Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1381 - 1410 of 1616 in total
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Thomas W Ekstedt, Oregon State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
persistence of engineering students’ misconceptions in heat transfer. Journal of Engineering Education. 101, 3, 412-438.[4] Prince, M., Vigeant, M., and Nottis, K. 2016. The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning Activities on the Retention and Transfer of Conceptual Learning in Heat Transfer. Chemical Engineering Education. In press.[5] Koretsky, M., Falconer, J., L., Brooks, B. J., and Gilbuena, D. 2014. The AIChE Concept Warehouse: A Tool to Promote Conceptual Learning. Advances in engineering education. 4, 1.[6] Prince, M., Vigeant, M., and Nottis, K. 2012. Using inquiry-based activities to repair student misconceptions related to heat, energy, and temperature. Frontiers in Education.[7] Koretsky, M., Mihelic, S., Prince, M
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Ramana Pidaparti, University of Georgia; Christopher Stewart Rose, James Madison University; Cheryl Lea Beverly, James Madison University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
scaf-fold on prior learning and experiences, addressing a continuum of lower level to higher levelthinking and deep learning as appropriate for the curriculum. Reflection essays, class discussion,individual and group projects/products, peer review and feedback, or other types of activities willbe used to measure learner progress on the learning objectives, and to provide timely and rele-vant feedback to both the instructor and learner. This information will be used by both the in-structor and learner(s) to guide decision making and engagement in bio-inspired design. Rubricsor grading guidelines will be created for each formative assessment to ensure they align with theproject goals and learning objectives. Summative assessment will occur at
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amjad Aman, University of Central Florida; Nina Orlovskaya, University of Central Florida; Haiyan Bai, University of Central Florida; Yunjun Xu, University of Central Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
.193-212. 8. Rogowsky, B.A., Calhoun, B.M. and Tallal, P., 2015. Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), p.64. 9. Dekker, S., Lee, N.C., Howard-Jones, P. and Jolles, J., 2012. Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in psychology, 3. 10. Peterson, E.R., Rayner, S.G. and Armstrong, S.J., 2009. Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future?, Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), pp.518-523. 11. Allen, I.E. and Seaman, J., 2013. Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Sloan
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vann Priest, Rio Hondo College; Gisela Spieler-Persad, Rio Hondo College; Ryan Taylor Bronkar, Rio Hondo College
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
multiple responsibilities such as school, work,significant other, family, etc. The STARSS scholarship has given me the opportunity to takecontrol of my time by allowing me to cut out a very significant part of my time which is work.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM) through Award No. 1154093.References1. Excelencia in Education, What Works For Latino Students in Higher Education, 2013, retrieved fromhttp://www.edexcelencia.org/research/what-works-series2. Rio Hondo College, Application for Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Self-Evaluation, 2014, retrieved fromhttp://www.riohondo.edu/accreditation/wp-content/uploads/sites/28/2014
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jill K Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society. (American Society for Engineering Education, 2009). at 2. Prince, M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004).3. Ambrose, S., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C. & Norman, M. K. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. (Jossey-Bass, 2010).4. Hjalmarson, M. et al. Developing interactive teaching strategies for electrical engineering faculty. in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference (2013).5. Kober, N. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University; Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
research but can also serve as a guide for others who may attempt similar work in the future.Project Goals for 20151) Development, testing, and validation of the engineering innovativeness measurement instrument for both student and practicing engineer populations through the collaboration and support of ten universities and ten corporations in three phases: a. Classical item analysis and instrument testing. b. Pilot testing and factor analysis. c. Validation testing of instrument[s].2) Planning for full evaluation studies in 2015-2018 of Engineering Innovativeness at all 20 collaborating academic and corporate institutions. a. Project plans for research studies to be conducted at the participating collaborating
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Rachel Roberts, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington- Seattle
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
students were electrical engineers and twowere mechanical engineers. No students participated both in an interview and a focus group.Demographics by major and population for each interview and focus group are summarized inTable 1.Table 1: Demographics of Student Participants in Interviews and Focus GroupsParticipant Pool Major(s) N Ethnicity Gender Applied Math (1)Focus Group Asian (3) Male (5) BioEngineering (1) 6Sensor Systems Caucasian (3) Female (1) Electrical Engineering (4)Focus Group
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yongpeng Zhang, Prairie View A&M University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, pp. 52-64, Mar 2010.7. Kroposki, B.; Lasseter, R.; et al, "Making Microgrids Work", IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, pp. 41-53, May/Jun 2008.8. Ipakchi, A.; and Albuyeh, F., "Grid of the Future", IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, pp.52-62, Mar/Apr 2009.9. Liserre, M.; Sauter, T.; et al, "Future Energy Systems", IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, pp. 18-37, Mar 2010.10. Bouhafs, F.; Mackay, M.; and Merabti, M., "Links to the Future", pp. 24-32, Jan/Feb 2012.11. Reder, W.; Bose, A.; et al, "Engineering the Future", pp. 27-35, Jul/Aug 2010.12. Venkata, S.S.; Brahma, S.; et al, "Continue Your Learning", pp. 37-43, Jul/Aug 2010.13. "Workforce Trends in the Electric Utility Industry", DOE Report to Congress, Aug
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ann Saterbak, Rice University; Matthew Wettergreen, Rice University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, 2013.8 L. Barba, "This CFD class is flippin’," Boston University , 1 February 2012. [Online]. Available: http://people.bu.edu/labarba/Lorena_Barba/Blog/Entries/2012/2/1_This_CFD_class_is_flippin.html. [Accessed 21 May 2012].9 S. Char, C. Collier, “Chalk and Talk Versus Classroom Flipping: Results of a Case Study,” in IOSR Journal of Resarch & Method in Education, Vol 5, Issue 1, pages 24-28, 2015.10 L. Deslauriers, E. Schelew and C. Wieman, "Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class," Science, vol. 332, pp. 862-864, 2011.11 A. Saterbak, M. Embree and M. Oden, "Client-based projects in freshman design," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX, June 2012.12 A. Saterbak, M
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Christina Frederick, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week,with each lecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Approximately 120 students attend a one-hour lecture in an auditorium. Thefollowing day, students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contactwith each student while s/he practices. There has been concern voiced regarding large lectureswith respect to attendance rates, effectiveness of large lecture instruction, and connectivitybetween the instructor and students15. To provide a more flexible learning environment and improve student learningoutcomes16-18, a blended learning approach was adopted in 2010 by approximately half of theEGR115
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Misty L. Loughry, Rollins College, Crummer Graduate School of Business; David Jonathan Woehr, University of North Carolina Charlotte; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University; Frank Luchini; Siqing Wei, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Mr. Behzad Beigpourian
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: Sustainability
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sarah M. Ryan, Iowa State University; Michelle L. Soupir, Iowa State University; Amy Kaleita, Iowa State University; Sergio Horacio Lence, Iowa State University; Robert Brown, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
external evaluator collects evaluation data on each cohort and each component of thetraineeship according to our logic model-based evaluation plan. At the time of paper submissionwe do not yet have results of the first year’s evaluation.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DGE-1828942.[1] E. Golde and G. Walker, Eds., Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006.[2] C. G. P. Berdanier, A. Talley, S. E. Branch, B. Ahn, and M. F. Cox, "A strategic blueprint for the alignment of doctoral competencies with disciplinary expectations," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: Student Learning 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Misty L. Loughry, Rollins College; David J. Woehr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Mr. Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University at West Lafayette
Conference Session
NSF Grantees' Poster Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Arnold, Alma High School, Alma, MI; Ze Zhang; Tolga Kaya, Central Michigan University; Bingbing Li, Department of Chemistry, Science of Advanced Materials Doctoral Program, Central Michigan University ; Qin Hu, Central Michigan University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
teacher ran MD simulation of the nano-composite by GROMACSin Linux system and learned to use Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) to visualize moleculartopologies and analyze the results, and discussed current issues and future work trends. Figure 1: PNIPAM and GO (water box not shown). The engineering process is about finding solutions to problems. Today’s high schoolstudents need to think like both scientists and engineers. Scientists ask a question and follow thesteps of the scientific method to answer the question. Engineers ask: Who need(s) what becausewhy?5 Both methods are important for students to understand and experience, but in order to doso current delivery and instruction practices require modification
Conference Session
NSF Grantees' Poster Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Liusheng Wang, Jackson State University; Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
. The proposedself-regulated learning model is actually repeated cycles of the four phases towards learninggoals as shown in Fig. 1 and is similar to the processes of engineering design. Thus,presentation of the two processes together are expected to provide a unified conceptual processmodel for self-regulated learning and creative problem solving for guiding students’community service learning projects. s Review learning performance and Set positive learning belief and ie U
Conference Session
NSF Grantees' Poster Session
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David L. Soldan, Kansas State University; Noel N. Schulz, Kansas State University; Don Gruenbacher, Kansas State University; Rekha Natarajan, Kansas State University; Blythe Marlow Vogt, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, and graphing. Wewill be collecting data on student performance to analyze how these modules are helpingincoming veterans.A similar effort has been started for review modules dealing with circuit theory. We have usedpaper based exams based on the final exam in the introductory circuits class. As an example aUnited States Navy veteran has successfully gotten credit by exam for the introductory circuitsclass. This exam opportunity was based on his U. S. Navy electrical circuits background and anextensive review of the course material.Another aspect of this project is the inclusion of summer internships for participants. These willbe provided by members of EPAP as discussed earlier and by funded research projects at theuniversity.Kansas State
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pheather R. Harris, University of California, Irvine; Tayloria Adams, University of California, Irvine
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
might impede on the progress of the project [7].Research MethodsLikert surveys (with open-ended questions) were administered at the start of the program tounderstand participant motivation for engaging in the experience, at the halfway point to gainfeedback on their journey in the program, and at the end of the project to examine whetherfaculty perceptions of access, diversity, equity, and inclusion changed throughout their time inthe project. There will be a final survey deployed at the end of year two to assess whether whatfaculty learned in the project ultimately impacted degree completion for MS. This paper isfocused on the feedback from Cohort 1’s survey responses at the end of their first year in theprogram.Preliminary FindingsWhile
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jae Hoon Ma, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ece Erdogmus, Georgia Institute of Technology; Erica Ryherd, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Kyungki Kim, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Catherine Armwood-Gordon, Tennessee State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
valuable insights for the designand implementation of VR/AR-based educational modules in STEM education. In addition,VADER-R will be developed and implemented, and data from this module’s implementation willbe analyzed to evaluate its impact on the recruitment of high school and community collegestudents to the AE/C fields.AcknowledgmentWe, the authors, would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Josephine Lau, Dr. Iason Konstantzos,Ben Kreimer, Jean Yves Chainon, and Carole Chainon for their valuable contributions to theVADERs project.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2202290. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Maya Menon, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
is supported by the US National Science Foundation through grant number 2126978.The opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the National ScienceFoundation. We acknowledge Dr. Jacqueline Handley's contribution to data collection andpreliminary analysis. We also thank Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad and Dr. Joi Mondisa for theiradvisory roles in this project. 4REFERENCES[1] National Research Council, Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington (D.C.): The National academies press, 2012.[2] P. Shekhar, H. S. Aileen, and J. Libarkin, “Understanding
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
theuniversity staff supporting makerspaces.ReferencesAndrews and Boklage, under review.Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., & Quintero, C. (2014). The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(2), n2.Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4.Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.Ogle, J. H., Bolding, C. W
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Noemi V Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; Deborah Anne Trytten, The University of Oklahoma; Russell D. Meier, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Harry A. Hogan, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
major selected by the institution. Hence these smalladvantages are accumulating to something that is really important: their choice of major and theireventual career path.Bibliography 1. N. V. Mendoza Diaz, S. Y. Yoon, D. A. Trytten and R. Meier, "Development and Validation of the Engineering Computational Thinking Diagnostic for Undergraduate Students," in IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 133099-133114, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3335931. 2. Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Trinidad Sotomayor, Effective teaching in computational thinking: A bias-free alternative to the exclusive use of students’ evaluations of teaching (SETs), Heliyon. Volume 9, Issue 8, 2023, e18997, ISSN 2405-8440, doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18997
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deepak Ganta, Texas A&M International University; Marcus Antonius Ynalvez, Texas A&M International University; Maria Lopez, Texas A&M International University; Alan Santos, Texas A&M International University; Claudia San Miguel, Texas A&M International University; Sergio Gonzalez Torres, Texas A&M International University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, pp. 109-119, 2004.[5] A. J. Nicholas, "Preferred learning methods of generation Z," 2020.[6] K. Moore and R. S. Frazier, "Engineering education for generation Z," American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111-126, 2017.
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Rae Jing Han, University of Washington; Selen Güler, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
institutionalizing changes in engineering education. The obstacles thatare concerns across multiple frames might be prioritized in current or future change projectsbecause of their wide-ranging impact. Change agents should employ change models andprocesses that will allow them to consider these obstacles within the context of their projects andinstitutions and identify a response to these challenges.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the RED teams for their participation in the RED community ofpractice. This work is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No.’s 2317318 and 2317319. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in the material are those of the authors and do not necessarily
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Malini Josiam, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
(CEED) at Virginia Techfor providing us with the opportunity to host a workshop for incoming students during theirsummer bridge program. This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. 1943811. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 2022,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D.C., 2023. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Engineering-and-Engineering-Technology
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Jacqueline O'Connor, Pennsylvania State University; Karen A. Thole, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
with research. 4. A dedicated staff member whose job is to be a student liaison and plan/coordinate and facilitate REU events is a critical addition to the leadership team.Acknowledgements: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant 2149667. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Advanced Technologies for Gas Turbines.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2020.[2] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Commercial Aircraft Propulsion andEnergy Systems
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida; Tanvir Hossain, The University of Kansas; Swarup Bhunia; Pavlo Antonenko
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
challenges.Examples of these challenges include integrating FPGAs with sensors to achieve intelligenthome energy management or optimizing air conditioners for precise temperature control. Theoverarching goal was to explore a range of science and math concepts, such as binary arithmetic,Boolean logic, combinational circuits, finite state machines, and memory read-and-writeprocesses. Additionally, students had the opportunity to engage with guest speakers who areexperts and role models in the field of computer hardware engineering.Measures and data sourcesBefore and after the seminar, students completed Romine et al.'s [15] Student Interest inTechnology and Science (SITS) survey. The SITS instrument assesses individual interest inscience and technology
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica D Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
partial when teachers eitherdidn’t get to the end of the challenge or did not implement major elements of the challenge (e.g.,not having students do presentations at the end of the challenge).Figure 1. STEM-ID Implementation by Grade Level Challenge and Teacher 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Systems Cell and System Visualizat Desig Syste Visualizat Desig Phone Investigati DesigTeachers Data s ion n Data ms ion n Design on n123
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashley Y. Tran, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Debapratim Ghosh, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Samuel Harford, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Houshang Darabi, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
the First Year of College,Psychology Press, 2005, pp. 36–56. [Online]. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410611864-7[2] C. A. Malgwi, M. A. Howe, and P. A. Burnaby, “Influences on Students’ Choice of CollegeMajor,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 275–282, May 2005, doi:10.3200/joeb.80.5.275-282.[3] D. Ghosh, S. Harford, H. Darabi, and J. Amos, “Board 315: Improving Students’ Decision-Making Behavior in Choosing an Engineering Pathway,” in ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, United States, Jun. 2023.[4] “Audio transcription for cloud recordings,” Zoom Support, Nov. 20, 2023.https://support.zoom.com/hc/en/article?id=zm_kb&sysparm_article=KB0064927[5] M. E. Kiger and L. Varpio
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mahender Mandala, HERL/VAPHS; Mary R. Goldberg, University of Pittsburgh; Jon Pearlman, Human Engineering Research Labs
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
AT test lab. All REV/Tparticipants have full access to these resources offering another avenue for experiential learning.Ability to quickly prototype ideas is a quintessential need of any design course, and REV/Tparticipants are allowed access to prototyping tools ranging from the basic crafts to advanced Page 24.1027.3desktop 3D printing.REV/T is split into two main sessions: the first session (typically spring) focuses on an AssistiveTechnology (AT) project-based course where VwD and teachers collaborate on product designproject(s), followed by the second session: a K-12 curriculum development session for theteachers and continuing research
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University; Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Misty L. Loughry, Georgia Southern University; David Jonathan Woehr, University of North Carolina Charlotte; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Eduardo Salas, University of Central Florida; Kyle Heyne, University of Central Florida
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
Methods.  Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & Woehr, D. J. (2013, August 9-13). Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Lake Buena Vista, FL.  Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Layton, R. A., Lyons, R., Ferguson, D. M., Heyne, K., & Driskell, T. Woehr, D. J., Pomeranz, H.R., Salas, E., Loignon, A.C., Sonesh, S. C. (2013, June 23-26). SMARTER Teamwork: System for Management, Assessment, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork. Paper and poster presented at the NSF Grantees’ session. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference &