thestudents.Acknowledgements:We thank our colleagues Dr. Nathan Delson, Dr. Andrew Lucas and Mr.Chris Casssidy for theirsupport on the project and many helpful discussions. This material is based upon work supportedby UCSD Course Development and Instructional Improvement Program (CDIIP) grant. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UCSD.Reference[1] J. Dewey.Experience and education. NY: Collier Books, New York, 1938.[2] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development,vol. 1, 1984.[3] P. Jarvis, “Meaningful and meaningless experience: Towards an analysis of learning fromlife”, Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 37, no
introduction inthe early 1990’s including transformational leadership, organizational transformation, learningorganizations, and motivation.1. Appreciation for a System: According to Deming, a system is “a network of interdependent components that work together to try to accomplish the aim of the system.” Leaders must know how to lead and optimize a system, and not destroy it. The aim of the system must be clear to everyone involved in this man-made system. Additionally, the aim must be related to value and better life for its consumers. For example, there is a difference between a company that has an aim of producing cars and another company that has an aim of solving mobility needs. The latter more likely involves greater creativity and
inenvironmental engineering, transportation engineering and physics department. The entire STEMtrainees reported that the analog devices used during the training session engaged and made themcurious fully in exploring and performing the experiments. The ECP team members became moreconfident in guiding their students to conduct home-based hands-on lab experiment safely andeffectively.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1915614. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References1. Despain, M. (2020). What does effective virtual training look like? Find
desde la perspectiva del estudiante. (Assessment of online courses from a student's perspective)," Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23-38, Jan. 2016. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412016000100002[2] S. Sundararajan and T. Heindel and B. Ganapathysubramanian and S. Subramaniam, “Women in Mechanical Engineering: A Departmental Effort to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Engagement of Women Students,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22240, 2012, pp. 25.1483.1 - 25.1483.15. https://www.jee.org/22240[3] E. P. Deess and K. Joshi and V. Briller and R. Calluori, Predicting Engineering
.[6] Hunt, J.M., Goodner, R.E., & Jay, A. (2019, October), Comparing Male and Female Student Responses on MIT Maker Survey: Understanding the Implications and Strategies for More Inclusive Spaces Paper presented at 2019 International Symposium on Academic Makerspace, New Haven, Connecticut.[7] Kilgore, D., & Sheppard, S., & Atman, C. J., & Chachra, D. (2011, June), Motivation Makes a Difference, but is there a Difference in Motivation? What Inspires Women and Men to Study Engineering? Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2–18816[8] Lewis, J. (2015). Barriers to Women’s Involvement in Hackspaces and Makerspaces. The Uni- versity of Sheffield.[9] Robinson, J., &
. 6. Council of Chief State School Officers, Attn: Publications, One Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Ste, 1997.[11] K. K. Hess, B. S. Jones, D. Carlock, and J. R. Walkup, “Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom- level Processes,” p. 8.[12] N. L. Webb, “Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas.” Unpublished Paper, Mar. 28, 2002, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/assessment/pdf/All%20content%20areas%20%20 DOK%20levels.pdf.[13] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2001.[14] E
onnational rates of educational achievement and retention in STEM, especially for populationsunderrepresented in STEM. The National Science Board (NSB) reports that “About 18% ofrecent (2009–13) U.S. citizen and permanent resident S&E [Science and Engineering] doctorateholders reported earning some college credit from a community or 2-year college,” and thatincludes 32% of American Indian or Alaska Natives, 21.8% of Hispanics or Latinos, 18.1% ofBlacks or African Americans, and 21.5% of mixed race people. [16] Looking at those whoreceived science and engineering bachelor’s degrees between 2007 and 2011, the NSB reportedthat about 18% had associates degrees--which does not account for the students who transferredtheir community college credits
in the United States. By mid-March, most universities and colleges in theUnited States stopped face-to-face instructions. On March 12, 2020, The University of Texas at SanAntonio (UTSA) suspended face-to-face instructions until further notice. The spring break wasextended for one week to allow the faculty to prepare for online instruction. The instructors weregiven the choice of offering live online lectures or recording their lectures and making themavailable to students. For live online lectures, instructors were asked to record their lectures andmake them available to students to account for cases in which students lost internet connectivity orcould not attend the session(s) due to uncontrollable factors. The College of
/hcp/non-us-settings/overview/index.html [Accessed March 6, 2021].[2] WHO, “Coronovirus,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/health- topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 [Accessed March 1, 2021].[3] S., Parr, B. Wolshon, P. Murray-Tuite, and T. Lomax, "Multistate Assessment of Roadway Travel, Social Separation, and COVID-19 Cases," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 147(5), 04021012. 2021.[4] J. Glanz, B. Carey, J. Holder, D. Watkins, J. Valentino-DeVries, R. Rojas, and L. Leatherby, "Where America didn't stay home even as the virus spread," The New York Times, April 2, 2020. Online. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/02/us/coronavirus-social
]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001[11] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Springer International Publishing, aug 2017.[12] A. Antonaci, F. M. Dagnino, M. Ott, F. Bellotti, R. Berta, A. De Gloria, E. Lavagnino, M. Romero, M. Usart, and I. Mayer, “A gamified collaborative course in entrepreneurship: Focus on objectives and tools,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 51, pp. 1276–1283, oct 2015.[13] R. S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M.-I. Carnasciali, J. Nocito-Gobel, and C. Li, “Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Students Using Integrated E-Learning Modules.” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018.[14] S. Bowers and K. Yerion
existing models; creativity is evident in the design User friendly: 0-10 The design takes into account that users may be young or old, tech-proficient or not so tech-proficient? Can design be used by the average person? Mission: 0-10 Relates to the mission of the non-profit organization/ stakeholders? Feasibility: 0-10 Is it realistic to implement (consider design, skills, timeline)? Additional feature(s) useful to the stakeholder: 0-20 Does the
of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference. Montreal, Canada, 2020.[8] G. Hofstede, G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. McGraw Hill Professional, 2010.[9] P. Sharma, “Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation,” J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 787–806, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11747-009- 0184-7.[10] K. S. Cortina, S. Arel, and J. P. Smith-Darden, “School Belonging in Different Cultures: The Effects of Individualism and Power Distance,” Front. Educ., vol. 2, 2017, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00056.[11] A. Alshahrani, “Power Distance and Individualism-Collectivism in EFL Learning Environment,” AWEJ, vol. 8
Outcomes Related to Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 28(3): p. 606-620.17. Borrego, M., J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(3): p. 185-207.18. Kirkpatrick, A., S. Danielson, and R.O. Warrington, Reduction to Practice. Mechanical Engineering, 2012. 134(11): p. 38-39.19. National Academies. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation. 2011; National Academies: Washington, D.C., 270 p. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/read/12984/chapter/1.20. Seymour, E. and N.M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving : why undergraduates
, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016.[6] M. Lovett, “Make Exams Worth More Than the Grade: Using Exam Wrappers to Promote Metacognition,” Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy, ed. M. Kaplan et al., Stylus, Sterling, VA, USA, 2013, pp. 18-52.[7] K.J. Chew, H.L. Chen, B. Rieken, A. Turpin, and S. Sheppard, Improving Students’ Learning in Statics Skills: Using Homework and Exam Wrappers to Strengthen Self-regulated Learning, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, Jun 26-29, 2016.[8] M. Craig, D. Horton, D. Zingaro, and D. Heap
, 2011.[3] E. M. Duffy and M. M. Cooper, “Assessing TA buy-in to expectations and alignment of actual teaching practices in a transformed general chemistry laboratory course,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 189–208, 2020.[4] R. Tormey, C. Hardebolle, and S. Isaac, “The Teaching Toolkit: design of a one-day pedagogical workshop for engineering graduate teaching assistants,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 378–392, 2020.[5] T. Bourelle, “Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Online: Theoretical and Pedagogical Practices,” Writ. Progr. Adm., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 90–113, 2016.[6] F. Marbouti, K. J. Rodgers, H. Jung, A. Moon, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Factors that help and hinder teaching assistants
pilot course and teacher workshop showed encouraging results and we hope tocontinue developing the CST kit and curricula around it.AcknowledgementThis work is supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) [DGE 1723687, 1821766, CNS1722557, 1801534; CCF 1718474] and Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) [2847.001,2727.001].References[1] K-12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.k12cs.org.[2] Holst, Alexander and Swaroop Ghosh. “Quantified Analysis of Magnetic Attack on Commercial Magnetic RAM Chip.” Hardware Demonstration in Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), 2016, Online: http://www.hostsymposium.org/host2016/hardware-demo-list_2016.php[3] A. Holst, J. Jang and S. Ghosh
field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 39–52.Journal of Engineering Education. (2006). Special Report - The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4). (October), 259–261.Hernandez, K. A. C., Chang, H., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2017). Collaborative autoethnography as multivocal, relational, and democratic research: Opportunities, challenges, and aspirations. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 251-254.Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. Feminist research practice: A primer, 111148, 111-138.Hughes, S. & Pennington, J. (2017). Autoethnography: introduction and overview. In Autoethnography (pp. 4-33
variables: type of institution,modality, age, and type of careerFirst, general results about selecting STEM disciplines in men and women between the years2008 to 2020 are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Distribution of preferences for first-year students in STEM disciplines concerning gender and women’s participation. Source: Own elaboration based on SIES historical enrolment from 2008 to 2020 [16].As shown in Fig. 1 the number of women who prefer STEM disciplines has gradually increasedfrom 2008 (38,515 students) to 2020 (54,982 students). However, female´s average participationfor the period under review is 19.5%, a fall in participation is seen between 2008 and 2012(Figure 2), where minimum participation of 18.92% was seen. We can see an
specific nor necessarily • Curriculum that reflects and affirms problematic marginalised student histories and subjectivities • Connectionist transition pedagogy (Hockings et al. 2010) Source: Gale, T & Parker, S, Studies in Higher Education, 2014Although the voyage of Caroline was narrated fully in this paper, it is worth noting that the
prepared that the millennials before them,growing up bombarded with messaging that the world is a dangerous place and that they must takeprecautions as they navigate it [4]. For those working in higher education, assuming they know howto handle this new cohort because they have always worked with 18-to-22 year-olds is an outdatedarrogance that many institutions will not be able to afford as they compete for a dwindling number ofprospective students to fill incoming class quotas. Schools in the Northeast and Midwest in particularare bracing for an up to 15% decline in the typical college-going population by the mid 2020’s due todeclining birth rates following the 2008 recession, as well as shifting college-choice behavior [2] [12][13]. Today’s 18
. Horlin, J. Hutchison, J.A. Murray, L. Robson, M.K. Seery, J. MacKay, "Ten simple rules for supporting a temporary online pivot in higher education”, PLOS Computational Biology, October 1, 2020, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008242.[2] D. Schaffhauser, “Educators Feeling Stressed, Anxious, Overwhelmed and Capable”, The Journal: Transforming Education, June 6, 2020, Retrieved from https://thejournal.com/articles/2020/06/02/survey-teachers-feeling-stressed-anxious- overwhelmed-and-capable.aspx.[3] C. Cahill, S. Jackson, N. Summerall, K. Harruna, “Helping Career and Technical Education Programs Meet this Moment”, JFF, September 1, 2020, Retrieved from: https://www.jff.org/what-we-do/impact
help inform initiativesgeared towards broadening the participation of underrepresented minorities in STEM and makethe culture of engineering more inclusive for all students. By shifting the frame of engineeringwork towards one more aligned with the NEP, underrepresented minority students can feel moreconnected to the field of engineering and all students can be better prepared for the broader,global work of engineering work.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work collected and supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1635534 and 1635204. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science
. Figure 14 S-Curve Motor Motion ProfileProgram Management and Multidisciplinary EnvironmentThe overall team was composed of foursub-teams. Overall, the entire team wasmanaged by the project manager thoughthere was support from an assistantproject manager to help keep the teams incoordination as shown in Figure 15. Theproject manager was responsible forensuring the project, that the sub taskswere kept on schedule while providing a Figure 15 Team Structuredirect interface to both the customer andsupervising faculty advisor. The programmanager delegated the responsibility of parts procurement to the procurement lead. Theprocurement lead was responsible to work directly with Boys Republic staff and the individualteams to order parts or purchase work
: http://www.ascjournal.ascweb.org/journal/1997/no1/JCE_Spring_1997.html10. Lee, N., Ponton, R., Jeffreys, A.W., and Cohn, R. “Analysis of Industry Trends for Improving Undergraduate Curriculum in Construction Management Education,” ASC Proceedings of the 47th Annual International Conference, Omaha, NE, April 2011. Available at: http://www.engineering.unl.edu/durhamschool/events/ascconference2011/11. Mead, S. P. and Gehrig, G. B., “Skills for the 21st Century: What Constructors Need to Know,” The American Professional Constructor, ASC Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ Arizona, April 1995. Available at: http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/1995/mead95.htm12. Mills, T., Novak, V., and
. Fig. 4. Materials window1.1.7 AntennasAntennas and Waveforms (Section 1.1.8) are not only co-related but also are closely associatedwith transmitters and receivers used in any project to perform propagation calculations in WI.Generally, waveform is defined first and then antenna associated with that particular waveform isdefined. All defined antenna(s) are listed in the Antennas tab. This tab facilitates the user to re-configure the antenna and see its inherent properties by right-clicking on that specific antenna.Furthermore, antenna should be assigned with TX and RX. WI has several selections of antennatypes7. Antenna patterns can be generated from: • Built-in models for various common antennas including dipoles, monopoles, helical
, evaluation, and accreditation, it has resulted in the creation ofmore effective and sustainable processes. Future work includes the implementation of a web-based course assessment management system where faculty can upload their course assessmentsand scores are automatically calculated.References[1] N. Johnson, G. Veletsianos, and J. Seaman, “U.S. Faculty and Administrators’ Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic,” OLJ, vol. 24, no. 2, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285.[2] “ABET | ABET Accreditation.” https://www.abet.org/ (accessed Feb. 26, 2021).[3] W. Hussain, W. G. Spady, M. T. Naqash, S. Z. Khan, B. A. Khawaja, and L. Conner, “ABET Accreditation During and After COVID19 - Navigating the Digital
) Development Water System Design Partner Limitations Panama, EWB (2010) Development Solar Photovoltaic Partner Limitations DesignReferencesObrien, J. 2010. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Paper Presentation, ServiceLearning in the College of Engineering at Villanova University. American Society for EngineeringEducation, Annual Conference, 2010.Dinehart, D. W. and Gross, S. P. (2010) "A Service-Learning Structural Engineering Capstone Course andthe Assessment of Technical and Non-technical Objectives", Advances in Engineering Education, aJournal of Engineering Education Applications, Vol. 2, No. 1, spring.Ermilio, J., Singh, P
collaborative activities among students and teachers throughthe use of Think-Pair-Share techniques,” International Journal of Computer Science Issues(IJCSI), 2010 Sep 1;7(5):18.[2] Kaddoura M. “Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students' criticalthinking,” Educational Research Quarterly, 2013 Jun;36(4):3-24.[3] Stover S, Noel D, McNutt M, Heilmann SG. “Revisiting use of real-time polling for learningtransfer,” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2015 Jun 30:40-60.[4] Wilson SG. “The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduatestatistics course,” Teaching of Psychology, 2013 Jul;40(3):193-9.[5] Love B, Hodge A, Grandgenett N, Swift AW. “Student learning and perceptions in a flippedlinear