Paper ID #11775Does Motivation Matter for Conceptual Change: Developing Effective Qual-itative Research ApproachesDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research
Paper ID #11190Ethics for BeginnersDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics; she is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter editor. She was named an
-warningsystem to allow faculty to notify students who may be at risk of failing a particular course19.Also, data have been used to understand differences across students in online learning strategiesto allow course designers to build a more personalized experience for different subgroups oflearners20,21. With an increase in the number of available data sources, colleges and universitieshave a great opportunity to explore how data can shape, enhance, and direct learning at all levels.Despite the need to investigate multiple categories of data from different areas of studentlearning, learning analtyics projects have relied heavily on learning management systems tocapture student learning processes. For example, Macfadyen and Dawson (2012)22 did a
managing director of the Center for Learning and Knowledge Man- agement of the RWTH Aachen University in February 2011. With a doctorate in Communication Science, she has been working at the IMA/ZLW & IfU Institute Cluster since 2003, from 2008 to 2010 as man- ager of the Business and Research Division: Knowledge Management. In 2004 Anja Richert completed her degree in Communication Science with a distinction at the RWTH Aachen University. In December 2007, she gained her doctorate in the field of e-learning, likewise with a distinction. In the years 2010 and 2011 she received the International E-Learning Award (IELA) for the projects ROLE and RELOAD with the e-learning solutions developed under her leadership
-traditional topics such as working with CAD and printed circuit design. Additionally itoffers students an introduction to non-linear circuit elements and modeling concepts. Many ofour students have participated in "Maker" and robotic events before coming to the University,and we believe that keeping this element of experience in the classroom is a valuable tool inmaintaining student interest. It also amortizes the learning curve required for these tools overseveral semesters, which will be of benefit when they enter the fourth year and are required to doa Capstone design project. We employ Multisim™ and UltiBoard™ from National InstrumentsInc. as our tool chain8.There were 2 sections of this course, a 3 hour section that met twice a week, and a 2
, we examine howengineering schools are helping students develop four key communication competencies:writing, creating and delivering presentations, developing and employing visual literacy skills,and participating in teams. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s(OECD) Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo) Project describes “competency” as: …more than just knowledge and skills. It involves the ability to meet complex demands, by drawing on and mobilizing psychosocial resources (including skills and attitudes) in a particular context. For example, the ability to communicate effectively is a competency that may draw on an individual’s knowledge of language, practical IT skills and
Paper ID #12997Understanding the NSF Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Educa-tion Report – Why are Industry and Academic Pathways toward KnowledgeDevelopment at Odds?Prof. Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University Charles (Chuck) Pezeshki is the Director of the Industrial Design Clinic in the School of MME at Wash- ington State University. The Industrial Design Clinic is the primary capstone vehicle for the School and focuses on industrially sponsored projects with hard deliverables that students must complete for gradua- tion. His research area is in knowledge construction as a function of social/relational
Paper ID #11245Using Isomorphic Questions, the Statics Concept Inventory, and Surveys toInvestigate the Benefits of and Student Satisfaction in a Hybrid Learning En-vironment (Civil Engineering Division)Mr. Eric Kjolsing P.E., University of California, San Diego Eric completed his B.S. degree in 2007 and his M.S. degree in 2008 in Structural Engineering from UC San Diego. In 2011, Eric earned his M.B.A. from San Diego State University with a coursework emphasis in finance and a thesis outlining a competitive framework for firms in the transportation industry pursuing Design-Build projects. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D
, but are very difficult to quantify.1. Introduction Page 26.1221.2The Partnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science(PRIMES) is a University of Louisville cross-college collaboration aimed at reducing attritionamong our STEM majors. This project unites faculty from the College of Arts & Sciences, theJ.B. Speed School of Engineering, and the College of Education and Human Development intackling identified hurdles that contribute to poor retention (and thus low graduation rates) in ourrespective undergraduate STEM programs. PRIMES’ goals are quite simple: 1. Increase by 25% the number of Bachelor’s degrees
the learning experience suchas lecture, independent reading, computer simulation, group discussion, and open-ended projects,to name a few.2 One reason is that individual students have different learning styles and thismulti-faceted approach will reach a broader base of students. Another though, is that differentapproaches to teaching move students to different levels within the taxonomy. A groupdiscussion is not an effective way to convey basic knowledge of a subject, just as lecture is not avery good way to drive synthesis.Much has been written about the use of computers as one such element of an enriched learningenvironment. Like most teaching methodologies, the introduction of a software component canbe done well and it can be done poorly
the night, they knew that I understand what it's like to be tired. When I try to get them to work through something, they'll usually at least make an effort, even if they were up half the night themselves.Some of her opportunities to connect with students came when discussing their future plans andaspirations, rather than current challenges. In the physics class, she was assisting them with abridge-building project, and was able to talk with students as she helped them glue toothpickstogether. Having a project like this also makes it easy to walk around and talk to the students, and see how they're doing in general. One very bright, ambitious young lady is planning to visit the colleges that have admitted her, so she can figure out
over forty (40) Senior Design Projects and his teams of students have received five (5) National Championships and three Best Design Awards. In the recent years, he has challenged himself with the creation an effective methodology for successful Invention and Innovation. Professor Sepahpour did his undergraduate studies at TCNJ and has advanced degrees from New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). He is the recipient of two (2) Best Paper Awards from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Divisions of Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Experimentation and Laboratory Oriented Studies (DELOS). He has served as the Chair of the Divisions of ME and DELOS of the ASEE. Prof. Sepahpour is an active member of
the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and
of results details the interests of student members in Chapter-providedprogramming. Some respondents are interested in greater outreach or social programming, butfor the most part, participants want their ASEE Student Chapters to be focused on teaching andresearch. Participants are most interested in faculty panels for teaching programming,presumably learning from the experts, and are interested in research projects as research-focusedprogramming.Student Chapters are valuable for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, they provideindividuals with an opportunity to interact with students that have an interest in engineeringeducation. The common interest in engineering education is interdisciplinary, meaningindividuals may interact with
theirstudents interest and understanding of engineering substantially. Similar results weredescribed by Yilmaz & Guillen5 and Specking & Clausen6 after middle and high schoolstudents attended summer engineering camp for various durations. Lyons7 stated thatmiddle school students’ perception of engineering changed significantly (positively) afterinteracting with engineering students through conversation and project work performedone to two days a week over an entire year. Vernaza & Aggarwal8 described a positiveimpact on the middle school students after their participation in the half-day MechanicalEngineering day event. Students felt they had an increase in engineering knowledge andwould recommend their friends who were interested in
. His research and teaching interests include wearable computing, electronic textiles, and interdisciplinary design teams for pervasive computing. In 2006 he was selected for the National Science Foundation’s Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for his research in e-textile-based wearable computing.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the
Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Courtney June Faber, Clemson University Courtney Faber is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow
design capacity (including factor of safety) or nominal capacity. Figure 4 – Classroom Designed for Interactive Group LearningStudents perform the entire analysis for a unit loading of 1 kip per top chord joint. Specificcalculation steps that students follow are identified in Table 4. For each calculation step, thestudents must answer a pair of questions that relate to that step. The spreadsheet-based table ofnumerical answers shown in Figure 5 is projected onto the screen at the front of the classroom.Answers are methodically revealed during the period to keep students on pace, and theinstructors answer student questions when necessary. The instructors spend about 15 minutesemphasizing the key concepts at the conclusion of the
Curricula project [3].Also, the curriculum must reflect the relationship of IT to other computing disciplines as theydepend on materials covered in other computing disciplines. The curriculum must reflect theaspects that set IT apart from other computing disciplines. The overview report of the ComputingCurricula 2005 was augmented as necessary and organized into a form acceptable to theComputing Curricula Series, which is a guideline for four-year undergraduate degree programsin IT from ACM and IEEE in 2008.IT as an academic discipline is concerned with issues related to advocating for users and meetingtheir needs within an organizational and societal context through the selection, creation,application, integration and administration of computing
518 “The H-1B nonimmigrant classification is a vehicle through which a qualified alien may seek admission to the United States on a temporary basis to work in his or her field of expertise. An H1B petition can be filed for an alien to perform services in a specialty occupation, services relating to a Department of Defense (DOD) cooperative research and development project or coproduction project, or services of distinguished merit and ability in the field of fashion modeling… In order to perform services in a specialty occupation, an alien must meet one of the following criteria: (1) hold a U.S. bachelor’s or higher degree as required by the specialty occupation from an accredited
A. Approved for public release. basic research 7 Scientific Partnerships • Hypersonics Research • Quantum computing, • Non-equilibrium flow transducers project • Digital Twin • Ultracold atoms, Quantum • Info ops and security • Nanocomposites sensor-magnetometry • Living With a Star • Microplasma for counter HPM Steering Committee
Mastering work was meant to encourage low-stakes practice,with multiple submissions allowed for each problem, and no hand-written work associated withthe Mastering problems was collected. Second, Mastering grading is only granular in the senseof how many attempts a student has taken—not in reference to the quality of their work leadingup to submission of their answer. In the absence of any evidence of problem-solving process, wedecided to remove the Mastering data from the analysis completed here because it is qualitativelydifferent (i.e., no meaningful partial credit) than the other pieces of graded work in the analysis.Students also completed a small project (5% of their final grade) on a topic of their choice, andthey earned class credit (up to
,like the New Jersey Project. This 1986 conference developed an inclusive curriculum that beganas distinct women’s studies and evolved into curricular integration of race, ethnicity, class andgender, introducing both content and methods. By 1996, the project grew to involve more than100 faculty members in two- and four-year higher education institutions; it was followed by theCurriculum Mainstreaming Teaching Initiative that involved faculty from New Jersey, Maryland,Massachusetts, New York, Illinois, California and Tennessee.History textbooks in British Columbia tended to add content about women’s issue in sidebarsand asides from the main text. This “filler feminism” trivialized the contributions of women anddepicted a subservient, lessor role
standards involved in designing engineering curricula. He is currently conducting research on an NSF project led by Dr. Stephen Krause, focused on the factors that promote persistence and success for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Cen- ter for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His
questions and the response choices were the subject of well-designedresearch, and each question included one correct answer and several distractors based onstudents’ customary or common sense ideas (i.e., commonly held misconceptions)8,9. The samecontent was covered in all three sections. In addition, there were three exams during thesemester, with each instructor creating his/her own exam. Two exam questions that wereidentical across the flipped versus non-flipped sections were statistically compared fordifferences in student performance. The assessment analyst for the project conducted a semi-structured interview with the instructors after the course to discuss learning gains and studentpreferences with the flipped classroom.To further assess our
courses in thermodynamics, heat transfer, energy systems laboratory, cryogenics, and vacuum technology.Mr. David J Gagnon, University of Wisconsin - Madison David J. Gagnon (University of Wisconsin, Madison) is a Discovery Fellow and program director of the Mobile Learning Lab in the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery at University of Wisconsin, Madison. He directs a team of educational researchers, software engineers, artists and storytellers that explore the inter- sections of learning science and media design, specializing in mobile media, video games and simulation. David is also the Director of the ARIS project, a free and open tool that allows anyone to produce mo- bile games, stories and tours. He is also active
native English speakers.2.2 Interview ProtocolsInterviews, which were part of a larger project on gender and interpersonal communication inengineering, were 75 minutes long and took place in a private room at the participants’ campus.For one week prior to the interview, participants were asked to keep a journal chronicling anytime they felt the need to complain or ask help. Interviews began by asking students somegeneral questions about their study and then asked them to elaborate on one or two incidents inthe journal. During the discussion, participants were explicitly asked who they went to whenthey needed help and whether or not they felt comfortable asking professors and peers for helpwith academic work. Participants were then shown some
pedagogical research and undergraduate research projects, and his research interests include manufacturing laboratory pedagogy and writing pedagogy.Dr. Wendy M. Olson, Washington State University Vancouver Dr. Wendy Olson is a tenured Associate Professor of English and specialist in rhetoric and composition. She serves as the Director of Composition and Writing Assessment at Washington State University Van- couver, where she teaches undergraduate courses in first-year composition and professional and technical writing, as well as graduate courses in writing studies theory and pedagogy. Page 26.924.1
University, Lehigh University,University of Texas–Tyler, University of Rhode Island, Michigan Technological University andUniversity of Pittsburgh also have developed curriculums that cultivate core global competencyskills through intensive coursework, projects and/or thesis work, and international study-abroadexperiences. The main issue with some of these programs, however, is the duration of theinternational experience and the amount of training that the student receives before embarkingabroad. In 2012, 341,284 U.S. students participated in some form of international study abroadprogram (4% engineering discipline), however less than 1% of the total served or studied abroadfor more than one academic year3. Comparative studies have demonstrated the
projects in the program. He is also keen in engaging students in his classrooms using a variety of methods while developing some. Page 26.934.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 In-class anonymous student feedback and interactivity at the speed of light!AbstractDespite their utility, traditional approaches to gauge student understanding and collecting theirresponses in class have multiple shortcomings. This paper discusses the shortfalls of thesetraditional methods (student raising hand, use of clickers, etc) and compares them with a newmethod