Asee peer logo
Displaying results 13951 - 13980 of 36208 in total
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Peer Mentoring/Learning, Teaching Assistants, and Career Mentorship
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ronald Harichandran, University of New Haven; Nadiye Erdil, University of New Haven; Stephanie Gillespie, University of New Haven
Paper ID #37524College-Wide First Year and Career Mentorship ProgramsRonald S Harichandran (Dean) Ron Harichandran has served as the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven since August 2011. During his tenure as dean he has let curricular and programmatic innovations to develop technical communication skills and an entrepreneurial mindset in all engineering and computer science undergraduate students. He also leads the First-Year and Career Mentorship programs in the college.Nadiye O. Erdil (Associate Professor)Stephanie Gillespie Stephanie Gillespie is the Associate
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 3, Nature and Environment)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Davis Chacon-Hurtado; Sandra Sirota, University of Connecticut; Shareen Hertel, University of Connecticut
Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/a- real-world-approach-to-introducing-sustainability-in-civil-engineering-capstone-designCatalano, G. D. (2014). Engineering Ethics: Peace, Justice, and the Earth, Second Edition. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, 8(2), 1–85. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00589ED2V01Y201408ETS022Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305Chacón-Hurtado, D., K. Kaserounian, S. Hertel, J. Mellor, J. Barry, S. Tulasi, (2022) "Engineering for Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a Human Rights-Based Approach to Engineering
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Lance White, Texas A&M University; Sara Amani, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Larry Powell, Texas A&M University; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University; Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University; Robert Lightfoot, Texas A&M University; Rachelle Pedersen, Texas A&M University; John Moore, Texas A&M University
future in which participants are asked to watch the film on their own if they hadn’t beenTable 1: Prominent themes and associated participant discussion quotes for each Session (S) Duration S1 0:00–19:13 S2 19:14–40:04 S3 40:05–1:05:55 S4 1:05:56–1:32:10 Prominent • Hostile environment • Power dynamics in • Cycle of problems • Bullying Themes • Student faculty relationships the workplace • Not accepted in discipline • Educated does not mean and power dynamics • Lack of support for • Significant evidence of women not be- inclusive
Conference Session
Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach
, A. M. Lui, and S. M. Martinelli, “A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education,” Med. Educ., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 585–597, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13272.[6] J. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research,” 2013, pp. 23–1200.[7] L. Sun, “Work in Progress: Gamified Learning in Graphical Communications During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Virtual Conference, Jul. 2021.[8] H. Shon and L. Smith, “A Review of Poll Everywhere Audience Response System,” J. Technol. Hum. Serv., vol. 29, pp. 236–245, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1080/15228835.2011.616475.[9] B. J. Beatty, Z. Merchant, and M. Albert, “Analysis of Student Use of Video in a Flipped Classroom
Conference Session
Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University; Gail Verdi, Kean University; Lara Letaw, Oregon State University
capability [2]Enhancing human capability (criterion 5) is the goal of all preceding criteria [14]. Theapplication of the Engineering for Social Justice criteria in this framework consists of lecture andsupplemental materials that emphasize the existence of engineering within a larger humancontext. The writing-to-learn and InclusiveMag techniques described above are adapted toexplicitly include Engineering for Social Justice criteria. The cognitive styles activities frameteaming across difference(s) as both increasing opportunity and reducing risk. Similarly, theprocess log prompts identify structural conditions by encouraging contextualization ofengineering problems throughout the course.MethodsThe two essential elements in inclusive teaching
Conference Session
Computers in Education 7 - Modulus 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Afrin Naz, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Gay Stewart, West Virginia University
). Computational thinking: Leadership toolkit. (1st ed.). Retrieved from http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11CTLeadershiptToolkit-SP-vF pdf[3] Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235- 254.[4] Code.org Advocacy. (n.d.). https://advocacy.code.org/[5] Gallup. (n.d.). Pioneering results in the blueprint of U.S. K-12 computer science education. http://csedu.gallup.com/home.aspx[6] Google for Education. (n.d.). Computer science learning: Closing the gap. Rural and small-town school districts. http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/computer-science-learning-closing-the
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elan Hope, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Derrick Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Anitra Alexander; Alexis Briggs; Laila Allam, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
adaptive strengths in the persistence of Black men in engineering graduate programs,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, pp. 39–74, 2019. https://doi.org/gd32fn[7] B. A. Burt, K. L. Williams and W. A. Smith, “Into the storm: ecological and sociological impediments to Black males’ persistence in engineering graduate programs,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 55, pp. 965–1006, 2018. https://doi.org/gd32d6[8] D. R. Williams, J. A. Lawrence, B. A. Davis, and C. Vu, “Understanding how discrimination can affect health,” Health Services Research, Advance Online Publication, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13222.[9] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, R. A., Long, M. W., Ohland, and M
Conference Session
ERM: Design!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohamed Jalal, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa
academic successin the course or their contribution to their team’s project. Goal orientation represents anintegrated pattern of beliefs that leads to different approaches and behaviour in relation toachievement-type activities (Ames, 1992). Learning goal orientation refers to two classes of goalthat individuals pursue in the domain of intellectual achievement: performance goals (in whichindividuals aim to gain favourable judgement over their abilities) and learning goals (in whichindividuals aim to improve their abilities) (C. S. Dweck & Leggett, 1988). Individuals with aperformance goal orientation view effort and achievement as an indication of ability while thosewith a learning goal orientation view effort and achievement as an indication
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Manning, Clemson University; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Catherine Brawner; Rebecca Brent; Michael Tidwell, Clemson University
Choice, Dropout, and Labor Outcomes,” Ph.D. dissertation, Econ Dept., University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2020.[4] H. Al Yagoub, H. Ebrahiminejad, and M. Ohland, “Work in Progress - The GPA Trajectories of Engineering Students,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33570. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33570.[5] J. P. Salazar-Fernandez, M. Sepúlveda, and J. Munoz-Gama, “Describing Educational Trajectories of Engineering Students in Individual High-Failure Rate Courses that Lead to Late Dropout,” p. 10.[6] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, “Learning while Black: Identity Formation and Experience for Five Black Men who Transferred into Engineering
Conference Session
ERM: New Research Methods and Tools
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Trevion Henderson, University of Michigan
Paper ID #37232Research Paper: Development and Validation of aDepoliticization in Engineering ScaleTrevion S Henderson (Assistant Professor) Trevion Henderson is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and STEM Education at Tufts University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Research Paper: Development and Validation of a Depoliticization in Engineering ScaleAbstractThe ideology of depoliticization in engineering refers to the pervasive belief that engineeringwork is technical
Conference Session
ERM: Conceptualizations of Engineering and Engineering Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julianna Gesun, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julia Rizzo, University of New Hampshire
substantial impacton society at large as these students will engage in an engineering workforce where their work directlyinfluences the thriving of society at large.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Dr. Brad Kinsey, Dr. Michael Loui, Dr. Michael Briggs, and Dr. KarenGraham for helpful discussions, insights, and/or feedback on drafts of this paper. This material is basedupon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant OIA-#1757371. This work is alsosupported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Engineering Fellowship (EEC-#2127509).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science
Conference Session
Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Athena Lin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. G. P. Berdanier, “Genre maps as a method to visualize engineering writing and argumentation patterns,” J Eng Educ, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 377–393, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20281.[2] M. Borrego, “Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 91–102, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.[3] S. Dart, S. Trad, and K. Blackmore, “Navigating the path from technical engineering to engineering education research: A conceptual model of the transition
Conference Session
Instrumentation Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Asad Yousuf, Savannah State University; Christopher Stronen, Savannah State University
ultrasonic sensor is responsible for triggering the output of the soundwave with a pulse. The action of sending the sound wave is called a chirp. To start measurement,this Trigger pin must receive a pulse of 5V for at least 10 us. The sensor will then output 8 cyclesof 40 kHz sound bursts. When the sensor detects that the wave has come back with itsmicrophone, it will set its Echo pin to HIGH, and keep it HIGH in proportion to the distancedetected.[5]The width of the echo signal can be converted to distance in cm using the following formulas:Speed of Sound = 340 m/s = 34000 cm/s1s/34000 cm = 29 us/1cmTime of Echo Pulse in us/29 us/1cm/2 = Distance in cmOr, Time of Echo Pulse/58 = Distance in cm Below is the code used to initialize the entrance gate
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sampson Addo, University of the District of Columbia; Pawan Tyagi, University of the District of Columbia; Eva Mutunga, University of the District of Columbia
Technology and Research (CAM-STAR).References[1] White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities.). Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/whhbcu/one-hundred-and-five-historically-black- colleges-and-universities/ [Accessed November 2, 2021][2] S. D. Lee, and D. Jang, “Support for Innovation in Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Exploring Associations with Disposition Toward Change, Empowerment, and Organizational Trust.” Journal of Black Studies, 43(8), 912-935. doi:10.1177/0021934712463236, 2012[3] J. Humphreys, HBCUs Make America Strong: The Positive Economic Impact of Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC
Conference Session
LEES 2: Stories of Intersectionality and Institutional Marginalization
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victoria Siaumau, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Yumi Aguilar, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Jane Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lynne Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Emily Flores, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
is essential inunderstanding the experiences of marginalized peoples [27] particularly when understandingvicarious trauma from hate crimes or experiencing microaggression related to a social identitythat, “may arouse immediate or delayed PTSD and related symptoms in the experiencing personif the experienced event(s) serves as a catalyst for recalling previous personal memories oridentity-group histories of extreme threat” [28]. This means that engineering students,particularly those with marginalized identities, are experiencing distress and, potentially, traumathat needs to be considered when conducting engineering education research.Utilizing Intersectional & Trauma-Informed Lenses to Build Better MethodologiesAs noted above, when
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Virginia Davis, Auburn University; Joni Lakin, The University of Alabama; Daniela Marghitu, Auburn University; Edward Davis, Auburn University
Engineering Education, Human Computer Interaction International Conference, and International Academy, Research, and Industry Association) in USA, Canada, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Romania. Her work was also presented by co-authors at conferences in Brazil, Taiwan and S. Korea. Among Dr. Marghitu's honors and awards are the following: 2011 AccessComputing Capacity Building Award, the 2012 Auburn University Access award, the 2012 Society for Design and Process Science Outstanding Achievement Award, the 2013 Microsoft Fuse Research award, the 2015 DO-IT Trailblazer award, the 2017 International Academy, Research, and Industry Association Fellowship, the 2017 Society for Design and Process Science
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gerald Marschke, University at Albany-SUNY; Holden Diethorn; James Davis; Andrew Wang
pandemic, and that such knowledge offered employment resiliency during theCOVID-19 recession beyond any resiliency associated with greater remote work capability and educational attainment.References [1] E. Barth, J. C. Davis, R. B. Freeman, and A. J. Wang, “The effects of scientists and engineers on productivity and earnings at the establishment where they work,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 167–191. [2] S. Mongey, L. Pilossoph, and A. Weinberg, “Which workers bear the burden of social dis- tancing?” Journal of Economic Inequality, vol. 19, pp. 509–526, 2021. [3] L. Montenovo, X. Jian, F. L. Rojas, I. M. Schmutte, K. Simon, B. Weinberg, and C. Wing, “Determinants of
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christine Wittich; Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
reconnaissance and performance assessment of rural infrastructure for 2018 natural hazards. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities (ASCE), 34(4): 04020054. * = REU Student. [7] Mousavi, M.S., Feng, Y., McCann, J., and Eun, J. (2021) In situ characterization of municipal solid waste using membrane interface probe (MIP) and hydraulic profiling tool (HPT) in an active and closed landfill. Infrastructure, MDPI 6(3), 33. * = REU Student.[8] Rageh, A., Linzell, D., Lopez, S.*, and Eftekhar Azam, S. (2020). Robust Output Only Health Monitoring of Steel Railway Bridges: Analysis of Applicability of Different Sensors. Handbook of Research on Engineering Innovations and Technology Management in Organizations. IGI Global
Conference Session
Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Salil Bapat, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Ajay Malshe, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Project: IntroductionWeek 3 Project: topic identificationWeek 4 Project: Topic literature reviewWeek 5 Project: Project statement and task-timeline planningWeek 6 Project: Design and MaterialsWeek 7 Project: Mid-semester project report submissionWeek 8 Project: Materials and process(s), evaluation of reports for feedbackWeek 9 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 10 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 11 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 12 Project: Fabrication and testingWeek 13 Project: Improvisation and optimizationWeek 14 Project: Writing Report (ppt) writingWeek 15 Project: Final ppt report
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Cristina Torres-Machi; Qin Lv, University of Colorado Boulder
), appropriate given Likert-type data that may notbe normally distributed.The average student ratings for the four primary survey factors are summarized in Table 3.Students had the strongest agreement with factor #4, related to their confidence in different skillsand abilities (6.27 ~ agree). Responses to this factor did differ among students with differentresponses to the computing attitude question (see Table 4 below; sig. 0.024 in KW test), wherestudents who wish there were more courses offered on CS and data analysis rated their abilitylower.Table 3. Average student survey responses across the multiple items in each construct on a 7-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree) Survey Factor Example survey item(s
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division: Developing Lab and Research Skills for BioE/BME Students
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Casey Ankeny, Northwestern University; Amy Adkins, Northwestern University; David O'Neill, Northwestern University
doreflect on standards-based grading and incorporate their reflections into the next iteration of theassignment. More specifically, 11 were aware of the course learning objectives based on coursestandards. Most students reviewed the standards-based grading rubric while completing thedeliverables for both Module 1 (12) and Module 2 (13). Twelve students reviewed the standardsafter receiving instructional team feedback and grade and twelve students used their performanceon Module 1’s deliverables to guide Module 2’s submission.We uncovered a disconnect between SBG reflections and students’ perceived utility with exampreparation. Fifty-seven percent used the standards to study for the final and 54% said that thestandards rubric guided their study
Conference Session
ECE Division Technical Session 1: Online or Remote Teaching and Curricular Developments
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed Zaghloul; Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh
, problem-based learning, and collaborative learning.Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul was born in Cairo, Egypt, in 1987. He received his B.E. degree in Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering in 2009, and his M.Sc. degree in Engineering Physics in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received a Ph.D. from the Electrical and Computer Engineering department of the University of Pittsburgh, in developing optical fiber sensors for monitoring harsh environments. Since 2019, he has been appointed as an Assistant Professor in the same department of the same school. Zaghloul is a recipient of multiple research and teaching awards; he currently holds the John C
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga; Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University
, doi: 10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0099.[7] E. Bingham and G. E. Gibson, “Infrastructure Project Scope Definition Using Project Definition Rating Index,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 33, no. 2, p. 04016037, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000483.[8] J. Sindhu, K. Choi, S. Lavy, Z. K. Rybkowski, B. F. Bigelow, and W. Li, “Effects of Front-End Planning under Fast-Tracked Project Delivery Systems for Industrial Projects,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 163–178, 2017, doi: 10.1080/15578771.2017.1280100.[9] M. Elzomor, V. Ferrer, P. Pradhananga, and R. Rahat, “Assessing the Pedagogical Needs to Couple Front-end Planning Tools with Sustainable Infrastructure Projects,” 2021, doi: 10.18260
Conference Session
Remediation and Curricular Changes to Improve Student Learning and Outcomes
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandie Han; Boyan Kostadinov, New York City College of Technology; Janet Liou-Mark, New York City College of Technology; Johann Thiel, New York City College of Technology
Paper ID #37007Curricular and Strategic Changes in mathematics to EnhanceInstitutional STEM EducationSandie Han Sandie Han is a Professor of Mathematics at New York City College of Technology, the City University of New York. She has extensive experience in program design and administration, including serving as the mathematics department chair for six years, PI on the U.S. Department of Education MSEIP grant and Co-PI on the NSF S-STEM grant. Her research area is number theory and mathematics education. Her work on Self-Regulated Learning and Mathematics Self-Efficacy won the CUNY Chancellor’s Award for
Conference Session
Computers in Education 2 - Programming 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Frank Vahid, University of California, Riverside; David May, University of California, Riverside
not write large chunks of code without running that codealong the way. If all a student's runs obey the rule (addedLOC <= 20), then IncDev = 1, but ifany run violates the rule, IncDev = 0.The rule is weak in being all or nothing: either IncDev = 1, or = 0. Instead, preferably the rulewould yield values between 0 and 1, representing the egregiousness of the rule violation(s).For example, a student who has just one violation with addedLOC = 21 should not be penalizedas heavily as a student with one violation with addecLOC = 50. Thus, we want the penalty to beproportional to the size of the addecLOC violation.Likewise, a student who has just one addedLOC = 30 should not be penalized as heavily as astudent who has three addedLOCs of 30 (a
Conference Session
PCEE Technical Session 6: Engineering Design in High School
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Figard, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Jacob Roarty; Samantha Nieto, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Adam Carberry, Arizona State University
Award Number EEC-1849430. Any opinions, findings andconclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s), and do notnecessarily reflect those of the NSF. The authors acknowledge the support of the entire e4usaproject team.References[1] National Research Council [NRC]. (2009). Engineering in K–12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects, National Academies Press.[2] Miaoulis, I. (2014). K–12 Engineering: The Missing Core Discipline. Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.6[3] Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynn Mayo, RePIcture; Katie Wheaton
an AISC award which provided the winning studentan opportunity to list an industry award on their resume. A similar assignment can be used forany STEM course.The majority of students recommended the assignment be used again next year, showing thatengineering and writing are perfect together!References[1] K. Levine, S. Allard, and C. Tenopir, “The Changing Communication Patterns of Engineers,” School of Information Sciences – Faculty Publications and Other Works, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_infosciepubs/84 [Accessed Jan. 16, 2022].[2] A. Peck, J. E. Nydahl, and C. K. Keeney, “Effective Strategies to Motivate Engineering Students to Develop Their Technical Writing Skills,” American Society for Engineering
Conference Session
Instrumentation Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Byul Hur, Texas A&M University; Carter Wheat, Texas A&M University; Zachary Stokes; Keith Fritz; Hunter Street; Xuan Dang; Kevin Myles; Zach Adelman
MedicalBranch/ Western Gulf Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases. Moreover, this work wassupported by Dr. B. Hur’s Texas A&M research fund and resources.References[1] T. G. Floore, “Mosquito larval control practices: past and present." Journal of the American Mosquito ControlAssociation,” vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 527-533, 2006.[2] L. Zou, S. N. Miller, and E. T. Schmidtmann, “Mosquito larval habitat mapping using remote sensing and GIS:implications of coalbed methane development and West Nile virus,” Journal of medical entomology, vol. 43, no. 5,pp. 1034-1041, 2006.[3] B. Hur, K. Myles, Z. N. Adelman, M. Erraguntla, M. A. Lawley, E. J. Kim, J. L. Burgi, K. Price, K. Fritz, D. H.Stalcup, Z. Pan, Z. Stokes, B. W. Harris, F. Aguado, C. B. Wheat
Conference Session
ERM: ERM Medley Session!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yashin Brijmohan, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
/download/447/297.[3] O. B. Adedoyin and E. Soykan, “Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–13, 2020, doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180.[4] C. B. Hodges, S. Moore, B. B. Lockee, T. Trust, and M. A. Bond, “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning,” 2020, http://hdl.handle.net/10919/104648[5] A. Bozkurt et al., “A global outlook to the interruption of education due to Covid-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis,” Asian J. Distance Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–126, 2020, http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/download/447/2.[6] J. Whalen, “Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Empathy, Metacognitive Skills, and Perceptions of Success
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Simon Ghanat, The Citadel; Dena Garner; Todd Wittman, The Citadel; M. Kristen Hefner, The Citadel; Deirdre Ragan, The Citadel; Thad Le-Vasicek, The Citadel; Emily Bierman, The Citadel; Blakely Adair-Hudson, The Citadel
student(s)receives a stipend of $1,000.The SURE Program strives to improve student skills integral to performing research. Studentsand their research mentors are expected to work together for eight hours per week for one-on-oneinstruction and research skill development. Each discipline required specific skills be developed,and the skills developed evolved over the course of the summer. In general students wereinitially taught how to perform several experiments. Once the students could collect data, thementors assisted the students in evaluating their data. By the end of the summer mentorsstrengthened student capabilities in finding/assessing relevant literature related to their work. Aweekly group meeting served as a structured event that