school programs where the cultural sensitivity is integrated into thedisciplinary content. Consideration of the successful foreign expertise will definitely be ofhigh practical value for both countries. Theoretical background together with the modernpractical approaches can bring the possibilities together and lead to the creation of jointcourses that will be of great demand in global intercultural platform and attract new studentsfor participation.AcknowledgementThe research was funded by Russian Foundation for Humanities grant, project #15-16-16003Bibliography1. James A. Banks Cultural Diversity and Education Foundations, Curriculum and Teaching Fourth Edition(2001)2. “Global Awareness – An Integrated Worldview”,UDEMY, https://blog.udemy.com
framework for teaching writing in thediscipline for engineering students [8]-[9]. These include pointing to technical and report writingattributes that should be emphasized, such as planning, clarity, simplicity, brevity, word choiceand more.There have also been several attempts to facilitate report writing by developing frameworks andapplications that guide and help students in preparing technical and scientific reports, both inengineering schools in the United States [10]-[11] and abroad [12].At our institution, we have an engineering department embedded in a liberal-arts generaleducation setting. Engineering students are required to take a wide core curriculum to integratetheir scientific and technical education in engineering. Still, to obtain
the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrol- ogy, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has led several interdisciplinary research and curriculum reform projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, and has participated in re- search and curriculum development projects with $4.5 million funding from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #17016water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 66
. Oliva and W.K. Waldron Jr., “Virtual Design Competitions in a Computer Aided Engineering Course,” Proceedings of 2004 ASEE/NCS Conference, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan (2004).2. W. Waldron, P. Chaphalkar, S. Choudhuri, J. Farris, “Teaching Design and Manufacture of Mechanical Systems,” 2007 ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24-27, 2007.3. S.J. Noble, “An Approach for Engineering Curriculum Integration for Capstone Design Courses,” Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 197-203, 1998.4. L.S-B King, T. Lin, “Interdisciplinary Integration of Courses – Automation and Quality Control, International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida, October 16-21, 2004.5
Problem-Based Learning and Industrial EngineeringAbstractProblem-based learning (PBL), also called inductive learning, is a well-known approach forteaching engineering courses. We undertake a study of concepts that can be taught via PBL,along with an analysis of courses and topics in the industrial engineering (IE) curriculum suitablefor PBL. While in the traditional deductive style of teaching, one usually starts with explanationof principles followed by examples, PBL is primarily characterized by providing examples firstand then generalizing to the underlying principles. A great deal of literature cites evidence ofPBL being more effective than deductive learning. However, PBL also provides numerouschallenges to the instructor – especially to
Mississippi as both a Professional Engineer and a RegisteredProfessional Geologist.SCOTT F. KOROM, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor and the Director of Geological Engineering at theUniversity of North Dakota. He is a licensed Professional Engineering in North Dakota.ZHENGWEN ZENG, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in Geology and Geological Engineering Department at TheUniversity of North Dakota. He is a member of the geological Engineering Curriculum Committee and the GGECommittee for ABET Assessment, as trained for ABET s Sustainable Assessment Process. 1. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference.
. IntroductionIn 1983 Stevens Institute of Technology became one of the first colleges in the United States torequire personal computer ownership by all undergraduates. A reason behind this move was tofurther an objective of the new engineering curriculum; namely, that there be a computer threadthroughout the curriculum.3 The other reason pertained to facilities. The mainframe wasseverally overloaded and was not able to accommodate the anticipated additional usage. It wasfelt that personal computer ownership would do much to alleviate this situation.Selection of the original computer and the subsequent evolution of the required machine aredescribed. At the outset, relatively few students were computer-literate and hardware, software,and documentation were
(US Army) is an Academy Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He has a B.S. degree from USMA in Organizational Leadership and an M.E. degree in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. He also holds a PhD in Management Science (System Dynamics) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research interests include systems design, new product development, system dynamics, decision support systems, project management and curriculum development. He has taught and served as the course director for numerous engineering courses in Systems Design, System Dynamics and Production Operations Management. He
disciplines andadministration and work together to design a new curriculum that draws together keyconcepts and problem-solving skills within the context of understanding science and itsconnections to engineering. Some results23 suggests that reorganizing the foundationalengineering education sequences so that the instructors cooperate and coordinatecontent, rather than just presenting disparate views of the subject matter in parallel.Others have suggested that providing engineering students with experiences inmodeling may help bridge the gaps among disciplines24,25. Any new core curriculum in Page 23.352.8engineering education must be sustained by an ongoing
teachers and pre-service teachers joinedother professionals in the region in an immersive materials “boot camp” facilitated by ASM priorto the start of their research experience. Field trips, guest speakers and group work that producedK-12 curriculum complemented the teams’ research experience. During the culminatingactivities, the groups presented the STEM curriculum developed, the final laboratory projectresults and provided regular guided reflections regarding their efforts during the six-weekprogram. Local System Change (LSC), Mathematics Teaching Efficacy and Beliefs Instrument(MTEBI) and Science Teaching Efficacy and Beliefs Instrument (STEBI) surveys wereadministered to identify changes in attitudes, beliefs and practices. Results of the
Education, Honolulu, HI.5. Eichhorn K. et al. (2010). “Infusing Communication Skills in an Engineering Curriculum.” Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY.6. Jernquist, et al. (2007). “Developing an Engineering Writing Handbook – A Case Study.” Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI.7. Heibling, J. et al. (2005). “Collaborative Development of an Engineering Style Manual.” Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR.8. Adam, D. and Manion, W. (2005). “When Less is More: Integrating Technical Writing Instruction in a Large
participants completed it. The outcomes in thispaper are based on the number of participants that responded to each specific question. Thesurvey took participants approximately 15 minutes to complete and, as noted, was fullysupported by Northeastern University’s Division of Research Integrity. To give an overview ofthe profile of respondents, 59% considered themselves to be active participants of EWB, 94% Page 14.597.5had traveled outside of the United States, 95% had been involved in community service in thepast, and 85% had been involved with community service since high school or before.Figure 1 shows respondents’ affiliations with other
of their curriculum that speak towriting the same importance as they would courses integral to their major, even going so far as tothink that writing is an exercise that is reserved for composition class alone.7 For example, aMechanical Engineering student would probably find a course in thermodynamics to be moreimportant than a course in technical writing because the former is perceived to be more directlytied to their degree plan and overall aspiration to perform competently as a mechanical engineer.Further, students may not see the need to hone their language and communication skills becausethis need has not been communicated to them. Most of engineering curriculum is built aroundthe language of mathematics. Students are taught to explore
information from multipledirections. Highly toned information literacy skills are the key to unlocking the potentialfor lifelong learning.How do we teach our students to be lifelong learners? This paper shares a glimpse of howa science course instructor, librarian, and the writing center staff have dialogued for acommon goal based on individual and collective teaching/learning outcomes. Scienceliteracy, information literacy and communication skills are crucial and criticalfoundations for students in Engineering Technology programs to become lifelonglearners. One of assignments from the University General Education course,Introductory General Chemistry, involves an integrated three-step process withdiscipline-specific pre-lab activity, general
Paper ID #42061Board 361: Reframing Racial Equity Year 2: Examining Script of WhitenessDr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineering is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
is a teaching and learning methodology that connects curriculum withidentified community issues and needs. Service learning engages projects that serve thecommunity and build their social and academic capacities. Service learning was based offthe views of John Dewey, a philosopher and educator who advanced the concept that activestudent involvement in learning, insisted that this is an essential element in effectiveeducation. He viewed the community as an integral component of educational experiencesfor both enhancing a student’s education and for developing future societies. The need forengaged learning and an implementation of technology will further develop training forstudents in technological discipline, and will fulfill a societal
provide recommendations for improving ethics in engineeringeducation, such as an integrative approach delivered at multiple points in the curriculum andincorporating discipline-specific context.IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology requires that engineering programsintroduce students to ethical issues that arise from the practice of engineering [1]. As a result,many engineering departments have recently worked to incorporate ethics into their alreadycrowded curriculum. In this paper, we compare two general approaches to teachingprofessional ethics to undergraduate students, with a particular focus on the effectiveness ofeach mode in improving moral judgment.The College of Engineering at the Georgia Institute of
A.A.S.communications, humanities, basic science and mathematics courses in its curriculum.Related to new structure of 2-year technical degrees in Florida, is the likelihood of ABETaccreditation of the A.S. Technology Degrees. Exploring such accreditation is an objective ofthe Tech 4 grant. The new definition of the A.S. program in Florida now offers the opportunityfor A.S Technology programs such accreditation. The curriculum content of the new technologyprograms can match a related ABET criteria. However, other ABET requirements for facultyand institutional resources will also have to be met if accreditation is deemed desirable.Teacher and Faculty DevelopmentThe success of any workplace development curriculum is acutely dependent on the faculty
with the skills involved in life-long learning. Since there are manyother factors beyond the scope of this paper that could impact the level of learning, more datawill be collected and future analysis performed. More self-learning exercises will beincorporated in other classes across the curriculum in order to encourage investigative,critical thinking and an improved learning outcome.References 1. Villiers, C., Y. Mehta, and R. O’Neill. 2008.“Effective Use of Integrated Lecture and Lab to Teach Civil Engineering Materials,” ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. 2. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission 2012. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2012-2013 cycle. http
: A New Curricular Model for Engineering EducationIntroductionTraditional physics undergraduate education has used a “spiral curriculum” method1: mechanics,waves, statistical and thermal physics, electromagnetics, and quantum physics are introduced in afreshman-level survey course; each of these subjects is covered again at a higher level insophomore and junior level courses; and selected topics are revisited in senior-level “specialtopic” or advanced study courses. This model allows for deepening understanding of each topicand the application of more sophisticated mathematical methods – such as complex analysis,differential equations, integral transforms, matrix methods, and linear algebra – as the students’mathematics preparation progresses
static, but integrated, or isolated, but dynamic learning modules for integration into currentcourses. The hands-on and active learning environment provides the culmination oftransforming a curriculum where classes are taught in isolation into a multidisciplinary integratedenvironment, which will introduce students to all aspects of enterprise engineering and illustratethe need for integrative and dynamic curriculum based on real-world scenarios.Throughout the curriculum, team-based lab and term projects will evolve from static problemsthat test the basic skill set to dynamic open-ended case studies and “simulated scenarios”, whichadd depth and integrate all areas of the enterprise engineering. These scenarios will utilize the“real-world” and
courses were first offered on an experimental basis in the Fall 2014 semester. We foundthe students to be very interested and engaged and all expressed positive impressions of theirlearning experience. Additionally, we gained insight into what the students were taking awayfrom their introductory coursework.We envision these courses as emerging as part of an on-going incremental development in ourembedded computing curriculum. For example, one of the outcomes of the “Design Your OwnEmbedded Experiment” is a new sequence of experiments that will be merged into our existingcourse enabling us to broaden our options for this course and perhaps develop new courseworkthat may be more focused for students from other majors such as Computer Science
themthroughout the curriculum, Ohio State formed a new program called the Integrated Business andEngineering (IBE) program as described in more detail below.The IBE ProgramBased on the authors' research, interpretation of the "voice of the customer" (i.e. industry), andyears of personal industrial and academic experience, the following interpretation of a T-shapedengineer is offered: 1. Sound technical expertise in one discipline Page 26.1507.8 2. A solid business acumen including the issues associated with product commercialization 3. An entrepreneurial mindset supplemented with design thinking 4. Ability to function effectively on
Paper ID #33586Biologically Inspired Design For Engineering Education: Online TeacherProfessional Learning (Evaluation)Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is s Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher pro- fessional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar is currently co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects
single offering of a course) at a single institution. As long as the majorityof papers report on a single intervention or single institution, with little reference to what otherinstitutions are doing, coherence in the scholarly conversation will be an elusive goal. The “one-off,” as we might call it, creates a publishable unit but gains significance for the broaderscholarly community only when it is integrated into a larger pattern of practice and assessment.To identify areas for potentially strategic action, we focused papers that either demonstrated orsuggested potentially more impactful ways of organizing research and publishing oncommunication in engineering. One example of a potentially more impactful design was“Preliminary Investigation of
an Integrated Engineering Curriculum to Improve Freshman Calculus," Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Conference, Seattle, WA.4. Hansen, E.W., 1998, "Integrated Mathematics and Physical Science (IMPS): A New Approach for First Year Students at Dartmouth College," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, 579.5. Kumar, S. and Jalkio, J., 1998, "Teaching Mathematics from an Applications Perspective," Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Conference, Seattle, WA.6. Whiteacre, M.M. and Malave, C.O., 1998, "Integrated Freshman Engineering Curriculum for Pre-Calculus Students," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, 820-823.7. Augustine, N.R., et al., Eds., “Rising Above the Gathering Storm,” National
the ABET innovation which achieved the transformation ofaccreditation paradigm. It provided an opportunity for ABET to put forward the newaccreditation criteria-EC2000, which brought a profound impact on engineering educationwithin colleges and universities. In order to cope with the transformation paradigm ofprogram accreditation, colleges and universities carried out various engineering educationreform which included the exploration of a variety of learning outcomes assessment methods,the engagement of a wide range of intellectual resources, the internalization of the philosophyof continuous quality improvement, the integration of evaluation management mechanism,the in-depth reform of curriculum and teaching.4.1.3. Deep Understanding of the
utilize cobots in preparing future workforce-ready graduates.Engineering Technology faculty at Illinois State University redeveloped an existing IntegratedManufacturing Laboratory (IML) to include five industrial cobots to be used concurrently withfive six-axis articulated industrial robots in an undergraduate-level, applications-focused roboticssystems integration course. This paper describes the rationale for deploying industrial cobots intoa traditional industrial robotics systems integration course. It describes the lab redevelopmentprocess, provides initial assumptions and early observations, and discusses lessons learned todate. The next steps for research and practice are also outlined.BackgroundThe IML was initially established in 2007
techniques for digitalintegrated circuit design and extending this coverage to include digital-analog and analog-digital conversion. Students design these elements in the course laboratory, producing acomplete chip that is submitted for fabrication at the end of the semester. The resultingexperience gives students a strong grounding in digital integrated circuit design, anunderstanding of some important analog concepts, and an appreciation for therelationship between digital design and analog design.1. IntroductionVery Large Scale Integration (VLSI) is the enabling technology for an ongoing revolutionin computers, communications, and electronics. The importance of this key technologymakes a VLSI Design course an essential ingredient in a competitive
others, like Kolar [9], and Wood et.al.,[10] suggest an integrated and systematicapproach to design which spans the entire four year curriculum. In the Civil Engineeringprogram at the University of Arkansas the culminating design experience prescribed in Criteria 4has been satisfied with a course titled Senior Design, CVEG 4494, a four credit hour, singlesemester course dedicated to a culminating design experience that requires the application ofdesign principles learned in previous course work.Senior Design, CVEG 4494, was introduced to the Civil Engineering curriculum in 1989. Itsintroduction was a direct result of the program self study prepared for the 1990 ABETaccreditation visit to the department. Through that self study the faculty