. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploring Impacts of Socially Engaged Engineering Training: What do Students’ Attend to in Scenario-Based Interviews?Introduction & BackgroundThis work is situated from the perspective that engineering is a sociotechnical endeavor. Theliterature is inconsistent in defining what it means to be sociotechnical–e.g., engineering issociotechnical because of the societal impacts of engineering work or because of collaborativeand interpersonal nature of engineering work—[1]. Despite this inconsistency, the spectrum ofsocial aspects
Tech Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Postdoctoral Associate in the School of Education at Virginia Tech, work- ing on several STEM-related projects. His research interests include addressing educational inequities, international higher education, and the African Diaspora.Rebecca Steele, Virginia Tech ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploring the Importance of Bonding and Bridging Capital for Graduate Women Accessing Academic and Professional Pathways in STEMIntroductionThe benefits of a graduate education are well documented and have significant implications foreconomic growth, equality, and social mobility [1]. Still, women remain underrepresented inSTEM graduate programs and
Engineering, Design and Computing at the University of Colorado Denver, afaculty learning community (FLC) is exploring how to apply known pedagogical practicesintended to foster equity and inclusion. Faculty come from all five departments of the college.For this three-year NSF-funded project, Year 1 was dedicated to deepening reflection asindividuals and building trust as a cohort. Now, in Year 2, the FLC is focused on translatingpedagogical practices from literature and other resources into particular courses. This cohort hasexperienced some adjustments as some faculty leave the FLC and new faculty choose to join theFLC. Since this cohort continues to grow, this paper presents key features that have supportedthe FLC’s formation and then transition
university’s newHumanitarian Engineering and Science master’s degree, in which students integrateknowledge from engineering, geoscience, and social science to solve contemporarychallenges alongside the communities they seek to serve. Our program is grounded in afunds of knowledge (FOK) approach to teaching and learning, mentorship, and studentprofessional development. Funds of knowledge are “historically-accumulated andculturally- developed bodies of knowledge and skills essential for household orindividual functioning and wellbeing” [1]. Our faculty integrate a FOK approach in theirown teaching, and students who receive the scholarship are invited to participate inco-curricular activities to support their professional development.Grounding the HESA
engineering, this CAREERproject specifically focuses on rural, Appalachian communities and students, populations whichare underrepresented in higher education broadly but engineering careers specifically [1], [2].Engaging students in opportunities to explore engineering and related career pathways beforethey graduate from high school is important not only for educational access, but also foreconomic resilience in these communities. The Appalachian Regional Commission [3] describesthe need to engage youth more deeply in their communities and their education, as well as theneed to invest in workforce development in various industries.However, addressing these needs can be challenging given more broad systemic factors. Forexample, with the introduction
REU (in-person, 10 weeks over summer, full-time) versus an REU delivered virtually,part-time, and over 10 months?2. Methods2.1 Study Design and ParticipantsThe study was based on an REU program at a Midwestern University. Program Participants wereundergraduate students from various engineering majors across the United States (with apreference for students enrolled at minorities serving institutions). The demographiccharacteristics of each group of students are presented below: • Year 1 REU (virtual + part-time + 10 months): A total of 15 students participated in the study, 9 females and 6 males; 11 students from minority-serving institutions (including historically black college or university, tribal college or university, and
in2YCs [1]. The "Capacity Building Workshops for Competitive S-STEM Proposals from Two-Year Colleges in the Western U.S." goal has been to support preparation and submission ofproposals to the NSF S-STEM program from two-year colleges (2YCs).The workshop has been offered during the summers of 2019 (in person), 2020 and 2021 (virtual)and focused on several aspects of proposal preparation, including addressing the NSF MeritReview Criteria, developing, and justifying proposed budgets, incorporating appropriate andmeaningful evidence-based strategies, and evaluation and dissemination plans. A completedescription and evaluation analysis of this project is currently being submitted for publication[2]. The workshop facilitators who were carefully
Committee (2020- ).Elizabeth Friedman, The University of Illinois, Chicago ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Master's Individual Development Plans as an Essential Tool in Workforce DevelopmentAbstract:The recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine Report on Graduate STEMEducation for the 21st Century recommends two broad and especially compelling career-relatedactions for STEM master's degree programs: (1) the creation of Individual Development Plans(IDPs) and (2) the provision of Career Exploration opportunities. However, while IDPs havebecome more prevalent in PhD and Postdoctoral programs, they are not at all common inengineering and science master's
experience conducting evaluation and design-based research studies in complex settings including and community- based settings. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Material Agency with Summer STEM Youth Designing with Micro:bitsIntroduction and Research PurposeIn this poster, we report results related to an NSF EEC CAREER project that characterizesframing agency, defined as making decisions and learning in the process of framing designproblems. Our past studies of framing agency have relied on discourse analysis to characterizeagency in talk [1-3]. However, this analytical approach, with its focus on talk, misses muchabout the materials in the design process, and given that design is commonly cast as
cohorts of low-income undergraduate students interested inmajoring in engineering. The BEES program supports Scholars for the first two years of theirstudy at WWU. BEES program cohorts are small (12 max), and students are supported through aseries of co-curricular and curricular elements, including a summer bridge program, cohortcourse structure, multilevel mentoring, project opportunities, and social events [1].This paper focuses on one component of the BEES support elements: the summer bridgeprogram. Regarding student support structures, participation in summer bridge programs isassociated with increased retention rates among STEM [2]. WWU has an existing campus-widesummer bridge program called “Viking Launch,” where participating students
John Gero is Research Professor in Computer Science and Architecture at UNCC He was formerly Re- search Professor in Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, and Research Professor in Computational Social Science at George Mason University and Professor of DesPaulo Ignacio Jr. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Measuring the “thinking” in systems thinking: Correlations between cognitive and neurocognitive measures of engineering studentsIntroduction and backgroundSystems thinking is a critical skill for engineering students to solve complex and ill-structureddesign problems [1]. Concept mapping is a tool for systems thinking [2]. It involves
engineering programs among selected groups ofstudents.Survey DesignThe survey initial survey instrument was largely comprised of widely used population-scalemeasures of mental health. Modules from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) were used tomeasure rates of depressive, anxiety, and eating disorders [1]. The PC-PTSD was used to screenfor incidence of PTSD-like disorders among engineering students [2], [3]. The actual conditionsmeasured are summarized in Table 1. Mental health conditions screened.. The Kessler 6instrument was used to measure moderate-to-major psychological distress among respondents[4], [5]. Demographic questions were added to allow us to study whether and to what extentmental health disparities exist among different student
to facilitate student engagement with the content, instructor, andfellow students. This approach leveraged the social-constructivist learning theory: a connectedcommunity of learners with classroom peers and co-construction of knowledge where theinstructor’s role is that of a subject matter expert who facilitates learning. To examine the impactof mobile devices on student learning in this two-year study (year one fall 2021 - spring 2022), thefollowing research questions were addressed, hypothesizing improvements in the areas ofengagement, enhancement of learning outcomes, and extension of learning to real-life engineeringscenarios: (1) Does mobile device use facilitate engagement in thermal-fluid science coursecontent? (Engagement), (2) Does
, University of Missouri, Kansas City Dr. Michelle Maher explores student research, teaching, and disciplinary writing skill development and higher education access and equity issues. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reaching Consensus: Using Group Concept Mapping in an S-STEM Research TeamAbstractThis study was done to explore Group Concept Mapping (GCM) as a method to reach consensusfor data collection using document analysis in an S-STEM research team. The team wascomprised of five members and the GCM approach was made up of six steps: (1) Preparation,(2) Generation, (3) Structuring, (4) Analysis, (5) Interpretation, and (6) Usage. The members ofthe
collaborationbetween two labs within the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Biomedical Engineering REU.MethodsInterdisciplinary Team Research ProjectDr. Greg Bashford’s lab specializes in research and development involving diagnostic ultrasoundimaging, with a particular focus on transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), a type of ultrasoundspecialized for monitoring blood flow in the major arteries of the brain [1]. Dr. Eric Markvicka’slab specializes in designing and manufacturing stretchable electronic devices for wearablebiomonitoring. The two PIs leveraged their areas of expertise to identify a cutting-edge researchtopic: wearable ultrasound devices [2]. The goal for the summer was to create a wearable TCDdevice. Before the 10-week REU program began, the two
creativity through assessment; however, theirapproach was in terms of individuals in the general population. Engineering students andpractitioners may exhibit different levels of creativity when working individually versus whenthey work in a team setting. In this study, we use the idea of promotion of creativity throughassessment and use it to purposely develop creativity in engineering students. A creativityassessment rubric developed and validated by previous research (CASPER, see Figure 1) hasbeen implemented in facilitated developmental experiences in several cohorts of freshmen andseniors in general design courses as well as technical design courses.Figure 1: The Creative Solution Process Rubric (CASPER)To determine the impact of purposeful
WorldInternational research collaborations provide important opportunities to support innovativeresearch and address the significant global challenges facing the world today. One way todevelop researchers who are both interculturally competent and able to navigate global researchnetworks within their field is to provide international research experiences for students. Priorwork has indicated that such experiences lead to a wide range of learning outcomes includingintercultural competence, research skills, personal development, and, importantly, a newperspective on their career goals and trajectory [1]–[6]. However, in the midst of the COVID-19pandemic, international collaborations and programs for students faced challenges in continuingtheir typical
Informatics programs at various public and private universities with more than 15 years of administra- tive experience as a chair/program director and 25 years of teaching, research, service, and industrial experiences. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Relationship between mindset and grit on undergraduate engineering student retentionIntroductionThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that employment in STEM occupations has grown79% since 1990, from 9.7 million to 17.3 million in 2018. Forty-five percent of STEMemployment is from information technology (IT) and 19% is related to engineering [1]. Theworkforce in IT and engineering is predominantly male
-funded project studies whether providing students with training and practicewriting questions about their confusions in an undergraduate engineering statics course supportsimproved course performance and metacognitive awareness. Data collection for the projectincludes assessing multiple measures of students’ metacognition, including metacognitivemonitoring during statics exams. In this current study, we focus exclusively on the monitoringdata collected thus far.Metacognitive monitoring is the process of observing one’s understanding and approach whilecompleting a learning task [1]. One way to assess students’ metacognitive monitoring is tomeasure students’ ability to accurately either predict or postdict their score on an assessment oftheir
assignments facilitate students being able to learnremotely. Applications and lab projects can be controlled using IoT capabilities. As processorshave improved more affordable microprocessor or computer alternatives such as Arduino,Raspberry Pi and other similar platforms have become more commonly utilized in educationalsettings. In this project, IoT concepts, educational materials and methods are introduced tostudents through various avenues such as Independent Study courses, Capstone Senior Designcourses and Sensors courses.BackgroundFigure 1 shows a simple representation of an IoT system that utilizes a Raspberry Pi. TheRaspberry Pi could be replaced by an Arduino, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or aProgrammable Logic Controller (PLC). In
also explains the career placement, student retention, and community collegetransfer rates.Project ActivitiesThis NSF-funded project was initially planned for three years but was extended to four years dueto the COVID situation. The project includes five major activities as listed in Table 1. In thesubsequent sections, these activities and the project evaluation plan will be explained in detail. Table 1. Project activities. Activity Description (i) Design, develop, and offer the new course and laboratory (renewable energy) (ii) Summer K-12 workshops through the CPCP at NJIT (iii) Faculty development workshops for the instructors of other 2- and 4
play a vital role in educating and awarding advanced credentials toAmerica’s future scientists and technicians. The research supported by this National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER) award emphasizesthe importance of and expands understanding of the role that two-year colleges play in theengineering education and career pipeline. Yet, racial and location inequity in vertical transferhighlights a lack of access to life-changing educational opportunities [1, 2]. This researchfocuses on identifying unique geographic and cultural assets to make pre-transfer engineeringstudents, from a variety of backgrounds, locations, and opportunities, more successful. Thisresearch is intended to support increasing the
Performance Evaluation of an Ongoing Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of High- Achieving, Low-income Engineering StudentsAbstractThe present paper reports an update on an NSF-funded S-STEM program currently in its lastyear at the University of Illinois Chicago. Lessons learned during the project implementation arealso listed in the paper. A summary of the paper materials will be presented at the ASEE 2023Annual Conference and Exposition as part of the NSF Grantees Poster Session.The project's objectives are 1) enhancing students' learning by providing access to extra and co-curricular experiences, 2) creating a positive student experience through mentorship, and 3)ensuring successful student placement in
, conducting literature review, and evaluatingand communicating results of research. Follow-up activities are ongoing during the teacher’sacademic school year, including carrying out the lesson plans in their classroom, teacherstraveling to conferences related to their field, and introducing students to careers in simulation,visualization, and industrial research, as well as STEM in general through presentations and fieldtrips.IntroductionSTEM Education provides students with multidimensional capabilities that are necessary to meetcurrent and future workforce needs due to constant technological advances in nearly all industries[1-4]. Unfortunately, only a small portion of students are both proficient and interested in STEMfields [5]. Researchers
$163B in 2008 to $230B in 2018 although itemployed only 7.09% of the total workforce [1]. Lack of manufacturing training, outdated schoolinfrastructure, wrong student perception on manufacturing, and new teacher skills must beaddressed to sustain if not enhance the manufacturing status of Texas. This RET programprovides necessary skills for teachers, helps to upgrade school infrastructure so that inspiredstudents would consider STEM /Manufacturing fields as their primary choice. Themanufacturing-focused training of a diverse group of 37 teachers was completed in summer2018, 2019, and 2022 (Fig. 1). Unavoidable program delay in 2020 and 2021 was due to theworldwide pandemic.This paper presents the program and approach to train both in-service
, ArtificialIntelligence, Modeling & Simulation, and Flight Testing. Students learned fundamental skills inengineering, computer science, and mathematics, and were trained to use computational toolsneeded to engage in multidisciplinary UAV research. Most of the participants who have alreadygraduated have joined aerospace companies or Government organization and are working inUAV technologies or related areas including Lockheed Martin Corporation and NorthropGrumman Corporation. Some of the Participants were also accepted for summer internshippositions at companies or corporations that are heavily involved in UAV research anddevelopment. Figure 1. Participants of 2022 Summer REU Program.Figures 2 and 3 show the multidisciplinary teams of
/demodulation, interpolation, FFT, filtering, delays, gain control, etc.). Transceiveroutputs are graphed for ease-of-use, although the process of tuning such outputs is arduous, dueto the irreplicability of precise hardware tx/rx chains [1]. The system defined and discussed in thispaper aims to address this issue via an interactive user environment which enables end users totune results in real-time and with sufficient specificity.Software defined radio (SDR) architecturesSince the release of Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) in 2003 [2], Software DefinedRadio (SDR) has gained significant traction for its versatility in the construction of high-qualitycommunication prototypes. The ability to manage signal processing through FPGAs and
thinking and reasoning. To be effective problem-solvers, students mustunderstand the relationship between the MKT, SRC and SRM throughout the problem-solving activities.Four research questions will guide the research: (1) How do students perceive their self-regulation ofcognition (SRC) and motivation (SRM) skills for generic problem-solving activities in EM courses; (2) Howdoes students’ metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving tasks (MKT) inform their Taskinterpretation?; (3) How do students’ SRC and SRM dynamically evolve?; and (4) How do students’ SRCand SRM reflect their perceptions of self-regulation of cognition and motivation for generic EM problem-solving activities?A sequential mixed-methods research design involving quantitative and