Conference Session

Research Methodologies – Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brooks Michael Leftwich, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Russell Korte, The George Washington University; Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering; Aditya Johri, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

] G. L. Downey, The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 1998.[6] W. Faulkner, “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[7] D. Vinck, Ed., Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2003.[8] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1994.[9] J. Trevelyan, “Reconstructing engineering from practice,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175–195, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135.[10] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T

Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lessa Kay Grunenfelder, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.[3] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen, and L. Vanasupa, “Integrating Project-based Learning throughout the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 3 & 4, 2007.[4] R. M. Marra, C. Plumb, and D. J. Hacker, “Developing Metacognitive Skills in PBL Undergraduate Engineering Introduction and Background,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2018.[5] K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. A. Leydens, J. Blacklock, J. Y. Tsai, and N. Plata, “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[6] M. Ashby, Materials

Conference Session

Sociotechnical Systems in Practice

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nandini Sharma, The University of Texas at Austin; Jeffrey W. Treem, University of Texas at Austin; Megan Kenny Feister, CSUCI

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

., Plant, T. A., Morris, M. E., & Seel, N. R. (1994). Collaboration media: The problem of design by use and the use of design. In Scrivener, S.A.R. (Ed.), Computer- supported Cooperative Work (1st ed., pp. 113-131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462276-8Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001Leonardi

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University; Allison E. Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

isyour major or intended major?” and “What is your gender identity?”Participants self-reported what they perceived their sources of SE in the course to be byanswering the open-ended question: “What experience(s) in this course have contributed to yourconfidence in building circuits?”The complete survey instrument can be found in the Appendix.MaterialsData were collected before and after participants completed an open-ended design project. Aspart of this course project, participants were presented with a lab kit containing a toolbox ofprototyping tools (e.g., digital multimeter, screwdriver, wire strippers, and a solderlessbreadboard), a robotics kit, and other supplies necessary to carry out the design project (seeAppendix for a complete list of

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Filip Cuckov, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Marisha Rawlins, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Pilin Junsangsri, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Wayne Bynoe, Wentworth Institute of Technology; James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology; José R. Sánchez, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Council (WEEF-GEDC), Nov. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WEEF-GEDC49885.2020.9293654.[2] X. Xu, Y. Lu, B. Vogel-Heuser, and L. Wang, “Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 61, pp. 530–535, 2021.[3] P. O. Skobelev and S. Y. Borovik, “On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From digital manufacturing to digital society,” Ind. 40, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 307–311, 2017.[4] P. K. R. Maddikunta et al., “Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., p. 100257, 2021.[5] F. Sánchez Carracedo et al., “Competency Maps: An Effective Model to Integrate Professional Competencies Across a STEM Curriculum,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 27

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

items from Method 1’s strongest factors were coupled with a different set ofitems in Method 2’s factor structure.Method 3: Under-loading and cross-loading iterations. In this method, five under-loading itemswere removed, one cross-loading item was removed, and then that procedure was repeatediteratively. In total, 49 items were retained across 10 factors. We noticed that whileimplementing this method, the removal of one cross-loading item often reduced the total numberof factors, presumably by weakening the factor structure of two latent factors from the previousiteration and causing the weaker of the two latent factors to be removed from the sample.Method 4: Fixed factors. In this method, the number of factors was fixed to 10, and otherwise

Conference Session

ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Dickson; Rafal Jonczyk; Elif Gunay; Janet Van Hell, Pennsylvania State University; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Paper ID #37269Utilization of Automatized Creativity Ratings inLinguistically Diverse Populations: Automated Scores Alignwith Human RatingsDanielle S. Dickson Danielle Dickson received her PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2016 with a dissertation examining the memory system’s representation of numerical information, using behavioral and electro-physiological (EEG, brainwaves) measures. She extended this work into comparisons of children and adults’ arithmetic processing as a postdoctoral scholar at The University of Texas San Antonio. Her most recent research examines creative thinking

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diego Reyes; Brooke Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.xBahr, R. P., Jackson, G., McNaughtan, J., Oster, M., & Gross, J. (2017). Unrealized Potential: Community College Pathways to STEM Baccalaureate Degrees. The Journal of Higher Education (Columbus), 88(3), 430–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257313Bos, A., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746147Fry, R., Kennedy, B., & Funk, C. (2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. PEW Research Center

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 1: Adapting to COVID and other Design Challenges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Orser, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lorraine Francis, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Sartori; Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Brody Hultman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lauren Linderman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Aaron Massari, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; R Penn, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

’ experiences.Throughout this journey, students and faculty clearly did not enjoy the transition to onlinelearning. Despite this negative baseline, the data show no significant change in survey responsesconcerning the design process (CSE 1012 LO #2-3), core quiz grades (EE 1301 LO #1-3), or theoverall perceptions of students (SRTs). Thus, there is good reason to believe that these sustainableadaptations, necessitated by the pandemic, should be retained.References[1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson

Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Sheima Khatib, Texas Tech University; Jacob Vaughn, Texas Tech University

demonstrated here through cluster analyses.Promising future projects relate to developing better tools to collect and analyze more extensivestudent reflections on their problem-solving behaviors. Related to more fruitful qualitative datacollection and analysis is the prospect of better understanding the ways in which problem-solving steps form into effective networks of information and coherent problem-solving plansand strategies. The present study takes a small step in that direction.References[1] Bloom, B.S., and D.R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classificationof Educational Goals, New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1956.[2] Bloom, B. S. "Test reliability for what?" Journal of educational psychology 33, no. 7 (1942):517.[3

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 1: Captstone, Ethics, and Statistical Methods

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth McDonald, United States Military Academy

write what they felt andprovide feedback on how to improve the study (see AAR Questions section).The following objectives were achieved:1. Conduct a character/virtue pre-survey.2. Conduct initial meeting and provide a virtue class to refresh and assist cadets with astandard baseline of virtue understanding. Answer any questions.3. Provide relevant reading(s) to educate cadets on virtue. Cadets will read the articlesbefore beginning the exercise and provide three questions or comments about the articles.4. Develop a daily “reminder tool/technique” to remind themselves to observe virtuous acts.5. Conduct a passive 5-day exercise (Monday-Friday) on virtue observations and log thenumber of encounters each day. Cadets were given logbooks to log

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arianne Collopy, University of Colorado Denver; Heather Johnson; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Kristin Wood, University of Colorado Denver; David Mays

,” National Science Foundation, NSB201510, 2015. Accessed: Feb.07, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsb201510/nsb201510.pdf[6] L. B. Kelly, “Draw a Scientist: Uncovering students’ thinking about science and scientists,” JRes Sci Teach, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1188–1210, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21447.[7] A. C. Barton, S. Menezes, R. Mayas, O. Ambrogio, and M. Ballard, “What Are the CulturalNorms of STEM and Why Do They Matter?,” CAISE: Center for Advancement of InformalScience Education, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.informalscience.org/what-are-cultural-norms-stem-and-why-do-they-matter[8] H. Fardi and G. Alaghband, “Assessment Strategies for Student Recruitment and Retention inEngineering,” GSTF International

Conference Session

LEES 6: Writing & Communication

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Essig, Purdue University Fort Wayne

teammates, but using the worksheet helps students practiceproject management skills and helps give them a method for communicating an absentee teammember. Table 3. Example tasks for a Workload Distribution Worksheet Task Team Member(s) Time Spent [min] Developed plan for experiment Wrote plan for experiment Recorded 2D motion videos Digitized videos in Tracker Processed data in Excel Created height graphs Created height equation Created setup diagram Created Results Table Proofread and edited graphics submittal Participated in peer review Wrote discussion on setup diagram Wrote discussion on height graph Wrote discussion on

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Student Growth

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Jensen, United States Air Force Academy; Luke Jensen; William Allison; Adam Goodworth; Douglas Fontes

, and technical competence to derive more detailed conclusionson how the charter of the program might be applied to lead to the best possible outcomes forstudents.REFERENCES 1- Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., Sullivan, W., (2009), Educating Engineers- Designing for the Future of the Field, Jossey-Bass, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching,. 2- Cooper, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Bruce, C., Dorman, S. G., Jensen, D. D., Otto, K., & Wood, K. L. (2015, June). Designettes in Capstone: Initial design experiences to enhance students’ implementation of design methodology. In Proceedings of the 122nd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 14- 17

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Baukal, John Zink Hamworthy Combustion; Linda Thurman, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Carter Stokeld

National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25284.[5] E. May and D. Strong. “Is engineering education delivering what industry requires,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), pp. 204-212, 2006.[6] S. Brunhaver, R. Korte, S. Barley, and S. Sheppard, “Bridging the Gaps Between Engineering Education and Practice,” in R. Freeman and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy, University of Chicago Press, 2018.[7] A. Agrawal and S. Harrington-Hurd, “Preparing next generation graduates for a global engineering workforce: Insights from tomorrow's engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 29(4), 5-12, 2016.[8] C. Baukal

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Supporting the Development of the Next Civil Engineers

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Clayton, Wake Forest University; Daniel Castaneda, James Madison University; Monica Palomo, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Carolyn Rodak, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute; Stacey Kulesza, Kansas State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University

in the ETW. The poll contained questions asking participants to respond to questionsusing a Likert scale with 1 being the lowest rating and 5 being the highest rating. When asked“How likely are you to recommend ECX Roundtable Discussions to a colleague?,” the averageresponse was 4.6, suggesting that participants value and support the program. For the question,“Do you feel like you gained new insights or new knowledge from the ECX RoundtableDiscussion(s)?,” the average response was slightly lower, at 4.2, suggesting that participants whoself-selected to attend the session based on their interest in the topic may have had some previousawareness of the ideas discussed in the session.The Future of ECXThe 2020 and 2021 offerings of ECX support

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brayan Díaz, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Cesar Delgado, North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC; Kevin Han, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

skills of graduate students in engineering(Markes, 2006; Ramadi E, Ramadi S and Nasr, 2016; Saeki and Blom 2011). This gap createsanxiety and frustration for recent graduates in the workforce (Jackson, 2014; Kolmos andHolgaard, 2019). Moreover, the construction industry demands for students to have more fieldexperience before joining the workforce (Atkison and Pennington, 2012).One strategy to bridge the gap is better integrating competencies developed in industry with thecompetencies developed in the universities. To better prepare graduates for the workforce, theindustry-based competencies must be transferable and adaptable so that graduates can applythem to different scenarios. Construction engineering education programs must prepare

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org; Leigh Ann DeLyser; Angelica Thompson; Eric Snow; Stephanie Wortel-London; Luronne Vaval

relationships between hypothesized Impacts, the Methods that will be used toMcGill, Snow, et al ASEE 2022collect data, and the evidence used to determine the extent to which the intervention is achievinghypothesized impacts. Using our hypothesis above, to measure the increase in teachers’ confi-dence, we may want to select a survey instrument that measures confidence teaching CS equitablyand administer that prior to and after the PD. We can identify appropriate construct(s) for measur-ing a teachers’ confidence in a specific area, as well as when those methods will be implemented.Finally, we can identify the specific evidence we will use to determine the extent to which theintervention

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Is This Real? Reaching Students with Virtual and Augmented Reality

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Sippel, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Hannah Blum, University of Wisconsin - Madison

.2018.11.005. [9] A. Barraclough and I. Guymer, “Virtual reality - A role in environmental engineering education?”, Water Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 303–310, 1998. doi: 10. 2166/wst.1998.0481. [Online]. Available: http://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.pdf.[10] L. Freina and M. Ott, “A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives”, Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE)(Bucharest, Romania, April 23–24, 2015), p. 8, 2015. doi: 10.12753/2066- 026X- 15 - 020. [Online]. Available: http : / / proceedings . elseconference . eu / index . php ? paper = b5bc8a20809b5689c689a7fec40255e6.[11] S. Kavanagh, A. Luxton-Reilly, B. Wuensche, and B

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jameka Wiggins, The Ohio State University; Amanda Johnston, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julie Martin, The Ohio State University; Ines Direito

and in the United States experienced social supports in the spring term(s)of 2020 when universities worldwide shifted into emergency remote teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cross-cultural study to examineengineering students’ social support during the pandemic. We administered the UndergraduateSupport Survey to engineering undergraduates at both institutions. The survey collected dataabout students’ sense of belonging and social capital, including names of individuals whoprovided support for their engineering education and the specific expressive and instrumentalresources they utilized during the pandemic.Results revealed similarities and differences between students at the two

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Becker, United States Air Force Academy; Timothy Frank, United States Air Force Academy; Joel Sloan, United States Air Force Academy

://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/lib_pub/10[4] K.J. Levine, S. Allard, and C. Tenopir, “The changing communication patterns of engineers.” IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1155-1157, 2011.[5] C. Plumb, and C. Scott, “Outcomes assessment of engineering writing at the University of Washington. Journal of Engineering Education, 333-338, 2002.[6] Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee, “Civil engineering body of knowledge: Preparing the future civil engineer,” Sponsored by Committee on Education of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Third Edition, Reston, Virginia, 2019.[7] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2021a). “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2019-2020.” [Online]. https://www.abet.org/accreditation

Conference Session

Statics and Dynamics Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Vitali, The University of Iowa; Emma Treadway, Trinity University; Aaron Johnson, University of Michigan; Jessica Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Alice Nightingale, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Nicole Ramo, West Chester University; Martell Bell, The University of Iowa

of Engineering Science at Trinity University, San Antonio. Her primary research interests include human-robot interaction and haptics.Alice M NightingaleJessica E S Swenson (Assistant Professor) Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan Her current research involves examining different types of homework problems in undergraduate engineering science courses, flexible classroom spaces, active learning, responsive teaching, and elementary school engineering

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nikhith Kalkunte, University of Texas at Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; Lindsey McGowen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Madiha Qasim, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

many comments indicating misinterpretation of the question’s intent.Notably, numerous respondents pointed out that there are other, much more important aspects ofleadership to be considered. In future climate surveys, we plan to replace this item with morecarefully worded one(s) about considering DEI contributions in selecting our leaders, and/or thedegree to which our leadership is viewed as understanding and prioritizing DEI. We also plan tomodify Question 2.12 (“At the X School of Engineering, I have opportunities to work or learnsuccessfully in settings with diverse individuals.) to refer to “individuals who have differentdemographic identities than I do” instead of “diverse individuals” to better control for variationin respondents

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Innovative Changes to the Typical Civil Engineering Coursework.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ellen Zerbe, Pennsylvania State University; Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kevin Haas, Georgia Institute of Technology; Susan Burns, Georgia Institute of Technology; Armistead Russell, Georgia Institute of Technology; Iris Tien, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute of Technology; John Koon, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert Simon, Georgia Institute of Technology; John Taylor, Georgia Institute of Technology; Donald Webster, Georgia Institute of Technology; Emily Grubert, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lisa Rosenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology

authoritative initiatives on CEE education have identified the need to graduatemore well-rounded CEEs to tackle society’s grand challenges and improve the human condition.The American Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE) 2019 Civil Engineering (CE) EducationSummit in Dallas, for example, summarized key elements of the future of CE education asproviding students with the following: (1) the power skills necessary to succeed in the CEprofession; (2) authentic experiences to promote learning and excitement; (3) a mindset towardinnovation, societal focus, sustainability and systems-thinking in their design solutions, (4) acommitment to diversity, inclusion and equity, and, (5) the flexibility to pursue their passion(s)(Hall et al., 2019). Along similar

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Design and Labs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manish Paliwal, The College of New Jersey; Bijan Sepahpour, The College of New Jersey

Senior First Semester14 Design Decisions and Matrices Produced and Final Designs Conceived 11- (with Consideration of Realistic Considerations, DFM, Man Power, etc.) 1215 Working Drawings Generated by each Team 8-1116 Working Drawings Reviewed by the corresponding Project Advisor(s) 9-1217 Working Drawings Critiqued by the Manufacturing Supervisor(s) 12-1318 Materials and Components Ordered 11-1419 Final Design Presented to the Faculty, Peers, and the Rising Seniors 1420

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - NAE Grand Challenges, Graduate Students, Sustainability, and Makerspaces

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olgha Qaqish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; David Parish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

prepare them with technical and essential skills that they can utilize whileworking with other groups and disciplines. Our scholars must take advantage of one or more ofthe following: complete a major or a minor in an approved interdisciplinary program, performan internship with an interdisciplinary focus, complete a research experience with aninterdisciplinary focus or take course(s) relating to a grand challenge theme (sustainability,security, health, or joy of living).c. EntrepreneurshipGrand challenges scholars are capable of translating inventions and innovations into marketventures and future global solutions to benefit the public interest and private citizens. Tocomplete this focus area, the scholars must take advantage of approved

Conference Session

Session 2 - Track 3: From website to work environment: Exploring minority undergraduate engineering students conceptualizations of engineering careers

Collection

2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Acaydia Campbell; Venicia Castro Villatoro; Angel Alexis Lopez, Florida International University; Janice L. Hall, Florida International University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

presence and work in the engineering field allowed humanity to take that next step to achieve either energy independence from non-renewable energy sources or anything that will improve the quality of life of everyone. Ultimately, I hope to enjoy the process and be proud of the outcome once I reach it, however hard, tedious or stressful it may be.The three authors worked collaboratively throughout this study in all aspects, and they operatedunder the guidance of two senior researchers. The former is a mixed-race woman of color from aclinically trained biomedical engineering background. Her research in designing medicalsolutions for health disparities led her to the field of social sciences to study the root cause(s) ofinequities

Conference Session

Assessment in Mechanics Courses

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amie Baisley, University of Florida; Keith Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Efhalia Chatziefstratiou, Arizona State University

Self-Efficacy: Four Meta-Analyses. Educational Research Review 22, 74–98.[3] Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta- Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430.[4] Lew, M., Alwis, W., & Schmidt, H. (2010). Accuracy of students' self assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 135-156.[5] Torres-Guijarro, S., & Bengoechea, M. (2017). Gender differential in self-assessment: a fact neglected in higher education peer and self-assessment techniques. Higher Education Research & Development, 1072-1084.[6] Sarin, S., & Headley, D. (2002). Validity of Student Self

Conference Session

AERO 2: Innovative Pedagogy and Hands-on Learning 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shantanu Gupta, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Mary E. Johnson Ph.D., Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Jiansen Wang, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

theseairports. This research aims to find whether taxi time at airports differ by airport hubclassifications and by the number of hot spots on airports.For this study, a sample of 33 airports was selected from the 77 airports listed in the AviationSystem Performance Metrics (ASPM) [5] data published by the FAA. The researchers sampledthe 11 busiest airports (by number of operations conducted) from each of the three hubcategories – Large (L), Medium (M), and Small (S) – as identified by the National Plan ofIntegrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) [6]. The 20 busiest days (by number of operationsconducted) from May 01, 2022, to September 30, 2022 were selected for each airport. From theASPM dataset, average quarter-hour taxi-in and taxi-out times between 06

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 7: Partnerships Making It Real! II

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

,alternative pathways and the different types of engineering disciplines. To address these needs,we brought in an undergraduate student panel to discuss a variety of topics and were given thefollowing questions to discuss: ● What do you wish you had been told in high school about applying to an engineering program? ● What do you wish you had been told about the engineering profession? ● What are some of the benefits of an engineering degree, as you see it? ● Do you know someone who you think would be an excellent engineering student? Why do you think s/he did not pursue engineering? ● What’s the number one skill set a prospective engineering student should be working on in high school? ● What’s the number one