Conference Session

IT-based Instructional Technologies

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peng Li, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Information Systems

. Nakagawa, H. Suda, M. Ukigai, Y. Miida, “An innovative hands-on laboratory for teaching a networking course”, Proceedings of the 33 rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 14-20, Boulder, CO, USA. November 5-8, 2003.8. G. Steffen G, “Teaching Local Area Networking in a Secure Virtual Environment”, Proceedings of 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 2004.9. http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VBox_vs_Others, retrieved February 3, 200910. S. Averitt, M. Bugaev, A. Peeler, H. Shaffer, E. Sills, S. Stein, J. Thompson and M. Vouk, “Virtual Computing Laboratory (VCL)”, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Virtual Computing Initiative, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, May

Conference Session

ECE Pedagogy and Assessment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Mark Jansson; Ying Tang; Ravi Ramachandran, Rowan University; John Schmalzel, Rowan University; Shreekanth Mandayam, Rowan University; Robert Krchnavek, Rowan University; Robi Polikar, Rowan University; Linda Head, Rowan University; Raul Ordonez, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Page 11.1329.6engaged in active learning exercises. The clinic experiences engage students early on inthe higher order and integrative thinking that we hope they have experienced in theirundergraduate education. Table 1 below highlights some of the key clinic and/or projectbased ECE/EE curricula described in the literature and on the college websites. Table 1 -Engineering Clinic or Project-Based Modules in EE/ECE CurriculaCollege/University[Ref] Number Credits Course Name / Year(s) OfferedDegree(s) granted – credits of Courses % of total for the Degree(s) RequirementsDrexel University [9,11] ~6 20 Engineering Design Lab [12 cr - Freshman]BSEE, BSCE – 181 Credits (11

Conference Session

Undergraduate Students' Development of Computational and Programming Skills

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Sofia Meyers, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Sarah-Elizabeth Deshaies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

R. R.Cocking, editors, How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press,2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853/how-people-learn-brain-mind-experience-and-school-expanded-edition[4] K. Rayner, “Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visualsearch,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1457–1506,2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461[5] M. Hegarty, Multimedia learning and the development of mental models. Cam- bridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 673–702.[6] A. M. Madsen, A. M. Larson, L. C. Loschky, and N. S. Rebello, “Differences in visualattention

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; Roberta Harvey, Rowan University; Brian Lefebvre, Rowan University; Heidi Newell, Rowan University; James Newell, Rowan University

specific learning processes that yield externalized performance. Other measures of personality, multiple intelligences, or learning styles provide information about the learner and then leave the learner informed but unequipped to use the information. [The LCI] not only provides the learner with the means to articulate who s/he is as a learner, but then provides the strategies (metawareness) for the learner to use these learning tactics with intention.13The LCI survey is composed of 28 Likert scale items—descriptive statements followed by a five-point set of responses—and three questions requesting written responses. The 28 questions arescored according to the patterns they illustrate, and from these scores the LCI profile

Conference Session

Qualitative Research Methods

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana Jaleh Arya, University of California, Santa Barbara; Noreen Balos, University of California, Santa Barbara; Maria Teresa Napoli, University of California, Santa Barbara; Elizabeth Sciaky, University of California, Santa Barbara

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

appointment of five lead engineers to serve as project mentors for theprogram. These project mentors selected ten community college students from a shortlist of 20candidates provided by two members of the RU team (lead principal investigator and graduatestudent researcher) who conducted 34 interviews from an original pool of 58 applicants. Originalapplicants represented a range of individual differences: 26% female, 55% underrepresentedethnic minorities; 57% first generation; 27% veterans; 62% low-income; 5% students with1This research was supported by, or in part by, the U. S. Office of Naval Research under awardnumber N00014-15-1-2438.disabilities2. The final selection of ten from this diverse pool echoed such diversity: two females,five minorities

Conference Session

Pre-college: Summer Experiences for Students and Teachers (2)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Besser P.E., University of St. Thomas; Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of St. Thomas; AnnMarie Polsenberg Thomas, University of St. Thomas; Jenna Laleman, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

applications of positively impacting others areeasily connected in the biomedical engineering field. Nearly 40% of biomedical engineers arewomen. Although males are still the majority in this field, biomedical engineering is one of themore popular engineering fields among women.15 The final major change to our program fornext year is our goal to interview participants about their experiences. We will utilize this as away for students to reflect on their experiences as well as a way for us to receive more rich dataabout the short-term impacts of our program.Resources[1] F. Halpern, D., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., R. Star, J., & Wentzel, K. (2007,September 1). Encouraging Girls in Math and Science. Retrieved December 2, 2014, fromhttp

Conference Session

Social Justice, Social Responsibility, and Critical Pedagogies

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech ; Christian Matheis, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Student Affairs, Washington, DC: Author.2. Schneider, C.J. and Miller, R. (2005). Liberal education outcomes: A preliminary report onstudent achievement in college, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington.DC.3. Baxter Magolda, M.B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming highereducation to promote self-development. Stylus Publishing.4. Parks Daloz, L.A., Keen, C.H., Keen, J.P. and Daloz Parks, S. (1996). Common fire: lives ofcommitment in a complex world. Beacon.5. Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2010) The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and Tools,Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.6. Paul, R., Niewoehner, R. and Elder, L. (2006). The thinker’s guide to engineering reasoning,Foundation Critical

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Teaming in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tristan Utschig, Kennesaw State University; Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University; Valmiki Sooklal, Kennesaw State University; Eduardo Farfan, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

.[7] Kotche, M., and S. Tharp, Interdisciplinary Medical Product Development Senior Capstone Design, Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015.[8] Redekopp, M., Raghavendra, C., Weber, A., Ragusa, G., and T. Wilbur, A Fully Interdisciplinary Approach to Capstone Design Courses, Proceedings of the 116th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009.[9] Seaward, G., Converting Single Disciplinary Capstone Projects to Interdisciplinary Experiences, Proceedings of the 108th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, June 24-27, 2001.[10] Sirinterlicki, A., Interdisciplinary Capstone Projects, Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Predicting Student Success

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanon Marie Reckinger, Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

formative assessments to favordifferent learning styles (Wang, Wang et al. 2006). Both learning style and formativeassessment strategy significantly affected student achievement, though, consistent with Pashler etal.’s conclusion, the interaction between these factors was not significant. Additionally, as thisstudy was performed with a web-based middle-school biology course, a gap remains with regardto undergraduate engineering education.As the primary motivation for this study is increasing the diversity of the engineering graduatesthat colleges and universities prepare for the workforce, some evidence demonstrates thatvarying teaching approaches to favor a multitude of learning styles may aid in achieving thatparticular end. A validation study of

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research and a Force and Moment Lab

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Prins, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

realobject. Based on free responses it can be said that some students appreciated the link betweentheory and practice. The activity has gained interest at the author’s institution where two additional instructorshave adopted it. It is anticipated that it will evolve as a result of broader deployment.Acknowledgements The author acknowledges the James Madison University Quality Collaborative project,funded by Lumina Foundation.References[1] S. D. Sheppard and B. H. Tongue, Statics Analysis and Design of Systems in Equilibrium (revisd edition), Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007.[2] F. P. Beer, E. R. Johnston, Jr., D. F. Mazurek, P. J. Cornwell and B. P. Self, Vector Mechanics for Engineers (11th edition), New York, NY: McGraw

Conference Session

Project-Based Learning

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bernard David, University of Texas, Austin; Jill Marshall, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering Programs, 2016-2017 (p. 25). Baltimore, MD.Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project- Based Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271–311.Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 369.Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, Agency, and Knowing in Mathematics Worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 171– 200

Conference Session

Curricular Issues in Computing

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University; Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

gained.References1. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Pyschologist, 37(2), 122-147.2. Basawapatna, A., Repenning, A., & Koh, K. H. (2015). Closing The Cyberlearning Loop. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '15, (pp. 12-17).3. Bean, N., Weese, J. L., Feldhausen, R., & Bell, R. (2015). Starting From Scratch: Developing a Pre- Service Teacher Program in Computational Thinking. Frontiers in Education.4. Bell, R. S. (2014). Low Overhead Methods for Improving Capacity and Outcomes in Computer Science. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.5. Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifact-based interviews to study the

Conference Session

Reflection

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Luciane de Greef, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University where he teaches courses in materials design, sustainable materials, and polymeric materials. Dr. Harding is PI on several educational research projects including the psychology of ethical decision making and promoting the use of reflection in engineering education. He serves as Associate Editor of the journals Advances in Engineering Education and International Journal of Service Learning in Engineering. Dr. Harding has served numerous leadership positions in ASEE including division chair for the Materials Division and the Community Engagement Division. Dr. Harding received

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louise Chan, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Mark Ahrens, Normandale Community College; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

division grades, collectively andindividually, do not predict upper-division design grades, we still require a minimum level ofexposure to the math, science, and, engineering concepts without which students are doingdesign outside of an engineering context. These results may also be indicative of the relationshipfor traditional capstone design experiences. Additional research is necessary to see if theseeffects hold true in that context. The implications for the study are that additional information inprogram applications must be included to effectively predict a student’s performance.References 1. S. Singer and K. A. Smith, “Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and

Conference Session

Integrating Liberal Education and Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

strong data that could indicate best practices, and which do not? Format of Final Product: The team would spend one (or if desired, two) semester(s) developing a set of critical areas for further investigation, culminating in an article suitable for a peer-reviewed journal.additional references, each, to clarify their portion of the outline. To share his or herfindings, each student used a 5-slide PowerPoint presentation to explain what he or shehad learned. The DoS participated via teleconference in the instructor-facilitateddiscussion. Then, for four weeks, each student worked independently to write a five-page, singled-spaced, draft document with a minimum of fifteen references, each, thatclarified his or her

Conference Session

Engaging Ethics, Internationally

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

organizations often tend to amplify the moral and political values that are lacking and need to be further enhanced in developing contexts. They view technologies as instruments for well-being rather than profits.As engineering educators who are interested in preparing future engineers for the increasinglyglobalized future, we need to be careful about what kind(s) of “global engineers” we are training.Emphasizing one or two approaches to engineering ethics over others represents an incompleteapproach that fails to project an appropriately comprehensive view of global engineering practice.Obviously, we are not training every student to become a professional engineer working in amultinational business company, nor do we expect that

Conference Session

Investigating Instructional Strategies

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible P.E., Texas Tech University; Jill Hoffman, Museum of Texas Tech University; Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

the given image. For example, one student (S03) wrote the following in hispre-VTS essay: “This mural shows us a landscape ... As for the content of this mural, ...[y]ou see a man in the middle who looks to be working next to some kind of fence in the pond that take[s] water closer to the house in the background.”InterpretationLike the quote above, most essays also contained writing that functioned to interpret the contentin the image. For example, another student (S02) wrote in his pre-VTS essay: Table 5. Preliminary Results of Inductive Coding of Short Essay Responses Before and After VTS Workshop (n=6) Total # of

Conference Session

Faculty Views of Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

focused on ambitious goals:“To take full advantage of the benefits and to recognize, address, and even avoid some of thepitfalls of technology. . . [to help citizens] become better stewards of technological change” (p.2). Then, as now, “technological literacy” is the most widely recognized way of describing theproject(s) in which this division is engaged. In my 2006 paper, I argued that we needed torename the enterprise, mainly because “literacy” implied remediation rather than the aspirationto create something that had never existed before: a well-informed citizenry with the knowledge,motivation, and confidence to engage in purposeful deliberation about technology. Looking back from a distance of over 10 years, I am pleased to say that

Conference Session

Software Engineering Concepts

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Goswami, North Dakota State University; Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University; Ganesh Padmanabhan, North Dakota State University; Mark E McCourt, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Paper ID #19852Improving the Requirements Inspection Abilities of Computer Science Stu-dents through Analysis of their Reading and Learning StylesMr. Anurag Goswami, North Dakota State University Anurag Goswami is a Ph. D. Candidate in the department of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software engineering, human factors in software engineering, and software quality. He is a member of the IEEE Computer Society.Dr. Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University Gursimran S. Walia is an associate professor of Computer Science at North Dakota State University

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Alexéi García Sheridan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Seungmo Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Vuk Marojevic, Virginia Tech; Nicholas F. Polys, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ayat Mohammed, Virginia Tech; Carl B Dietrich P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. In Handbook of competence and motivation, eds. A.J. Elliot and C.S. Dweck. New York: The Guilford Press.Echo Ridge (2017). Dyse – Dynamic Spectrum Environment Emulator, http://www.echoridgenet.com/products/dyse.Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454-459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. (2009). How many dual-process theories do we need? one, two, or many? (). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0002Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (1st ed.). New York

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University; Ben Hein

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

conducted, we have uncovered, timeand time again, that our students come into our classes with issues that have a direct or indirectbearing on their ability to learn physics. One central question this paper aims to address is: Arethe factors that impede or enhance student learning in physics any different in the millennial age?IntroductionToday’s classrooms are largely populated by millennials. For the past two decades we have seenincreased use of variety of terms used to describe them. The millennial is often considered to bean individual born sometime between approximately 1980 and 2000. We often refer to thissubset of the population as Generation Y or Gen Y. Other names given to this group ofindividuals include Echo Boomers and 24/7’s

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 23: Courses and Research on Communication

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wendy Roldan, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Ahmer Arif, University of Washington; Gina Tesoriero, University of Washington; Yuxin Xu, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

can note that 99% of students reported professional and personal useand 100% of practitioners reported professional and personal use. Further, for faculty, 100%reported personal use and 97% reported professional use. These data suggest that reflection isassociated with a range of uses, and also that reflection is being used by students, faculty, andpractitioners. While Carberry et al.’s data do not address the frequency of use, the effectivenessof use or the satisfaction associated with use, the data do speak to a prevalence of use [7].Carberry et al. point to a limitation of their data collection methodology noting that “the mode ofsurvey delivery may have led to shorter and less thoughtful responses” [7]. In our work, wecomplement Carberry

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaobin Le P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology; Richard L. Roberts, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Anthony William Duva P.E. , Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

course for undergraduate mechanical students. The main focus presented in this paper willbe for teaching fundamental concepts of FEM theory utilized in the first 3 weeks of the semester.At the end of the course in 2018 spring semester, students participated in a class survey and tookthe CSWA-S certification exam (Certified SOLIDWORKS Associate – Simulation). Analysis ofthe collected data indicated that teaching the fundamental concepts of FEA theory significantlyhelped students to have a better understanding of FEA and facilitated them to use FEAcommercial software.2. TEACHING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS 22.1 THE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MECH4200-SIMULATION-BASED

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azar Eslam Panah, Pennsylvania State University, Berks; Heidi Reuter

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Exposition, 2004.[2] Hertzberg, J., “Seeing Fluid Physics: Outcomes From a Course on Flow Visualization,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Paper # QE3, 55 (16), 2010.[3] Poon, M., Todd, J., Neilson, R., Grace, D., Hertzberg, J., “Saffman-Taylor Instability in a Hele-Shaw Cell,” Physics of Fluids, 16 (9), p. S9, 2004.[4] Settles, G. S., “On the Fluid Dynamicist as Artist,” Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Gottingen, Germany, 2006.[5] Kleine, H., Settles, G. S., “The Art of Shock Waves and Their Flow Fields,” Shock Waves, 17, pp. 291-307, 2008.[6] Samuel, M., Henley, J., and Shakerin, S., “Development of a Wet Wall: An Undergraduate Research Project,” Paper #37677

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

affiliates.References[1] J. M. Bekki, M. Huerta, J. S. London, D. Melton, M. Vigeant, and J. M. Williams, “Opinion: Why EM? The potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7(1), 2, 2018.[2] C. J. Creed, E. M. Suuberg, and G. P. Crawford, “Engineering entrepreneurship: An example of a paradigm shift in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91(2), pp. 185-195, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00691.x[3] National Science Foundation, NSF Innovation Corps (I-Corps™), 2019. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/i-corps/index.jsp[4] A. Huang-Saad, J. Fay, and L. Sheridan, “Closing the divide: Accelerating technology

Conference Session

Faculty Development Round Table

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Katie Johanson; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College; Naja A. Mack, University of Florida; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

when it successfully fulfills a human request and the individual has confidence thechatbot can perform well. Figure 1. Conceptual Framework for the User Interface Perceived Trust Efficacy of Chatbots for Future Faculty Mentoring. Adapted from “Enhancing User Experience with Conversational Agent for User Satisfaction Movie Recommendation: Effects of Self- Disclosure and Reciprocity,” by S. Y. Lee

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

learning approaches with ever-changing research-based and technologically instrumented means, transferring control over education from teachers to mangers of the bureaucracy.Therefore, engineering education is considered as a system that can be studied, controlled,optimized, and assessed. A classic example in this regard is the “pipeline” metaphor [10] that hasbeen widely used in the United States to understand and tackle the systematic challenges withretaining engineering students and recruiting underrepresented populations. Nearly allengineering education graduate programs in the United States are in engineering colleges,schools, or departments. Arizona State University (ASU)’s Engineering Education PhD Programis another good example

Conference Session

It's All About the Student: Integration, Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, and Self-Efficacy

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Timothy W. Mays, The Citadel; Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel; John C. Ryan, The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1741611 Encouraging Civil Engineering Retention through Community and Self-EfficacyBuilding. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] "Infrastructure Report Card." American Society of Civil Engineers. (accessed 2 Feb., 2019): https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.[2] S. Hatch, Diversity by Design: Guide to Fostering Diversity in the Civil Engineering Workplace. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[3] "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2019-2020." ABET. (accessed 2

Conference Session

Online Programs and Program Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University; Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University; Rene Alexander Soto Perez, Purdue University; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

increased when students have easyaccess to the learning management system.While our literature review provided us with general guidance on developing online courses, wefound no studies discussing online courses for Ph.D. students. We were particularly interested inPh.D. level courses that require reading, analysis, discussion, and writing with feedback.We hoped to answer three questions ourselves: (1) Given the Ph.D.’s students’ high levels ofmotivation, what kind of environment would foster their engagement in online courses? (2)How can an institution best support faculty members for designing, developing, and deliveringthis kind of course? (3) What are the students’ experiences in these courses?Developing Online Courses for the Graduate