and technology teacher, as well as several years of electrical and mechanical engineering design experience as a practicing engineer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Swarthmore College, his Master’s of Education degree from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Doctorate in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Prof. Bhaskar C. S. Chittoori, Boise State University Dr. Bhaskar Chittoori received his bachelor’s degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada, India in 2002 and master’s degree from National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, India in 2004. He received his Ph.D. degree in 2008 from the
Paper ID #21429The Ethical Judgement Processes of Students in Computing: Implications forProfessional DevelopmentMr. Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Amir Hedayati is a PhD Candidate in Human Resource Development at College of Education at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in Computer Engineering from Sharif University of Technology in 2008 and his M.B.A. from University of Tehran in 2011. He has presented his research in past years at multiple conferences including American Evaluation Association, International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, and Academy of
peo-ple to solve complex problems or achieve complex goals in conditions when something is notknown and the solutions are in the field of uncertainty, that is, at the starting point there is noobvious solution and the whole path. This methodology is especially relevant in the develop-ment of new entrepreneurial and innovative projects both for engineering and management stu-dents, since it allows going beyond the standard thinking when it is necessary to develop a newproduct, service or technology. The SAP Next-Gen program [6] is an innovation platform for the SAP ecosystem ena-bling companies, partners and universities to connect and innovate with purpose linked to theUN Global Goals. The SAP Next-Gen program provides unique
Johnstown. Prior to joining University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, Dr. Parks’ worked for over seven years at the Alcoa Technical Center focusing on development and commercialization of sustainable wastewater treat- ment and solid waste reuse technologies. She also served as a member of the Alcoa Foundation Board of Directors, providing environmental expertise to support the Foundation’s focus areas of Environment, Em- powerment, and Education, as well as her experience with science, technology, engineering, and mathe- matics (STEM) education for women. Prior to joining Alcoa in 2008, Dr. Parks worked for approximately seven years as a consultant to government agencies, municipalities, and industrial clients performing wa
).16. B. Rubin, R. Fernandes, M. Avgerinou & J. Moore. “The effect of learning management systems on student and faculty outcomes.” The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 82-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.008 (2010).17. T. McGill & J. Klobas. “A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact.” Computers & Education, 52(2), 496-508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.00218. M. Besterfield-Sacre. “Triangulating assessments,” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Meeting. American Society for Engineering Education (2000).
of the need for targeted faculty development in the implementation of active-learning methodologies to insure the method has the intended effect on student learning andengagement.Introduction:Teaching methods are known to affect student performance in a course. The meta-analysis of225 studies on active-learning by Freeman, et al [1] found students in STEM courses taught withextensive lecturing are 1.5 times more likely to fail, earn a D, or withdraw from the course thanstudents taught with active-learning methods in the same STEM course subject. A second meta-analysis of engineering and technology education journal articles confirmed that small-group andcollaborative learning pedagogies increased student performance by close to a half a
infrastructure content into upper level courses.Dr. Michael R. Penn, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Lead author of the textbook, Introduction to Infras- tructure: An Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Matthew W Roberts, Southern Utah University Dr. Roberts has been teaching structural engineering topics for 14 years. He recently joined the faculty in the Engineering and Technology department at Southern Utah University.Dr. Steven D Hart, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Steven D. Hart, P.E. is an adjunct professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute, the Chief Engineer of Hart Engineering, LLC
Paper ID #13550Multidisciplinary Vertically Integrated Teams Working on Grand ChallengesMs. Magdalini Z Lagoudas, Texas A&M University Magda Lagoudas, Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships, Dwight Look College of Engineering, Texas A&M University. Mrs. Lagoudas holds a BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering. She worked for the State of New York and industry before joining Texas A&M University in 1993. Since then, she developed and taught courses in the Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Technology. In 2001, she joined the Spacecraft Technology Center as an Assistant
about how well what students learn transfers to the workplace. Our researchattempts to highlight the importance and necessity to effectively evaluate how and what studentslearn, transfers to real life work situations.This project will illustrate how instructors can use technology judiciously to increase studentlearning. The MATLAB® modeling and simulation components of the engineering statics ELMreduces the time that students usually dedicate to computation. When students solve problemsthat have several equations and unknowns, they often commit manual errors. Introducing theMATLAB® component, as we do, after the students are exposed to the concept allows thestudents to spend more time reflecting on the theoretical aspects, setting up the
. Page 26.310.3BackgroundPrevious work has shown that not just industrial engineering students but all Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) students are predominantly active,visual, and sensing learner types2 . However, it is evident that most undergraduateengineering courses are generally taught toward reflective, verbal, and intuitive learnertypes3 . This is in fact the exact opposite of the suggestions made from multiple learningstyle studies4 . Engineering teaching is more focused on theory and mathematical proofsover practical, “real world” applications and experimentation favored by sensing learners 4 .As is suggested by Felder 5 , in order to meet Student Outcome C (SOc) from ABET (SOc:Ability to design a system
Paper ID #21425Improving Instruction and Assessment via Bloom’s Taxonomy and Descrip-tive RubricsDr. Kathryn R. Gosselin, San Jose State University Kathryn R. Gosselin is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at San Jose State University. She joined SJSU in 2015, and her research is focused on thermo-fluids problems in sustainable energy, particular the effect of turbulence on a wide variety of technologies. She teaches courses in thermody- namics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer, and she is interested in studying the intersection of pedagogy and assessment.Dr. Nicole Okamoto, San Jose State University
Paper ID #22452Machine Design: Different Pedagogical Approaches to Achieve Targeted Out-comesDr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 14 years in industry designing automated equipment.Dr. Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dr. Rungun Nathan is an associate professor and program chair for mechanical engineering in the division of engineering at Penn State Berks
Paper ID #27419Advancing Freshmen Engineering Education by Utilizing the Impact of 2017Storms on U.S InfrastructureDr. Jagadish Torlapati, Rowan University Dr. Jagadish Torlapati is currently a faculty at the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Rowan University in Glassboro. His primary areas of interest are environmental and water resources engineering. Prior to his role at Rowan University, he was a post-doctoral researcher at New Jersey Institute of Technology where he worked on Exxon Valdez and BP oil spills. He has received his Doctoral and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Auburn University. He
in the In- dian Institute of Technology (IIT) at Gandhingar, India and in the Theoretical and Applied Mechanics/ Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department at Cornell University, and has served as a technical adviser to Timetooth Technologies Pvt. Ltd., India. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing and Improving Student Engagement and Motivation in Mechanical Engineering Online CoursesAbstractDevelopment of online courses in academia has been on the rise and both educators and students haveshown interest in possibilities and affordances peculiar to this platform. It offers time flexibility and allowsstudents to better organize their individual
scientists, especiallythose that will be working with data about people and with automated techniques that can haveconsequences on people's lives” [4, p. 20]. Similar to the curriculum defined by IDSSP [3], theyrecommend that students study failures as well as successful case studies. The report alsoincludes a link to a list of university courses on ethics and technology and other resources [5].The ethical topics raised in the report can be summarized in two categories: 1. educational training: curriculum and research programs; define code of ethics, and 2. current events/case studies: success and disaster stories.2.5 National Academies of Science/Engineering/Medicine (NASEM)The US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM
interests in- clude innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Through real-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarova’s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance is influenced by aptitudes, spatial skills, personal interests and direct manipulation of mechanical objects.Mr. Douglas Hagemeier, Boise State UniversityProf. Harish Subbaraman, Boise State University Dr
to achieve optimum robustness. For an energy collection systemwe decided to use evacuated tube technology. To store this energy we selected a basic,well-insulated water tank. Much deliberation was put into what type of collector to use. The Architecturestudents were looking for a technology that was both aesthetically pleasing and resistantto the corrosive saltwater environment of the Elizabeth River. As engineering students,we were looking for an efficient system that could provide the requisite heat to the poorlyinsulated classroom space (three walls of floor to ceiling single-paned hurricane glasswith an R-value of one). Both parts of the team found a compromise in evacuated tubetechnology. This technology provided a high level of
AC 2008-269: INCREASING AWARENESS ABOUT SERVICE INDUSTRIESOPPORTUNITIES FOR IET AND IE GRADUATESDonna Summers, University of Dayton Page 13.737.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Increasing Awareness About Service Industries Opportunities For IET and IE GraduatesToday’s global economy has significantly affected job opportunities for IndustrialEngineering Technology and Industrial Engineering graduates. Fortunately, IET and IEare adaptable degrees. The tools and techniques taught IETs and IEs focus onproductivity, costs, quality, and safety. Can you think of any organization, anywhere inthe world, that wouldn’t want to improve in these
management discussions, briefings on CE projects, technological Page 11.231.3 advances in the discipline, cutting edge research, lessons learned through a career in CE, introductions to advanced CE software, business practices, the role of a new CE graduate in a firm, preparing for job interviews, resume writing and opportunities in the CE field.2. Hold professional conduct meetings: A special meeting category exists to promote meetings that focus on ethics and issues concerning professional licensure. Often real cases are discussed, issues engineers face in the real world on a continual basis, as well as requirements and expectations on
2006-1504: LEAN SIX SIGMA AS AN IMPROVEMENT TOOL IN ACADEMIARosida Coowar, University of Central Florida Rosida Coowar received her Ph.D. from the University of Central Florida in Orlando in Industrial Engineering. She holds a Diploma in Telecommunications and Electronics from the U.K., and an MSEE from the University of Massachusetts. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. Her research interests include Process Improvement, Industrial Statistics, Quality Engineering and Digital Systems Design. She is a senior member of the IEEE, member of ASEE and
development, not an erroneous calculation inthe detailed design phase, that leads to failed systems. However, in many cases involving thedevelopment of highly complex systems, poor systems engineering practices can result indifficulties or failures executing sound architectures.Systems architecting can be a difficult topic to teach since it typically involves an eclectic blendof art, science, judgment, and the application of heuristics; it also requires a holisticunderstanding of technologies, politics, and society. Despite recent increased emphasis onsystems engineering, most systems engineering textbooks focus either on exclusively softwaretopics or on specific tools (such as Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Design StructureMatrices (DSM), or
data measuring how wellstudents achieve course objectives. Finally, experience gleaned from this course for non-majorshas produced ideas for lessons engineering instructors can apply to their own courses.IntroductionThe context for this work is a course titled The Global Environment. The course teaches studentsto analyze global environmental issues, resources, and human activities with a systems approachbased on scientific, economic, political, social and ethical perspectives. The course forms thecapstone experience for the Minor in Environmental Studies.Perhaps what will most fascinate engineering faculty is how the course integrates non-technicalcontent with science and technology. The lecture portion of the course mixes technical and non
microfluidic/thermal devices.Hakan Gurocak, Washington State University-Vancouver Hakan Gurocak is Director of School of Engineering and Computer Science and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Washington State University Vancouver. His research interests are robotics, automation, fuzzy logic, technology assisted distance delivery of laboratory courses and haptic interfaces for virtual reality.Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver Dr. Dave (Dae-Wook) Kim is an Assistant Professor of School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Washington, Seattle, and his M.S. and B.S. at Sungkyunkwan University
transformative sustainable education, presented at AASHE 2010 (Pittsburgh PA) (accessed 5/22/12)4 Rhodes, F.H.T., Sustainability: the Ultimate Liberal Art. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53 (9): B24, 2006.5 Minsker, B. A Framework for Integrating Sustainability Education, Research, Engagement, and Operations through Experiential Learning, presented at AASHE 2011 (Pittsburgh PA) (accessed 5/22/12).6 Hauser, J.R., D. Clausing (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 63-73.7 Hacker, M., Barden B., Living with Technology, 2nd edition. Delmar Publishers, Albany NY, 1993.8 Crismond, D.P., R.S. Adams (2012). The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 101(4): 738-797
engineering ethics is reinforced by theway that micro-ethics are taught to engineers. For example the Fundamentals of EngineeringExam offers multiple choice ethics questions suggesting that ethics problems can be solved in ananalytical fashion like other engineering problems. This worldview is problematic for learningmacro-ethics where there is often no single, precise “right answer” and where the power todecide what is right or wrong lies in the broader society. This worldview left unchallengedlargely precludes critical thought and reflective judgment regarding macro-ethics because itshores up the paradigm that “technology is neutral” and this leads inexperienced engineers tobelieve that engineering principles can be applied in abstraction and
practices.Christina Smith, Oregon State University Christina Smith is a graduate student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Utah in chemical engineering and is pursuing her PhD also in chemical engineering with an emphasis on engineering education. Her research interests include diffusion of innovations and student personal epistemology.Dr. Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University Bill Brooks is a postdoctoral scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oregon State University. His Ph.D used written explanations to concept questions to investigate technology mediated active learning in
ofEngineering, of the National Academies, entitled The Engineer of 20201 and its follow-onEducating the Engineer of 20202. These reports, written by two groups of distinguishededucators and practicing engineers from diverse backgrounds, were developed in response to aconcern that engineering students of today may not be appropriately educated to meet thedemands that will be placed on the engineer of the future. The reports tackle the demands facingcurrent engineering students without refocusing and reshaping the undergraduate engineeringlearning experience.Numerous articles and papers have been written regarding the evolution of the engineer and theneed to therefore evolve the education of engineering students, due to breakthrough technologies,fast
AC 2012-4716: A THERMODYNAMICS SHORT COURSE FOR A SUM-MER OUTREACH PROGRAMMs. Natalie Barrett, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natalie Barrett is a mechanical engineering Ph.D. student at Purdue University and is interested in re- newable energy. Barrett received a B.S.M.E. from Florida State University, a M.S.M.E. from Georgia Institute of Technology, and a M.B.A. from Indiana University. She has taught at Wentworth Institute of Technology as an Adjunct Professor. She has also worked in industry at Pratt & Whitney for several years and served in roles such as Integrated Product Team Leader and Affordability and Risk Manager for the F135 Engine Program
), where his teaching and research interests were in the area of polymer processing, manufacturability, and rapid prototyping/tooling technologies. Kander was also Department Head of Integrated Science & Technology (ISAT) at JMU and a faculty member in the Materials Science & Engineering Department (MSE) at Virginia Tech (VT). While at VT, he was also Director of the College of Engineering’s interdisciplinary ”Green Engineering” program. Be- fore joining academia, he was employed by the DuPont Company as a Senior Engineer in the Advanced Composites Division of the Fibers Department and in the Polymer Physics Group of the Central Research Department. Kander has taught a wide range of courses. At Philadelphia
insight into the ethical problems theywill encounter as professional and a framework for making ethical decisions.Conclusions (1) Statistical analysis demonstrated that students who were instructed explicitly in ethics are more aware of ethical questions in engineering. (2) There is value in teaching ethics to the students. (3) The authors plan to extend this strategy to two other courses over the next three years. The method presented in this study may be used at other institutions with appropriate modifications in order to prepare the students for the ethical dilemmas they will encounter when they enter engineering practice.Bibliography1. Rosentrater and Balamuralikrishna, “Ethics for industrial technology