: Insights from Undergraduates.”[2] J. Dewey, Experience And Education. Simon and Schuster, 2007.[3] D. A. Schön, The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.[4] A. R. Carberry, T. S. Harding, P. J. Cunningham, K. R. Csavina, M. C. Ausman, and D. Lau, “Professional and personal use of reflection by engineering faculty, students, and practitioners,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 2018-June.[5] L. Boswell, “The structure trap: students’ perceptions of reflection on a co-curricular immersion service-learning trip,” Thesis, Humboldt State University, 2010.[6] G.-D. Chen, C.-C. Liu, K.-L. Ou, and M.-S. Lin
Characteristics to Dimensions of Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness,”Coll. Stud. J., 2006.[4] S. Liaw and K.-L. Goh, “Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations ofteaching,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., pp. 37–43, 2003.[5] C. Kim, E. Damewood, and N. Hodge, “Professor Attitude: Its Effect on TeachingEvaluations,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 458–473, 2000.[6] J. S. Pounder, “Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analyticalframework for answering the question,” Qual. Assur. Educ., 2007.[7] T. Hinkin, “The Effects of Time of Day on Student Teaching Evaluations: Perceptionversus Reality,” J. Mangement Educ., 1991.[8] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton,“Persistence
Demonstration in Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), 2016, Online: http://www.hostsymposium.org/host2016/hardware-demo-list_2016.php[3] A. Holst, J. Jang and S. Ghosh, "Investigation of magnetic field attacks on commercial Magneto-Resistive Random Access Memory," 2017 18th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Santa Clara, CA, 2017, pp. 155-160.[4] CSAW Embedded Security Challenge, https://www.csaw.io/esc[5] Berrett, Dan. "How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture." The chronicle of higher education 12 (2012): 1-14.[6] Furman, Burford J. "The un-lecture: a computer-assisted curriculum delivery approach for the effective teaching of mechanical design
of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology, 22:1215-1217.2. Emmert-Streib, F., S-D Zhang, and P. Hamilton. 2015. Computational cancer biology: education is a natural key to many locks. BMC Cancer, 15:7.3. Janes, K.A., P.L. Chandran, R.M. Ford, M.J. Lazzara, J.A. Papin, S.M. Peirce, J.J. Saucerman, and D.A. Lauffenburger. 2017. An engineering design approach to systems biology. Integrative Biology, 9(7):574-583.4. Dunn, M.C. and P.E. Bourne. 2017. Building the biomedical data science workforce. PLoS Biol., 15(7):e2003082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.20030825. Hood, L., R. Balling, and C. Auffray. 2012. Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches
. 423-451, 2004.[8] R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/, 2013.[9] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar, "Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 369-398, 1991/06/01 1991.[10] E. H. Fini, F. Awadallah, M. M. Parast, and T. Abu-Lebdeh, "The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 473- 488, 2017.[11] J. S
seminar was supported bythe Oregon GEAR UP program in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Education, throughthe GEAR UP program, grant No. P334S140033. The opinions expressed are those of theauthors and do not represent the views of the GEAR UP program or the U.S. Department ofEducation.References1. States, N.L., Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States, Education, Editor. 2013, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.2. Yoon Yoon, S., M.G. Evans, and J. Strobel, Validation of the Teaching Engineering Self‐ Efficacy Scale for K‐12 Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 2014. 103(3): p. 463-485.3. Board, N.S., Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. 2016: Arlington, VA.4
. Boice, Advice for new faculty members: nihil nimus, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[2] P. C. Wankat, The effective, efficient professor: teaching, scholarship, and service, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.[3] J. Price and S. R. Cotten, "Teaching, research, and service: expectations of assistant professors," The American Sociologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2006.[4] B. G. Davis, Tools for teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[5] T. Huston, Teaching what you don't know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.[6] W. J. McKeachie and M. Svinicki, "Countdown for course preparation," in McKeachie's teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 2006
twosentences that the intention is to ‘understand how a steel, circular bar, loaded under torsion,behaves until failure.’For the second section of improvement, the preceding lab manual mostly contained experimentalprocedures in paragraph format, as shown in Figure 2, which made it difficult for students to followand understand. Thus, the authors decided to reformat the procedures in a numbering, hierarchicalscheme such that each step would be followed accordingly (Figure 3). This modificationeliminated the need of having to search in multiple paragraphs for necessary information anddeciding what to implement. In addition, the revised manual specified exactly the type of table(s)needed for recording experimental data. This allowed students to include
of these dimensions, are represented in their ecological model thatincludes a cognitive dimension within an interpersonal dimension, within a broadersocietal/cultural dimension.Our team’s larger study builds uponthe work of these researchers whohave characterized different elementsof systems thinking. We representour working definition of systemsthinking in Figure 1, where the“component” is in the center, whichrepresents a potential solution orsolutions to the engineering problembeing explored. The expandingcircles represent the contexts that canand should be considered in makingdecisions about the solution(s) andtheir appropriateness. Many times Figure 1: Elements of Systems Thinkingthis component is part of a largersystem, thus
National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of Toledo protocol202214.References1. Crimson. Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future: Future Skills. 2018 [cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/jobs-of-the-future.2. Vest, C.M., Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 2012.3. Daigger, G.T., et al., Real World Engineering Education Committee. 2012.4
Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012.[3] B.J. Tewksbury, “Specific Strategies for Using the “Jigsaw” Technique for Working in Groups in Non-Lecture-Based Course,” Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), pp. 322- 326, 1995.[4] D. Fitzgerald, “Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum,” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8(3), p. 88-90, 2013.[5] D.E. Allen, R.S. Donham, and S.A. Bernhardt, Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol 128, pp. 21-29, 2011.[6] S. Freeman, et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23) pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[7] S. Martin, D
and the City ofFreiburg im Breisgau for their help in facilitating the CREATE Germany program.6. References[1] L. Quitzow, W. Canzler, P. Grundmann, M. Leibenath, T. Moss, and T. Rave, "The German Energiewende–What's happening? Introducing the special issue," ed: Elsevier, 2016.[2] W. Fischer, J.-F. Hake, W. Kuckshinrichs, T. Schröder, and S. Venghaus, "German energy policy and the way to sustainability: Five controversial issues in the debate on the “Energiewende”," Energy, vol. 115, pp. 1580-1591, 2016.[3] L. Gailing and A. Röhring, "Germany’s Energiewende and the spatial reconfiguration of an energy system," in Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition, ed: Springer, 2016, pp. 11-20.[4
, 2016.[6] S. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, How Learning Works: Seven Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, 2010.[7] L. Shulman, “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching,” Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 4–14, 1986.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1347675 (DUE). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.
isotherms of phenol andchlorophenols onto granular activated carbon: Part I. Two-parameter models and equationsallowing determination of thermodynamic parameters. J. Haz Mat., 147, 381-394.Hutchins, R.A. (1974) New Method Simplifies Design of Activated Carbon Systems. Chem.Engr., 80, 133-138.Langmuir, I. (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica, and platinum, J.Am. Chem. Soc., 40, 1361-1402.Pfluger, A., D.M. Roux, and M.A. Butkus. (2012) “A Hands-On Experience in Air PollutionEngineering Courses: Implementing an Effective Indoor Air Pollution Project,” Proceedings ofthe 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, American Society forEngineering Education, San Antonia, TX.Senthilkumaar, S., Kalaamani, P
. Discovery Press, 2019.[2] L. W. Anderson et al., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition, 1 edition. New York: Pearson, 2000.[3] D. Sayers, The Lost Tools of Learning, 1 edition. Fig, 2011.[4] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, Reprint, Updated edition. New York: Ballantine Books, 2007.[5] J. Dunnicliff and D. U. Deere, Eds., Judgment in Geotechnical Engineering: The Professional Legacy of Ralph B. Peck, 1 edition. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1984.
].References[1] T. Motohiro, Handbook of sputtering technology, edited by K. Wasa, I. Kanno, and H. Kotera(Elsevier, Waltham, MA, 2012), 2nd Ed.[2] J. Vawdrey, P. Weber, Operating the Sputtering Machine, 2019.[3] R. Kamali-Sarvestani, P. Weber, A. Minaie, S. Tolman, "Integrating EnvironmentallyImproved Photolithography Technology and Virtual Reality into Advanced NanotechnologyEducation,” NSF-ATE Grant 1700695.
, Global Health Innovation Insight Series, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/centers-initiatives/csi/teaching-curriculum/global-health-innovation Session Topic(s) Introduction, Global Health Challenges 1 Spotlight Speaker (Global Health Clinician and Researcher) Identifying and Validating Needs 2 Spotlight Speaker (In-Country Engineering Partner) Design Principles 3 Spotlight Speaker (Design Firm) Understanding Market/Stakeholder Dynamics 4 Spotlight
engineering: a historical perspective," in Introduction to Biomedical Engineering, ed: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 1-29.[2] R. A. Linsenmeier, "What makes a biomedical engineer?," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 22, pp. 32-38, 2003.[3] ABET, "ABET-Accredited Program search," 2019.[4] R. A. Linsenmeier, T. R. Harris, and S. A. Olds, "The VaNTH bioengineering curriculum project," in Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society][Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002, pp. 2644-2645.[5] D. G. Williamson and K. Fridley, "A Survey of Credit Hour Requirements in BS Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering ABET Accredited
-216, February 01 2006.[6] V. Potkonjak et al., "Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review," Computers & Education, vol. 95, pp. 309-327, 2016/04/01/ 2016.[7] E. Scanlon, C. Colwell, M. Cooper, and T. Di Paolo, "Remote experiments, re-versioning and re-thinking science learning," Computers & Education, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 153-163, 2004.[8] J. Ma and J. V. Nickerson, "Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 38, no. 3, p. 7, 2006.[9] J. E. Corter, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, J. Ma, and J. V. Nickerson, "Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student
responses? Analyze and code homework assignments for connection and curiosity. Correlate participants’ homework with the five curiosity factors.We also hope in the second iteration of the course to increase the sample size of the data set.References 1. Mahadevan-Jansen, A., & Rowe, C. (2004, June), Module Based Freshman Engineering Course Development Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13180 2. KEEN, https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset-matters.aspx [accessed 1/20/2020] 3. KEEN,https://engineeringunleashed.com/searchresults.aspx?searchtype=allexemplarcard s, [accessed 1/20/2020] 4. Vernon
education: introduction tothe thematic issue,” International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, vol. 3.1, pp. 3-26,2010.[4] M. Lackeus, “Entrepreneurship in education – What, why, when, how, Entrepreneurship360Background paper”, OECD, 2015.[5] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students andentrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes”. International Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 28(2), pp. 425–435, 2012[6] E. M. Eisenstein, 2010. “Engineering and entrepreneurship: Creating lasting value fromengineering”. IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skillsfor Complex Global Environments, Dublin Ireland, 2010.[7] R. M. Carey and R. D. Shonat, “Assessment of Self-Paced
beprovided questions that evaluate W.S.P. 's ability to meet the following criteria. Is it easilydeployable in the classroom? Does it allow students to meet learning outcomes? Are teachersmeeting classroom standards? Is there student engagement, and are they meeting diverse needs ofthe students. Are the classes well-structured units and lessons? Is there student motivation in acollaborative learning environment? Is there a variety of assessment methods? Is the teacherdrawing analysis and conclusions and then sharing it with the students? Figure 7: Educator InterfaceParents - Parental and guardian observation can be recorded during the study portion of Work.Study. Play!. The child’s progress can be viewed
discussion on the significance of the service activity.The completed portfolio is submitted not only to the Peer Review Committee but also to ExternalReferee(s). For contract renewal, at least one External Referee will be determined by the candidate aswell as the division chairperson. In cases of tenure, the candidate will recommend three ExternalReferees and the division chairperson will select an additional three External Referees. The yearfollowing the portfolio submission the faculty member is observed in the classroom by at least threetenured faculty from the division (any field of engineering or computer science).SupportThe small branch campus has offered a positive experience, particularly in providing a supportivedepartmental culture where
, but go a bit further. At this level of effort, instructors should create originalexaminations and multiple versions of them. Many teachers who teach the same courserepeatedly, reuse their same tests each semester. Certainly, this does save time, but in this ageof total and digital communication, this should be considered a certain invitation to ‘cheat’. Tosee how easy it is to find old exams online, just search for ‘where can I find my professor’s oldexams’. Online forums can also be found that defend this method of ‘studying’ because5|Pageprofessors should know that their past tests have been digitalized for anyone to see. “If theprofessor thinks you cheated, then s/he is very naive about how the world works. Studentfraternities typically
GoalIndicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1) - United Nations Development Programhttp://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html[2] Gee, D., Tiari, S., and Zhao, L., “Design of Solar-Powered Food Dehydrators to Meet FoodAvailability Needs in Emerging Markets,” Proc. 2018 IEEE Global Humanitarian TechnologyConference (GHTC 2018), San Jose, CA, 2018[3] Malecki, A., Breniser, E., Littman, A., and Gee, D., “First-Year Engineering ServiceLearning Projects Can Play Large Role on Global Issues,” Proc. 2019 ASEE First YearEngineering Experience Conference (FYEE 2019), University Park, PA, July 2019[4] Laborde, L., Zepp, M., and Hirneisen, A., “Let’s Preserve: Drying Fruits and Vegetables(Dehydration),” Penn State Extension, 2019. https
beincorporated into other sections of this course.AcknowledgmentFunding from the DTE Energy Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.References[1] J. Lenn, F. Menkulasi, M. Jansons, J. Potoff, “Incorporating Computer Aided Design andThree-Dimensional Printing in a First Year Engineering Design Course”, Unpublished.[2] S. Johns, C. Hanson, J. Lenn, “Implementing Embedded Controls for Students with Little orNo Programming Experience.”, Unpublished.[3] Gordon, Jessica; Henry, Peter; Dempster, Michaux, “Undergraduate Teaching Assistants: ALearner-Centered Model for Enhancing Student Engagement in the First-Year Experience”,International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2013[4] Robert M. Capraro and Scott W. Slough, “Why PBL? Why STEM? Why
cannot afford.References[1] E. Salas and J. A. Cannon-Bowers, “The science of training: a decade of progress.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 471–499, 2001.[2] E. Salas, S. I. Tannenbaum, K. Kraiger, and K. A. Smith-Jentsch, “The Science of Training and Development in Organizations,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 74–101, 2012.[3] P. Chandler and J. Sweller, “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 293–332, 1991.[4] F. G. W. C. Paas and J. J. G. V. Merriënboer, “The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors
Capstone program. References1. E. J. Coyle, L. H. Jamieson and W. C. Oakes, "EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service*," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 139-150, 2005.2. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.," Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977.3. R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown and K. C. Larkin, "Self-Efficacy in the Prediction of Academic Performance and Perceived Career Options," Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 265-269, 1986.4. E. Bjögvinsson, P. Ehn and P.-A. Hillgren, "Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges," Design Issues, vol. 28
what they showed to solve revision questions.”This is consistent with Hattie and Donoghue (2016)’s model of learning where learning strategies canvary between students, and their effectiveness can change as students move through the surface, deepand transfer phases. Thus these results imply that WEVs can serve as a launching pad for further study,leading to deeper learning, critical thinking and knowledge transfer (Hattie and Donoghue 2016). Thisbehavior could be further encouraged by recommending additional practice problems related to eachworked example, which was in fact proposed by some students when asked how the WEV conceptcould be improved. These findings support WEVs as a means of encouraging active learning. Finally, it is important