineering curriculum in the UnitedStates should support students along this career path by providing resources, both academic andprofessional, that can help answer these questions so students can pursue their
seniordesign projects. Additionally, most industrial engineers have experience interacting with otherengineers earlier in their academic career through common engineering courses. However,interaction with business students rarely occurs before the senior year, if then. This deficiencyprevents the development of a key skill required for industrial engineering practice. This paper describes two innovative approaches to experientially teach multidisciplinaryproblem solving to teams of engineering and business students. Both approaches allow theinteractions to occur earlier in the curriculum. The first approach is through class partnering.Such partnering emulates more long term interdisciplinary efforts such as design teams andconfiguration